上位 200 件のコメント全て表示する 495

[–]Squampyjones 639ポイント640ポイント  (19子コメント)

Why is this photoshopped garbage always on the front page, please stop with this

[–]Shankley 101ポイント102ポイント  (16子コメント)

It's crazy that this isn't higher up. This shit so obviously photoshopped

[–]joshj94 14ポイント15ポイント  (14子コメント)

I can't tell. Can you point out some of the things that gave it away (outside of the context)?

[–]energylife 19ポイント20ポイント  (1子コメント)

The positioning of the R on matters is what makes me think it's RETOUCHED.

[–]Shankley 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

Haha. You mean aside from how totally impossible this situation is? Look at the fingers where they overlap the text.

[–]babybatteronanapkin 6ポイント7ポイント  (2子コメント)

Or you could not be a condescending cock sucker and actually answer his question.

[–]doogie88 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

No kidding. What a goof. I've used photoshop before everyone! Look at me!

[–]Shankley [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I actually haven't used photoshop, but I do have functioning eyeballs so it was pretty obvious this shit is fake.

[–]redditonlyonce 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

the "m" by the finger of the guy on the left

[–]Hawaiiily 579ポイント580ポイント  (12子コメント)

No Lives Matter. Cthulhu 2016.

[–]jessesterr 41ポイント42ポイント  (5子コメント)

I would like to see the flying spaghetti monster fight Cthulhu. Besides the fact it would be a Japanese businessman's tentacle fantasy gone wild, it would help us with this whole issue. Somehow.

[–]colefly 16ポイント17ポイント  (0子コメント)

What do you think Cthulus tentacles are made of?

The FSM is a corrupted depiction of the Elder one

[–]abnerjames 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

Cthulhu wins. The uncompromised horror overwhelms his every noodly appendage as the imagery of our infinite nothingness in death overflow his cauldrons of boiling sauce.

[–]mojoslowmo 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

False, his noodlieness wins as Cthulhu denounces nothingness when he tastes the delicousness of his giant meatballs. Though his noodlieness dies Chtulhu transforms from the ecstacy of Oregano into the new FSM. Its kinda like a Phoenix

[–]itsgoofytime69 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

So he opted to keep the bonfire going, so to speak.

[–]directconnection 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

The resulting fry up would be pretty fucking delicious too.

[–]UnusualXchaos 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Cthulhu supreme overlord of this very Earth.

[–]iMakeItSeemWeird 708ポイント709ポイント  (205子コメント)

Black Lives Matter Too would have probably been a more effective slogan. Many people read it as Only Black Lives Matter, which was not the intent.

[–]verybakedpotatoe 192ポイント193ポイント  (18子コメント)

It probably still could be. I mean, "#BLM2" seems like it could be a pretty good twitter thing. It would be the sequel to the Black Lives Matter movement, "Now with more solidarity!".

How is a white guy going to support the movement if he doesn't know who is hostile to his participation and who isn't? "Black Lives Matter" would totally have been my kind of movement if it were not a fifty fifty chance that a meeting would be openly hostile to my presence.

I am pretty obviously a hippie looking kind of guy, and figured it would be like my college days with lots of folks coming together from all kinds of backgrounds and beliefs to support the idea that people of color, women, men, LGBT, and fringe members of society deserved to be unstigmatized participants in the government and formation of policy. About half of the time it is just this, and it is pretty awesome. The other half the time, it is not about inclusion. Instead, it seems to be about some specific charismatic individual's anger, and nothing good ever comes from that.

[–]j8sadm632b 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

BLMT could work too but people might mistake it for a more explicit listing of the ingredients of a BLT.

[–]Thelastofthree 27ポイント28ポイント  (4子コメント)

I'd say #BLM2.0 would be better. Gives the image of second try/restarting.

[–]LiGht_UrpLe 10ポイント11ポイント  (6子コメント)

Out of curiosity, what makes you think there's a 50/50 chance of your presence causing hostility?

