上位 200 件のコメント表示する 500

[–]reganomics 217ポイント218ポイント  (80子コメント)

i have always been fascinated with the concept of burqas. its like men telling women, "we are unable to control our own actions and treat you like a human being, so you must cover up so that i dont become tempted and rape you".

[–]Helplessromantic 158ポイント159ポイント  (22子コメント)

The women say its empowering, that they don't have to be sexualized

I dont think they understand that women in western cultures can wear a sweater without getting stoned to death

[–]VladTheRemover 69ポイント70ポイント  (0子コメント)

The burqa/hijab/niqab are empowering for Muslim women the same way a space suit is empowering for an astronaut.

You get to go outside without being killed.

[–]BeatMastaD 84ポイント85ポイント  (4子コメント)

But many muslim women believe that women who wear sweaters should be stoned to death.

[–]Mothu [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

It's easy for something oppressive to seem empowering when you're convinced from childhood that doing it shows support for what you believe in. If a woman is taught that taking slaps to the face from her spouse makes her a good wife she'll probably view anyone woman who doesn't as unfaithful and diluted.

[–]Zusuf 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

Another tangental point that I believe is an issue is misunderstanding about what the burqa actually is. From my experience talking to people they all think that the normal headscarf (a.k.a. hijab) is a burqa/niqab, and want that banned too.

Generally speaking, the burqa is not a required piece of clothing for women, so if it were banned it'd be a shame, but wouldn't make someone practising their faith impossible. It really stems from the requirement that both men and women act and dress modestly and decent while in public.[1]

[1]: remnants of Islamic "Sunday school" teachings.

[–]fuzzeenavel [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Same thing with women's suffrage. Tons of women were against it because they were so brainwashed that women can't think for themselves.

[–]Z0idberg_MD 50ポイント51ポイント  (36子コメント)

And i am equally fascinated with groups of western men telling women what they can NOT wear. I dislike religious modesty garments, but I also dislike us forcing the decision on anyone.

As a redditor said: if it's wrong to force them to wear it, it's wrong to force them not to.

[–]reganomics 33ポイント34ポイント  (10子コメント)

its an interesting problem since it was an oppressive regime that has foisted the dresscode in the first place. now that some have taken it and embraced it as part of their culture, it's seen as oppressive to tell them to take it off. no matter what, the women of this particular culture lose. i feel bad for the refugees and the cultures that have to take them in as both are in precarious situations. do countries and the governmental bodies have a right to make their citizens assimilate with the culture regardless of how those people entered the country? idk, its an interesting conundrum

[–]RedditCensorshipBad 26ポイント27ポイント  (2子コメント)

Stupid beliefs need to be challenged. People can be respected while their ideas are held under scrutiny.

[–]Just_A_Dogsbody [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

No, governments must not force assimilation. But they can't create or tolerate refugee ghettos that make assimilation very difficult, either.

I agree, it's a situation that finds us Westerners drilling down into our core beliefs to decide what path to take. Interesting, indeed.

[–]Automaticus [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

No, governments must not force assimilation. But they can't create or tolerate refugee ghettos that make assimilation very difficult, either. I agree, it's a situation that finds us Westerners drilling down into our core beliefs to decide what path to take. Interesting, indeed.

No they do.

Are you going to have your government force people to stop child marriage? if not you're dumb and gay.

Forced assimilation has its place.

[–]DeepDuh 37ポイント38ポイント  (6子コメント)

That's all fine in general, but if you can't show your face in public you invoke a certain cost to society. In a democracy it's the right of the majority to decide what's over the line - the courts and constitution are there to protect minorities. If burqas aren't protected in the constitution then the Muslim minority has to accept what the non-muslim majority sets up as the ground rules. Since burqas are AFAIK not required in the Quran, a ban is legitimate.

[–]Tiger-Billionaire 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Since burqas are AFAIK not required in the Quran

Just because something is not explicitly part of the main text of a religion does not mean it is not an aspect of that religion.

