Read The Forum Rules: We have a clear set of rules to keep the forum running smoothly. Click here to review them.

Post Reply 
Women Should Not Be Allowed To Vote
Author Message
Return Of Kings Offline
International Playboy
******

Posts: 3,037
Joined: Oct 2012
Reputation: 11
Post: #1
Women Should Not Be Allowed To Vote

At the dawn of the 20th century, Britain had the greatest empire the world had ever seen. It stretched from the boreal vastness of Canada to the ice floes of the South Pole, from the scorching deserts of Egypt to the steamy jungles of New Guinea.

In 1900, British king Edward VII ruled over a quarter of the world’s population. His navy was the largest, most modern, and most ruthlessly efficient fighting force on the planet. His was the empire on which the sun never set, the undisputed global leader in science, technology, and commerce.

BEgoods

And then, in 1918, the British Parliament made a historic mistake. It gave women the vote. In 1920 the United States followed. Women’s suffrage rapidly spread around the world. Nearly 100 years later, how’s that working out for us?

Men were free in 1900


A man in Britain or the United States was free to say what he liked, subject only to the ancient laws on slander, treason, and incitement to crime. Men were the heads of their households, and they commanded respect as fathers and husbands. The majority paid no income tax. You were free to start a business without having to fend off legions of government busybodies. There was no welfare state, the only people who expected to live off their fellow men were beggars and drunks.

Western civilisation was unashamedly patriarchal and capitalist. Masculine virtues had propelled Europe out of the dark ages and colonised the New World, creating mighty new nations from scratch. Freed from feudalism and serfdom, the fertile mind of Western man produced an incredible series of discoveries and inventions. These allowed our forefathers to tame the forces of nature which had dominated and immiserated human beings since the first primitive hominids gazed in wonder and fear at a sunset on the African savannah.

Electricity let us push back the night. The steam engine brought us factories, mass production, and railways, which made mass prosperity and mass transit possible for the first time. Modern agriculture eliminated the ancient evil of famine in every country that bathed in the light of Western science. The world began to knit together as the primordial forerunner of the internet—the telegraph—brought regions and then nations and then continents together in almost instantaneous communication.

tesla_3

The intellectual crowning jewels of the West lay in its universities, from the medieval institutions of Europe to the Ivy League. These were places where serious and ferociously bright young men studied law, philosophy, and science. Where the secrets of the atom were probed, life-saving medical advances were made, astronomers mapped the cosmos, and engineers dreamed of ways to take us there, one day, into space.

The Western world in 1900 was not Utopia. There was poverty, bigotry, and injustice, but opportunity was real and a man with grit and ability could make something of himself. Many of the richest and most famous men of that era had been born poor and were self-taught.

Where stands Western civilisation today?

Men are not free in 2014


Most Western countries have a labyrinthine code of laws designed to jail you for saying the wrong things. Even in the United States, which stubbornly clings to its First Amendment, a man’s career can now be ruined and his reputation traduced if he offends against the latest dictates of political correctness.

Half or more of your income ends up in the pockets of the government, thanks to its bewildering array of taxes. Fathers and husbands—when they’re not being ridiculed as the butt of every joke on television—are second class citizens. If your wife decides she wants to take your house and your children away from you, she easily can with the full force of the law behind her.

If you try to start a business, you will find that not only are you not free to hire whoever you want, but you must also satisfy every whim of town planners, environmental bureaucrats, and health and safety commissars—all of them paid for by you, the taxpayer, to tell you what to do.

Another thing that you, the taxpayer, are funding is the welfare state. The welfare state exists to allow lazy people who don’t feel like working to live off you without going to the trouble of begging you for your money. The welfare state pays single mothers to squat out feral kids by multiple men without having to hold down a husband to pay for it all. The welfare state means the government is substitute Daddy for these women and their bastard offspring.

One fifth of US households now claim food stamps. That’s 47 million Americans, living in the richest and most successful society that has ever existed, where food is cheap and plentiful beyond the wildest dreams of people living 100 years ago, who are supposedly so pathetic and helpless that they need the government to feed them, as if they were children.

Our universities have become a bizarre combination of daycare facility, pick-up joint, and grotesque circus of left-wing drama. Universities are no longer places for serious thinkers to hone their minds. They’re places where braying young idiots go to learn to parrot feminist and Marxist slogans before reality punches them in the face with the realisation that their joke degrees are worthless.

gammamale2

The days have gone down in the West. Behind the hills, into shadow.

How did it come to this?