[–]verybakedpotatoe 44ポイント45ポイント  (1子コメント)

That has been what I have encountered. It isn't a projection of expectations but rather an estimation of my experience.

[–]Summer_Friend 44ポイント45ポイント  (1子コメント)

I've personally seen only one group of BLM protestors in real life, and that group had signs that said shit like "we're coming for you whitey."

Obviously that's a small sample size and probably bad luck on my part that that was the first and last group I saw but it definitely doesn't make me want to support their movement. And the fact that I've seen plenty of racist stuff from them online (including from the cofounder) solidifies that.

It's the same problem I have with SJWs: I agree with their goals mostly but not the "fight fire with fire" methods.

I won't crucify myself for being white. I didn't choose my skin color any more than anyone else did.

[–]ShallowPedantic 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Because the movement is fairly decentralized, there's a great deal of variance in how different BLM groups operate, and much of it is determined by where you are. Some are pretty chill and openly invite white people to come support them. Others are sort of uncomfortable with having white people there and have sort of strange rules for participating as a white person, but are otherwise OK. Other BLM locals are pretty hostile against white people as a whole.

The other thing is that BLM has become a magnet for attracting opportunists who just want to riot, and many of these people will outright physically attack white people without provocation.

[–]xacht 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Funny thing about that, There was a "Black Lives Matter Too". I have spoken with Mr. Michael hand he said that they are disbanding because they want to distance themselves from the BLM movement from California. And if one is curious Black Lives Matter Too registered 4/21/15 and BLM as we know them today was 5/22/15.

[–]meneye 20ポイント21ポイント  (0子コメント)

I guess they underestimated the stupidity of people.

[–]binginJAK 55ポイント56ポイント  (43子コメント)

Maybe the fact that certain members of the movement targeting other races and committing acts of violence against them solely because of their race might also lead people to believe that their slogan means "only black lives matter".

[–]Mistikman -1ポイント0ポイント  (5子コメント)

A white person gets judged as an individual.

A black person apparently gets judged based on the absolute worst examples of their entire group.

That's a pretty racist sentiment, and being utterly dismissive based on the worst members of an 'organization' that anyone can join trivializes every valid claim they have.

[–]CherrySlurpee [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It has less to do with race and more to do with population sizes. White people make up like 70% or so of the US so grouping them all together is kind of useless.

If and when you break down white-people groups into things like the Irish, Italians, etc, you get the same thing.

Not saying this is right or wrong, but rather just how we as society react.

[–]Zorro_Darksauce 35ポイント36ポイント  (26子コメント)

Many people read it as Only Black Lives Matter, which was not the intent.

The people who read it that way wanted to, or else were paying so little attention that nothing would have gotten through to them. It was pretty obvious from the start that the "too" was implied.

[–]Aleitheo 27ポイント28ポイント  (8子コメント)

If you look at the words and actions of many within the BLM movement you can tell that it wasn't a far fetched thought.

[–]OppressiveShitlord69 15ポイント16ポイント  (13子コメント)

It was pretty obvious from the start that the "too" was implied.

That's kind of a solipsistic thing to say. If a movement is founded upon a simple saying, clarity is paramount. Clearly it wasn't that obvious if so many people found reason to take issue with it, or at least it wasn't obvious enough. "Black Lives Matter Too" adds one word and makes the argument immensely more clear.

[–]Zorro_Darksauce -3ポイント-2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Plenty of people had a preconceived idea of what they wanted to think about such a movement. Lack of clarity was never the issue.

[–]Gailestorm 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Or they live in Milwaukee. This city sucks for race relations anyway. :(

[–]Wikkiwikki420 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Why does this look photoshopped as fuck?

[–]JuryNightFury 15ポイント16ポイント  (11子コメント)

Save the rainforest!

Why only the rainforest? Why not save the rainforest too?

[–]Nut5y 3ポイント4ポイント  (10子コメント)

It's not save the black lives... A more accurate statement would be "rainforests matter too." This makes rainforests included with all the other things that matter. Just like all the other lives that matter, black or otherwise.

