(2) Agreement is construed as an offer by the volunteer. (No discernible consideration btw.) WTF considering...pic.twitter.com/B1xpmM81x7
(1) I took a look at the legal form agreement mandatory for Trump online volunteers. Many flaws!http://cin.ci/2bS2tHB
-
-
- その他の返信を表示
-
(3) It's literally framed as an offer on the website, where you click to agree:pic.twitter.com/3Lw5JRELQN
- その他の返信を表示
-
(4) Also it's called a "Non Disclosure Agreement" and the URL is "https://talk.donaldjtrump.com/User/NonDisclosureAgreement …" but it includes WAY morepic.twitter.com/WGhEDblwJs
- その他の返信を表示
-
(5) It's written to protect all of Trump's family and enterprises and anything created to benefit same. Broad AF!pic.twitter.com/sq4Wt5pKXx
- その他の返信を表示
-
(6) It assumes any breach of this overbroad AF agreement causes "irreparable harm" - fully indemnified, of course.pic.twitter.com/IXC3W3ZJAr
- その他の返信を表示
-
(7) Even by the grossly permissive standards of Citizens United, coercing your employees is completely illegal.pic.twitter.com/rV69hba0re
- その他の返信を表示
-
(8) No, you can't prevent your employees from volunteering for Hillary. Coercive and illegal!pic.twitter.com/ZoIXjm6pBA
- その他の返信を表示
-
(9) This one's charming: the terms of this agreement were totally negotiable!pic.twitter.com/Lt5VfiFzyl
- その他の返信を表示
- さらに表示
-
-
@rachelsklar@Enquirer um, I love this. Terrific!!! -
@rachelsklar@RobGeorge@Enquirer It's like a prenup, minus the payout. -
@rachelsklar He'll have as much luck litigating negative tweets about his products as he will rounding up 11M ppl. -
-
.
@rachelsklar I know that everything this guy does is atrocious, but you're missing the point. Fascism shouldn't even be in a political race -
@vruz@rachelsklar the problems with seeking total control of his volunteers serves that point, that he's outside democratic norms. -
.
@davidabenner@rachelsklar He shouldn't have been allowed to register as a candidate to begin with. Racism should have disqualified him. - その他の返信を表示
-
.
@davidabenner@rachelsklar The "press" should have given him the cold shoulder. But he has been validated time & time again. It's late now. - その他の返信を表示
-
@vruz@rachelsklar agree on 2, not on 1. He has a right to run, and press has a right and obligation to tell the truth abt him. -
.
@davidabenner@rachelsklar Rationalisation. If you are a declared enemy of vast segments of the population, you don't have a right to run. -
@vruz@rachelsklar no, we have the 1st Amendment. The NDA shows Trump doesn't respect it, but he has a right to run. -
.
@davidabenner@rachelsklar It's funny how certain requirements are implicit but others can't possibly be. - さらに表示
-
-
@rachelsklar looks like Trump is out of touch with basic legal realities. Sad!
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。もう一度試すか、Twitterステータス(英語)をご確認ください。