[–]ToValhalla 11ポイント12ポイント  (1子コメント)

When you visit certain countries you need to cover up. When you come to germany you need to uncover or get out.

[–]Inaspectuss 12ポイント13ポイント  (6子コメント)

It's far more than people just not liking the message and meaning of them, they are a legitimate security threat. There is no way of telling what is under there.

[–]anupsetzombie 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

The thing is, is the core reason of why they have to wear them is blatantly misogynistic (and I never use that word). Muslim men force women to wear it so they can't be tempted to rape them, also because they deem women distracting/indecent if they don't cover up completely.

It's completey hypocritical to wear one claiming it's liberating for you.

I understand your points on how it's ironic telling them what to wear, but it's like a Jewish person wearing a Swastika. It makes no sense.

[–]Princess_Princess_Pr 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Same thing happens in the "west" when women are blamed for their own rape by being told that they shouldn't have been wearing short skirts or whatever.

[–]SentienceFragment 9ポイント10ポイント  (6子コメント)

It sounds crazy, but then the question is why can men walk around shirtless in the US but women can't? The standard answer is that it's "disruptive".

It's obviously orders of magnitude more extreme in a lot of these other countries, but the 'logic' is strikingly similar to that in the US.

[–]zarfytezz1 12ポイント13ポイント  (3子コメント)

I don't think that's sound logic either. It's impossible to prove that a naked woman is causing concrete, provable harm to a discernible party, and as such should absolutely not be illegal.

[–]Lysergicide 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Where I live women can walk around topless in public, it has yet to cause a riot.

[–]tharbespeed 11ポイント12ポイント  (6子コメント)

Certain evangelical Christians say similar things ie. dress modestly so you don't distract men/ get raped.

[–]mmaBorat 1091ポイント1092ポイント  (291子コメント)

Burqa is the one that makes it impossible to identify the person inside, isn't it?

Totally reasonable to ban masks in general, for security reasons.

[–]totallyRebb 412ポイント413ポイント  (58子コメント)

Agreed. A Burqa is basically a full body cover. Can you tell who's under it ? Can you tell if its a woman ? Can you tell what they might be concealing ?

[–]mmaBorat 316ポイント317ポイント  (29子コメント)

What if it's a ninja?

[–]RinionArato 203ポイント204ポイント  (14子コメント)

Then you wouldn't see them at all, or else its a pretty shit ninja and they should probably have the ceremonial ninja garb confiscated anyhow.

[–]ian356094 74ポイント75ポイント  (8子コメント)

Real life ninjas were seen all the time. They wore disguises like agent 47 to blend in.

Much better being caught in an area dressed as a lowly ignorant servant than dressed in ninja garbs.

[–]Saitoh17 36ポイント37ポイント  (1子コメント)

Feudal Japan was pretty much an ideal society to pull this off. The upper castes were such elitist fuckwads they would pretend not to notice commoners. It's a lot easier to hide in plain sight when the people you're hiding from are actively trying NOT to see you.

The same philosophy created the stereotypical all black ninja outfit. In traditional operas/stage plays the stagehands would wear all black so they would blend into the black background. They're still hardly invisible so everyone pretends not to notice them. This made it very surprising when someone who's only on stage because special effects weren't as advanced as they are now suddenly pulls out a sword and murders the lead actor.

[–]totallyRebb 13ポイント14ポイント  (2子コメント)

Are you saying Michael Dudikoff has lied to me all this time ? :(

[–]Secret_Is_Based_Oppa 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

Two midgets in a trench coat?

[–]Questale 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

It might be 3 cats standing on each others shoulders! The burqa is part of the cats' plan to take over the world!

[–]Joyoflogic 59ポイント60ポイント  (14子コメント)

germany has had a ban on mummery since 1985, and it had nothing to do with muslims, but it only applies on the way to, at, or on the way from any type of any type of gathering.