[–]froibo 17ポイント18ポイント  (9子コメント)

Okay, "rainforests matter", still doesn't say nothing else matters but rainforests.

[–]lagrandenada 10ポイント11ポイント  (4子コメント)

Nor is it a logical derrititve of BLM. Broken down, the statement is that if a black life, it matters. The opposite of that is if it doesn't matter, it's not a black life. Inferring "black lives matter and white lives don't" is not logical, to say the least.

[–]cakeandale 8ポイント9ポイント  (1子コメント)

Language isn't formally rigorous, and the conversion of "black lives matter" to "if a black life, it matters" begs the question as to whether the statement is an exclusive assignment of value or an inclusive implication.

There are constructions of "X matters" where the statement is a (usuallty hostile) exclusive assignment of value... For instance, take the exchange

Andrew: Why do you always go where Cindy wants to go for dinner?

Beth: Cindy's opinions matter

In that example, the statement "Cindy's opinions matter" is directly intended to imply that Andrew's opinion does not matter.

Because the name "Black Lives Matter" does not have any context, the ambiguity as to whether it is a exclusive assignment or a inclusive implication is left to be resolved by the listener through the lens of their feelings about the group. For some people that sense hostility in regards to racial tensions (And I'll admit, from the association of the BLM movement with protests shouting "No justice, no peace!" at its inception, I was initially one of those people), the statement can invoke the hostile interpretation in their minds.

[–]overtoke 6ポイント7ポイント  (13子コメント)

it made a bunch of ignorant racists angry.

"black lives matter too" is literally in the constitution

[–]RebootTheServer 5ポイント6ポイント  (5子コメント)

No Black Lives Matter kicking white people out from their rallies made people angry and racist

[–]Wise_Kruppe -5ポイント-4ポイント  (6子コメント)

Yea, probably had nothing to do with burning down their own city and beating people out of their cars for being white.

[–]overtoke 0ポイント1ポイント  (5子コメント)

blaming "BLM" for that, yes, makes you look stupid

[–]MozeeToby 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

The internet allows for organic grassroots movements where anyone can join and even organize an event in the name of your movement. This is what's known as a double edged sword.

The KKK has more control over who represents them to the public than BLM does because BLM isn't a group, it's a rallying cry. You don't have control over what people are rallying to do.

[–]Malphael 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

BLM is a lot like Anonymous in that sense. Anyone can claim the mantle of BLM or Anonymous and use it for whatever purpose they see fit for it. It means whatever the person using it thinks it means.

[–]fingerweh 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Except when this happens under the "guise" of BLM. I know BLM isn't what these bigots are doing; however, it doesn't help the credence of people who are legitimately fighting for a real cause.

Common Sense is not common. Throw that right the hell out the window.

What does it look like to an average citizen?

I see a person of one ethnicity beating people up for being a different ethnicity. I see other people in that SAME ethnicity wearing the SAME clothes and parroting the same cause.

Yes. It makes me an idiot for blaming BLM for that...

OR

These two groups are named the same but have completely different causes.

Not confusing if you dive in deeper than your toe, but always remember that people often believe what they are told.

I don't disagree that it's not hard to figure out what's going on, but it's not easy when idiots go out of their way to prove the bigots right.

[–]overtoke 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

bigots are never right, and they never get proven right.

[–]CodnmeDuchess 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

There's no misunderstanding. The people who misunderstand choose to do so.

[–]sciamatic 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

which was not the intent.

Nor even the most reasonable interpretation of the phrase.

I mean, I'm white, and it was immediately apparent that the phrase "Black Lives Matter" was about the apparent lack of value prescribed to African Americans -- specifically in relation to the criminal justice system. IE, black lives were treated as inherently less valuable than most white lives, and that they should be treated with the same level value -- not that white lives should be de-valued.

Interpreting it as that seems almost willfully obtuse; like someone coming up to a suffragette, in 1915, and getting mad because they think the sign "Women Deserve the Vote" implies that men don't deserve the vote.

Well of course not. Don't be daft.

[–]GodOfAllAtheists 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

To a lot of the followers, that's exactly the intent.

