1869
1870

Settled Science: Consensus of Doctors Say Hillary's Health Is Disqualifying - The Rush Limbaugh ShowILLary (rushlimbaugh.com)

Trump-For-LifeMAGA が 投稿

全 117 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]highwaysongs 88ポイント89ポイント  (26子コメント)

You can not argue with consensus science. In fact, you can lose your job, be chased out of University, and some even advocate arresting people for arguing with professional consensus. 7 out of 10 Doctors agree Hillary is disqualified.

[–]dragonpc_caCAN 35ポイント36ポイント  (5子コメント)

That's more than the 6 out of 10 dentists that recommend Colgate!

[–]Mr_Glenn_QuagmirePD 9ポイント10ポイント  (3子コメント)

Toms toothpaste is 10/10

[–]I-Am-Sam-Sam-I-Am 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

11/10 with rice. Thank you for your suggestion.

[–]dakinniaFL 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Floride-free.

[–]AlanAmpersand1CA 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

lol nice, I use this brand now too, simple ingredients, gets the job done, no bullshit.

[–]RhEEziE 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Side note: In those ads all the dentists agreed. Since no dentist will say i dont recommend toothpaste. The ad states 4/5 just to add some flair.

[–]allegorically_hitlerCA 15ポイント16ポイント  (4子コメント)

Yep, there is a consensus now, if you disagree at this point you should go to jail. Disagreeing is akin to hatespeech and racism

[–]XDingoX83NAVY 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yep, there is a consensus now, if you disagree at this point you should go to jail. Disagreeing is akin to hatespeech and racism

-Bill Nye, Minister of Science

[–]giggle2themitKY 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

They actually believe this way too. "science" is the new dogma, and scientists the new priest class. It doesn't matter if the presented "evidence" doesn't hold up to comparison in reality, the lord scientist has said it, and therefore disbelieving is heresy!

Men are women, no difference, a doctor of some sort said it, so therefore its true!

All races are exactly 100% the same, nevermind that a basic examination of facial features and skin color alone destroys this assertion, a poly-science major said it, and they went to the holy cathedral of Berkley, so pagan, believe or die!

Don't believe in man made climate change? Do you want to burn in hell on earth in 1982...er..1996...er..wait...2001...wait no...uhh when was the earth gonna boil and kill us all due to CO2? 20...2020! YES 2020 is the start of the end times due to you driving a car, heathen, praise be to bill nye and socialism!

[–]allegorically_hitlerCA 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Buy a diesel truck, rig it to roll coal, trigger them all hard.

[–]solar_lottery 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Men are women,

Yeah, no, I have two X chromosomes and I can bear children. I've never met a man like that. Also, I have breasts, a smaller and differently constituted body, menses, maternal instinct, mitochondrial DNA...

I'm a stupid barbarian patriarchy-bitch though, so take my opinion with a grain of salt =)

[–]LSUDocLA 9ポイント10ポイント  (2子コメント)

I was not in the survey. Make it 8/10.

[–]Trumpthulhu-FhtagnFL 8ポイント9ポイント  (1子コメント)

99 our of 100 leftists think that u/highwaysongs should be fed to the nearest trigglypuff.

[–]TrigglyPuff_botUSA 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

KEEP YOUR HATE SPEECH OUT OF THIS CAMPUS!

TRIGGLYPUFF JUST GOT 10 POUNDS HEAVIER!

CURRENT WEIGHT: 17,840 POUNDS!

That's 89.20000% of the weight of one billion dollars in 100-dollar bills (20,000 lbs)! Only 2,160 lbs left to go!

A bot by /u/BotsByLiam. Please use this form or visit /r/BotsByLiam to report errors or make suggestions!

[–]GraceJonestownMAGA 21ポイント22ポイント  (1子コメント)

SETTLED SCIENCE

[–]XDingoX83NAVY 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

SETTLED SCIENCE

SETTLED SCIENCE

SETTLED SCIENCE

SETTLED SCIENCE

SETTLED SCIENCE

SETTLED SCIENCE

SETTLED SCIENCE

SETTLED SCIENCE

SETTLED SCIENCE

[–]GodEmperorPePeGA 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

sort like...some kind of warming...on a global scale...

