•
•

Women generally claim to be against discrimination yet they place the highest value on DNA. (self.MGTOW)

victor_knight が 投稿

We can see this in how they almost always put their own family members ahead of their husbands. How they can never love children who don't share in their DNA as much as the ones who do (if they even love those). How they are so fucking picky about genetic traits sperm banks typically reject 80-90% of willing donors based on "superficial" things like skin color and height.

I'm sure there are many more examples. Does this mean that DNA is actually far more important and significant than men are typically led to believe? Of course, everyone tells women the truth about the world the moment they turn 3 and men have to learn it for themselves at 30. What do you guys think?

全 5 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト (提案されたアイデア)
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]Chris_Danger_ 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Richard Dawkins, in his seminal work The Selfish Gene, argued that we are all simply elaborate gene-replicating machines. If you look at how many resources an animal will sacrifice for their relatives, it corresponds exactly to the percentage of shared DNA. There are many examples in nature, and Dawkins covers them extensively. This is a fact of life, not anything to do with personality or culture.

DNA is the foundation of life in every sense.

[–]victor_knight[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes, I'm somewhat familiar with Dawkins' work myself. It stands to reason then, that groups with lower quality DNA could have evolved complex strategies to make groups with higher quality DNA believe that DNA was virtually irrelevant. This would work to their advantage.

[–]aanarchist 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

children aren't a product of love to women, they are tools and trophies.

you decide who you are, that's why men are diverse and successful. for women dna is a lot more important because most of their value in relationships is something they are born with, their beauty and their disposition.

they also tell us how women's sexual prime is 35+ while mens is at 18. feminism literally reverses the genders.

[–]victor_knight[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Yes, to extract more resources from the man, usually. It also helps if the man has been brainwashed to be a "good dad" which means he will suffer more after a divorce (perhaps even commit suicide) and be willing to pay more than he should. Not to mention expose himself to more legal risks every time he tries to see his kids because he believes doing so makes him a "good dad". Whatever the reward for that is supposed to be.