[–]SlaughterMeister 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Except you would have to be pretty stupid to assume that it means "Only Black Lives Matter", considering the context.

[–]mikekoot111 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Sounds like a dece movie sequal

[–]puzzle_button 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

It only applies when the white lives mess with the black lives

[–]Warmth_of_the_Sun 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Problem is all the white guys on Reddit are coming up with these kind of ideas and upvoting your comment. The hardcore BLM members don't see it as 'we want real equality' but as 'we want special privilege' because you all had it for years.

[–]makes_guacamole 99ポイント100ポイント  (6子コメント)

Bad photoshop. Look at the R on both shirts.

This is a perfect microcosm of the all lives matter movement. Someone really wanted to show that their movement wasn't racist - so they did something racist to prove it.

[–]kiss-tits 32ポイント33ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why is this shitty photoshop on the front page? God damn it reddit.

[–]GuruMeditationError 44ポイント45ポイント  (0子コメント)

The fact that someone made this post and it's upvoted this much is /r/cringepics.

[–]fuck-dat-shit-up 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

I didnt see the original White Lives Matter, am I going to be totally lost if I see the sequel?

[–]artificial001 274ポイント275ポイント  (71子コメント)

How fucking hard is it to understand that "Black lives matter" does not negate the fact that everyone else's life matters too? The reason the slogan exists is to point out institutionalized and de facto racism in the country; not to get the whites all worked up.

Seriously it's not even that fucking nuanced.

[–]invertedspear 49ポイント50ポイント  (2子コメント)

Pretty hard when you have to fight media bias. When every message is twisted into an "us vs them" story because that gets people watching and reading and sells ads. There's money to be made in getting people worked up about this. And the way to get them worked up is to editorialize every story until it's clear there are sides, and you need to pick one and fight the other.

[–]pure_x01 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

That is why I always wonder how people who work with this can sleep at night. They are feeding hate that leads to killings and a worse society.

[–]Joey0811 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Because they are ignorant people who don't care about their machinations.

[–]lurker628 30ポイント31ポイント  (0子コメント)

What makes it hard to understand isn't the phrase is supposed to mean, but what it actually means when some people rally under it while interrupting Sanders, going after college students in a library, objecting to locally initiated police-and-Black-community-members BBQs, and interrupting LGBT events to make racially charged (and flat out racist) comments.

The phrase itself isn't hard to understand.
The way many people use it isn't hard to understand.
But how to understand it in practice, when the same phrase is used to espouse so many different, and often conflicting, perspectives on a baseline position can be hard.

People using the phrase are under no obligation to make it easier for anyone else, but when the people rallying under the phrase use it to mean different things, is it any wonder that the rest of the population isn't sure how to interpret it?

[–]malosa 58ポイント59ポイント  (28子コメント)

I think the CONCEPT of Black Lives Matter doesn't negate that; however, the BLM activists themselves have given the concept such a bad name through several misguided attempts to get EVERYONE worked up, including whites.

Blocking traffic on major freeway intersections is a great way to get noticed, but a terrible way to get people on your side.

[–]Sanders-Chomsky-Marx 21ポイント22ポイント  (4子コメント)

So is congesting the streets by marching on washington. Or preventing white moderates from eating lunch at their favorite restaurant by staging a sit in. Or kneeling during the national anthem.

People will complain about any type of protest that they can't ignore. Because that's what they want to do. They don't want to be reminded of the problems, they want to live their lives without having to feel guilty that they don't care.

[–]-Cynosure- 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

Bruh. The March on Washington was litterally across the National Mall. Not an inconvience at all. Washington is very good at handling protests. Also sitting in a restaurant is not a matter of convenice if you are trying to order. The white people were not mad because they couldn't eat, but instead because there wasa black person at a white persons counter.

Now walking across a highway and blocking off cars is:

A. Dangerous

B. Annoying to those that want to get home that are innocent and not targets of the protest.

Edit: Colon

[–]Sanders-Chomsky-Marx 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

What about the innocent white people in the restaurant who just wanted to eat? The police aren't the target of the protest. A society that values the lives of black people as worth less than those of white people is the target.