[–]polakfuryPOL 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hillary is not fit at all

[–]faintpremonitionARMY 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

That's not actually how science works. Settled science is rarely actually settled and an unwillingness to challenge assumptions leads to stagnation.

I'm not saying that her health isn't awful, and that she should drop out of the race.

I am saying that only non-scientists would say that you Can Not argue with consensus science.

[–]diarrhea_champion 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

I think you're missing the joke here. This whole thing is a reference to the fact that a "consensus" is used in the climate change context to make anyone who dares question the science out to be an ignorant heretic.

[–]faintpremonitionARMY 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Got it. He's doing a thing. I'm on board now.

[–]acme2011[🍰] 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Not disagreeing with you, but consensus science should be thoroughly examined from the other side as well. Otherwise you get the man made climate change scientific consensus stance where any skepticism is met with fierce attacks.

[–]blindbull 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

There's no such thing as a consensus in science, but there is such thing as an undeniable observable fact. Which is Hillary Clinton has no business running this country.

[–]TalktoberryFin 28ポイント29ポイント  (2子コメント)

DISQUALIFIED!

[–]Trump-For-LifeMAGA[S] 15ポイント16ポイント  (1子コメント)

Tactical Stumping Inbound!

[–]fwipfwip 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Rare Pepe Team 6 reporting for duty!

[–]GraceJonestownMAGA 100ポイント101ポイント  (26子コメント)

Using their own logic against them, love it! If there is global warming because there is a consensus of scientists then surely she is too sick to be president by the same rules. Based fucking Rush.

[–]SheriffDonkey 29ポイント30ポイント  (3子コメント)

"Don't doubt me!"

—Rush

[–]GraceJonestownMAGA 11ポイント12ポイント  (2子コメント)

Never have, never will. Guy was based before it was cool!

[–]allegorically_hitlerCA 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

I grew up in a time when the bus drivers would have rush playing on their radio during field trips and no one complained. It planted the seeds which eventually grew into this Hatefact Tree in my mind.

[–]GubmentTeatSuckerVA 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Different era, man. Different era.

[–]chaos_of_cages 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

"Internet survey."

Not quite the same thing.

[–]cazique 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, not exactly "settled science"

[–]vikesfanben28 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Holy shit. So not only was it probably like ten doctors, but it was an Internet survey, too? They're really grasping at straws here, huh.

[–]zevjk 12ポイント13ポイント  (17子コメント)

Are you saying you're a climate change denier? I honestly don't know where the Trump camp stands on it, and I'm just here to learn.

[–]slickrick0133MAGA 21ポイント22ポイント  (9子コメント)

Most of us would say we don't deny climate change is happening.

Only that most studies indicate even if every citizen in the United States were to stop living and producing emissions, it still would not be near enough to make any large impact. China and other industrializing nations produce a huge - enormous proportion of wastes. That is where the change needs to happen.

Not only that, but the Left seems to be intent on linking every national disaster (hurricanes, snow storms, earthquakes) to "climate change" as if you paying more taxes will prevent the next hurricane from occurring.

[–]BlackbeltJones 9ポイント10ポイント  (4子コメント)

China and other industrializing nations produce a huge - enormous proportion of wastes. That is where the change needs to happen.

How will reforms happen in these industrializing nations if the United States doesn't lead from the front on this issue?

[–]KyzrRelaxMO 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Disavowed Bernout here:

Something I've learned about spending my time here is that the left has an "appeal to authority" problem when it comes to Climate Change. They've constantly kept moving the goal posts to the point where Conservatives just don't care to listen anymore, and I can't blame them, even though I'm in the "Humans Cause Climate Change" camp.

The left should focus on the shared common goal of Energy Independence. Offer up some compromise on things like Alaska Natural Gas and Keystone XL, and ask for Solar/Wind plants in return.

Problem is that the "elite" left is attached to the Saudi tit, so they don't actually give a fuck about the environment other than the votes it generates. This is why they don't ever put actual effort into green tech.

