BERLIN – Europe is under pressure. Integrating asylum-seekers and other migrants – 1.1 million in Germany alone in 2015 – into European society poses a major challenge, one that has been complicated by a spike in crimes committed by new arrivals. Making matters worse, many European Muslims have become radicalized, with some heading to Iraq and Syria to fight under the banner of the so-called Islamic State, and others carrying out terror attacks at home. Add to that the often-incendiary nativist rhetoric of populist political leaders, and the dominant narrative in Europe is increasingly one of growing insecurity.
Many European countries are moving to strengthen internal security. But their approach is incomplete, at best.
Germany and others have introduced new measures, including an increase in police personnel, accelerated deportation of migrants who have committed crimes, and the authority to strip German citizenship from those who join foreign “terror militias.” Other steps include enhanced surveillance of public places and the creation of new units focused on identifying potential terrorists through their Internet activities.
The pressure to reassure the public has driven Belgium, Bulgaria, France, and the Netherlands, as well as the Swiss region of Ticino and the Italian region of Lombardy, to ban the burqa (the full-body covering worn by ultraconservative Muslim women) and other face-covering veils in some or all public places. Several French coastal cities have also banned the burkini, the full-body swimsuit some Muslim women wear to the beach.
Even Germany, whose Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière initially rejected such a ban, has succumbed to pressure from allies of Chancellor Angela Merkel and proposed a ban on face-covering veils in public places where identification is required. Such clothing, the logic goes, is not conducive to integration.
But no internal security measures, much less clothing requirements, can guarantee Europe’s safety. To find a real solution, European leaders must address the ideological roots of the security challenges they face.
The problem is not Islam, as many populists claim (and as the burqa and burkini bans suggest). Muslims have long been part of European society, accounting for about 4% of Europe’s total population in 1990 and 6% in 2010. And previous waves of immigration from Muslim countries have not brought surges in terrorist activity within Europe’s borders. For example, beginning in the 1960s, roughly three million migrants from Turkey settled in Germany to meet the booming economy’s demand for labor, without posing any internal security threat.
Today, that threat results from radical Islamism – a fundamentalist vision of society reordered according to Sharia law. Beyond enduring untold suffering and violence, many of today’s refugees, from war-torn countries like Iraq and Syria, have imbibed radical Islamist ideology and, specifically, calls to jihad. Some might be Islamic State fighters who have disguised themselves as asylum-seekers, in order to carry out terrorist attacks in Europe. US intelligence officials have repeatedly warned of this possibility.
Even for the majority of asylum-seekers, who are genuinely seeking safety, the violence and Islamist rhetoric to which they have been exposed may have had a powerful psychological impact. After living for so long in a conflict zone, assimilating to a peaceful society governed by the rule of law requires the newcomers to develop a new mindset, one that enables them to face genuine challenges without resorting to criminality.
And this does not even account for the deep psychological scars that will afflict many of the refugees. Research indicates that more than 50% of the men and women who have spent time in war zones experience at least partial posttraumatic stress disorder, which is associated with an increased risk of violence.
To many in Europe, these factors suggest that the key to keeping Europe safe is controlling the flow of refugees, including through improved vetting procedures. (Such procedures have often been lacking, owing to the sheer number of refugees pouring in.) And there is a case for keeping the refugees in the Middle East, though a key mechanism for doing that – the European Union’s deal with Turkey – is now at risk, owing to political turmoil following last month’s failed coup against Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s government.
But not even constructing a Fortress Europe would eliminate the terrorist threat. After all, some attacks, including in Brussels and Paris, have been carried out by Muslim European citizens who became radicalized in their own bedrooms. According to Rob Wainwright, who heads Europol, some 5,000 European jihadists have been to Syria and Iraq, and “several hundred” are likely plotting further attacks in Europe after returning home.
The only way to address the threat of terrorism effectively is to tackle the radical Islamist ideology that underpins it. This means working to stop the religious-industrial complexes in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and elsewhere in the Gulf from using their abundant petrodollars to fund the spread of extremist ideology.
It also means launching a concerted information campaign to discredit that ideology, much like the West discredited communism during the Cold War – a critical component of its eventual triumph. This is a job for all major powers, but it is a particularly urgent task for Europe, given its proximity to the Middle East, especially the new jihadist citadels that countries like Syria, Iraq, and Libya represent.
