@imillhiser who do you think actually thinks this
Sure, Trump is authoritarian racist, but the Clintons have a foundation that provides health care to AIDS patients, so they're the same.
-
-
- その他の返信を表示
-
@JStein_Vox Obviously I'm being sarcastic & hyperbolic. I'm also unimpressed w/ many of the editorial decisions of our colleagues lately. - その他の返信を表示
- さらに表示
-
-
-
If only all money went to the AIDS patients, instead of Foundation "operating expenses."
#ClintonSlushFund#Scam@imillhiser@AndyRichter - その他の返信を表示
-
@gradearadio@imillhiser@AndyRichter 88-89% of funds went to charitable services. http://www.factcheck.org/2015/06/where-does-clinton-foundation-money-go/ …pic.twitter.com/6sdsEpzfev - その他の返信を表示
-
It is almost impossible to audit accurately the Clinton Foundation, sadly. Will never be known probably.
@greggynix@imillhiser@AndyRichter - その他の返信を表示
-
@gradearadio@imillhiser@AndyRichter Well non-partisan, non-profit CharityWatch & http://FactCheck.org both did if you read the article! - その他の返信を表示
-
@greggynix@imillhiser@AndyRichter (sigh) if you honestly believe ANY party will ever have access to the FULL documentation, I pity you. - その他の返信を表示
-
@gradearadio@imillhiser If you endlessly repeat political talking points instead of informing yourself w/ reputable sources, I pity you - その他の返信を表示
-
@greggynix@imillhiser just because a nonpartisan source comes to a finding doesn't make it true when it isn't possible to have full info. - その他の返信を表示
-
@gradearadio@imillhiser If there were any sources indicating w/ proof of money laundering, I'd certainly read them. - その他の返信を表示
- さらに表示
-
-
-
@imillhiser@c18913 10-15% AIDS relief nice cover for CGI while 85-90% pocketed for Clinton's enrichment - その他の返信を表示
-
@ukloner@imillhiser@c18913 Actualy 88-89% of funds were spent on charitable programs. http://www.factcheck.org/2015/06/where-does-clinton-foundation-money-go/ …pic.twitter.com/SfJ8r5dcYY - その他の返信を表示
-
@greggynix@ukloner@imillhiser@c18913 actually if you look at the actual tax docs, over 50% of those "program expenses" went to... 1/2 -
@greggynix@ukloner@imillhiser@c18913 salaries, travel, conferences, meetings, and office supplies. - その他の返信を表示
-
@nickexperience@ukloner@imillhiser@c18913 So you mean "operating a charity?" That's how charities work. Same true for wherever you donate - その他の返信を表示
-
@greggynix@ukloner@imillhiser@c18913 is it now? I'll assume this claim is based on your deep dive on "all charities". -
@nickexperience@ukloner@imillhiser@c18913 Well, I've worked for about a half-dozen non-profits. Have you? -
@greggynix@ukloner@imillhiser@c18913 utterly irrelevant. Did you do their taxes? - その他の返信を表示
- さらに表示
-
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。もう一度試すか、Twitterステータス(英語)をご確認ください。