use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
272 人のユーザーが現在閲覧しています
Be nice, be kind, be helpful, and be polite.
Please keep discussion focused on Ethereum, take any market discussions to one of the many other independent Ethereum subreddits.
English language only, please provide accurate translations where appropriate.
Guide
Main Site / Tutorial
Chat on Gitter
Technical Q&A (Stack Exchange)
Network Status
Github
Blog
Bounty program
Meetups
Whitepaper
Facebook
Youtube
Google+
DApps List by EtherCasts
Read our rules before posting: http://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/3auc97/ethereum_subreddit_rules/
Vitalik Buterin: Casper PoC3 backbone simulations: 3s block time, 1.25s avg latency + 2s avg clock offset: 1% stale rate (twitter.com)
heliumcraft が 10時間前 投稿
[–]NewToETH 64ポイント65ポイント66ポイント 10時間前 (2子コメント)
Exciting times. This is what really matters.
[–]TheHeavyRocksteady 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 4時間前 (0子コメント)
Completely this.
[–]bitp -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 33分前 (0子コメント)
Of course this is what really matters. Why do you even have to say it? Are you saying what people think matters, doesn't actually matter? Lol, yea the declining price and confidence in the foundation's ability to make this chain survive doesn't matter.
[–]xdacoolinvestorx 41ポイント42ポイント43ポイント 10時間前 (75子コメント)
Any update from the ETHC dev team on how their simulations are going?
[–]Sharden 54ポイント55ポイント56ポイント 10時間前 (68子コメント)
Don't worry they have their copy and paste fingers primed and ready for action.
[–]BruLee 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
hahaha, good one dude
[–]Gunni2000 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 7時間前 (16子コメント)
Is there a way to make future developments incompatible with ETC?
[–]svlad 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 6時間前 (5子コメント)
No. Why would you want to anyway?
[–]Ihaveinhaledalot 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 5時間前 (3子コメント)
Why not?
[–]TheHeavyRocksteady 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 4時間前 (0子コメント)
It would require making Ethereum closed source. That is not a viable option for any serious coin.
[–]openbit 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 5時間前 (0子コメント)
Waste of time?
[–]DavidDann437 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 4時間前 (0子コメント)
It's open source... ETC is basically production Ethereum 1.0 it can be upgraded to suit its clients.
[–]SammieData 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 6時間前 (0子コメント)
This goes against the very motto of The Ethereum Foundation, they're not out to stifle competition.
[–]TheHeavyRocksteady 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 4時間前 (0子コメント)
Is there a way to shoot yourself in the foot?
Yes there certainly is. Thankfully devs and the community have some perspective
[–]SalletFriend 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 4時間前 (7子コメント)
Why cave in another core Ethereum value when this argument is over other value?
By the time you fork for every crime, prevent theft, close source the code you wont have a viable crypto any longer.
I don't think the product you are looking for is Ethereum, I think it is Windows 10.
[–]Gunni2000 -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 3時間前* (6子コメント)
a.) Nobody said anything about forking, thats just something YOU came up with.
b.) Its not a proposal just a technical question. IF its doable THEN we could discuss if its an viable option or not. I am sure there would be arguments to be heard on both sides.
Edit: Just checked your post-history, looks like you are some ETC groupie. LOL
[–]SalletFriend 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 3時間前 (2子コメント)
Its totally doable, but you seem to not recognise that the open source nature of the platform is another part of its core ethics. I brought up the fork because the people you are trying to exclude from access to the code, exist because in their eyes they maintain the original ethics of the platform.
tl;dr: You are proposing to prove the EthC guys completely correct by following this path.
[–]Gunni2000 -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 3時間前* (1子コメント)
Somehow you seem to assume that its only doable while going closed source. I disagree, imo there should be ways to develop further that simply would make copy-pasting impossible.
And that would be absolutely no breach of any open-source codex as the software would still be opensource but had decided to go a certain way of development. Just leeching would be made much harder this way. You can still go and implement anything that ETH develops but not by just copy-pasting it.
