0
1

serious question (self.SRSQuestions)

Bobolopolis08 が 投稿

so SRS is described as a circlejerk and therefore not the place to debate. The sidebar then directs users to here and socialjustice101 if they'd like to engage in active conversation. But both of those sidebars plainly state that you can only question them for classification on why they are right. Where are you willing to defend your believes? Just as I realize that I don't know everything, and that having an open enough mind to at least listen to opposing arguments garners more respect than inadvertently being the bigot I claim to be against.

全 9 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]PrettyIceCube 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

Debating anyone that doesn't agree with the concept of social justice is pointless because we disagree on fundamental issues so there's no chance of any middle ground being reached.

[–]MarxBro2 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

What is the concept of "social justice" and how does SRSD adhere to this concept?

[–]Lolor-arros 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

In person, mostly, when I know it won't be a waste of time. Part of this is, as another commenter said, being able to find a middle ground with that person.

That's very hard to figure out on the internet - so the safe move is to refuse to engage.

[–]NotQuiteHapa 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't mind debating anywhere, personally, and I wouldn't mind an open debate/question subreddit, but you have to imagine it would get overrun by insincere trolls.

[–]Bobolopolis08[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

and that's where good moderation would have to come into play. banning anybody with an opinion different than yours is the definition of insecurity. the problem with safe spaces is that the real world is not and never will be a safe place.