[–]giggle2themitKY 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Name me another time in which a nation has "lead from the US example" without us military bombing the example into them post haste?

[–]J0kerr 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Follow the US example...HAHAHAHAHAHA!

[–]GodEmperorPePeGA -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

not to mention the OTHER planets have warmed by almost the same amount as the earth, all those damn Martians and their SUVs i guess

[–]Reck_yo -1ポイント0ポイント  (2子コメント)

Didn't they try and tie in one of the race riots to climate change as well?

[–]giggle2themitKY -2ポイント-1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Yes, it was democrats that did it, the blamed climate change on blacks being mad and murderous. This is why no one takes the democrats seriously anymore. they are literally a ball of yarn composed of every crack pot leftist theory rolled into one. Occupy wall street made political platform

"Don't you know black people are getting shot by cops because of racist SUV owners polluting the atmosphere? Black people get violent when you eat meat! Also communism was great!"

[–]buildwall9000 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

Why is he getting down voted? He seems sincere

[–]AkhaianOR -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Likely because he called people deniers rather than skeptics.

[–]cmaoscmosa 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

The right looks at climate change as a logical problem where you need real world solutions that make an actual difference and do not affect our economy drastically.

The left looks at it from a Michael Jackson heal the world, hippie point of view. Dont you want to save the planet and mother nature and all that crap with no understanding of what it would mean in practice.

The more deranged the left become, the more skeptical the right becomes almost on reflex at this point.

[–]GraceJonestownMAGA 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I certainly don't speak for anyone else here. But it's my view that the same people that have now been proven to be colluding with the media and guilty of corruption on every level are also guilty of doing it with climate change data (google Climate Research Unit of The University of East Anglia) for the same reasons: to advance a globalist agenda.

To say that global warming is "settled science" is far from the truth. There are tons of dissenting opinions which obviously get bar-belled/exiled by the left.

Personally I believe we're on a 5 billion year old planet and we have only 30 years of moderately accurate models. There are also records of it being both a lot hotter and a lot colder in the past. Either way I think the joke here is the consensus of science thing which is obviously not how science works. We don't vote for what we want the science to be because of grants and agenda, we run test, results and draw conclusions.

Two great books on this subject are "Apocalypse Not" by the Cato Institute and "Climate Change: The Facts" by the institute of public affairs.

[–]kriegsonUSAF -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

"Climate change denier" is a pretty disingenuous term in how it is often used. Not saying you are, but consider:

When people are skeptical of climate change, they're usually skeptical about mankind's influence on climate change. To be specific, anthroprogenic climate change.

Dishonest media and pundits usually conflate "Climate change" (ie natural climate change) with AGW (Manmade) and proclaim they're one and the same.
This is an outright falsehood. The climate has been changing well since before we've been here and will continue to do so well after we've gone, one way or another.

Another manipulation is how it's often posed as a binary decision: Either you think mankind causes all climate change, or has nothing to do with it. Realistically we have an affect, but not necessarily a very drastic one. And that's the question "How much do we affect the climate. How do we do it. What can we do to reduce that affect" rather than "Do we or don't we" which is how it is posed in order to ridicule anyone that disagrees with them.

Lastly, there is no "consensus". Nor would it matter if there was. In simplest terms, science isn't about "being right" and certainly not about being popular. It's about pushing the boundaries on what we know. To do that, there can be no sacred cows. Nothing "settled".

For instance, Cholesterol was considered to be a harmful nutrient for decades now until only just recently studies were conducted that cleared up a previous Correlation but not causation between it, and health problems.

Despite the various studies, peer review and general "consensus" on the issue, it was simply wrong. People hadn't been asking the right questions or had simply come to the conclusion and were looking for facts to support it rather than finding facts and creating a conclusion that meets them.

And now it's officially being taken off the harmful nutrients list, last I heard.

All said and done, many people agree that we have an affect on the environment and are concerned, but certainly not everyone. Not everyone agrees on how much we affect and through which methods we do so significantly.

