全 63 件のコメント

[–]ejaxtagram [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Wait, do we really believe she hasn't practiced all these answers, and she was getting them on the fly? I may disagree with her but I don't believe she's incapable of providing answers on her own.

[–]Banecn [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Same woman that couldn't remember shit during her FBI interview. She also said landing under sniper fire was just how she remembered it when she was called out on that too.

[–]JackBond1234 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

When your life is a book of lies, you need help keeping your story straight.

[–]bucknorris22 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It's not that we believe she didn't practice the answers. She's had plenty of practice. She cant remember the answers

[–]novvva [スコア非表示]  (14子コメント)

For the debates, Republicans may deploy some pulsed RF jammers.

[–]apackofmonkeys [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

Oh man, watching her flinch severely from all the loud bursts of static right in her ear would be amazing.

[–]Gbcue [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

It may even cause her to short circuit, being they're powered RF signals.

[–]obama_loves_nsa [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Honestly though. Think of the fodder this gives Trump when he meets her live on stage in a few weeks.

Hillary: mumbles through some accusation about tax returns and trump u....

Trump: "Hey before we continue can you show the crowd and cameras your nice new inner-ear pearls?" "Also feel free to open your mouth and show off the green balls of phlegm forming from your worsening bronchitis you've had the last 2 years".. "Now I'll start by dumping these wikileaks emails right now explaining how you've been involved personally in the IRS scandal to take out conservatives for decades"... "I'd also like to show this email where you ordered the hit and murder of Seth Rich 3 months ago, as well as these other 8 people who you ordered killed with audio,video and witness testimony we have here to confirm it all"

Her face would turn bright red and she'd probably shit her pants and then have Trump assassinated on the spot.

No matter what, 10's of millions of people are going to be instantly exposed to her sheer volume of lying and deceit she uses in every step of her existence once there's finally a NON mainstream media filter between everything Hillary/Trump are saying.

[–]JackBond1234 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hillary: Tax returns

Trump: No YOU show YOUR tax returns. MY tax returns are tremendous, they're the best tax returns you've ever seen. People come up to me all the time and tell me how great my tax returns are.

[–]FatStig [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Her face would turn bright red and she'd probably shit her pantsuit and then have Trump assassinated on the spot.

[–]Machismo01 [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Unfortunately, deliberately jamming is illegal. Now if you 'happened' to be using a device on the same frequency and it prevented hers from working AND it had FCC approval, that would be an accident. This is unlikely to work though. Her ear piece is almost certainly channelized and should be fine.

A better option is to use some of the new RF absorbing wall papers (basically faraday cages) and paints on the walls of the venue. Or figure out where they are doing it and put an RF absorbing material between her and them. They are probably in a van or truck outside. Just drive a truck in front of them or a fake sign full of those foam cones.

If I were wealthy enough, I would do this. It'd be fantastic. You also don't interfere with security services this way. Sweet!

[–]LikeableAssholeBro [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

If my last name happens to be Clinton, could I actively jam and get away with it if I didn't intend to?

[–]speleo_don [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

If the device was really a low-frequency inductive device like they said, jamming would be very practical without hitting up against FCC issues...

[–]Packin_Penguin [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I think the secret service, moderators and media would take issue with that. No one would be able to communicate!

[–]syncrophasor [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I wish but it would be illegal. The FCC barely enforces rules anymore but I bet they would come down on anyone jamming her earpiece like a ton of law books.

[–]Racheakt [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The real fun is in letting her start to get the answer then jam her mid sentence.

[–]I_am_just_sayingLibertarian Conservative [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

There are so many actual, provable, things to hit Hillary on...

Is an easily deniable hidden conspiracy like this from someone like Alex Jones really the best one to go with right now?

[–]ed_merckx [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

this, weather she has one or not, planted questions in the audience or not, it is not going to take away her voters, or magiclly make people want to support someone else. The news doesn't help her, but let the story hurt her, Trump makes zero gains by focusing on this instead of issues that will possibly get him votes.

Whats more Clinton would much rather talk about these wild, politically motivated conspiracy hit pieces, which she can spin right back on you and plays to her narrative of trump being crazy, as opposed to her having to talk about and defend her past actions, flip flops and proposed policies.

I watched an interview with one of her campaign surrogates after Trumps immigration speech in AZ, question was basically "you heard trumps speech, and we've all been talking about it, give us Hillary Clinton immigration plan to those undecided voters", all they did was give the typical "well unlike trumps hiliarys would work, all of his points are invalid, hes a racist, blah, blah blah" the reporter flat out said "I'm not asking you to break down what you do or don't like in trumps plan, im asking you to talk about clintons plan" again the clinton guy would only talk about how horrible trumps plan and trump is. He eventually said something like "oh well you can find the plan on her website, and she's talked plenty about the individual points about it" only to roll into another tirade about trump.