Edit: Also if ETC is maintaining the original ethics of ETH and ETH is just some fuck-up. Then why copy-paste from them? I mean ETC IS then the original, it doesnt need any copy-pasting. Especially not from some bogus software-version of itself. So be consequent and start developing stuff like Casper on your own.
[–]SalletFriend 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
A second fork could do this. Ethereum could go through a second hard fork to make its future updates are technically incompatible with what we currently call EthC. You could also disentangle EthC removing the Replay attack.
Of course this could leave you with a third Ethereum clone AND it would be trivial to restore those updates for EthC, they would just need to change some code rather than implement immediately.
[–]SalletFriend 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 3時間前 (2子コメント)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyleft
Read up. This is the philosophy the Ethereum license is based on.
[–]Gunni2000 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 3時間前 (1子コメント)
So you are basically saying that its doable without going closed source. Am i right? That would answer my initial question, because thats basically what i was asking.
A discussion about doing it or not would be a completely different animal.
[–]SalletFriend 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
Doable not Feasible or ideologically correct.
[–]jordaninthesky 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 5時間前 (2子コメント)
PoS is an experiment ethf can try. I'm personally uncomfortable with the idea of Whales and insider traders determining how the chain is verified.
[–]Ihaveinhaledalot 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 5時間前 (1子コメント)
Yeah I wonder what ETC is going to do.
[–]cakes 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
my vote would be to continue pow, and I believe it would get overwhelming support, especially with the miners being ejected from the ethf chain
[–]Onetallnerd -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
You don't like open source do you?
[+]FaceDeer スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7ポイント-6ポイント-5ポイント 8時間前 (12子コメント)
And why, exactly, is this a problem? Open source development is all about reusing code and development work efficiently between projects.
In fact, one of the complaints folks here seem to have about ETC is that they think it won't make use of PoS (due to a common conception that ETC is opposed to any sort of fork rather than just specific kinds of forks). So it's kind of baffling finding objections like this.
[–]Sharden 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント 8時間前 (8子コメント)
It's not a problem, but that's not how a project becomes a leader in their domain.
ETC can and will copy many elements of ETH development moving forward, but let's not beat around the bush - this won't be the Ethereum foundation supporting both in parallel. This will be one group retrofitting new features onto the ETC chain, and they will be consistently behind. This is already clear to developers and investors, and it doesn't exactly inspire confidence.
If there is ever an issue that uniquely affects the ETC chain they are effectively doomed because they won't have the human capital to address it. This makes ETC a terrible, terrible choice for any enterprise projects.
[–]gynoplasty 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
True, if there is ever a dilemma like the disagreement between geth and other implementations of the Ether client the ETHc clients will be prone to attack for a longer period of time until they can merge the fixes that the ETH devs produce.
[+][削除されました] 8時間前 (6子コメント)
[deleted]
[–]Sharden 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 8時間前 (5子コメント)
when they surrendered to the those calling for the chain to be forked in two.
You mean that time they let the community choose and the majority chose to fork?
[–]cakes 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)
several mining pools chose to fork
[–][削除されました] 7時間前 (3子コメント)
[–]Sharden 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 7時間前 (2子コメント)
Unfortunately it was the Foundation that gave up their leadership position, when they surrendered to the those calling for the chain to be forked in two. I agree, it was necessary to give the community the option.
Unfortunately it was the Foundation that gave up their leadership position, when they surrendered to the those calling for the chain to be forked in two.
I agree, it was necessary to give the community the option.
Pick one.
[–]AroundTheBlock_ 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
Lol. Funny how he deletes his comment too. Coward.
[–]terpnation13 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 7時間前 (1子コメント)
A community based upon very strict ideologies who copies and pastes the foundations of their technology from the organization that they so staunchly disagree with. That makes perfect sense.
[–]FaceDeer 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)
They don't staunchly disagree with everything the Foundation does. They're in 99% agreement with what the Foundation does - 100%, if you consider that the Foundation didn't explicitly push the fork but just provided it as an option.