Worse, there are a number of people who seek specifically to twist the issue to their own agenda and push non-solutions that will benefit them while they can continue pushing fear on the subject to ensure compliance with their self-benefiting non-solutions.

Trump hasn't made a serious statement on it yet.

He's dismissed it for now.

[–]AkhaianOR -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you are going to call people deniers for ANY reason then you are not a skeptic.

A denier goes against a belief, not a claim based on evidence. It's hypocritical to call someone a denier and anti-science. Using the word denier is itself anti-science.

[–]highwaysongs 18ポイント19ポイント  (3子コメント)

Just think...we are just two months away from getting Hillary the healthcare she needs. Vote Trump to save her life, to give her the vacation she deserves, some rest and rehabilitation at the worlds finest medical facilities. Its the right thing to do.

[–]noploopUSA 9ポイント10ポイント  (1子コメント)

With new Trumpcare, she can even choose to keep Doc Choc if she wants.

[–]AintGotNoTimeFoThis 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Orange is the new black Hilary

[–]nimblecalifornianCA 17ポイント18ポイント  (3子コメント)

Had a convo with my doctor yesterday when I was getting my annual bloodwork done. On the conversation of Hillary he bluntly stated "I wouldn't bank on her staying alive to run a second term if she won."

[–]MemeBoy1 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

Im a med student at Northwestern and my professor bet $10,000 that she dies before 2018 on an online website.

[–]imlostatseayouseeUSAF 8ポイント9ポイント  (1子コメント)

Fucking love Rush

[–]OclafcirePA 34ポイント35ポイント  (3子コメント)

I'd almost feel bad for her... But that's what happens when you dedicate your life to Lucifer. She's literally rotting from the inside out. Evil, nasty woman!

[–]Mission_Impawzible 11ポイント12ポイント  (1子コメント)

Yup, this evil witch deserves every bit of the inevitable shitstorm headed her way. On earth and in hell.

[–]chipotlemcnuggies 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

b-but... I would be so much happier if she went to jail instead. This is not satisfying.

[–]FutureWulfWA 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

CROOKED HILLARY ROTTEN CLINTON

[–]mtbwaltUSA 13ポイント14ポイント  (1子コメント)

If you have a parent or family member suffering from dementia, you recognize that blank vacant look she gets when she short circuits.

[–]hypnotica420xIA 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

You're right, i worked at a nursing home for a year as a cna. I can tell you right now that she not even close to being fully functional.

[–]TheDynamis 19ポイント20ポイント  (5子コメント)

How big is Rush Limbaugh's reach? Is this essentially "going into the mainstream"?

I know Breitbart and Drudge have moved into the mainstream lately, but I'd like to know where Rush stands.

I ask, because this is huge if he holds sway.

[–]Trump-For-LifeMAGA[S] 26ポイント27ポイント  (2子コメント)

Rush Limbaugh is the number 1 radio talk host, and has been since at least 1991. He has over 13 million weekly listeners. The only other host to attain 13 million weekly viewers is Michael Savage, and he is most certainly on the Trump Train.

Limbaugh owns the radio dial when it comes to talk

[–]TrumpTrain-botUSA 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

IT'S OFFICIAL! DONALD J. TRUMP IS THE REPUBLICAN PARTY'S NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT! THE TRUMP TRAIN JUST GOT 100,000 MPH FASTER!

CURRENT SPEED: 574,517,000 MPH!

That's 85.66996% of the speed of light (670,616,630 MPH)! Only 96,099,630 MPH left to go!

A bot by /u/BotsByLiam. Please use this form or visit /r/BotsByLiam to report errors or make suggestions!

[–]GraceJonestownMAGA 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

Rush has a uuuuuuuuuuuuge reach.

[–]JyrannusCO 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Rush is the biggest radio host to ever exist.

He is single handedly attributed to saving AM radio.

I would go as far to say he is bigger than what you think is considered mainstream media like Fox, CNN, CBS etc. If anything he's mainstream media.

