Mexican President Fact Checks Donald Trump To His Face, In Spanish

Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto and GOP nominee Donald Trump. CREDIT: CNN

Following a controversial and hastily thrown together bilateral meeting behind closed doors on Wednesday, GOP nominee Donald Trump and Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto held a tense press conference in which they politely disagreed about immigration, trade, and jobs.

Speaking first, President Peña Nieto tore into the core argument of Trump’s campaign — that illegal immigration across the U.S. Mexico border is out of control.

Watch:

“Undocumented immigration from Mexico to the U.S. had its highest point 10 years ago and it has slowed down consistently, even to the point of being negative in a net effect at this point,” said Peña Nieto, referring to data that supports these claims. He added that Trump’s portrayal of the border as a one-way street is “a clearly incomplete version” that “doesn’t account for the illegal flow” of money and firearms that goes into Mexico from the United States.

“Every year, millions of dollars and weapons come in from the north that strengthen the cartels and other criminal organizations that generate violence in Mexico,” Peña Nieto pointed out, adding that criminals in the U.S. benefit from the sale of illegal drugs.

Mexico’s president, who is deeply unpopular in his own country, also pushed back against Trump’s frequent rhetoric disparaging the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). “I shared with Mr. Trump my belief that NAFTA has been good for both the US and Mexico,” he said, adding that Trump’s characterization of multilateral trade deals having winners and losers is inaccurate. “Trade is not a zero sum endeavor.”

“Every year, millions of dollars and weapons come in from the north that strengthen the cartels and other criminal organizations that generate violence in Mexico.”

Trump stood stiffly at his podium during Peña Nieto’s statement, not looking at the Mexican president. When it was his turn to speak, he hammered the importance of building a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.

“Having a secure border is a sovereign right,” he said. “We recognize and respect the right of either country to build a physical barrier or wall on any of its borders to stop the illegal movement of people, drugs, and weapons.”

He then hinted at his frequent boast that he would force Mexico to pay for such a wall, which is estimated to cost billions of dollars, saying: “Cooperation toward achieving the shared objective, and it will be shared, of safety for all citizens is paramount to the United States and Mexico.”

But when reporters present pinned Trump down on whether he directly asked Mexico to pay for the wall, as he has led supporters at nearly all of his rallies to believe, he demurred. “Who pays for the wall? We didn’t discuss that. This was a very preliminary meeting.”

Update:

In a follow-up statement after his joint press conference, Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto said that he had in fact told Donald Trump that Mexico would not pay for his proposed border wall.

Next Story — Trump Details New ‘Deportation Force’
Currently Reading - Trump Details New ‘Deportation Force’

Trump Details New ‘Deportation Force’

His surrogates had been taking about Trump taking a more “humane” approach.

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump delivers an immigration policy speech during a campaign rally at the Phoenix Convention Center, Wednesday, Aug. 31, 2016, in Phoenix. CREDIT: AP Photo/Evan Vucci

During his major immigration speech Wednesday night in Phoenix, Donald Trump reiterated his plan to create a deportation force tasked with removing undocumented immigrants from the country — a proposal he first put forth during the Republican primary.

“We are going to triple the number of ICE deportation officers,” Trump said. “Within ICE, I am going to create a new special deportation task force focused on identifying and quickly removing the most dangerous criminal illegal immigrants in America who have evaded justice.”

Though “criminal illegal immigrants” would be the initial focus of Trump’s deportation force, he made clear that he wants all undocumented people out.

“Anyone who has entered the United States illegally is subject to deportation,” he said. “That is what it means to have laws and to have a country. Otherwise we don’t have a country.”

Whether Trump would stick with his deportation force plan during the general election phase of the campaign was a subject of speculation in recent days. Over the weekend, his campaign signaled Trump might be shifting to a more “humane” approach. On Sunday’s Face the Nation, Trump campaign manager Kellyanne Conway said he’s “not talking about a deportation force, but he is talking about being fair and humane.” The headline to the New York Times report detailing those comments reads, “Donald Trump’s Surrogates Back Off ‘Deportation Force’ For Illegal Immigrants.”