To take down the terrorists requires delegitimizing the belief system that justifies their actions. Burqa bans and other measures by European authorities that target Islam as such are superficial and counter-productive, as they create divisions in European society, while leaving the ideological underpinnings of terrorism unaddressed.
Comments
Hide Comments Read Comments (10)Please log in or register to leave a comment.
Comment Commented ROHIT CHANDAVARKER
The fundamental source of radical Islam is the Wahhabi school of learning that has been stealthily used for indoctrination. This brand of radical belief is espoused by Saudi Arabian clerics and is being preached across many mosques in Europe by hardline clergy. In an insecure & anxious social environment, man chooses to fall back on religion & seeks solace. These clerics are preying on such laity to spread the venom in dangerous proportions. Unfortunately, most Western nations & the US considers Saudi Arabia as a staunch ally against whom no conceivable action can be contemplated. Hence, any meaningful reversal of this growing trend is possible only when demonstrable action is taken to eliminate this menace originating from Saudi Arabia, a task that seems impossible today.
Read more
Comment Commented M M
Have you ever wondered why every US President on his last year in office and since GWBush Jr, has paid pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia and the gulf countries? Because they control the financial market, the commodities market, the equity market, the real estate market, etc...effectively, they control everyone's livelihood. Read more
Comment Commented Ian Brookes
The author rightly identifies the radical salafist ideology of the Gulf Sates as a cause of terrorism and we must deal with it. However, he ignores the role of Western governments foreign policy in radicalisation. The Western penchant for bombing Muslims to impose the Western vision of the world is counterproductive and is a major factor in radicalisation. However, it seems a topic that most are not willing to address. Read more
Comment Commented M M
Ian, check out the list of donors and the donations to the Clintons Foundation and you will get your answer. Read more
Comment Commented Marendo Müller
A long-termist solution could be to divide the european continent into Pakchristianistan and Pakmuslimistan. Albania, the only country with a muslim majority on the European continent could serve as the central region of Pakmuslimistan. It would take a lot of diplomatic efforts though. Read more
Comment Commented M M
Linking terrorism to religion is always wrong. Amongst the refugees from the ME and Africa there were many Christians and other non Muslim people. Those ones that committed the atrocities in the EU were born, raised and radicalised in the EU. What the EU and the west need are proper leadership and not the sightseeing type. Read more
Comment Commented dan baur
Burqa bans are not anti-terrorist measures, but religious discrimination measures from the atheist religion states against all other. France bans Christian crosses too, together with all symbols other than atheistic ones. Read more
Comment Commented Michael Public
Islam asserts that it is superior to all other faiths and must either assimilate or destroy them. Western thinking asserts that its general ideology of economics is superior to all other economic ideologies and it must either assimilate or destroy them. Perhaps it can be hypothesised that the west and Islam are well suited as they have a similar lesson to learn. Read more
Comment Commented Steve Hurst
@Micheal
👀 Islam is still stuck in the 7th century, how does that plot as a learning curve. Read more
Comment Commented Steve Hurst
The soviet bloc collapsed because of economic stress not because of anti-communist propaganda.
5,00o European jihadists have been to the ME and several hundred are likely plotting attacks. Come on. A population of 500 million cannot provide resources to track and monitor 5000 suspects?
In most cases of jihadist attacks on EU soil the perpetrators are known by security services before the attack. Perhaps that suggests something
50% of the recent migrant crisis is economic migrants not genuine refugees
The EU-Turkey deal is bound to fail as Turkey is currently and for some considerable time not a suitable applicant to join the EU. Which do you want to deal with - 3 million migrants who are presently in Turkey or 75 million Turks fighting amongst themselves and 3 million migrants, because as nobody appears to have noticed if Turkey joins the EU those migrants are immediately inside the EU
It is quite reasonable newcomers to a country are asked to comply with broad host country protocols as determined by citizens
Read more
Featured
Reducing Inequality and Poverty in America
Martin Feldstein identifies an approach that achieves results without undermining work incentives.
The Politics of Negative Interest Rates
Yanis Varoufakis argues that the turn toward negative interest rates reveals the limits of technocratic policymaking.
Reform or Divorce in Europe
Joseph E. Stiglitz warns the eurozone against trapping its members in an untenable marriage.