It's the ETH chain that the ETC chain has issues with. Both chains use the same software, just with a slightly different configuration and a steadily-diverging blockchain state.
[–]JP8080NL 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 8時間前* (0子コメント)
Strange... can you pin point where a problem or a complain is mentioned? Copy pasting is very effective till it's not possible anymore. Edit: a risk is when you are pasting stuff you not understand well enough. Less harmful is pasting stuff you couldn't figure out your self.
[+]the_bob スコアが基準値未満のコメント-32ポイント-31ポイント-30ポイント 10時間前 (32子コメント)
You realize a ton of Ethereum is copy and pasted from Bitcoin, right? And literally tons of open source projects are forked from others (and therefore "copy and pasted")? Bitcoin alone has 6,415 forks on github.
[–]ItsAConspiracy 24ポイント25ポイント26ポイント 10時間前 (2子コメント)
Actually, no, it's a completely new and very different codebase. The official client isn't even written in the same language as Bitcoin's.
[+]the_bob スコアが基準値未満のコメント-21ポイント-20ポイント-19ポイント 10時間前 (1子コメント)
Cpp-Ethereum is. Are you talking about geth? There's btcd, written in Golang.
[–]ItsAConspiracy 27ポイント28ポイント29ポイント 10時間前 (0子コメント)
Still a fresh codebase. I think it uses the same elliptic curve library but that's it.
Major differences from Bitcoin include a different block format, GHOST instead of a linear blockchain, EVM opcodes instead of Bitcoin's much simpler transaction model, accounts with balances instead of Bitcoin's UTXOs, and a different proof of work. It's a redesign from the ground up.
[–]Sharden 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント 10時間前 (17子コメント)
I'm aware. Forking a project and developing it in a new direction is one thing. Forking a project and expecting to leech almost entirely off the development of the project you left is laugh out loud hilarious.
[–][削除されました] 8時間前 (1子コメント)
[–]Sharden 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
I've never seen this argument anywhere else in open source software. Generally speaking the project that carries over the development team from the original is considered to be the main branch. At this very moment in time the most important part of Ethereum are the people involved, and ETC doesn't have the ones that matter.
Please, explain what makes this different?
[+]the_bob スコアが基準値未満のコメント-11ポイント-10ポイント-9ポイント 9時間前 (14子コメント)
Who left who? Everyone says Ethereum "abandoned" the "old" chain. It's more like ETH devs now have to support two versions of the same protocol, or risk being liable for loss of funds and/or fraud.
[–]Sharden 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント 9時間前 (13子コメント)
No? If private, for profit companies like Microsoft regularly stop supporting their products when they get deprecated, what makes you think that a non-profit, open source project will be held to a higher standard in a court of law?
People still use Windows XP too - that doesn't mean any project of value is being developed for it.
I get that you're trolling and all, but please, put your back into it at least.
[+]the_bob スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8ポイント-7ポイント-6ポイント 9時間前 (12子コメント)
XP is EOL.
The Ethereum foundation is liable because they intentionally left out fraud-preventing code from the fork, enabling loss of funds between the two chains. It is their fault that replay attacks can happen, and that they for some reason, did not add the preventive code into the fork.
By their willful negligence, they now have to support both chains. Unless, of course, they wish to see more fraud happening (wouldn't competely surprise me, considering the leaked conversation of ETH devs colluding to control the ETC price).
[–]Sharden 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 9時間前 (11子コメント)
Do we live in the same universe? I read those conversations and 'collusion' is hardly the word I would use for something so innocuous.
You're grasping at straws and stamping your feet with the mistaken belief that your personal interpretation of the situation is objective truth that must be adhered to and conjuring up a vague threat of legal liability on weak grounds.
We are done here. All the best to you and your chain.
[–]aminok 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 9時間前 (2子コメント)
He's a troll.
[–]Sharden 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 9時間前 (1子コメント)
I know, but each time you draw the troll out into a longer conversation you can expose their tenuous grasp of the situation for the world to see. I think that's important.
