Objectively.... it's pretty bad when you look at how poorly they made the PC version. Like... horrible. Specific aspects I can complain about are mainly the unnecessarily long accomplishment screens. It sets you back like 10 seconds every time. The overall performance of the entire game is a shit-show. Like, I couldn't say it's a good game even if I tried to like it because overall the experience is shit when playing on PC no matter how great your configuration is. I've been able to run some of the most demanding titles to date on ultra at 1080p and higher, and this indie title's bad optimization has put an end to that streak.

So when people complain about how bad the game is, don't take it personally as though you'd had something to do with the game, other than praising it even before it came out (99% of the NMS fandom) Sure, the concept of the game is amazing, and I will agree to that extent. Outside that, I don't think it's cool or even sane to damage control games like these that screw over the consumers. Especially for sake of trying to make a game feel as though it's worth your time and this weird sense of pride in sticking to your guns with a game even when it's shown to kind of just suck in a lot of aspects. I had a better time playing the launch Batman Arkham Knight on PC than I had with this and all it's "fixes".

So, yeah. I can't stand the game at this point. It's gotten to the level of hype where it makes me almost cringe seeing people desperately trying to damage control with these very obvious posts, and comments, that try and tell people it's a good game. Like, we can tell when someone's being a little over the top JUST to damage control.

TLDR; Game is shit. Concept is cool. Horrible execution for a launch. And I hate the damage control screwing the rational consumer over.