全 28 件のコメント

[–]libertarienQCQuébec | Democracy is incompatible with freedom 11ポイント12ポイント  (2子コメント)

He's gross and cringe, he reminds me of every gay kid I was in school with...treating life a stage show where he's the star. I doubt he even believes what he's saying tbh, he just likes being contrarian and bitchy.

[–]-hbd[S] 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

pretty much.

[–]libertarienQCQuébec | Democracy is incompatible with freedom 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

You can tell when he talks about feminism. I'm an anti-feminist and there are plenty of rational arguments and discussion topics in regards to the topic but he just goes on about nothing. It's not about feminism or anti-feminism for him it's about being a catty bitch.

[–]diversity_is_racism 11ポイント12ポイント  (5子コメント)

He is a performer, a public figure, and a celebrity bringing attention to an excellent cause.

We are not Leftists. We do not demand everyone agree with the dogma or be destroyed. There are many roles in which we can help bring about meaningful change.

As far as Milo goes, I think he's talented and hilarious. I also think there are a number of people who are homosexual who are doing good work for the alternative right, so it makes sense (to me) to focus on the bigger issues instead.

[–]angrifff 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

I don't know. I used to view him as a helpful tool in red pilling people about at least some topics, but now I'm starting to think that he is trying to shape the Alt Right into what he'd prefer it to be (basically "Cultural Libertarianism").

Between his article where he claimed the 1488 stuff was all a big joke and people trying to be intentionally offensive for the lulz, his DR3 arguments, and something I heard him say on an interview the other day I'm really quite suspicious now. He basically said something like "you can tell the real racists because they actually bring out numbers and data to talk about some races being more intelligent", so he's not only playing down 1488 and "antisemitism" now but also playing down the race realism part of the movement.

When a big name like that paints a movement in an inaccurate light, it brings people who are going to start using it to identify themselves who aren't really in line with the movement at all. He's basically promoting entryism at this point.

[–]diversity_is_racism 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

now I'm starting to think that he is trying to shape the Alt Right into what he'd prefer it to be (basically "Cultural Libertarianism")

People hide behind this because it is a good neutral position. "If we went libertarian, people could live with others like them," which is essentially what Jared Taylor (<3) said about ending anti-discrimination law. As Plato notes, this is one stage in people attempting to resist tyranny. A better solution is to take the bull by the horns... and I am not debating you on that point.

[–]libertarienQCQuébec | Democracy is incompatible with freedom 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Cultural Libertarianism

That's Lauren Southern's term, it's a nice concept but the situation is a bit dire for that

[–]winter-sleep 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

If Milo isn't explicitly right-wing he can fuck off out into his own "movement"

[–]diversity_is_racism 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

He is explicitly right-wing. He introduces it as a variety of libertarianism, but then goes farther.

[–]Iamjacksblackpill 1ポイント2ポイント  (6子コメント)

I'll go ask Commander Pepe to make sure everyone knows Milo isn't one of us, I mean he said he isn't and we always say he isn't but the left wing media said he was so we better disown him.

Stop being stupid. Your race is about to go extinct and you're pissing and whining about some retard being labeled a political term that even the people who identify with it can define. It's shit like this that got us into the mess we're in. You're so busy playing the PR cuck that you're more worried about a degenerate helping you than you are your enemies slaughtering you in your sleep.

[–]winter-sleep 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Embracing Milo is "muh PR". Disowning him is the exact opposite.

[–]-hbd[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (4子コメント)

all i am saying is that he is not one of us. i am sorry that such a notion seems to upset you so much.

[–]Iamjacksblackpill 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

What you're doing is losing the argument. You said you want to discuss racial issues, the left says "That gay man is one of you!" and then you waste your time arguing if Milo is one of us or not and never get to discuss the racial issue.

Do you understand now? You're taking liberal media bait. If they make you waste time on fighting their lies about Milo you burn time and energy on nothing.

[–]Grulug 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

He should still be disowned.

[–]libertarienQCQuébec | Democracy is incompatible with freedom 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

He's not discussing racial issues though he's discussing black dick.

[–]-hbd[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

speech is not a zero-sum game.

[–]PYMTS 0ポイント1ポイント  (5子コメント)

So it's true what they say the alt-right movement is? Rolling Stone wasn't off base?

[–]CAPS_4_FUN 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

The more we talk about him, the more he gets associated with us.... just stop mentioning him so much. And I would disagree a little. SJWs represent the far-left. The more people are turned off by the SJWs, the more are turned off by the left as a whole. Once they see the inherent flaws of the left that the left is either ignoring or purposely trying to hide it, there is no going back. That's when they come to us. So I think we need as many of these public "anti-sjw" personalities as possible, because that acts as a "bridge" towards our ideologies.

[–]FashWave30 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm down. Hes a faggot race mixing kike and he has zero place among us.

[–]OhMyGodTheDailyMail 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

I can sort of understand why people defend him, which seems to be a reaction against the people like you who give an impression that a homosexual can't be an ally to our movement even if they're a perfect orator for the principle ideas and rebust at defending them from attack. However Milo in particular knows nothing about the alt right, and instead misrepresents it as a group of mischevous provocateurs dedicated chiefly to winding up would-be censors on college campuses who abide by a culture of "safe spaces and microaggressions", while downplaying the nationalist element to the point where viewers could be forgiven for thinking Ben Shapiro was alt-right.

Returning to the point where homosexuals with political convictions can actually be useful, I refer here and here

[–]angrifff 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

However Milo in particular knows nothing about the alt right

I don't think this is true at all. I don't think he is ignorant. He is disingenuous.

[–]InGodWeTrust1776Identitarian Monarcho-Capitalist 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

(((Milo Yiannopoulos)))