The state of modern society is a disaster for many fathers. But of all the self-inflicted wounds perpetrated on Western civilisation, votes for women was the most easily avoidable. It must have seemed like a good idea at the time, in 1918 and 1920, when Britain stood at her peak and the United States looked to the century ahead with supreme confidence. But women are not like men. They don’t think in the same way. They don’t understand or value freedom the way men do. Women have a herd mentality. Rugged individualism, healthy masculine debate, and raucous male laughter offend their sensibilities.

As soon as American women were allowed to vote, alcohol was banned in the United States. The temperance movement had been a female dominated nuisance for decades, but now hopelessly misguided female busybodies had electoral power. It was a farce that turned a nation into lawbreakers and birthed organised crime on a massive scale.

Slowly but inexorably, the United Kingdom and the United States, and other societies that allowed women to vote, began to tilt leftward. Welfare states were created, largely because women feel that it’s not “fair” to allow people to succeed or fail on their own merits. And it’s not “fair” that a woman should have to rely on the father of her children to support her, when she can make men in general pay for her upkeep through the tax and welfare systems.

Government, which had once been small and limited, began to spread its tentacles like a rape-beast from the sickest Japanese anime porn until it penetrated the lives of every citizen. Taxes started to rise in order to pay for all these new entitlements and programmes, and an entire caste of useless bureaucrats emerged to run them. Family and divorce law gradually warped into the anti-male Kafkaesque nightmare it is today because of politicians chasing female votes.

As with most female demands, capitulating to women’s suffragists didn’t satisfy them. Not content with invading the traditionally male space of political affairs, women started insinuating themselves into every other masculine sphere. The universities admitted them, which is why male students today find themselves harangued about imaginary “rape culture”. They swarmed into the workplace, which is why working men today find themselves terrified of sexual harassment or discrimination accusations from spiteful female co-workers. Even the military became feminised and sensitised, with deleterious consequences for the fighting man.

suffragewants

The modern religion of the West—political correctness—is every feminine vice writ large: bossy, deceitful, petty, and false. Almost everything that is wrong with modern life can be traced to the decline of masculine virtues and their replacement with feminine vices. For civilisation itself is the triumph of masculine energy, vision, and courage.

For the sake of our civilisation, for the sake of all men and women, we must undo this historic wrong turn. Women have no business voting in elections for public office, let them stick to voting for things they understand, like the X-Factor. This may seem like a quixotic idea. But remember—so was women’s suffrage, once.

Read More: Liberals Are Not The Enemy…But Liberalism Is


Posted on Thu, 15 May 2014 12:00:09 +0000 at http://www.returnofkings.com/34330/women...ed-to-vote
Comments: http://www.returnofkings.com/34330/women...e#comments
05-15-2014 07:15 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Return Of Kings's post:
Onto, durangotang, DJ-Matt
EisenBarde Offline
Wingman
***

Posts: 686
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 3
Post: #2
RE: Women Should Not Be Allowed To Vote
There's a major difference between reeling back the nonsensical damage modern culture has done to society and Sharia law.

I can't get behind this.

To learn who rules over you, notice who you cannot criticize.
05-15-2014 09:25 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
theking Offline
Game Denialist

Posts: 47
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 0
Post: #3
RE: Women Should Not Be Allowed To Vote
Much of this 'red pill' stuff has been taken way to far. Alarmist stuff like this is in my opinion the same as the the nonsense spouted by feminists -- from people who state they are the opposite of these feminists...
05-15-2014 10:42 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like theking's post:
soup, L M McCoy
Dusty Offline
International Playboy
******
Gold Member

Posts: 4,691
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 56
Post: #4
RE: Women Should Not Be Allowed To Vote
Popcorn3

“Take care of those titties for me.”
05-15-2014 10:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Onto Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,841
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 68
Post: #5
RE: Women Should Not Be Allowed To Vote
(05-15-2014 09:25 AM)EisenBarde Wrote:  There's a major difference between reeling back the nonsensical damage modern culture has done to society and Sharia law.

I can't get behind this.

Isn't that exaggerating a bit?

It seems pretty clear to me that giving women the right to vote gave them more power, and now the feminine has take over the country.

Sure the President has never been a woman, but he serves the feminine agenda, and there will be a woman there soon enough.

Women won't be satisfied until they are completely in power and men are their servants. It starts out as, "oh we just want the right to vote", then progresses to, "Why aren't there more women on the board?" As if the primary qualification should be the applicant has a pair of tits.

There are some people on this forum that are still "asleep" and don't see what's happened and what's going on.

Remember those Sci-Fi stories where the adventures stumble upon a civilization where women rule and men are their slaves.

