62
63

So with the purchase of Paul Pogba and John Stones, i wanted to see where the PL was in terms of money spent. (self.soccer)

Redrocket1701 が 投稿

So in total, as of today the 9th of August (Post Pogba), the Premier League has spent:

€859.9m

So how does this break down? Well:

€51.2m - Arsenal
€35.1m - Bournemouth
€3m - Burnley
€76m - Chelsea
€27.5m - Crystal Palace
€8.5m - Everton
€45.5m - Leicester
€82.1m - Liverpool
€182m - Man City
€173.3m - Man U
€21.7m - Middlesborough
€28.5m - Southampton
€20.5m - Stoke
€9.5m - Sunderland
€28.7m - Swansea
€34.9m - Tottenham
€21.5m - Watford
€6.5m - West Brom
€27m - West Ham

Surprisingly, Man City is still ahead of Man Utd post Pogba, the John Stones signing boosting them to €182m. Liverpool has spent the 3rd most at €82.1m, while Chelsea have managed to spend €76m on just two players. Arsenal and Leicester take 5th and 6th dropping €51.2m and €45.5m respectively so far this transfer window.

All this leaves me wondering, do you think we'll see the Premier League break a billion euros this transfer window?

So how does Europe compare to the spending of the Premier League:

2nd - Serie A at €407.8m. (Mostly thanks to Higuain and Juventus)
3rd - La Liga at €368.3m.
4th - Bundesliga at €366.4m.
5th - Ligue 1 €182.17m

At the request of /u/guilikzor: Primeira Liga at €55.33m

I'll do a cumulative one of these at the close of the transfer market on August 31st.

As people are asking for them, my sources are here and here

Hope you guys have a lovely day! :)

全 126 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]Tottenham Hotspurbrokenairguitar 26ポイント27ポイント  (7子コメント)

It's hard to fathom us keeping up with free-spending giants like Bournemouth.

[–]West Bromwich Albioncggo1994 50ポイント51ポイント  (6子コメント)

€6.5m - West Brom

FML

[–]Redrocket1701[S] 22ポイント23ポイント  (1子コメント)

hey at least you're not Hull.

[–]Arsenalfour_four_three 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's good news for us all.

[–]Manchester Uniteddemonictoaster 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

When Sunderland are out spending you, you know there is a problem.

[–]Las PalmasRabidNerd 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Sunderland has spent before Fletcher, Johnson etc

[–]ReadingCandleJakk 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Mate, chances are that even we've spent more than you.

[–]Germanylefix 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

classic eco round

[–]Chelseaaphromagic 14ポイント15ポイント  (3子コメント)

West Ham doin the lord's work with 27m

[–]West Ham UnitedItsTheHomeWrecker 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

To be fair, you can bet your house Nordviet and Feghouli would have had signing on fee's.

[–]West Ham UnitedAnalAttackProbe 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

27m net matches what we've spent the last few seasons... now consider we've got a shiny new stadium and a new TV deal. Been doing some excellent business so far and appear to still have money to spend.

[–]Southamptonhoorahforsnakes 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

Feels cruel to just completely ignore hull on that list. Could have at least given them an honerary mention, after all, they are still technically in the premier league, at least until february

[–]Arsenalangelicporcupine 16ポイント17ポイント  (2子コメント)

Note: Leicester aren't 5th, Arsenal is. For once. Leicester are 6th.

[–]Redrocket1701[S] 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Ah crap, missed that, yeah i'll fix that.

[–]Aston VillaMoreRedAnts 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Probably because you thought 4. Arsenal

[–]Tottenham HotspurBurgleYourTurds 3ポイント4ポイント  (13子コメント)

I have to assume City and United have neared the end of their business dealings (puchasing wise) and I'm not sure where Chelsea, West Ham, Liverpool, Leicester City or Southampton stand.

But I'd expect Spurs, Everton, and (jokes aside) Arsenal all to make at least one more purchase. I doubt Levy will spend big but I'd imagine that Everton or Arsenal might bring in a big money player. In addition to all of the smaller/less glamorous dealings that will take place throughout the league.

