Edit: They've now created this thread - "Can I sue Hillary Clinton, Correct the Record, or Reddit $hills?" as a sticky to discredit the whole subject.
I posted the following thread in /r/LegalAdvice:
A question about US FEC rules regarding a 2006 document titled "Special Notices on Political Ads and Solicitations"
It was immediately removed by a mod with this explanation:
Your post has been removed for the following reason(s):
This thread has been removed by CorrectTheRecord. Hillary 2016
I asked if they were joking and got this response:
Please vote for Hillary Clinton this November! #ShesWithUs
Screenshot 1 - Post with removal message
Screenshot 2 - Mod response
Here's the contents of the post:
The straightforward question is this: Are paid proponents of candidates for office required to post a disclaimer when promoting their candidate on Reddit?
Special Notices on Political Ads and Solicitations
From that document:
a "disclaimer" notice is defined as a statement placed on a public communication that identifies the person(s) who paid for the communication and, where applicable, the person(s) who authorized the communication.
.
When is a Disclaimer Required?
(3) web sites available to the general public, regardless of whether the communication expressly advocates the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate, or solicits funds in connection with a federal election
Also:
A disclaimer must appear on any "electioneering communication" (defined below) and on any public communication by any person that expressly advocates the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate or solicits funds in connection with a federal election.
I was under the impression that if a person or group claims to just be an educational entity promoting ideas that happen to align with a particular candidate, then certain exemptions apply. However, this document specifically states "regardless of whether the communication expressly advocates the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate".
So what if you ask one if they support a particular candidate and they say they do, and they're being paid to say so? Would that comment then require a disclaimer? Would all of that account's politically-relevant comments need disclaimers, even if they didn't advocate for a specific candidate? It sounds to me like the FEC is saying all payed shilling online should be marked with disclaimers. How wrong am I?
Is there any recourse if a person or group is found to be in violation?
[–]c0rporate 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Jack_Lives_Here 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]mjcohe2 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Idler- [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]dejeneration [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]giantfrogfish [スコア非表示] (3子コメント)
[–]netskink [スコア非表示] (1子コメント)
[–]parapaparapa [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]Juan__Lennon [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]King_of_One[S] [スコア非表示] (3子コメント)
[–]PM-Me-Beer [スコア非表示] (2子コメント)
[–]voteforcorruptobot [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]Void_if_Valid [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]even-though [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]Lb3pHj [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]unruly_mattress [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]AutoModerator[M] -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (0子コメント)