(as in, a legal or illegal protest and the likes)

[–]ChillAuto 35ポイント36ポイント  (8子コメント)

Never heard it referred to as "mummery" before. I like that.

[–]AnusHoldus 26ポイント27ポイント  (5子コメント)

It feels like I'm reading A Song of Ice and Fire again.

[–]Tsegen 18ポイント19ポイント  (2子コメント)

The North Germany Remembers, and this mummer's farce is nearly over.

[–]carrotman424 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

This is a potentially scary phrase.

[–]TheDonDelC 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Did somebody say North German Confederation?

[–]sirsotoxo 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Be aware of the mummer's farce

[–]siyanoz 16ポイント17ポイント  (2子コメント)

or on the way from

That is false. Furthermore, do not forget you have to prove a person is on the way to an assembly.

any type of any type of gathering

Only what is considered a public assembly and there are various exemptions, e.g., this law doesn't apply to pilgrimages, conventional public fairs.
Thus, for instance, since the law also covers bearing of defensive arms you should be able to carry pepper spray and obviously veil yourself at a carnival parade, though, there are other laws that may apply.

Regarding the racist fear mongering about the almost nonexistent burqas, a complete ban wouldn't pass the German constitutional court. In contrast to France the German court demands reasonable and vital purpose when issuing exceptions to basic laws.
That is the reason the recent partial ban in public institutions was agreed on by the conservatives.

[–]Killmelast 15ポイント16ポイント  (5子コメント)

I'm surprised the Burqa is legal in Germany in the first place. We actually have a law prohibiting you from covering your face ("Vermummungsgesetz"), due to potentially hiding your identity (applies only to gatherings - but technically more than 3 people are a gathering already...if someone wanted to take things this literal). If you group up with a bunch of people wearing scarfs over their mouths on a cold winter day it can technically be considered an illegal action - so from a pure logical point of view, considering existing laws, wearing a Burqa should already be illegal, at least for groups of people.

I personally don't care one bit what someone else want's to wear, I'm not really against it - but I do see it as problematic from a practical point. Hell, you'd basically have to have fingerprint readers at every public place, like schools etc., to verify that there isn't someone else underneath that thing who is e.g. writing an exam.

[–]-The_Blazer- 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

There are already laws against anything that covers the face in a few countries. It's just a matter of applying them.

[–]oogachucka 46ポイント47ポイント  (15子コメント)

Exactly. You walk into a bank with a mask on and you're going to get tackled and arrested so why is it OK for stupid religious reasons. You wanna wear the whole penguin getup that's fine, but you need to leave your face showing

[–]ScienceBlessYou [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You wanna wear the whole penguin getup that's fine, but you need to go to a country accepting of this wear, don't force us to accept it. Your country wouldn't even consider one miniscule change for us.

FTFY

[–]Z0idberg_MD 7ポイント8ポイント  (4子コメント)

You can ban head coverings in certain buildings. You don't ban them everywhere.

[–]CaliforniaShmopper [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Why not? Chicago has had a city ordinance since 1922 banning masks that hide a person's identity. From some cursory research, it sounds like it was originally used to combat the KKK.

Preventing people from completely hiding their identity in public seems like a reasonable thing to me. If you don't want to show your face, don't go out in public.

[–]MBncsa 33ポイント34ポイント  (2子コメント)

I don't see how. None of the recent terrorists were previously known by the police and their faces were visible while they killed with guns, trucks and axes. It is sad to see these rather lame attempts to defend a ban gain in popularity all over central Europe, but 'for security sadly suffices today to take away so many freedoms, from religious expression to privacy. Even more so,it feels like spite is the real motivation here: take something from 'them', the Muslims, who are all terrorists, right. I don't see which security threat is reduced thereby. Even worse, you show the European Muslim that an essential part of his cultural/religious identity is not welcomed. Doesn't this play into the hands of those who preach hate and anger? No death will be prevented by banning cloths.

[–]alphabits555 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

So much for my Spider-man costume this Halloween...