[–]the_bob -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント 9時間前 (7子コメント)
Sure. Plug your ears and cover your eyes. I know it must be difficult knowing Vitalik and co. did this to you.
[–]happythots 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 9時間前 (6子コメント)
must not be much engaging conversation on r/ethereumClasssic seeing as you spend all your time here screaming about the sky falling. yawn
[–]huntingisland 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 9時間前 (9子コメント)
You realize a ton of Ethereum is copy and pasted from Bitcoin, right?
None of it is, with the exception of a couple crypto libraries.
[+]the_bob スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント 9時間前 (8子コメント)
"None of it is, with the exception of some of it."
[–]huntingisland 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 9時間前 (7子コメント)
Do you know what a code library is?
[–]the_bob -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント 9時間前 (6子コメント)
Do you?
[–]huntingisland 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント 9時間前 (5子コメント)
Yes. I've written some.
Do you program?
[–]the_bob -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 9時間前 (4子コメント)
Yep. Care to condescend more?
[–]huntingisland 14ポイント15ポイント16ポイント 9時間前 (3子コメント)
Then why are you confused about the difference between copying code and using a crypto library?
[–]twigwam 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
lol what?
[–]TreeOfLibrty 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 10時間前 (0子コメント)
Crickets you say?
[–]ubermicro 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 3時間前* (1子コメント)
This is the dev team for ethc. How are the bailouts on the ethf? Looks like the DAO people manipulated the 5% of the vote as needed and cashed out. Someone send vitalik a statistics book on why voluntary polls with 8% responses aren't representative.
[–]bitp 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 28分前 (0子コメント)
Lol.
[–]smartbrowsering 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
I hear its going to be copied over so probably on par with Vit's
[–]TommyEconomics -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 5時間前 (0子コメント)
Didnt you hear? They ran this simulation first and Vitalik actually copied them.
[–]bitp -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 29分前 (0子コメント)
Lets hope you guys don't rush POS like you rushed the Hard Fork. I am expecting only failures from an incompetent dev team that didn't even include code to prevent replay attacks in the HF code. They knew about the attacks in advance, but chose not to fix them because of their arrogance. They were so confident that the legacy chain won't survive for long. I can't trust their foresightedness on any issue.
[–]ChinookKing 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント 10時間前 (0子コメント)
YEAH ETH!
[–]CrystalETH_ 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント 10時間前 (8子コメント)
I have absolutely no idea what that screenshot shows exactly, but it's probably very nice! :)
[+]the_bob スコアが基準値未満のコメント-31ポイント-30ポイント-29ポイント 10時間前 (7子コメント)
I have no idea what's going on, either. Better upvote it!
[–]hmontalvo369 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 9時間前 (6子コメント)
apart from etc, what are you investing on? please, I need to do the exact opposite haha
[–]linksss 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
Short everything he's touched
[–]jordaninthesky -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 5時間前 (2子コメント)
So you hate etc because of /u/the_bob? Don't you realize that preserving ethereum is a service to the world?
[–]hmontalvo369 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 4時間前 (1子コメント)
hahahaha dude
[–]jordaninthesky 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
LOL, I'm actually being sincere. Ethereum could be like the Linux of the world computer where Ethereum Foundation is RedHat. I like the choices.
[+]the_bob スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント 9時間前 (1子コメント)
I'm investing on a nice comfy couch. So, I guess the opposite of that would be on a bed of nails in the middle of the street?
[–]thederpill 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
This is actually a genuine lol although your trolling is otherwise annoying. 7/10 would read again.
[–]georgeblairRedditor for 2 years with less than 100 comment karma. 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 10時間前 (0子コメント)
Exciting times!
Roughly how close is ethereum in getting a POC that is sufficient for incorporating into a serenity release? A couple more iterations? A dozen?
[–]M-alMen 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 9時間前 (6子コメント)
I am not sure if this is good... everything that I learn from cryptocurriencie tells me that the lower the blocktime the increase of the orphan blocks Can someone please point me to some good articles explaining me how do Ethereum deals with the scalling?