She does not want to actually debate and discuss proposed policy, or defend her past actions that are questionable, she gains less in doing that than she does by attack trumps (or any other candidate she might have gone up against) personality, and spinning everything into how hes going to screw us all over.

[–]I_am_just_sayingLibertarian Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

A great real world example that I'm sure everyone remembers is how Hillary and the left actually started the entire "birther" talking point against Obama and then immediately turned it around and used it to call all republicans crazy conspiracy theorists and racists.

[–]StandardGOPartyAmerica First [スコア非表示]  (15子コメント)

Here's an email released by wikileaks that confirms her use of an earpiece.

[–]wiseracer [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

that's from 2009, just fyi

It's probably just a light reflection issue:

https://gfycat.com/CarefulDenseCapeghostfrog

Not that I want to defend her, I just want to attack her on the 9,000 horrible things she DID do.

[–]Gstreetshit [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Yeah, doesn't look like there is an ear piece in there to me.

[–]KyloRenEatsShorts [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

Even if it is who cares? Campaigns aren't easy, there's a lot of meticulous planning and data crunching going on behind the scenes. Like you said, I'd rather focus on things shes actually done vs global inquirer level conspiracy

[–]BellaAlex [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

You think wearing an earpiece while answering questions at a presidential forum is ok? Who is answering the questions? Hillary or the person speaking in her ear?

[–]SparklingGenitals [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

George Soros should've just run for president and we could've just skipped the middleman.

[–]whatwereyouthinkingLibertarian Conservative[S] [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

that's probably who was in her ear. that or DWS

[–]VectorB [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I know, at least with Trump when he starts reading the teleprompters we know that its the puppeteers who are speaking.

[–]kdawg423 [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

The ear piece in question is a device used when dealing with foreign speakers that provides a simultaneous translation. It is used extensively in the United Nations.

[–]nobahdi [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

The ear piece in question is a device used when dealing with foreign speakers that provides a simultaneous translation. It is used extensively in the United Nations.

September 23rd and 24th, 2009 (the dates in the wikileaks email) also correspond with a UN meeting and a "Foreign Ministers Luncheon" she attended so it seems perfectly reasonable to talk about bringing an earpiece.

http://m.state.gov/mc32567.htm

[–]whatwereyouthinkingLibertarian Conservative[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

the ear pieces they use at the UN are provided by the UN Translation Service

[–]BellaAlex [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

So why did she use it talking to Matt Lauer? What did she need translated?

[–]kdawg423 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

There was no earpiece! The still photo was photoshopped. Check out the video of the forum and you will clearly see that there is no earpiece.

[–]ajt1296 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I dont think it was photoshopped. I think it was just taken at the right time to make it look like something was in there. If you watch the fluid motion of her ear, it's pretty clear there was nothing there though.

[–]Wrath-of-God [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Can we cover legitimate issues in this subreddit and not crazy conspiracy theories from Alex Jones.

[–]jsteve0 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Enough with this crap. Remember when Dems accused Bush of having the same thing.

[–]whatwereyouthinkingLibertarian Conservative[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

they were going after a bulge in his suit jacket and even had NASA scientists come in to perform analysis on the photos.

then everyone (with half a brain) shutup when the Secret Service confirmed that it was his bullet proof vest. obviously.

[–]Gavin1123 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Website won't load for me. Do they mention why NYPD cares about this?

[–]whatwereyouthinkingLibertarian Conservative[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

they were assisting the Secret Service to provide security for the event.

I'm speculating that they have a unit that can monitor or regulate wireless signals and maybe picked up on it.

[–]CarolinaPunk [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

....or part of regular audio equipment for a tv appearance?

r/con is it conservative or a conspiracy?

How about both?

[–]chabanaisStronger than derp [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It was mind control from her reptilian overlords.

[–]kdawg423 [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

She did not have an earpiece. Look closely at the video of the forum. This picture has been doctored. This is just another perfect example of the use of perception management as a propaganda tool in order to falsely discredit Hillary. The right has been doing it for years.

[–]Lewa879 [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

But don't most candidates do this?

[–]whatwereyouthinkingLibertarian Conservative[S] [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

nice try Hillary campaign staffer who's job it is to carry the earpiece equipment around.

[–]Lewa879 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

No, I'm genuinely curious. For myself, it would be hard to have awnsers for a broad range of questions, with out notes, or something to help me.

[–]miss_and_mrs [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Look closely at the video of the use of an earpiece. https://archive.is/DgC3r. that's from 2009, just fyi.

[–]ircanadian [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Makes you wonder who is the one really speaking.