[–]aydiosmio 4ポイント5ポイント  (4子コメント)

Yeah but, why though? Why would you ban masks? What are these "security reasons"? Asking for my friend Mr. Orwell.

[–]moushoo 8ポイント9ポイント  (3子コメント)

Do you know everyone you walk across on the street?

[–]RedditCensorshipBad 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

No! I guess we no longer need face identification. That's a thing of the past, since nobody knows anyone!

[–]IgotAnEvilNut 195ポイント196ポイント  (35子コメント)

Mandatory leiderhosen for all!

[–]Masculine_McManlyman 162ポイント163ポイント  (10子コメント)

Lederhosen: leather pants

Leiderhosen: pants of pain and or misfortune

[–]flapjacksamson 66ポイント67ポイント  (2子コメント)

Liederhosen: singing pants

[–]hippydipster 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Lieberhosen: pants of luuuuv!

[–]IpecacNeat 28ポイント29ポイント  (3子コメント)

Depending on who is wearing them, sometimes leather pants can also be pants of pain and or misfortune. If that's your thing.

[–]Living_like_a_ 40ポイント41ポイント  (17子コメント)

In the great state of Bavaria, alles klar.

[–]eXXaXion 13ポイント14ポイント  (2子コメント)

You said leiderhosen, which basically means unfortunatelypants. You meant to say Lederhosen, leatherpants.

[–]meandmetwo 24ポイント25ポイント  (0子コメント)

I am sure that if men started wearing them and gangs started using them as cover they would soon be banned. I find it crazy when a person can hide behind a mask in public all the time, As a victim of theft by a group of muslim women i will always be wary around anyone wearing something that completely covers any way to identify them.

[–]Oznog99 54ポイント55ポイント  (1子コメント)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/10438195/The-runaway-terrorist-his-burka-disguise-and-a-compensation-bid.html

Terror suspect cut off his ankle monitor, put on a burqa, and left using his sister's passport. Effectively defeating all border controls, and even basic policing. If there was a policeman standing guard outside his building and was alerted immediately when his anklet was cut off, he probably couldn't stop someone in a burqa just on that theory. If you didn't see any problem stopping anyone in a burqa, it would probably be an unrelated female you stopped and he'd just walk by that scene.

Of course in the real world you'd not likely be alerted to the immediate problem while only tens of feet away. You'd potentially have to stop and somehow identify everyone in the city in a burqa, which simply wouldn't happen and probably wouldn't work anyhow.

Doesn't need to be a terror suspect, for that matter. Everyday criminal, male or female, can commit crimes or just avoid tracking/arrest almost indefinitely. People who wear the totally concealing versions of hijab of sincere belief aren't the bad actors, but they create an environment where the bad actors are free to operate with impunity.

[–]philosphrstone 23ポイント24ポイント  (2子コメント)

What a surprise... another western country is tired of being invaded by people who will remain segregated in the cities and cling to their shitty medieval religion. News flash... the people of every western nation are tired of this trend. Here in Canada, we swear in new citizens with their face covered, and also let people vote with a ski mask on. http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2015/10/16/gail-thorne-niqab-ban_n_8288298.html

[–]tallandlanky 600ポイント601ポイント  (610子コメント)

If that is what the German people want, good. Immigrants should assimilate, not the other way around.

[–]DarthVantos 308ポイント309ポイント  (207子コメント)

Burqa's only worn by immigrants? I keep seeing this get echoed "do what the majority want you to do". If you don't then leave. The majority of people in my country are religious, but I am a athiest. Should i just assimilate and bow my head to a god i don't believe in?

Is that not why we were given freedoms, to do what we want so long as it doesn't hurt others?

[–]universaljoint 170ポイント171ポイント  (13子コメント)

As a pastor, some of my fondest memories are drinking beer with people while exploring big mysteries, grand stories, and ethical questions. I've sat at quite a few tables with people like you, and I have always been impressed by how many unique ways there are to be a decent human being. Peace.