But like the rest of the speech, Trump’s deportation force proposal indicated his hard-line immigration message hasn’t changed from what he said in the speech launching his campaign, when he called Mexicans who illegally cross the border “rapists” and “criminals.”

The reality is that the Obama administration already operates a deportation force of sorts. Earlier this year, ThinkProgress detailed how deportation raids are turning Latino communities into ghost towns and splitting up families. But Trump wants to beef up those efforts, the ultimate goal being the removal of all undocumented immigrants from the country — during his speech, Trump didn’t mention any possible pathway to citizenship for them.

Beyond the human toll, Trump didn’t talk about the huge financial burden deporting the country’s 11 million undocumented immigrants would impose. Citing a recent study from the right-leaning American Action Forum think tank, the Los Angeles Times reported that deporting all undocumented immigrants would cost up to $300 billion and reduce the domestic product by roughly $1 trillion. To meet Trump’s goal in two years, the report estimates that about 90,000 deportation officers would be needed. But if Trump followed through on his promise to triple the current number of 5,000 deportation officers, that would still leave him about 75,000 short.

Next Story — Two Big Lies In Trump’s Immigration Speech
Currently Reading - Two Big Lies In Trump’s Immigration Speech

Two Big Lies In Trump’s Immigration Speech

Pivoting from the truth.

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump AP PHOTO/EVAN VUCCI

In his most anticipated immigration policy speech since he delivered his campaign speech last June, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump painted a relentlessly bleak view of undocumented immigrants, claiming they are responsible for tens of thousands of homicides and are leeches on the U.S. economy.

During his speech, which at one time was thought to represent a “pivot” to a softer approach, called for the mass deportation of the country’s undocumented population, which would also likely force their U.S. citizen children to leave the country with them. Trump also spent considerable time depicting undocumented immigrants as violent criminals.

According to Trump’s statistics, undocumented immigrants committed 25,000 homicides and cost the country $113 billion. The problem is that those statistics are false and misleading. Here are the facts:

  1. Undocumented immigrants were arrested for 25,000 homicides.

As ThinkProgress previously reported, a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report found that 25,000 foreign nationals — or immigrants — were arrested for homicides, but for over a 51-year period between August 1955 and April 2010. In comparison, there were 11,200 arrests for homicides in 2010 alone among the general American population, according to the U.S. Department of Justice statistics.

A 2007 study found that immigrants have lower incarceration rates than native-born immigrants, according to the immigration organization American Immigration Council. Another similar 2013 study found that first-generation immigrants commit crime at a lower rate than second-generation immigrants and native-born, non-Hispanic whites.

Still, Trump’s claim has been peddled by other anti-immigrant politicians such as Reps. Steve King (R-IA) and Pete Sessions (R-AL) in the past.

2. Immigrants cost the economy $113 billion.

According to Trump, undocumented immigrants are a billion-dollar burden on the economy, costing $113 billion in local, state, and federal taxes. The same statistic can be found at the Federation for American Immigration Reform website, an anti-immigrant organization founded by white nationalist John Tanton.

In reality, undocumented immigrants are a net positive to the economy, contributing $11.64 billion into local and state taxes, according to a 2016 Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy report. What’s more, undocumented immigrants also contributed $35.1 billion to the Medicare Trust Fund between 2000 and 2011, according to a 2015 Journal of General Internal Medicine study. Even Alex Nowrasteh, the immigration policy expert at the Libertarian think tank CATO Institute, called Trump’s claim “nonsense.”

Next Story — America’s ‘Most Prolific Conspiracy Theorist’ Reveals He’s Now Advising Donald Trump
Currently Reading - America’s ‘Most Prolific Conspiracy Theorist’ Reveals He’s Now Advising Donald Trump

America’s ‘Most Prolific Conspiracy Theorist’ Reveals He’s Now Advising Donald Trump

Trump is taking him very seriously.

Alex Jones, and american conspiracy theorist, radio show host, is escorted out of a crowd of protesters after he said he was attacked in Public Square on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, in Cleveland, during the second day of the Republican convention. CREDIT: AP Photo/John Minchillo

During his radio show on Wednesday, conspiracy theorist Alex Jones — Infowars proprietor, radio host, and the man the Southern Poverty Law Center describes as “certainly the most prolific conspiracy theorist in contemporary America” — said he advised Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump about how to avoid having the election stolen from him.

