•
•

R/politics with it's most blatant example of censorship yet (self.Conservative)

OrichalcosDartz が 投稿

Several hours ago I post a link to r/politics about how $15 can let you post multiple times I copied and pasted the exact title and removed all the caps in accordance with it's caps lock rules and the article is still somehow pulled for being unacceptable. (Here is the comparison between the article names to let you know they're exactly the same) I message the staff and ask what's wrong with the title and get no response. Several hours pass and I log back in and message them again and they decide to change the reason for it's removal from "Unacceptable Title" to "Rehosted Content". These libs are so desperate to keep the "Voting fraud isn't an issue" story going that they'll arbitrarily remove anything that goes against the mantra.

全 9 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]Uhillbilly [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Correct the record has hired guns attacking any pro Trump, anti Clinton posts, their doing it in "Progressive" blogs and sites as well, anything to "Protect" the Queen.

[–]chabanaisStronger than derp [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

Did you message the mods?

[–]OrichalcosDartz[S] [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

I message the staff and ask what's wrong with the title and get no response. Several hours pass and I log back in and message them again and they decide to change the reason for it's removal from "Unacceptable Title" to "Rehosted Content".

[–]chabanaisStronger than derp [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Was the content re-hosted?

[–]senorhotpants [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I did a search for anything close. Not a thing.

I personally am more bothered that the one megathread on Clinton's emails they put up on Friday is already in stickied and buried. Can't have too many people seeing negatives on her.

[–]chabanaisStronger than derp [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

"Re-hosted" content would be like a taking a video from one site and using it on another's.

When I was a moderator there they would not allow duplicate stories however they have changed that.

The "no re-hosted content" rule was to essentially prevent any sort of comparison, analyzation, or editorialization of topics.

So, for example, Newsbusters wants to show how Fox vs. CNN covered the same even by providing a transcript, etc...

Since a lot of "Conservative media" is doing just that I always thought the real reason was to screen it out.

[–]RavensFan15 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

This has been happening a lot lately over there. r/politics doesn't publish anything these days that isn't far left. If you post anything that's not far left or anti-Trump/GOP, you will be hit with the "Unacceptable Title" bullshit.

It's a pretty pathetic place honestly.

[–]OrichalcosDartz[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Indeed, which is a shame because I like debating my views with other people, it lets me strengthen my arguments and I have even been proven wrong with some of my views. Unfortunately r/politics isn't the place to do that as any source that violates their safe space are outright censored or ignored (One of the highest upvoted posts in my topics was nothing more than calling American Thinker "American Stinker").