[–]PapaLove77 36ポイント37ポイント  (9子コメント)

As a non-religious person ....More pple like you please. Thats a really +ve attitude. Have a nice day.

[–]random_side_note 66ポイント67ポイント  (5子コメント)

Just curious, but writing out "positive" was just too much, or...?

[–]universaljoint 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thank you for your kind words. I do my best with the little tribe of elderly folks I see on Sundays and am always delighted to be in the thick of things with the amazing leaders in our community at large. We have different stories that motivate our collaboration and different explanations of why we do what we do, but most of the time we have a lot more in common than not. Great gifts are missed wherever we refuse to imagine that the "other" has a story that is worth hearing and a perspective by which our understanding of our own stories might be expanded.

[–]onehundredtwo 61ポイント62ポイント  (32子コメント)

Are you allowed to walk around wearing Nazi uniforms in Germany? No? Can you walk around nude? No? So there's some sort of codified dress here already? And banning some oppressive misogynist covering is too much?

[–]AppleJoey 19ポイント20ポイント  (1子コメント)

Actually, you can legally walk around naked, but as soon as someone complains about you, the police can arrest you for public indecency

[–]MetroidMuscle 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

I know I'll be downvoted and harassed for this, but neither Nazism nor nudity are recognized religions.

[–]dentaldeckathalon 41ポイント42ポイント  (22子コメント)

You missed his point. If the core principle justifying the ban is that assimilation is mandatory, then should an atheist in the Arab world relinquish his beliefs to fit with the norm around him? To assimilate?

[–]timescrucial 38ポイント39ポイント  (13子コメント)

Most atheists, in fact, do assimilate and hide their atheism around religious folks. Often times it's out of respect for the venue or people around then. The other times it's just to avoid confrontation.

[–]BeatMastaD 32ポイント33ポイント  (10子コメント)

But should they legally be required to? Should the government, under threat of force, dictate what someone believes?

[–]Hexagonal_Bagel 12ポイント13ポイント  (4子コメント)

What if their belief was that women should also remain uneducated for the sake of preserving their modesty? Would Germany be wrongfully violating their religious rights to say the all children should go to school?

[–]DeepDuh 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

In fact those cases are real, see Swiss cases about Muslim girls who can't join swim classes (mandatory in the Swiss school system).

[–]NoShameMcGee 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you're an immigrant and expect a foreign government to bend over backward to accommodate you, then you don't need to be in that country. It's a two way road. Should the government allow you basic rights, obviously. Should the government cater to your beliefs if it differs from the majority? No. Become apart of the new country, become apart of their culture and maybe they'll adopt and respect yours.

[–]Nebor 32ポイント33ポイント  (15子コメント)

Should i just assimilate and bow my head to a god i don't believe in?

You may as well get used to it if you're going to keep arguing for Islam. Atheism gets you the death penalty in every Islamic state in the world.

[–]tharbespeed 15ポイント16ポイント  (6子コメント)

It's not like we're gonna put the crazy ones in charge. I don't see the mayor of London, who is a Muslim, putting atheists to death.

[–]feelingthis53 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

Assimilation and relinquishing your religious beliefs are not the same thing.

[–]Raestloz 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

What? Assimilation does not mean embracing religion. Where did you see people asking Muslims to convert as your example says? That's stupid

[–]PostYourSinks 1ポイント2ポイント  (6子コメント)

So would you be morally okay with countries in the middle east banning all western clothing if you lived there?

[–]LongWaysFromHome [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Is that a chant slogan yet? Assimilate not accommodate? Can I get the rights to that?

[–]itsonlyastrongbuzz 257ポイント258ポイント  (181子コメント)

Women, regardless of religion, must cover up in some Muslim countries.

What's the difference in saying "You can't cover up" here? Isn't it just respecting the local culture?

Doesn't make sense to have it both ways.

