0
0

Gravity explained (self.flatearth)

Iknowmytruth1 が 投稿

Im not your average flat earther, im alot more intelligent.

Flat earthers would shrug off sattelites as a hologram or a plane. Not the case at all, we can detect sattelites with homemade devices and confirm they are real. But how do they stay up there? Gravity, ofcourse. Now your question is how does gravity work on a flat earth? Let me show you. http://imgur.com/a/4Klsj

The reason flat earthers shrugg of gravity as false information, is because they are uninformed and dont know how to answer. Much like an average man cant answer questions that a sientist can answer.

Lets get started on gravoid. What is the gravoid? Its where sattelites can get into orbit. What causes it is unknown but its real and we observe it. What causes gravity on earth, unknown. I may add that its unknown what causes gravity on the supposed ball earth.

I have also done some tests to find out amazing things about gravity. One of them is that for some odd reason, Gravity is stronger in the round circle of antartica and on the north pole. But on equator its weaker.

全 29 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]Demon_God_Burny 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

Boy, these bait accounts keep getting worse and worse. I wish we had some of the pros still, like /u/8mark and junkerfes

[–]Iknowmytruth1[S] -2ポイント-1ポイント  (2子コメント)

i can assure you im not a bait account. I have been a flat earth beliver since 2010 and ive never really been a user of reddit. But you peoples ignorance just had to be put down.

[–]Demon_God_Burny 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

No, you're definitely a bait account. I can tell by the shitty grammar, the fabricated post, and the fact at you still think that things like "muh perspective" still work as proof. You aren't fooling anyone.

[–]Iknowmytruth1[S] -3ポイント-2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thats your personal belief.

[–]stillobsessed 2ポイント3ポイント  (8子コメント)

How do Sun-Synchronous Orbits work in your model?

[–]Iknowmytruth1[S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (7子コメント)

I am not qualified enough to answer that.

[–]DethFiesta 2ポイント3ポイント  (6子コメント)

What qualifies you to toss out literally all of human understanding of Gravity and replace it with your own model which, by your own admission, you can't even apply to existing things like Orbit?

[–]Iknowmytruth1[S] -3ポイント-2ポイント  (5子コメント)

We have been lied to for years, all that understanding is falsified information. Again Gravoid explains orbit, We dont know if Orbiting mass is a thing outside of earth.

[–]DethFiesta 3ポイント4ポイント  (4子コメント)

We can watch the Jovian Moons orbiting Jupiter. We can watch Mercury and Venus orbit the sun. We see the moon orbit the Earth.

And explain how we were able to use that understanding to predict the EXISTENCE, LOCATION, and MASS of Neptune if the math is nothing but fantasy.

We have enormous predictive power using the standard model -- how can this be if it is all false?

[–]Iknowmytruth1[S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (3子コメント)

We have predicting power with the flat earth model but we are lied to and say we can predict things using the geocentric model.

[–]DethFiesta 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

Yeah, sure. Why are you dodging the question? How could we have accurately predicted so much about Neptune if our understanding was so flawed?

Where on Earth will the planet Venus be visible at 5:48 AM GMT on January 23rd, 2079?

[–]Iknowmytruth1[S] -3ポイント-2ポイント  (1子コメント)

too far into the future, non predictable.

[–]DethFiesta 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

LOL. Then why am I able to predict it?

Let's do the same exact prediction except for next year.

[–]DethFiesta 2ポイント3ポイント  (7子コメント)

The Gravoid, LOL.

And gravity seems weaker at the Equator because of the Earth's centrifugal force created by rotation.

Where are the write-ups of the experiments you performed? No one will take you seriously until you provide this.

What can this model of gravity explain that our current one cannot?

Can you use your model to describe the orbit of Mercury?

How do you reconcile gravity with the Sun and Moon circling overhead? Orbits makes sense, but circling overhead.....how does this work with gravity? What keeps the Sun and Moon from falling into the Earth? How do they maintain their distance from us? What force compels them to circle overhead if the Gravity vector is perpendicular to the plane of the FE?

Remember the Scientific Method

[–]stillobsessed 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

And gravity seems weaker at the Equator because of the Earth's centrifugal force created by rotation.

That's about half of it. The other part of the difference is due to the earth's oblate shape - at the equator you're a little further from the earth's center of mass so the total force of gravity is reduced.

[–]DethFiesta 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Ah yes, very good point that I usually forget.

[–]stillobsessed 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ultimately the pole vs equator difference in gravity is all due to the earth's rotation -- Earth's oblateness is due to the interplay between centrifugal force and gravity, shifting the hydrostatic equilibrium of the earth's matter and slightly squishing the globe.