What I'm trying to say is yes, I'd expect the PL spending to eclipse 1bil.

[–]Manchester CityPottsaayy 0ポイント1ポイント  (7子コメント)

City are done other than maybe signing a keeper. Nothing but departures now which will pocket us at least £60m, you'd assume.

[–]Manchester Citytitykaka 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

You don't think we'll get a fullback?

[–]Manchester CityPottsaayy 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Nah, especially not with Zaba confirming he's staying. Sagna/Zaba/Maffeo and Clichy/Angelino with Sarmiento further down the line who looked incredible during his short time with the u18s, I think we're alright. I don't see anyone who we could get that particularly improves us, tbh. Best to reevaluate next summer when Clichy, Sagna and Zaba all have more miles on the clock and an extra year in their legs.

[–]Republic of IrelandMayo4Sam 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

Other than Mangala and Bony who else are City trying to move on? Also do you not think you do with signing some fullbacks?

[–]Manchester CityPottsaayy 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

Nasri and Kolarov. Maybe Navas, and potentially even one of Hart/Willy if we do go after a goalkeeper.

Eh, I said to the other lad that I don't think so. We have some talented kids coming through on both sides. Zabaleta has confirmed Pep asked him to stay, and we're not letting Sagna go after his last season. Also, the market is pretty dry in terms of full backs. Not sure who we could go and get who would massively improve us. Rodriguez and Peres were linked but I'm not sold on either, tbh. There can also be such a thing as too much overhaul in one go, I think it's best to reevaluate next summer once the kids have got some games at our level, and we see how Clichy, Sagna and Zaba are all fairing with an extra year in their legs. The market could also look completely different and there could be a more obvious option for us.

[–]Republic of IrelandMayo4Sam 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

I'd be surprised if you managed to move Nasri on given his wages and attitude problems. Any idea how long he has left on his contract? I had read that City were interested in MAtS and he would be a great signing.

That's fair you have to give youth a chance at some stage and ye have already had a serious enough outlay so probably better only moving for a player that would considerably improve the team as opposed to stop gap measures.

[–]Manchester CityPottsaayy 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

We only want £17m and apparently there's interest from both Milan clubs and Roma. His wages aren't extortionate and he's some player on his day, I think we'll get him out fairly easily. His contract expires in 2019.

It's definitely the intention, we've poured plenty into our youth setup. The first set of lads who have been the benefactors of the revamp will be u18s next year, despite most of them being 16. They've not lost a game for more than 3 years as an age group, winning with ridiculous scorelines like 9-0 more frequently than not. They beat Swansea u23s 7-1 a few days ago despite being up to 7 years their junior. The feeling is that this is the age group that will be the ones to first break into the first team, but ahead of that we have a few kids who will be capable of making the step up in the next year or two. I wouldn't be surprised to see at least 2 or 3 involved from time to time this season.

[–]Republic of IrelandMayo4Sam 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah maybe tbh obviously don't follow Nasri closely but the only him I see him on /r/soccer is for his off field activities.

Yeah it will be interesting to see how the academy produces given the investment, but even if City were to only get one first team player ever 2/3 years you'd almost say its worth it given the state and direction of the transfer market.

[–]Liverpoolbiffbangboom 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Other than a LB I'd think we're done.

[–]Tottenham HotspurBurgleYourTurds 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

For curiosity's sake, who do you imagine you're in for?

I know Hector was thrown around but anyone else?

[–]Liverpoolbiffbangboom 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not Hector according to Pearce and a few others. Few names mentioned as possibilities, but nothing concrete yet.

Might not happen either, might just keep using Milner as required.

[–]Aeceus 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Liverpool just need a LB. Small chance a CB comes in too.

[–]ChelseaProphet_of_Jaciam 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Most Chelsea fans, myself very much included, are happy with the signings we've made, but the lack of a CB signing ( hopefully Koulibaly ) and a LB ( worryingly no rumours of any merit) is something that needs to be addressed. Our defence was the part of our team that needed the most work, yet we are set to start the same back line against West Ham as we did all last season.

