A couple of days ago I posted this collection of studies on TRP. I'm reposting it on this sub because some of you guys might find some stuff interesting. Also, to cut down a little bit on the memes lol. There you go:
I found a huge collection of studies about women's sexuality on 4chan. I kept reading, some I've already read, and most of it was pretty interesting. So I decided to save and post here.
A healthy reminder is that I found this on a 4chan imageboard, so they might be inclined to some bias.
So If you have some criticism or something to add about some of the studies, feel free.
Well... time to take some redpills.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24845881
Following recall of a conflict involving direct aggression and role-playing a reaction to it, compared with men, women reported their anger would dissipate less quickly and they would take longer to reconcile. Women also exhibited increased heart rate, but little change in cortisol, whereas men exhibited little change in heart rate but increased cortisol production. We interpret the results as indicating that women are less prepared than men to resolve a conflict with a same-sex peer.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/05/160509085748.htm
"For their own partners, women focus on an attractive appearance that suggests good health and an ability to pass on their genes. At the same time, they prioritize qualities in their sister's partner that can provide direct benefits for the whole family," say the researchers. "This is consistent with our previous studies where we compared mothers' and daughters' choices," they add.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26098378
Hierarchical linear modeling indicated that wives' total narcissism and entitlement/exploitativeness scores predicted the slope of marital quality over time, including steeper declines in marital satisfaction and steeper increases in marital problems. Husbands' narcissism scores generally had few effects on their own marital quality or that of their wives.
http://pillse.bol.ucla.edu/Publications/Pillsworth&Haselton_ARSR.pdf
This one is an analysis of women's dual sexual strategy across several cultures. There are many interesting observations on this one, I'll leave one of them:
There is abundant evidence that women, as well as men,
desire long-term committed relationships; but there is also an emerging
literature revealing a hidden side of women's desires suggesting that
women have also evolved to pursue short-term or illicit affairs. The purpose
of this article is to review these lines of evidence and other recent
findings pertaining to the evolution of women's sexual strategies
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1617143/
Here, we show that women in the fertile phase of their cycle prefer body odour of males who score high on a questionnaire-based dominance scale (international personality items pool). In accordance with the theory of mixed mating strategies, this preference varies with relationship status, being much stronger in fertile women in stable relationships than in fertile single women.
http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/royptb/367/1589/657.full.pdf
This one is arguing that monogamy developed as a form of social control and stability. Approximately 85% of human societies have allowed MEN to have polygynous marriage, yet Europe adoped monogamy.
Here, we develop and explore the hypothesis
that the norms and institutions that compose the modern package of monogamous marriage have been
favoured by cultural evolution because of their group-beneficial effects—promoting success in
inter-group competition. In suppressing intrasexual competition and reducing the size of the pool of
unmarried men, normative monogamy reduces crime rates, including rape, murder, assault, robbery
and fraud, as well as decreasing personal abuses.
http://www.ibtimes.com/women-less-forgiving-toward-unattractive-men-study-1943420
The study of 170 college-age women revealed that unattractive men earned a “negative double bias” upon violating a social norm.
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/11/the-evolution-of-bitchiness/281657/?utm_source=SFFB
The Evolution of Bitchiness: Women engage in indirect aggression and slut-shaming, even in clinical research studies
In his book, The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating, Buss argues that women do this because, evolutionarily, women who are willing to have casual sex undermine the goals of women who want long-term relationships. "Slutty" women hint to men that it’s okay not to commit because there will always be someone available to give away the milk for free, as it were. Their peers' “derogation” is thus intended to damage the reputation of these free-wheeling females.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/06/150624155436.htm
Being disgusted is a bigger passion killer for women than fear, according to new research.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/4790313.stm
Study shows that once a women 'bonds' or knows she has fully secured her mates commitment she will lose interest in sex.
But women, he said, have evolved to have a high sex drive when they are initially in a relationship in order to form a "pair bond" with their partner.
But, once this bond is sealed a woman's sexual appetite declines, he added.
http://www.psy.unipd.it/~pbressan/papers/BressanStranieri2008.pdf
Because men of higher genetic quality tend to be poorer partners and
parents than men of lower genetic quality, women may profit from securing a stable
investment from the latter, while obtaining good genes via extrapair mating with the
former
In this study, 208 women rated the attractiveness of men
described as single or attached. As predicted, partnered women favored attached men at
the low-fertility phases of the menstrual cycle, but preferred single men (if masculine, i.e.,
advertising good genetic quality) when conception risk was high.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00444.x/abstract
Using nationally representative data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth, I estimate the association between intimate premarital relationships (premarital sex and premarital cohabitation) and subsequent marital dissolution. I extend previous research by considering relationship histories pertaining to both premarital sex and premarital cohabitation. I find that premarital sex or premarital cohabitation that is limited to a woman's husband is not associated with an elevated risk of marital disruption. However, women who have more than one intimate premarital relationship have an increased risk of marital dissolution.
EDIT: Just one more, this is a pretty good one. Especially for Europeans.
http://faculty.washington.edu/hechter/KanazawaPaper.pdf
The evolutionary psychological perspective on wars suggests that the
ultimate cause of all intergroup conflict is the relative availability of
reproductive women. Polygyny, which allows some men to
monopolize all reproductive opportunities and exclude others, should
increase the prevalence of civil wars, but not interstate wars, which did
not exist in the ancestral environment. The analysis of the Correlates
of War data supports both hypotheses derived from the evolutionary
psychological perspective; polygyny increases civil wars but not
interstate wars. The evolutionary psychological perspective implies
that women should be far less resistant to alien rule than men, because
they have the option of marrying into the conquering group; however,
this sex difference should disappear when women are no longer
reproductive. The analysis of the Eurobarometer data from 15
European Union nations strongly confirms this prediction.
EDIT 2: Just one more, from the user /u/SummertimeMelancholy . Some motivation for the next workout.
http://psp.sagepub.com/content/early/2007/06/19/0146167207303022.short
Evolutionary scientists propose that exaggerated secondary sexual characteristics are cues of genes that increase offspring viability or reproductive success. In six studies the hypothesis that muscularity is one such cue is tested. As predicted, women rate muscular men as sexier, more physically dominant and volatile, and less committed to their mates than nonmuscular men.
ここには何もないようです