That's the feminist end-game. It amazes me how blind this country is to it. They are truly plugged into the Matrix
(This post was last modified: 05-15-2014 11:50 AM by Onto.)
05-15-2014 11:43 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
iknowexactly Offline
International Playboy
******
Gold Member

Posts: 5,149
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 101
Post: #6
RE: Women Should Not Be Allowed To Vote
Rather than making vague, general claims like "the government serves the feminist agenda" or "the feminine has taken over the country"; this would be a lot more interesting and possibly effective for policy purposes if the writers wrote like a reporter and dug (tiresome fact reporting) , and found real horror stories-- like the workman patient I heard of in a clinic where I worked--in a very rural "company town". I'm not a reporter, so I don't have the exact monetary details that would really make this a professional article, but it's something like what's needed:

The patient was in a union, but that didn't mean much in a town where many supply their own meat via deer hunting--they can't afford it any other way.

When he was out of work, he went to court to get his child support adjusted, and gave them the documentation, but the clerk (NOT an accountant or qualified finance professional I'm sure) simply stated something like "Oh, you're in a union , you should make more than that. "

Then they calculated the child support based on the imaginary figure they dreamed he was making, and he was pretty fucked.

When I met him, he was HOPING to get a minimum wage job so he could document 40 hours of making little money, and he hoped they might be forced to use this to calculate his debts.

"Feminist agenda, counter-revolutionary, liberal, conservative" are all abstract weasel words people can interpret to mean anything. I am sure many people have been executed based on being called "counter-revolutionary"; I personally wouldn't want anyone tried for furthering a "feminist agenda" or being "conservative" or "liberal".

When you state specific, verifiable or disprovable events like what percentage of the time women get custody-- and therefore money transfer from men-- then you have a basis for real political discussion and change.

Maybe we can start a fund or subscription service to hire a pro reporter--yes, with a degree in journalism--that's a "useless" degree where people are begging for jobs right? And have him investigate, say, the frivorce/child support system....

I'd subscribe for a very small amount...$5 per month...hire the guy 2 days a week...

then publish article that could have more mainstream creed...Roosh could take his franchise to the next level..

I could be wrong, Rush Lmbaugh makes/made a reported 10 million a year.. he's not really very objective


Now gone from desert of Canada and happily married in Brazil! :-)
(This post was last modified: 05-15-2014 02:01 PM by iknowexactly.)
05-15-2014 01:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like iknowexactly's post:
Onto, Handsome Creepy Eel
It_is_my_time Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 1,660
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation: 25
Post: #7
RE: Women Should Not Be Allowed To Vote
(05-15-2014 01:46 PM)iknowexactly Wrote:  Rather than making vague, general claims like "the government serves the feminist agenda" or "the feminine has taken over the country"; this would be a lot more interesting and possibly effective for policy purposes if the writers wrote like a reporter and dug (tiresome fact reporting) , and found real horror stories-- like the workman patient I heard of in a clinic where I worked--in a very rural "company town". I'm not a reporter, so I don't have the exact monetary details that would really make this a professional article, but it's something like what's needed:

The patient was in a union, but that didn't mean much in a town where many supply their own meat via deer hunting--they can't afford it any other way.

When he was out of work, he went to court to get his child support adjusted, and gave them the documentation, but the clerk (NOT an accountant or qualified finance professional I'm sure) simply stated something like "Oh, you're in a union , you should make more than that. "

Then they calculated the child support based on the imaginary figure they dreamed he was making, and he was pretty fucked.

When I met him, he was HOPING to get a minimum wage job so he could document 40 hours of making little money, and he hoped they might be forced to use this to calculate his debts.

"Feminist agenda, counter-revolutionary, liberal, conservative" are all abstract weasel words people can interpret to mean anything. I am sure many people have been executed based on being called "counter-revolutionary"; I personally wouldn't want anyone tried for furthering a "feminist agenda" or being "conservative" or "liberal".

When you state specific, verifiable or disprovable events like what percentage of the time women get custody-- and therefore money transfer from men-- then you have a basis for real political discussion and change.

This one can be one upped....

This used to be the law in many states, and I am sure it probably still is...

In the USA you can be in the "reserve forces". This means you go to basic training in the military and then serve out your term (number of years you are obliged to serve). After this is done you can choose to completely leave the military, re-enlist so you are under a new contract for a number of years, or go in the reserves.

The reserves get paid a small amount to be "on the bench" so to say. They are there in case of emergency. Already trained and ready to go, they get paid to basically be the back-ups. Then like one weekend a month and two weeks a year they go do training drills to stay on top of their game.