[–]Iknowmytruth1[S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (3子コメント)

i have traveled the world and measured different items in different conditions in the last 3 years, Such as temprature. So Far, Heat and cold does not seem to do any difference on gravity. Not on a large enough scale for me to detect atleast. Other planets are a mystery, We know nothing about them. We dont know if we live in a heliocentric or geocentric model, Or any of those. Gravity might not even exist outside of earth.

[–]DethFiesta 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

LOL. Why can't you answer any of the questions I asked you about your model of gravity?

And yes, we can say with completel confidence that Gravity permeates the universe. We used Newton and Keppler's understanding of the universe to predict the EXISTENCE, LOCATION, and MASS of the Planet Neptune. It was found where the math predicted it would be, and that was before our better understanding of Gravity provided by Einstein.

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.

You should've just taken a single physics course before traveling the world measuring Temperature vs. Gravity, which everyone knows are not correlated whatsoever.

If you actually did those things then you WASTED ALOT OF TIME AND MONEY.

And yes, we know the way the Solar System is organized.

Your Dunning-Kruger is showing.

[–]Iknowmytruth1[S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

And yes, we know the way the Solar System is organized.

No we dont, proof?

[–]DethFiesta 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thanks to Einstein we know that you can describe any motion from any reference point accurately. In that sense, you can ultimately describe the Solar System from ANY arbitrary center point.

However, there's a reason why no one actually uses a Geocentric model: there is NO explanation for why the Solar System would be organized that way.

We have perfect reasoning to justify the Heliocentric model: it works and can be explained using known physics. There is no way to explain all the crazy motion required for a Geocentric Model to match our observations.

Want to desscribe a Geocentric solar system? Be prepared for the wackiest, unjustifiable motion of planets and moons.

Want to decribe a Heliocentric solar system? Breathe easy with simple calculations that actually make sense given our understanding of physics.

Here's a fun example: http://i.imgur.com/AReqgfP.gif

And if you really want to learn, here's a detailed series of videos that explains the many, many ways that Geocentrism just doesn't work. Sorry.

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLmWeueTF8l82THrHwihtcmhQdjcBQBXjT

In short: we can justify describing the Solar System Heliocentrically because that model matches our PROVEN physical models. The Geocentric model can't be justified through any empirical process.

[–]cristi1990an 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Here, ladies and gentlemen, we have a flat-earther trying to explain what he thinks gravity is... Keep in mind that he's "smarter than the average flat-earther".

Ok, in all seriousness now... You have no idea what gravity is. "gravoid"? Wtf? Did you actually make this word up? Omg, I'm dying here... Ok, ok... First of all, your image makes no sense. What exactly is supposed to be the force that makes those satellites spin? [The movement of satellites is created by the combination of the gravitational attraction of the Earth and their initial velocity... You know... An object in motion stays in motion until acted upon...]. Second of all, gravity is not some magic force that attracts one object to another. I can tell you're confusing the way it works with magnetism. The gravitational force of an object will always attract other objects to its center! In your picture, everything on Earth would be pulled towards the North Pole, including the Earth itself. There's a reason why every celestial object is a sphere... Third of all, we kinda do know what gravity is. It's the curvature of space and time, created by every object with mass. https://youtu.be/MTY1Kje0yLg

[–]DethFiesta 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

You say that satellites are real but that we don't actually understand gravity. YOU are the person who has come up with the correct explanation of gravity.

So how did we get thousands of satellites into orbit before we discovered the "Gravoid" ?

Why are the vast majority of orbital insertions successful if our model is so completely wrong?

Why aren't you employed already in SatCom or another aerospace industry?

[–]Iknowmytruth1[S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

the gravoid has been known in every Space agency since the very first sattelite.

[–]Hachfredditor 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

"Im not your average flat earther, im alot more intelligent." LOL, you're all beyond help

[–]MaximaFuryRigor 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

  • I'm not...
  • a lot more intelligent.
  • satellites
  • shrug
  • Let's
  • it's

You might want to start showing your greater intelligence in the form of improved grammar.

[–]Iknowmytruth1[S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (2子コメント)

just cause i dont care about my spelling online doesnt mean im not intelligent. I use good grammar where it matters, Like work.

[–]MaximaFuryRigor 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

I use good grammar where it matters, Like work.

So you don't feel good grammar is important when claiming you are more intelligent than other people?

[–]Iknowmytruth1[S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

No, i dont have to prove that i am more intelligent on every single level. I already know that i am, i dont care if you think im not intelligent. What i do care about though, is the truth and spreading it.