[–]Benficaguiiikzor 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

/u/Redrocket1701, how much have we spent (primeira liga)?

[–]Redrocket1701[S] 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Primeira Liga has spent €55.33m, almost all of that comes from Benfica (€16.91m), Porto (€22.35m), Sporting CP (€12.61m) and Braga (€3.14m).

I'll add the main spend for the league to the top, and i'll also find the transfers for Ligue 1, as it feels odd not having them now.

[–]Manchester Unitedidunlikeu 6ポイント7ポイント  (2子コメント)

How about net spent?

[–]Tottenham HotspurBurgleYourTurds 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Fella.

[–]LiverpoolConall1 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Our spending looks like alot, but with our net spend its not that bad.

[–]Arsenalsandbag-1 1ポイント2ポイント  (11子コメント)

Don't mean to undermine the effort you put into this or anything, but why have you quoted the prices in Euros? None of the teams use that currency

[–]Redrocket1701[S] 7ポイント8ポイント  (2子コメント)

The site i got all the information from quoted in euros, i'm looking around for another one and will update them into pounds for the PL.

[–]Redrocket1701[S] 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

Also its worth noting that most of the international deals that take place in football are done in euros, not pounds.

[–]Arsenal9jack9 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

The site i got all the information from quoted in euros

Can you add a link to the source in your post please?

[–]WebSir 8ポイント9ポイント  (6子コメント)

Why does it matter what currency he uses? Ain't that hard to use Google to convert it to what ever currency you fancy

[–]wayv__ 2ポイント3ポイント  (5子コメント)

The clearest and most precise way to show the data is to use the currency that those teams actually use. Exchange rates fluctuate but the number of pounds each team has spent is constant.

[–]Philadelphia UnionJuan_Kagawa 7ポイント8ポイント  (3子コメント)

It might be in Euros because a lot of the transfer deals are with teams in other European nations so the most accurate published data is in Euros.

[–]Redrocket1701[S] 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Also, all this is out of date come the next signing.

[–]wayv__ 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

It's obviously because transfermarkt use Euros, but transfermarkt is far from the most accurate published data.

[–]FC Hakafmurto 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Transfermarkt is just an aggregate for different sources anyway. And because this post lists figures from other European leagues, the best way to go about presenting the data is with a unified currency.

[–]WebSir -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Unless you have stocks in those signings, it doesn't matter at all. Nobody is going to anything with this data.

30 million euro or pound or dollar... we all know its a shitload of money but it matters to know one how much it, to the penny, exactly is

[–]Sunderlandwonderfuladventure -4ポイント-3ポイント  (0子コメント)

The whole post is fucking gobbidy goop to me

[–]Manchester UnitedHamAaron 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

Burnley are gonna really struggle if they spend some money

[–]Burnleyjawh94 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

We'll struggle either way I reckon. The club isn't attractive to Premier League level players, and the rest aren't worth paying for.

[–]Redrocket1701[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

While i think you will struggle, i wish you guys all the luck in the world as your first three matches aren't exactly a walk in the park.

[–]Redrocket1701[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

at least they spent some, Hull haven't spent a drop yet.

[–]West Ham UnitedAnalAttackProbe 0ポイント1ポイント  (6子コメント)

This is net spending, correct?

[–]Liverpoolbiffbangboom 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

No

[–]West Ham UnitedAnalAttackProbe 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Then ours is waaaaay the fuck off.

[–]Redrocket1701[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

This doesn't include profit from selling players, this is just how much the clubs have spent on new talent so far this transfer window.

[–]West Ham UnitedAnalAttackProbe 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Then your numbers for West Ham are way off.

[–]Leicester CitySnowballMyself 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Should be more like £40m?

[–]West Ham UnitedAnalAttackProbe 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yep. £40.5m is what I've got. There or abouts.

[–]metrize 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Man utd still spent less than man city wtf