[–]HASH_SLING_SLASH 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Have you seen how they've acted or heard the things they've said? I can understand their goal is to raise awareness for equality, however; their actions can often be hostile or downright wrong.

[–]the_leprechauns_anus 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I understand it too, but you have to remember most people are stupid and can't think beyond the surface. And people are always looking for a way to defend themselves from being offended.

[–]orangefly 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

How about we just work on the problem in some way that actually helps and ignore the irrelevant hate group that does nothing but require periodic babysitting?

[–]kickrox [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Yeah how could anyone think that? Hmm?

/s

Seriously though, get off your high horse because you're probably a tool.

[–]afternoonofthefaun -3ポイント-2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Because white people love feeing like victims.

I mean everyone does, but since whites so rarely are, this is an exciting opportunity.

SOURCE: I'm white.

[–]kingeryck 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Are you sure that's not shopped?

[–]isaidicanshout 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thankfully someone is looking out for the whites.

[–]edd010 83ポイント84ポイント  (22子コメント)

Yes, but there's no need to point that out. For the police that's very clear already.

[–]ufailowell 6ポイント7ポイント  (2子コメント)

Except based on number of interactions with police white people are more likely to be shot than black people (at least based on this study of Houston)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/07/13/why-a-massive-new-study-on-police-shootings-of-whites-and-blacks-is-so-controversial/

[–]PostYourSinks 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

That's true, but you have to realize that there are roughly 5x as many white people as black people in America. And the number of white people shot by police isn't 5x higher, its less than .5x higher.

https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/514ozj/nice/d79h9je

[–]ufailowell -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes but the police are more likely to interact with black people because of their unusually high representation in violent crimes.

[–]tegu5309 -4ポイント-3ポイント  (7子コメント)

Yeah, cops never shoot unarmed white guys.

[–]meneye 10ポイント11ポイント  (5子コメント)

as a proportion of the population it's very rare.

[–]hblok 61ポイント62ポイント  (4子コメント)

2015 numbers, from Guardian's Counted database. Absolute numbers, and per million fractions:

 581 White (2.93)  
 306 Black (7.66)  
 195 Hispanic/Latino (3.45)  
  27 Other/Unknown  
  13 Native American (5.49)  
  24 Asian/Pacific Islander (1.34)  
1146 Total  

In other words, the US police killed almost twice as many white people as black people in 2015, but by proportion black people were more than twice as likely to be killed by the police. Either event is rather rare (1 in a million), however compared to each other, they're still within the same multitude. If you were to bet on the race of the next person killed by the police, the safest bet would be a white person.

Looking at the numbers for 2016, the US police has already killed 730 people. That's 64% of the total last year, and we're 68% (day 248/366) through this year. Meaning, they are a bit behind schedule. As last year, the white people body count is double that of black people (365 vs. 180).

[–]edd010 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I see you didn't take statistics at school.

[–]PantsGrenades -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wouldn't a more inclusive message be better either way?

[–]brojangles 125ポイント126ポイント  (46子コメント)

This kind of equivalency is just a denial of the actual issue. Black lives don't matter to the cops or the courts is the point.

[–]sooovad 10ポイント11ポイント  (8子コメント)

This kind of equivalency is just a denial of the actual issue. Black lives don't matter to the cops or the courts is the point.

There were 90 homicides in Chicago last month. Let's not pretend the police are the problem.

There are absolutely social, economic, and system-wide issues that need changing, but that is not the police's job to fix.

[–]lifeonthegrid 39ポイント40ポイント  (6子コメント)

Police brutality is the police's job to fix.

[–]ScramblesTD -3ポイント-2ポイント  (9子コメント)

If BLM honestly believes that black lives matter, then they should address the greatest threat to the lives of black people. And it ain't the police.

[–]ricker182 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

There are "stop the violence" marches almost every day on Chicago.
It's a really complicated issue.

