Breaking Down Trump’s Border Wall

The candidate’s signature policy proposal remains shrouded in mystery.

By Comments

Photo by Tom Pennington/Getty Images

Donald Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, is en route to Texas today for fundraisers in Fort Worth and Austin, as well as a rally and a town hall in the latter. The rally in Austin has puzzled the local community, since the state’s most famously blue bubble is hardly a hotbed of radical Trumpism. Personally, though, I’m more intrigued by the town hall scheduled for this evening. The event will be hosted by one of Trump’s greatest admirers, longtime Fox News host Sean Hannity, and should therefore be a safe space for Trump to at long last reveal his plans to address illegal immigration and border security—two issues of great interest and importance to Texans.

Trump’s enigmatic ideas about illegal immigration have received a lot of attention since last weekend, when reports emerged that the candidate had, at a meeting with national Hispanic leaders, declared his intention to take a moderate approach to the unauthorized immigrants already in the country. That would, of course, appear to be a comic reversal of the stance he declared last June, when he announced his bid for the presidency with a speech that was largely focused on immigrants from Mexico and the various threats they supposedly represent to American jobs and safety, which he warned an audience in Ohio about as recently as yesterday. Trump has, however, vigorously rejected the idea that he is flip-flopping on the issue. And in fairness, it does seem that none of his proposals are ultimately rooted in coherent thought or principled convictions; that being the case, it may actually be unduly draconian to accuse Trump of having held any positions in the first place.

What really intrigues me about this evening’s town hall, however, is Hannity’s promise that Trump will explain how he plans to secure the border. Of course, we already know that Trump says he wants to build a wall. But for more than a year, we’ve lived with the mystery of whether that means Trump wants to build a literal wall, like the Great Wall of China, which he has repeatedly referenced as a role model in this context, or perhaps it’s a “virtual wall” that utilizes cameras, sensors, and drones to detect crossings. (A virtual wall might also include more strategic fencing, of the kind that already exists along parts of the border, in Texas and elsewhere.) In other words, is “the wall” a metaphor for the kind of border security apparatus that already exists? In which case Trump means to continue Barack Obama’s border policy, albeit “with a lot more energy,” as he put it yesterday.

For those of us in Texas, this is a particularly intriguing question. Our state makes up more than half of the United States’s southern border with Mexico, and per the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, our border is a river, the Rio Grande. As I noted on Fox News on Saturday—to the annoyance of many Trump supporters who weighed in online—I find the metaphysical ambiguity troubling. If Trump is indeed proposing a physical wall like the Great Wall of China, the implication is that he either wants to block our state’s access to the Rio Grande—which is an important waterway in addition to being a border—or, perhaps, to drain and pave it. At last check, the Texas-Mexico border is still a river. What does Trump plan to do to it? It would be nice if an answer to that question were forthcoming.

Related Content

  • WUSRPH

    Good outline of the questions still to be answered by his apparent move to try to win back some Hispanic votes.

    • BCinBCS

      W wrote: “Maybe because he calls the US a “third world country” he thinks we should start acting like one.

      That’s an astute observation and a frightening prospect.

  • Bad Blood

    It’s pretty simple actually, Erica. The border wall will never exist as anything more than a promise.

    1) It’s significantly more likely than not that Trump will not win. 2) Donald just says whatever Donald thinks will get the crowd going at any given time without any thought to ideology or a coherent policy. Even if he were to win, all the promises about the border would be as meaningless as the rest of the words he has uttered. Congress won’t fund his wall and Mexico won’t pay for it, so no wall.

  • vajohna

    Troll level: expert

  • BCinBCS

    Erica wrote: “And in fairness, it does seem that none of his proposals are ultimately rooted in coherent thought or principled convictions; that being the case, it may actually be unduly draconian to accuse Trump of having held any positions in the first place.

    Your statement made me laugh, it’s uncommon when the truth is both cutting and humorous.

  • BCinBCS

    JJ, most people, including Erica, believe that Donald Trump is a highly unqualified, dangerous candidate for President. Her articles demonstrate this opinion as do the polls when it comes to most other people.

    • John Johnson

      I disagree. I find her much more onerous and dangerous than Trump. The fact, however, that our adversaries would view him as tougher and more “dangerous” is, in my mind, a good thing.