[–]vbuterinJust some guy 26ポイント27ポイント28ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
The innovation here is that the algorithm is "non-competitive": there is a clear primary validator that is selected to make the next block. This greatly reduces the risk that blocks will be "in conflict" with each other; under smooth operation, there should be almost no uncles unless network latency is above a particular threshold.
[–]cosurgi 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 9時間前 (4子コメント)
there are no orphans, just uncles. All previously mined blocks contribute to blockchain security, even those that mined simultaneously. You can see a plot of ETH and ETC blockchains with their duplicated uncles happening from time to time: http://fork.ethstats.net/
[–]M-alMen 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 8時間前 (3子コメント)
hmmm, So the uncles work like a blocks on the next block ? And about the sacaling of the chain ? ETH uses now about 20GB discspace, this for me is huge for and 1year old blockchain... how do the Ethereum will deal with the blocksize encrease? I think there is some pruning systems workin out there, how do they work ? Can someone point me to good articles about it ?
[–]adrianclvRedditor for 2 years with less than 100 comment karma. 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 7時間前 (1子コメント)
If I recall correctly, there are plans to do sharding with the blockchain.
[–]newretro 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
More than sharding is needed to deal with bloat. See https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/35
[–]liskhq -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
Its going to increase blockchain bloat to an astronomical level.
[–]eyecikjou567 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 9時間前 (0子コメント)
Very Exciting.
Can't wait for first public test networks.
[–]benjaminionredditor for less than 1 month 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 10時間前 (10子コメント)
Does PoC mean Proof-of-Concept here?
I've heard of Proof-of-Work and Proof-of-Stake, but Proof-of-Concept sounds like a really crazy idea for a blockchain :)
[–]bullfightsonacid 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 4時間前 (0子コメント)
'Proof of Casper' ;)
[–]hmontalvo369 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 4時間前 (1子コメント)
In software development a PoC is just that, a proof of concept... a developer conceptualizes a functionality or design and builds it to test it, or in other words, prove it works... so the development can move along to other phases like unit and integration testing...
[–]benjaminionredditor for less than 1 month 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 42分前 (0子コメント)
Yes, I know. It's just my feeble attempt at humour. Proof-of-work/proof-of-concept... I'll get my coat.
[+]the_bob スコアが基準値未満のコメント-22ポイント-21ポイント-20ポイント 10時間前* (6子コメント)
Proof-of-Concept means there is no code ready and that it is merely an idea.
edit: Ok! I was wrong, you wolves! Sue me!
[–]swoopxRedditor for 2 years with less than 100 comment karma. 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 10時間前 (0子コメント)
Proof of Concept is just very early code. There were many PoC versions for Ethereum.
[–]ConradJohnson 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 10時間前 (0子コメント)
Proof of Design is the sketch of an idea in graphical form. Proof of Concept is the proof that the concept will work, in working form, so yes, this includes code that is ready and much more tangible than a POD or idea.
[–]BusyBeaverHP 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント 8時間前 (1子コメント)
Programmer reporting in. Proof of concept have code backing it.
After seeing this guy's multiple posts with objectively false information, I reported him for both trolling and spreading misinformation. I urge everyone to do the same.
[+]the_bob スコアが基準値未満のコメント-10ポイント-9ポイント-8ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
Cool your jets, Robocop. It's a crime to be wrong now?
[–]thouliha 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 6時間前 (0子コメント)
How are you not banned? You're like the one person in the room that refuses to stop screaming. You make this sub much shittier than it actually is, is that your goal?
[–]clarkster 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
You continue to prove you know nothing about programming here... Why do you claim to?
[–]BCNext 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 8時間前 (1子コメント)
How many hops was included into 1.25s avg latency? Do validators need to be connected directly with each other?
[–]vbuterinJust some guy 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 5時間前 (0子コメント)
The 1.25s was obtained by taking the latency graph from https://ethstats.net/ and multiplying by ~1.5-2x just to be safe.
