•
•

Women generally claim to be against discrimination yet they place the highest value on DNA. (self.MGTOW)

victor_knight が 投稿

We can see this in how they almost always put their own family members ahead of their husbands. How they can never love children who don't share in their DNA as much as the ones who do (if they even love those). How they are so fucking picky about genetic traits sperm banks typically reject 80-90% of willing donors based on "superficial" things like skin color and height.

I'm sure there are many more examples. Does this mean that DNA is actually far more important and significant than men are typically led to believe? Of course, everyone tells women the truth about the world the moment they turn 3 and men have to learn it for themselves at 30. What do you guys think?

全 8 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト (提案されたアイデア)
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]Chris_Danger_ 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Richard Dawkins, in his seminal work The Selfish Gene, argued that we are all simply elaborate gene-replicating machines. If you look at how many resources an animal will sacrifice for their relatives, it corresponds exactly to the percentage of shared DNA. There are many examples in nature, and Dawkins covers them extensively. This is a fact of life, not anything to do with personality or culture.

DNA is the foundation of life in every sense.

[–]victor_knight[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes, I'm somewhat familiar with Dawkins' work myself. It stands to reason then, that groups with lower quality DNA could have evolved complex strategies to make groups with higher quality DNA believe that DNA was virtually irrelevant. This would work to their advantage.

[–]aanarchist 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

children aren't a product of love to women, they are tools and trophies.

you decide who you are, that's why men are diverse and successful. for women dna is a lot more important because most of their value in relationships is something they are born with, their beauty and their disposition.

they also tell us how women's sexual prime is 35+ while mens is at 18. feminism literally reverses the genders.

[–]victor_knight[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Yes, to extract more resources from the man, usually. It also helps if the man has been brainwashed to be a "good dad" which means he will suffer more after a divorce (perhaps even commit suicide) and be willing to pay more than he should. Not to mention expose himself to more legal risks every time he tries to see his kids because he believes doing so makes him a "good dad". Whatever the reward for that is supposed to be.

[–]aanarchist 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

there was this one article i read about some standup guy who commited suicide after being hounded into a corner for years by his ex wife and her lawyer, they literally made his life a living hell and he couldn't do anything about it. his last words were may god have mercy on my soul. he knew he was abandoning his children and ultimately depriving them of a crucial father figure, but he just saw no other way. women are digging themselves into a hole they're not going to come out from unscathed.

[–]victor_knight[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

There are probably many such cases that go unreported. I remember the story of a divorced man who self-immolated in front of the courthouse. Not that anyone cared or that legal reform was initiated. No such thing. This is why sometimes, walking away is the safest and smartest thing a man can do.

[–]T0000009 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Does this mean that DNA is actually far more important and significant than men are typically led to believe?

Yes and no....

A long time ago it did, but technology and medicine have changed all of that, which females are unable to comprehend. Today, they still seek "real men" who can chase a mastodon down, kill it then drag it 20 miles back to a cave. That meant survival 10,000 years ago, but not anymore. Now you need people skills, and brains to run all the tech because men don't sit in the jungle for days trying to kill dinner anymore.

Selecting for height, speed, strength, hair color, and other superficial traits is idiotic because none of those will help you keep your job, shield you from the law, or pay your bills. Short, old, fat and bald guys who smoke a dozen cigars a day can make more money in the modern world than any 6' 5" brute with a prison tat and bad attitude. Yet the stupid cunts will chase the thug over the good guy all day long to swallow his "winning DNA" even though it's almost worthless as a modern survival mechanism.

Guys don't walk around with clubs anymore fighting rival tribes, we have courts and laws to prevent that, except for the niggers and Hillery which has recently been proven don't work. In those cases, breeding way down to the lowest common denominator works because tribal warfare is a way of life in the third world.

It really boils down to one question.... Do you want brains or brawn? Brains will help you survive in the modern world, brawn will keep you alive in the ghetto.