[–]anEthiopian 4ポイント5ポイント  (4子コメント)

Which is about 3 degrees of separation from slavery and white supremacy lol. People are working on it though, and apathetic people who have never cared about people from the hood just talk about it.

[–]Tipsylou 44ポイント45ポイント  (1子コメント)

Oh thank god. I was worried about all this racial discrimination I, as a white person, face every day going unnoticed. Police racism sure is hard on me.

[–]toilet_bowler 26ポイント27ポイント  (4子コメント)

Good to see white people finally getting their due after centuries of abuse and subjugation.

[–]dissenter_the_dragon 20ポイント21ポイント  (10子コメント)

why do people talk to OPs like OPs are the people in the picture? this is not OP, he's just posting it.

anyway, yeah, shit like this is sometimes needed for the insecure. the people that think "black lives matter" somehow means "white people don't matter, in a general sense, and I HATE THEM."

nobody is saying that. and honestly, nobody should NEED to clarify...but I get it.

[–]MachoChips 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Stupid ass people gettin' worked up over two dudes in t-shirts.

[–]Fyodor007 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

All I can think of is Mars Attacks.

[–]SlightlyStable 10ポイント11ポイント  (9子コメント)

I think we can all agree all lives matter. Except for maybe purple people. Fuck them.

[–]RebelRaven94 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

If you see a purlple person, help em!

[–]Article_a 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

bad photoshop matters.

[–]thiscontent 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

[–]cmhhss1 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

I think that must be the wrong subreddit, for me there are only 4 posts to links to download books.

[–]Tsobaphomet 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Look at those two white supremacists

[–]ajac09 -2ポイント-1ポイント  (1子コメント)

White lives have been the only thing that have mattered for 200 years in America.. we know they matter.

[–]hushzone 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not really - the definition of whiteness is constantly changing - it used to not include Irish, poles, etc.

[–]1123581321345589144b 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why do kids these days not know the peace sign is not flippable like that. What these guys are signing is a nicer fuck you.

[–]Erve 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's funny, cause two fingers up is more of an insult here than anything else.

[–]ABatt1980 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

What about Asian/Hispanic/Native American/...whatever...

[–]XFiveOne 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is getting redundant and stupid. No lives matter. We're all equal and no one is above another. People, in general, are stupid and racist and make mistakes. They don't speak or represent that entire race. Give it the fuck up and shut the fuck up. This is creating separatism and that's worse than the problem you fucking morons are trying to solve. I don't have an answer. I only know what the problem is. I can't fix stupid on a national level. Uhhh...vote for me in 2016...?

[–]nealski77 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

All lives matter. Black, white, poor, rich. If everyone pooled their efforts to stop those who would take life for their own sin then this country would be better

[–]helpmeiaminhell93 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Tony Toni Tone has done it again

[–]Inmycrib 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Phins up that hat isn't photoshopped!

[–]GooseVersusRobot 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

A pathetic photoshopped picture.

[–]SkyPork 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I never saw the first one.

[–]bobers654 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I want to get a black shirt with white letters that says "black lives matter" but black out the "black" with sharpie so you can kinda see it still, so that people arnt entirely sure what kind of stand Im taking.

"Black lives matter" with black for the "black"

Or

"Lives matter"

[–]rojm -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

blm is the worst thing to happen to the black community since crack cocaine. i like how if we say the black community has a big problem we're labeled as a racist. look at trump, he points out that the communities are run down and education is really low and he gets labeled as a racist by CNN. don't ignore the problems just because of race. blm just diverts from real issues like drugs, poverty, and violence and focuses all their problems on cops and then burn down buildings in their own community. what a pos self destructive organization.

[–]BuckyDuster 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

All lives matter

[–]DietKibble 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

632 white people agree

[–]leftnotracks 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Nobody has suggested they don't.

[–]Tiberius666 -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

In before mods lock the comments due to racism or whatever

[–]andyflour 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

your cap is attractive

[–]cashboxmoneybags 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Awe. Thanks guys.

[–]MilfGaardians 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

"White Booty Matters"