The same person who'd say"Don't be insensitive, cover your head to assimilate into their culture, you're the guest here..." over there says this here: "Don't be insensitive, they can do what they want, they're guests here..."

[–]alien6 176ポイント177ポイント  (15子コメント)

Because Western countries believe in freedom of choice, and that includes choosing whether or not to cover up. Iran and Saudi Arabia do not believe in that. That is the difference.

Let's start by distinguishing between Hijab and Burqa. Hijab covers the head but leaves the face visible, while Burqa covers the face so that no skin can be seen.

Some Muslim women choose to wear hijab as a personal decision, not because they are punished otherwise, but because they feel it helps to affirm their faith. Some sects of Islam require Hijab, and some sects do not.

It is true that women in some countries are legally obligated to wear Hijab. It is also true that some women in western countries are forced to wear it by their families whether they want it or not. By forcing them to wear one thing, or forcing them not to wear one thing, they are denied the freedom to choose either way.

I, personally, do think that a full-body-plus-face burqa raises safety questions because it obscures the wearer's identity, for the same reason most people don't wear balaclavas over their face in public. However, that is my own opinion.

[–]itsonlyastrongbuzz 31ポイント32ポイント  (8子コメント)

Nobody's talking about the Hijab, and I don't think anyone has a problem with it either.

[–]alien6 33ポイント34ポイント  (4子コメント)

That's good, but I know some people do get confused about it so I felt a need to distinguish.

[–]itsonlyastrongbuzz 24ポイント25ポイント  (3子コメント)

And that's totally fair.

Just covering your head is completely fine, but the one where you're covered from head to toe, save for a small lace viewing port?

Come on dude. If I can't even tell if you have eyes, let alone what color, that's a little much.

[–]MAGASAURUS_REX 200ポイント201ポイント  (49子コメント)

Because Muslims are immune to any criticism, and therefore you must bow to their way of life, racist.

[–]pizzaiolo_ 59ポイント60ポイント  (13子コメント)

Because Muslims are immune to any criticism

That's certainly not applicable to Reddit... or Europe... or the US... or anywhere, really.

[–]kyle5432 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

Isn't one of the whole selling point of western society that we don't use what third world countries do to justify our actions. If we allow ourselves to do this under the guise that they would do the same, then we are no better than them.

[–]bijhan 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm Muslim. I'm American. I keep Hijab. And I think it's heinous that anyone anywhere is FORCED to keep Hijab. It's not equal. It's not fair. Each person should be able to act within their conscious regardless of where they are. No country of Muslims has a right to make someone cover themselves for the same reason that no country of secular Westerners has a right to strip anyone.

[–]JaXXXuP 10ポイント11ポイント  (1子コメント)

We really should be ok with saying that Islamic religious practices such as the Burqa aren't allowed. Women are told they need to wear a burqa because if men see them without one, they can't be at fault if they rape them. If western culture allows for such ideology to exist under the guise that they are innocently practicing "religion", we will soon after lose the traits that make free societies possible.

[–]Joben86 22ポイント23ポイント  (1子コメント)

There is no difference. That's the point. They are both oppressive.

[–]Shiroi_Kage 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

So you're taking those countries as your benchmark? Seriously? "They tell women what to wear there and thus we'll tell women what to wear here!"

[–]Miffers 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Walking my 1st grader to school, my son asked me why a lady was dressed like a ninja. I didn't know what to say.

[–]ChucksMuscleGut [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Fuck everything it represents. Hey let's cover up the women from head to toe because we're insecure, tiny dicked zealots. It's not OK to walk around without being able to be identified. It's also not fair to Germans that decided to raise their daughters in a civilized culture that holds men responsible for their actions. If you want the old ways, the old line of thinking, and the old rules, go back to the old fucking country. 21st century humans have no need for such asinine bullshit.

[–]tangohunter8071 15ポイント16ポイント  (0子コメント)

Burqas, hijabs, and other modest body coverings have nothing to do with islam. They're man made rules that Allah never ordered anyone to partake in. Remove the burka free yourselves from that oppressive culture.