      • Beerman

        The following thoughts from Bob Kagan in a recent Brookings Press article on fascism offers some eye-opening points about Trump and his use of the strength and machismo attitude:

        “We’re supposed to believe that Trump’s support stems from economic stagnation or dislocation. Maybe some of it does. But what Trump offers his followers are not economic remedies—his proposals change daily. What he offers is an attitude, an aura of crude strength and machismo, a boasting disrespect for the niceties of the democratic culture that he claims, and his followers believe, has produced national weakness and incompetence. His incoherent and contradictory utterances have one thing in common: They provoke and play on feelings of resentment and disdain, intermingled with bits of fear, hatred and anger. His public discourse consists of attacking or ridiculing a wide range of “others”—Muslims, Hispanics, women, Chinese, Mexicans, Europeans, Arabs, immigrants, refugees—whom he depicts either as threats or as objects of derision. His program, such as it is, consists chiefly of promises to get tough with foreigners and people of nonwhite complexion. He will deport them, bar them, get them to knuckle under, make them pay up or make them shut up.”

        • WUSRPH

          A classical description of Fascism…..The appeal is reflected again and again in some of the comments made on this post….For example, only today we were regaled with the tale of how wonderful it all became when the “weak” Carter was replaced by the “strong” Reagan……with predictions that The Donald would be a great diplomat because people fear him. “A healthy respect” for our power is vital….but “fear” leads to dangerous actions by those who feel threatened, especially if, like Putin and Trump, the participants appear compelled to demonstrate their male strength. Trump’s record suggests that he fails to understand the one of the primary lessons of diplomacy in a nuclear age—never leave your opponent without a backdoor out. The worse thing that can happen is a cornered bear.

  • John Bernard Books

    Do dems plan on flooding the US with low information voters to shore up their voter base?
    “A top priority of liberal billionaire George Soros is to enlarge the U.S. electorate by 10 million voters by 2018, according to leaked documents.
    “George Soros is involved in every aspect of manipulating the rules of American elections,” Adams told the Washington Free Beacon. “From funding Pew’s efforts to centralize election administration, to fueling litigation that attacks election integrity laws, to fanning the flames of racial agitation and polarization, Soros dollars are doing all they can to fundamentally transform American elections.”
    http://freebeacon.com/issues/soros-aims-to-enlarge-electorate-by-10-million/
    and Mr Soro’s agenda is exposed again
    “Last week, Mr Orban accused Mr Soros – who was born in Hungary – of deliberately encouraging the migrant crisis.
    “This invasion is driven, on the one hand, by people smugglers, and on the other by those (human rights) activists who support everything that weakens the nation-state,” Mr Orban said.
    “This Western mindset and this activist network is perhaps best represented by George Soros.”
    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/11/02/soros-admits-involvement-in-migrant-crisis-national-borders-are-the-obstacle/

    What could possibly go wrong with open borders…..

  • John Bernard Books

    But JJ….Hillary will be the first woman prez….sigh

  • WUSRPH

    Did you ever think you would see the day when JJ defended someone for acting like a politician in changing a position for political reasons? I thought the reason The Donald is so special was because he would not do that. I guess it is only a despicable thing to do when the other guy does it.

  • John Bernard Books

    Dems aren’t the brightest bulbs in the bunch….
    “But the notion that vote fraud doesn’t exist, is, of course, lunacy. People steal cars, people steal money, why anybody would think you wouldn’t steal votes is a mystery to me. Vote fraud is rare but it absolutely occurs, and sometimes occurs on a massive basis.
    He then offers proof….
    “Braden related a case of “massive” voter fraud from his own experience, recalling the 1982 Illinois gubernatorial race:
    I did a recount in Illinois of the governor’s race. I went to the Chicago Board of Elections, where they explained to me that vote fraud was a Republican illusion. And a Chicago Times reporter explained the same thing to me. But when we got done with the recount, the grand jury report showed that 10% of the Chicago vote was made up on election night. That’s 110,000 votes. So the notion that vote fraud doesn’t happen is a joke. It does happen.”
    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kyle-drennen/2016/08/22/election-lawyer-blasts-lunacy-msnbc-denying-voter-fraud

    Dems are in denial about voter fraud, because if they admit it occurs they’re admitting I’m right and they are stupid…..

  • dpcesq

    Excellent exposé of Trump — his “signature issue” is a total and complete joke. You obviously spent more time thinking about “how would one actually do this” to write this column than Trump has spent thinking about such “details” in the year he has been running for President. He is a vulgar, racist, buffoon and totally unfit for office. Hillary has a lot of problems/shortcomings, but she is the alternative, so I’m voting for her. Trump ‘s buffoonery, arrogance, bigotry and fear mongering, coupled with his ignorance and his corruption (which is much worse than Hillary’s although hers exists for sure) is a danger to our democracy, our country, and the planet. Her transgressions are “run of the mill pol” kind of stuff — nothing compared to his extreme unfitness for any office, let alone President. Anyone who expects Trump to “pivot” or get serious about the issues is delusional.

    • Beerman

      Bingo….⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️’S