全 5 件のコメント

[–]Ozamataz_BuckshankSUMcDonald's - I'm cuckin' it 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

But what about the core of anti-government sentiment "put me in charge of the government and I promise to destroy it?" The anti-intellectualism passing for candor and "plain speaking"? Large segments of the US voting populace willing to ignore qualifications in favor of "guts" to support a candidate who "speaks for me"?

If that's the case, Trump and Palin are just a continuation of the mindset that elected George W. Bush.

[–]MyCommentIsSarcasm[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

That's the kind of answer I was looking for -- enlightenment as to the abyssal continuum we find ourselves staring at. Bush was the pre-Palin? Then who was the pre-Bush? I guess Bush....

[–]Wowbagger1 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Newt Gingrich 2012 though.

dude was saying ridiculous shit and drove Romney hard-right.

[–]MyCommentIsSarcasm[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Did he push the fringe out further than it already resided, then? I honestly can't recall much other than sliminess connected with his name.

[–]princessnymphiaMake Crimea Russia Again [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It goes way back. There are certain voters who are more concerned about being able to "have a beer" with someone than how experienced they are, and they resent people who can be considered experts on foreign policy and economics. We saw this with Brexit, too. Economists said, "don't vote to leave, this would be a disaster" and a UKIP politician essentially shot back with, "we're tired of experts telling us how to do things."