[–]exmothrowaway1234 35ポイント36ポイント  (3子コメント)

I grew up in a cult where people are made to feel guilty and ashamed of their bodies, "modesty" is encouraged heavily for women and it contributes to this fear.

Ultimately people should be able to choose how much or how little they want to show, but people need to have certain freedoms from religion. If your religion tells you that you need to cover up from head to toe you are a slave to that religion.

If it weren't for the presence and tolerance of other faiths, I would not have got out (would have clinged even more). But a line needs to be drawn at some point, the burqa is subjugation and is more than just symbolic oppression of women. Wear your headscarfs and whatever, but fuck off back to where you came from if you want to treat your wife or daughter like a piece of property and not a whole person.

[–]all4reddit 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

If adults want to wear the burqa, they should live in a country where it is welcomed.

[–]allzehkittiez 31ポイント32ポイント  (10子コメント)

Good, if you're going to live in another culture you should adapt to the new environment, not force your views on others.

[–]metallicdk 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Those are my thoughts as well, people need to adapt to a country's cultural and social values if they want to live there considering that they are fleeing from their home country.

[–]LAST1butthenmore 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

This one is reasonable. This one doesn't infringe on citizens' rights more than necessary to ensure the safety of all.

[–]Gendoyle 31ポイント32ポイント  (21子コメント)

Who wouldn't want to Burqa ban - it looks uncomfortable and hot... but its not my choice to make.

[–]Abusoru 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

Actually covering up keeps you a lot cooler than you would think. Look at the traditional clothes Arab men wear. It also tends to cover up much of the body.

[–]i_am_average_AMA 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

I've heard it's actually fairly light and comfortable.

[–]Mr_Flappy 54ポイント55ポイント  (44子コメント)

looks like Germans don't take kindly to foreign cultures being pressured on them

[–]PhilKelix 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

Good. Burn this oppressive filth

[–]fluffywinston [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

As a woman who sees this in Canada, it's disturbing, uncomfortable and offensive. But personal feelings aside it's a huge security risk. Unis in Toronto have problems with people wearing burqas get other people to take tests for them.

[–]newloaf 23ポイント24ポイント  (15子コメント)

There is no such thing as forced integration. Making up a bunch of shitty minutiae that Muslims are supposed to follow isn't going to do anything except isolate a sometimes isolated culture further. People have to be enticed and educated to integrate. Arbitrary punishment serves the exact opposite purpose.

[–]dkyguy1995 9ポイント10ポイント  (2子コメント)

Europeans like to make fun of us racist unnaccepting Americans but cant even recognize the obvious similarities between how muslims are treated there vs how Mexicans are treated here.

[–]captionquirk 35ポイント36ポイント  (12子コメント)

Im pretty sure most women that are wearing burqas also want a burqa ban

[–]xsebix 41ポイント42ポイント  (1子コメント)

nah they really totally enjoy being a floating bedsheet

[–]dnm_ta_88 10ポイント11ポイント  (1子コメント)

Sorry but it's not for you to decide what people can and can't wear.

[–]3VP 8ポイント9ポイント  (1子コメント)

Maybe not a ban, but it appears that most Muslim women do not like them because they stop wearing them when they escape the middle east.

[–]jplevene 6ポイント7ポイント  (2子コメント)

Fun fact, the burqa is not religious. It was first used by Jewish women in the Arabian peninsula to help prevent rape. It is not written in the Koran that women should wear one, it is to protect a man's property from other men seeing or sharing it.

I guess swinging is not big in the Islam community.

[–]clickwir 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

America here, no burqa.

[–]dsmith470 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

And I hope they get it!

[–]TheDarkAgniRises 11ポイント12ポイント  (5子コメント)

As a muslim myself, I think that banning the burka=good. But banning the Hijab=Terrible.

