“It’s really dangerous for a guy to go to college these days. He’s better off if he doesn’t talk to any women when he gets there. The feminists are perfectly glad to make false accusations and then claim all men are capable of some dastardly deed like rape.” – Schlafly, “Hatred of Men Gave Rise to UVA Rape Story,” Dec. 2014.

Honestly, I think it's pretty funny when radfem phrases are turned around and then all off a sudden everybody's sensitive panties are in a knot. The "hatred of men" in particular is a fun flip of the script because just about everything is discussed as some covert formulation of "hating women" in Dworkin etc (for the record, I think Dworkin is an analytical genius although I do think she maybe lacked some tact but meh, can't fault someone for having a style and eventually the words lose their incendiary bite and I think the message is sound).

Tangent:

At college orientation there was a "fun" exercise led by a gender studies professor where every third woman was counted out and asked to stand. These purportedly were to represent the women who would soon be raped--anyone could be the victim. Then everyone was asked to notice all the men in the room. Any one of them might be the rapist, looks and personality can be deceiving, etc. Worse: they could be the serial rapist and you wouldn't suspect it in the least. He could be, say, the harmless-looking man sitting next to you. If you suspect anything report it, catch the bad seeds early. Statistics and such. R1 universities in the '90s in the era before trigger warnings, folks.

Now, actually I think this could have been a good exercise if it were even remotely about teaching empathy for victims and the need for everyone (including men) to be vigilant and to come together as a community. Maybe. But in execution it was very much about fear. Fear of being raped. Fear of being a rapist.

FWIW the professor leading that orientation was silently banned from orientation activities a few years later because the College of Engineering finally had enough of that bullshit and threatened to pull their students out of university-wide orientation activities. Problem because CoE (read: CoE donors) essentially underwrote the entire thing.

Ironically CoE was moved to act only because it was determined this professor was frightening the CoE freshmen women and was cited by them as a major reason why women were struggling with the CoE freshman curriculum--women were said to be afraid to work with men and team work is pretty essential in the CoE curriculum. To be fair, engineer types of both gender tend not to be the best adjusted out of the gate anyway and CoE did basically nothing to address that. Freshman orientation made an easy scapegoat when the administration's quota and retention police arrived.