After 9/11 when war broke out, there were some men who made a good income in the reserves and they were immediately called up for active duty due to the war effort in Afghanistan and soon Iraq. When this happens they had to leave they high paying jobs to go fight for their country. In doing so, they took a large pay decrease.

For those men in this situation, if they were paying child support, it would be difficult and time consuming to get through the court system to get their child support reduced. So there were men who were called up to active duty, shipped overseas, put their lives on the line, and the second they landed back on US soil they were arrested for failure to pay their child support. Their reservist pay was not even enough to cover their child support payments.
05-15-2014 02:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes It_is_my_time's post:
Onto
DJ-Matt Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,817
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 13
Post: #8
RE: Women Should Not Be Allowed To Vote
He's right, all the socialist policies started getting enacted right after they got the vote. I'd be fine with just land owning taxpayers though, because that'd cut out of a lot of women also.

As the French might say "No, I fucking cannot" - Ari Gold
Feminists are just ugly underachievers who need an excuse for their failures.
Somewhere near Kansas City.
05-16-2014 03:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
soup Offline
Innovative Casanova
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 10,999
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation: 115
Post: #9
RE: Women Should Not Be Allowed To Vote
Seems like a bit too much of an oversimplification to essentoislly blame the fall of Britain's power on feminism..

This kind of cartoonish take on things doesn't really make the whole redpill movement look good.

Go out of your comfort zone to open girls that intimidate you.
(This post was last modified: 05-16-2014 06:21 PM by soup.)
05-16-2014 06:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes soup's post:
LeBeau
LeBeau Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,635
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation: 36
Post: #10
RE: Women Should Not Be Allowed To Vote
^ Agreed. The more people overreach in their claims, or try to re-write history to fit their own viewpoints, the less credibility there is when we bring up relevant and actual issues.
05-16-2014 06:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
spalex Offline
Wingman
***

Posts: 604
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 8
Post: #11
RE: Women Should Not Be Allowed To Vote
Women aren't allowed to vote. They never have been.

If you have a wife, you get an extra vote.
If you have a girlfriend, You get an extra vote.
If you have a dumb a dumb sister, you get an extra vote.
You can bribe any fat girl with a cup cake to vote the way you want.

The less fucks you give, the more fucks you get.
05-19-2014 06:30 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Wadsworth Offline
Chubby Chaser
**

Posts: 597
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 8
Post: #12
RE: Women Should Not Be Allowed To Vote
I'm increasingly inclined to agree with this, although not entirely for the reasons provided by OP. If women aren't held equally responsible in the case of social collapse, then their opinions should not hold equal weight in terms of what direction we push society in. If you have no skin in the game, it's too easy to offer your pet theories on what ought to be.

I think you should have to pay a minimum amount of taxes before you qualify to vote, and further I think you should be liable to defend society if the need arises.

I remember reading a number of op eds from a number of hypocritical feminist women back in 2001 following 9/11. They all wanted America's men to stand up and defend her women and children etc. etc. I remember wondering what happened to equality. No individual should have the power to compel others into a situation (for example combat) that they themselves will be held exempt from.

If this is something women can't comprehend, then they are certainly not qualified to talk about fairness, much less equality.
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2014 02:47 PM by Wadsworth.)
05-19-2014 02:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Kizman Offline
Beta Orbiter
*

Posts: 135
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 1
Post: #13
RE: Women Should Not Be Allowed To Vote
I personally don't have a problem with females voting, it's just that a majority of them vote based off emotion and whatever is trending, rather than factual evidence or logic.
05-19-2014 09:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Truth Teller Offline
Alpha Male
****

Posts: 1,386
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 12
Post: #14
RE: Women Should Not Be Allowed To Vote
(05-19-2014 09:31 PM)Kizman Wrote:  I personally don't have a problem with females voting, it's just that a majority of them vote based off emotion and whatever is trending, rather than factual evidence or logic.

Most people don't vote based on factual evidence or logic. I hate both political parties, but the fact is that the Democrats appeal to people's minds with "social issues," most of which don't pose any existential threat to the United States. The Republicans talk about things like the debt, economy, sustainability of government spending, etc.

Just look at the 2012 election. Obama campaigned on social issues. Romney campaigned on actual issues. Obama won.
05-19-2014 10:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  How To Register To Vote For Donald Trump Return Of Kings 0 1,034 08-24-2016 11:15 AM
Last Post: Return Of Kings
  Today Is The Brexit Vote—Did The Global Elite Fumble By Allowing It? Return Of Kings 1 512 06-23-2016 07:36 AM
Last Post: scrambled
  Brexit Vote: Why Britain Should Leave The European Union Return Of Kings 1 1,618 06-02-2016 05:07 AM
Last Post: 262

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication