全 33 件のコメント

[–]dakruNeither [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

I don't believe that missing out on casual sex is oppressive. I'll grant you hurtful (depending on the guy's interests), but certainly not oppressive.

Also, I think you're missing that "hardworking, studious men" absolutely can get sex. I'm pretty vocal on here with my belief that most men don't have much access to casual sex, but most men can get relationships, and sex in those relationships.

[–]drok007Non-Blue Pill [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I don't believe that missing out on casual sex is oppressive.

While RP believes the egg came first, and BP believes the chicken came first, there is definitely some sort of causation here that is a feedback loop. A system that makes the incels incelier, and the chads chadlier could be considered oppressive, since you could make the case that it's not good to be incel, and the chads don't need to be any chadier than they are.

However, I've seen a lot of backlash against chads lately, so I fight for chad rights.

[–]dakruNeither [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Of course it's not good if a man wants casual sex but can't get it. It's also not good if a woman wants commitment but can't get it. It doesn't mean she's being oppressed because no one's giving it to her, though. It's a really big leap from "it's not good to not get something I want" to "I'm being oppressed".

[–]oilpainter777[S] [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I'm pretty vocal on here with my belief that most men don't have much access to casual sex, but most men can get relationships, and sex in those relationships.

Well yes this makes sense. But the problem is that casual sex is going to such a small amount of men. Just like rich have to pay more taxes, why do the most ripped guys have most of the girls?

[–]SkinnySweatyChad's Dad [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

why do the most ripped guys have most of the girls?

Natural Selection? Maybe you have heard of it.

[–]ozymandias271Borderline Insanity Disorder [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Why are you objecting to girls' butts hanging out of short shorts? Are you TRYING to ruin it for the rest of us? Sit back and appreciate the view, dude.

I assume the author of this post, not being a hypocrite, chooses his sexual partners solely on the basis of how much they contribute to society, and not on the basis of how nice their tits are.

[–]ProbablyBelievesIt [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

oppression

I can't wait for the sit-ins. The protest songs. The speeches. "I have a wet dream! No, I won't go to the back of the beta bus! It's time for an end to the sexual segregation! Don't let my people go!"

Seriously, you really need to explore the world beyond college hook-ups. It sounds like you're already doing a good job of holding yourself down, without any help.

[–]oilpainter777[S] [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

It's time for an end to the sexual segregation!

Did u not read the article I linked? Isn't it obvious women aren't hoping into bed with nerds that are actually having an impact on the world

[–]ProbablyBelievesIt [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Most men - even geeky men - manage to meet up with the right someone and lose their virginity. You just want to break the high score, sex as a game.

But for most people, life isn't porn...and this is bad, why? Sex isn't just about your experience, you know.

[–]SkinnySweatyChad's Dad [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Please tell us how you plan on ending this oppression.

I'm all ears.

[–]PaeddaPurple Pill Man [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

  • Restraining female sexuality wouldn't do anything about that, would it? If you're not getting any sex now, you won't be getting any sex then either.

  • If you study STEM to be attractive to women, you're doing it wrong. Study it because you enjoy it. You're worrying way too much about female validation.

  • Being violent, aggressive and unintelligent isn't better than being kind and intelligent. The latter traits are already their own reward. Again, you're worrying too much about women, while not seeing the things for themselves.

  • All of this assumes that indeed violent & aggressive men are the only ones being appreciated by women. I very much doubt that.

[–]SmurfESmurferson [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

So what's your plan? Force women to have sex with men they're not attracted to?

[–]SipsSparklingWaterBlue Berry Flavoured [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

It's oppressive to below average men. And like no shit athletes get women, did you also know grass grows and birds fly?

[–]oilpainter777[S] [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Well the economy is oppressive to the below average earner, in terms of household income. People care a whole lot about that. Look at the following Bernie Sanders got.

If people are fine with restraining the rich whats the issue with below average men?

[–]SipsSparklingWaterBlue Berry Flavoured [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

whats the issue with below average men?

They are below average.

[–]BeyondTheLight [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

awwwww poowiffleman want free hot wimin for doing what exactly? Being smart? Contributing to society? Fuck that, chad is where it is at! That toned body, those beautifull eyes and he is probably loaded too!

