•
•

Bachelor Fee (self.MGTOW)

Scimiturd が 投稿

I remember my parents telling me that before the fall of comunism in '89, '90, men had a bachelor fee they had to pay if they weren't married up until they were 24, but women didn' have such a fee. The years may not be entirely accurate, and they may differ by country, if they had such a fee. The fee was roughly 10% of one's salary, and you would have to pay it up until you were about 50 years old. Mind you, this happened in communist Eastern Europe.

What do you think about such a fee and what would happen if such a fee would be implemented in the Western society for bachelors?

全 6 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト (提案されたアイデア)
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]thedudeth 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't think that they would do it quite as overtly as that - it'd be introduced in general taxation. In effect we have stuff like this anyway, as being single/childless means that you don't get all the associated tax breaks, benefits and so forth.

[–]clayticus 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ya it basically already exist. You get either taxed in a single bracket, or married bracket. Married you pay a lower percent therefore the difference between the single and married taxes is the Bachelor tax. It also affects women so I guess that's cool. I support a flat tax for everyone...

[–]RecQuery 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ancient Rome had a bachelor tax for a time as did many other countries throughout history.

It's not ideal but even a 10% extra tax is probably less than you'd have to deal with if you were married or in a relationship.

[–]BukM1 -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

could never be introduced today, as its a fundamentally unjust unequal legal discrimination based on sex. it would never fly.

[–]Mens-Advocate 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes it would. Men already pay the majority of taxes, while women draw the majority of benefits, from pension to dole to courts to ......

[–]hxii -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's cool that I'm being taxed more. Being married is the ultimate tax.