@BCAppelbaum @kairyssdal That’s a horrible representation of the TPP because ONE provision benefits that doesn’t make it not corrupt.
Trump is now calling for improved protections of US intellectual property. Which is, of course, a key goal of the TPP. Which he hates.
-
-
@BCAppelbaum@davebudge don't need tpp to do that -
@BCAppelbaum@kairyssdal@realDonaldTrump is master at doublespeak: "War is peace", "Freedom is slavery" and "Ignorance is strength". -
@BCAppelbaum@msbshoshani hilarious that he violated the intellectual property rights of so many bands for his events. -
@BCAppelbaum I guess all of those countries will just voluntarily improve their IP protections with nothing in return. -
-
@BCAppelbaum I bet he doesn't know what he's talking about. He (Trump) knows virtually nothing about the economy. -
@harper_herry@BCAppelbaum really? nothing?
-
-
@BCAppelbaum@benshapiro We can also do that without going via the TPP route dummy! -
@benshapiro@BCAppelbaum One can seek better IP property rights and still reject TPP! It's not a zero sum game! -
@BCAppelbaum@benshapiro One line item sums up entire massive trade agreement = your logic. -
@BCAppelbaum@benshapiro Protecting intellectual property can stand on its own. -
@BCAppelbaum@benshapiro Because we've enforced previous trade deal protections so well right. -
@BCAppelbaum@JimPethokoukis that might be a goal but has nothing to do with TPP. -
@BCAppelbaum@benshapiro Hey, if you're against TPP, you have to be against the whole thing. Even "and" and "or" right? -
@BCAppelbaum@benshapiro wait, you mean like NAFTA created American jobs? -
@BCAppelbaum@NoahCRothman only certain provisions of TPP are objectionable but that doesn't serve your agenda now does it? Liars abound -
@BCAppelbaum Just because some elements are sound, there is not reason to ignore the bad ones.
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。もう一度試すか、Twitterステータス(英語)をご確認ください。