[–]AskeiuBlue Pill [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

pick the most attractive, ripped, bad ass men on campus

Yeah, women are more attracted to attractive men. If you had your pick of women to sleep with, you wouldn't spare a single thought for plain but kind and hardworking girls. Being sexually attractive is sexy, and that's normal.

They go after frat boys, athletes, party boys, the majority of which are not intellectually gifted and have no real goals for after college.

Pre-professional frats are pretty common man. You think all the guys in the pre-med frat are subhuman rapists?

I can't tell if you hate women or sexually successful men more, but you don't seem to understand either group.

[–]AutoModeratorPurple Pill Machine...literally[M] [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair, just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]buarthaMale gynosocialist [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I hated when I was in the closet and straight men insisted on oppressing me by daring to be simultaneously sexually interesting to me and sexually uninterested in me. And still there are men out there who turn down perfectly good, honest, hard-working dick.

Will the oppression never end?

[–]NalkaNalkaNo Pill [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

People making choices on how to live their lives are oppressing me, halp!

Let me oppress them first. It's the only logical solution. Can't have people making choices that I don't agree with. That would be madness.

[–]oilpainter777[S] [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Can't have people making choices that I don't agree with.

But if those choices are hurtful to a very large population of men, why should people be allowed to make them?

[–]NalkaNalkaNo Pill [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Am I being a dick by spending my money on me instead of sending it to the starving children in Africa? Why should I be allowed to hoard it to myself?

[–]hakosua [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Okay, fair enough. I can't C your V. But, if it's any consolation to you, unrestrained male sexuality has similarly adversely influenced women's behavior.

I guarantee: for every bulky, exercise-addicted male there is a waifish, calorie-obsessed female; and for every over-confident, emotionally stunted male there is a passive, emotionally masochistic female.

Ideally we would all lust after healthy, well-rounded people, thereby incentivizing adaptive behavior among members of the opposite sex. But fuck it -- we all know mentally unstable people are more fun in the bedroom.

[–]sen--senfirst of her name, non-red queen of the mythical slut-beasts [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

welp, ladies, it was fun, but i guess it's time. some guy on reddit says our freedom is actually oppression. better rein it back in!

[–]Atlas_B_ShrugginBitch, I'm in the 215 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Are you Asian, Indian or Muslim?

[–]PlumClafoutiIt'smorelikeaflan [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

women have no consequences or limits

False

[–]sjamadmethadone for the romantically hopeless [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

A lot of it has to do with modern society's idolization or 'pedestalization,' if you will, of the athlete as the gold standard of masculinity (and, increasingly, femininity! see Rhonda Roussey et al and the increase - in this decade - of female participation in strength training). People reared in the West are simply obsessed with athletic performance to a degree that didn't exist even 20-30 years ago, and this had made training mandatory for the millennial generation. Get with the times, hit the gym, start a strength training routine, and get with the program. The Red Pill already acknowledges this with their basic tenet of working out being obligatory for men in this day and age.

[–]Casshern1973Purple Pill Man [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Have you ever heard of Ancient Greece and Rome?!?

[–]sjamadmethadone for the romantically hopeless [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Yes, I have heard of those cultures. And?

[–]TheScamr [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Unrestrained anything is bad. In part because it puts short term enjoyment over long term success. For many people this impulsiveness is not just in one area of their lives but instead subtly pervades so many of their decisions.

Promiscuous people are relatively disease vectors compared to more prudent people. For those that don't take the time to learn about prospective partners they put themselves and others at risk.

STDs aside much harm has been done to young kids by women that have a stream of men coming through to spend time with their mom.

The damage to grown men is a side show to what so many of these fuck ups do to their children. Cheating on the father (which is what women unrestrained by morality do) is one thing, but the damage caused by the conflict in the home is even worse to the kids.

Promiscuous women have one less reason to stay with a man that provides stability. And of course these women don't tell their kids that their lack of loyalty is selfish, they blame shift and brain wash their kids into assuming that unrestrained female sexuality (sluttiness) is normal and healthy.

[–]wynterpetalsBlue Pill XX [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

When your life revolves around women and only women and you do everything just for women, yeah it's going to feel oppressive. Oh, and you're going to have a bad time.

[–]mojo_magnifico [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You know, it IS possible to value emotional connection /love and have professional goals without being a little beta bitch.