[–]TheCommunistInt 7ポイント8ポイント  (13子コメント)

It's been really hot the past couple of days in Europe, at least it has been where I am. Seeing these pictures of women of the beech wearing "burkinis" in the sweltering heat has made me think about just how punishing these things must be to wear. Not just burkinis, but burkas. Full body, face covered, eye slits. Not white and cool and made of cotton, but black and I think made of polyester.

Never mind about how burkas, to some, represent oppression of women. They seem to be deliberately designed to be fucking terrible to wear, especially in hot weather. I mean, think of women wearing this in Riyadh, where it can be over 50 degrees. There is no way on fucking earth that I will believe that a women could possible want to wear a burka unless a severe amount of threat has been used if they don't.

[–]dkyguy1995 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

A lot of full body coverings are actually very cool and designed to keep the sun from beating down too hard, thats why even the men will still wear long pants/sleeves because you dont want the acorching sun hitting you head on.

[–]Tha_Dude_Abidez 7ポイント8ポイント  (2子コメント)

Good for Germany! I hope they get that ban and then I hope the REST of the civilized world follow suit. I think most all of us are completely done with that bullshit religion.

[–]dkyguy1995 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Yeah let's ban a religion, I see no constitutional amendments against it

[–]RedHourMagic [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Germany is also restricting scientology. Not every religion is harmless. Islam certainly isn't.

[–]Hexagonal_Bagel 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Questions:

What if women, in line with choosing to wear the burka, also held a strong conviction for remaining uneducated for the sake of modesty? Even if she believed these were her own decision and there was no coercion, could society at large not still intervene? On a more moderate scale, what if large groups of Muslims refused to speak German and only spoke in Arabic, could other Germans not object to that?

Is Germany better to make limitations on personal freedoms (targeted at a minority population) or to maintain absolute freedom of expression for the sake of appealing to an ideal of liberty?

Can one culture be better than another or are all cultures relative, impervious to comparison? Is it necessarily wrong to limit a culture's influence if it can be reasonably argued that it is in fact detrimental? Will such limitations put us on a slippery slope, lessening the rights of other minorities?

Germany banned Scientology. How is that different from banning any other religion that doesn't have a historical basis in Germany?

My Perspective

I value freedom of religion, but I also see faith as an obviously invalid way of understanding the world and influencing our actions. I believe that some religions are objectively worse than others (the extreme pacifism of Jainism > the divisive in-group/out-group nature of Islam)

All religions need to adapt in order to be compatible with modern societies. This is the difference between moderates and fundamentalists. I would not insult a Christian for believing the idiocy of Noah's ark or thinking shrimp are an abomination or a belief in Creationism if that is not relevant to her specific belief structure. In turn I won't assume a Muslim believes Apostasy is crime and should be punishable by death (though there are 23 Muslim countries that have these laws were punishments range from death to imprisonment and it is a part of the Qur'an). When I see extreme displays of faith, such as the Burka, it is not unreasonable to suggest that those people's views may be more in line with the more intolerable side of their religion. The side of Islam that is authoritarian in nature and in practice is anti-LGBT, anti-pluralist, anti-secularism, anti-women, possibly violent and in a great many ways rejects Western Values.

To what degree should we tolerate the intolerant?

I will accept moderate Islam in my community, despite its many failings, which it shares with all other religions. I despise extremism and don't want it to sew its roots anywhere. The hijab doesn't bother me, but the burka is a clear expression of gendered inequality and oppression. I have love for the people, contempt for their ideology and a belief that we all deserve liberty in our pursuit of happiness.

[–]ImitationsHabit 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

"Americans are so intolerant! I can't believe xenophobes like trump could be a major party candidate! Now how do we force the Muslims out of our country!"

[–]fuccdemfags 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

your country, your rules

they should know that before trying to impose their shit culture in europe

But it's all good. Soon we'll march again.

[–]ITS_MAJOR_TOM_YO [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Society has a right to demand you show your face.

[–]Dixon_Butte [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The world is starting to move in the right direction.