Jones said he “personally talked” to Trump about “election fraud,” Media Matters reports. Specifically, Jones said he warned Trump “that Homeland Security was going to go in and probably bring in U.N. observers, to make sure illegals and people could vote, and change the debate away from election fraud, to retail voter fraud, which is individuals cheating rather than the computers being hacked.”

Jones also said he also warned Trump that “ globalists” would “start skewing the polls” by cooking up “fake polls that you’re way behind and actually create that perception.”

Much to his delight, Jones said Trump took him seriously. According to Jones, Trump “already concurred and absolutely was on the same page and was already right there with me or even ahead of me.” Indeed, Trump’s first general election pushed an election rigging conspiracy, and as his campaign has struggled in recent weeks, his advisers have argued polls aren’t to be trusted.

As the New Yorker wrote in a mini-bio of Jones, his reputation “arises mainly from his high-volume insistence that national tragedies such as the September 11th terror attacks, the Oklahoma City bombing, the Sandy Hook elementary-school shooting, and the Boston Marathon bombing were all inside jobs, ‘false flag’ ops secretly perpetrated by the government to increase its tyrannical power (and, in some cases, seize guns).”

During a campaign event just days ago, Hillary Clinton said Trump’s worldview “is what happens when you listen to the radio host Alex Jones, who claims that 9/11 and the Oklahoma City bombings were inside jobs.”

“I don’t know what happens in somebody’s mind or how dark their heart must be to say things like that,” she added. “But Trump doesn’t challenge these lies. He actually went on Jones’ show and said, ‘Your reputation is amazing. I will not let you down.’ This from the man who wants to be president of the United States.”

Trump actually uttered those words to Jones on the morning of the San Bernardino massacre when he was a guest on his show.

Earlier this month, Trump tapped Steve Bannon, former executive chairman of the far-right website Breitbart News, to be his campaign CEO. That move signaled Trump’s full embrace the white nationalist movement known as the “alt-right.” If it’s true that Jones is advising Trump — and anything he says should be taken with a grain of salt — then that signifies something just as scary.

Next Story — BREAKING: America’s Worst Voter Suppression Law Won’t Take Effect For This Election
Currently Reading - BREAKING: America’s Worst Voter Suppression Law Won’t Take Effect For This Election

BREAKING: America’s Worst Voter Suppression Law Won’t Take Effect For This Election

You don’t have the votes. You don’t have the votes. You tried to disenfranchise black voters but you don’t have the votes.

In a brief order offering no explanation for the Court’s decision, the Supreme Court announced on Wednesday that North Carolina’s comprehensive voter suppression law will not take effect in the 2016 election. A federal appeals court previously struck down several key provisions of the law, explaining that the law was designed for the very purpose of making it harder for African-Americans to cast a ballot.

North Carolina hired Paul Clement, a former United States Solicitor General who frequently argues cases that are a high priority for the Republican Party and movement conservatives, to ask the Supreme Court to reinstate this law for the 2016 election. Wednesday’s order denies Clement’s request.

So that’s the good news for voting rights. The bad news is that all four of the Court’s Republican-appointees voted to reinstate the lion’s share of the law. These four justices, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito, all voted to neuter a key provision of the Voting Rights Act, and to reject an early challenge to voter ID, a common method of voter suppression that was included in the North Carolina law.

Nevertheless, because the facts of this particular case are especially stark — federal appeals courts do not typically accuse state lawmakers of actively targeting black voters for disenfranchisement — many smart court-watchers expected Roberts and Kennedy to vote with their more liberal colleagues in this case. The fact that they did not suggests that, but for the recent death of conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, North Carolina’s voter suppression law would now be largely reinstated.

The close vote in this case also raises the stakes for the upcoming election, as the next president is likely to appoint the deciding vote who will determine if this voter suppression law is ultimately struck down for good.

Sign up to continue reading what matters most to you

Great stories deserve a great audience

Continue reading