[–]polakfuryPOL 9ポイント10ポイント  (3子コメント)

Her brain is cooked

[–]Trump-For-LifeMAGA[S] 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

Implying she has a brain

[–]ScreamingMidgit 10ポイント11ポイント  (3子コメント)

Now let's see how Hillary and her pack of shills respond to this.

[–]GraceJonestownMAGA 18ポイント19ポイント  (0子コメント)

I suggest we start calling her pack of shills "flat earthers" if they deny the scientific consensus here.

[–]CaptainDBagginsKY 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

They always just attack the source

[–]Spiffinz 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Gonna look reaaaal fuckin smart attacking the AAPS

[–]Mission_Impawzible 11ポイント12ポイント  (1子コメント)

Put this heifer out to pasture!! She won't be around much longer.

[–]asdfasdf123456789 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

you'd think hacking up a few pepe turds would have sealed the deal

[–]No_stop_signs 9ポイント10ポイント  (1子コメント)

Myself, I believe climate change is likely real and should be addressed. However what I do know is:

  • The corporate whore owned by the Saudi petroleum dictatorship will never do anything to improve it.

  • It can't be solved by sacrificing our living standards or allowing some country to shirk their responsibility and screw America yet again because of their "per-capita" emissions and vast population numbers.

  • Anybody today who believes in climate change and thinks something should be done about it, is perfectly free to take action for themselves. If 50% of Americans did that, it's a huge number of people and would significantly reduce emissions. I've noticed they haven't quite decided it's important enough yet for them to stop using cars, airplanes, electricity, internet, buying iphones, eating meat, etc. Any minute now, I expect...

  • Trump can be trusted to do what is best for the American people, and if that turns out to be some course of action on emissions, then it will be backed up with international deals that get the best outcome for America and hold others to account as well.

[–]drosophila_guy -3ポイント-2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I respect your logic and point of view, however I recently read The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels and now find myself a bit more skeptical about climate change. Not fully convinced one way or the other, but you might be interested in it.

[–]MythArcana 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Her brain needs to be retained for criminology study like Jeffrey Dahmer. I suggest we remove it today to get this under way. More jobs for this task!

[–]lime_raidNY 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Illary

[–]trainhasnobrakes 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

HILLARY FOR HOSPICE 2016

[–]spitting_nonsenseUSA 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

The logic checks out.

[–]allo-ver 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I fucking love science!

[–]24-pounder_FrigateUSA 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Maybe she'll pull a Woodrow Wilson and Bill will run the show.

[–]ObamaIsUgly 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Is there any source? I'm not saying that its not true but I'm not taking it at face value and the transcript offers no sources.

[–]CGRampage 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

It ain't legit. It's informal, meaning the survey methodology is not valid enough to draw any conclusions from it, and the doctors they sent the survey to clearly are fairly conservative, meaning the survey is inherently biased to begin with. Check it out: http://www.aapsonline.org/index.php/about_us/

And the survey: http://www.aapsonline.org/index.php/site/article/hillarys_health_concerns_serious_say_most_doctors_polled_by_aaps/

[–]giggle2themitKY 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

But...thats the saudis puppet regime....she has to be elected!

[–]_Donald-Trump_WA 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

CHECKM8

[–]feeldabenis 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

Defend Hillary or defend the Climate Change Religion... Nice

[–]Trump-For-LifeMAGA[S] 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Welcome to 4D chess! I believe this move is called "Checkmate"

[–]GraceJonestownMAGA 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yup. Rush is a sly old dog.

[–]fancyfeast2 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Libtards will find a way to discredit doctors now.

[–]chipotlemcnuggies 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Is Rush going to unexpectedly quit next?

[–]Adramedes -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

He's been on the air longer than I've been alive. The day he quits will be the day he dies.

[–]anothercleaverbeaver 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I am not in the medical field and not very familiar with the different associations one can belong to. Can someone with better knowledge of the field speak to the qualifications of the AAPS?

[–]SpaceshotX 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hillary is probably acutely aware that her only chance of not seeing jail time, and most likely the death penalty, is if she sneaks her way into the presidency so she can pardon herself.

Sorry fatso, that's President Trump's house!