[–]krakrakra 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 7時間前 (1子コメント)
Was that a local test or routed via internet? Isn't 1% stale rate quite high for a simulation?
[–]vbuterinJust some guy 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 5時間前 (0子コメント)
Local. But 1.25s average network latency was simulated.
[–]killswitch 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
Okay I don't know anything, but isn't a 3 second block time close enough to the network propagation time that you might get two solutions trying to propagate simultaneously in competition? I guess that kind of issue is solved?
[–][deleted] 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 9時間前 (0子コメント)
Is the code/branch pushed to github?
[–]TruthTaco 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
I don't care about block times, can someone tell me how long confirmed transactions on casper are expected to take?
[–]twigwam 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
AWESOME! :)
[–]akombaRedditor for 2 years with less than 100 comment karma. 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 6時間前 (1子コメント)
Is there a way to prevent mindless copy-paste of the code? Something that requires more than "pull from master"?
[–]smartbrowsering -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
Rise up from the dirt, this is a time to rejoice as the farther has bestowed onto us a gift.
[–]STCJOPEYredditor for less than 1 month 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
Question, if both Eth and Etc chains are exactly the same it is possible to port any dapps or even casper when it is implemented? Or maybe we use Etc as a test chain to make sure it works right?
[–]TheRandyMagnum 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)
How come no one is talking about the miners and PoS? Miners, tell us what you have to say about PoS!?
[–]PhiStr90 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
Will there be a Olympic challenge to stress test the network again?
Cant wait to spam the testnet again :D
[–]HandofBitcoin 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1分前 (0子コメント)
So Vitalik decides to release distractions as the Ethereum project collapses infront of his eyes.
[+]seweso スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7ポイント-6ポイント-5ポイント 10時間前* (17子コメント)
Is this why we created the ETC network? To test Casper? Ethereum Casper? ;)
[–]FaceDeer 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 8時間前 (2子コメント)
I expect it's more likely to go the other way around, with ETH testing Casper and then ETC adopting it shortly after it's proven out.
[–]ringokid1redditor for less than 1 month 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 7時間前 (1子コメント)
Yeah, because ETC has more the higher hash rate, more community support, more developers, more dapps and the actual Ethereum foundation backing it. Oh wait ...
[–]newretro 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
FaceDeer has it correct, well sort of because it depends where the respective chains are and what it does about the difficulty bomb.
[+]the_bob スコアが基準値未満のコメント-10ポイント-9ポイント-8ポイント 10時間前 (13子コメント)
Erm...You created Refundeum. Ethereum Classic is the original, unmolested chain.
[–]seweso 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 10時間前 (11子コメント)
Hi Bob. That sounds .... democratic....refund + referendum. Your compliments mean a lot! Thanks.
[–]the_bob -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント 10時間前 (10子コメント)
Also, seweso.com seems to be borked! And you only have a BTC address for donations on there!? You aren't a real Ethereum user!
[–]Facelikeawolfredditor for less than 1 month 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 9時間前 (4子コメント)
Jeez, aren't you the one always crying ad hominem when someone dares to call you out on your mouth-frothing vitriol, bob? Give it a rest already.
Maybe you should unplug for a bit, go outside and get some sunshine, maybe talk to some women and try to make a new friend. I'm stoked on the tech too but seriously, there's more to life than blockchain. Maybe a little introspection could help you release some of this unkindness and feel a little better about life in general. No sarcasm here. I hope you can find the courage for some quiet reflection and release some that serious emotional weight you're carrying around. It's gotta be heavy as fuck.
[–]jonesyjonesy 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
This is how I see /u/the_bob and a bitcoiner that's paying him to troll:
https://youtu.be/xFH-y-gJn6w
[–]the_bob -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント 9時間前 (2子コメント)
I actually worked on my tan today with my girlfriend, but thanks for the consideration. I have emotional weight? That's news to me.
[–]happythots 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 8時間前 (1子コメント)
Jerking off with spray tan doesn't mean you're tanning with your girlfriend. But I can see how someone like you confuses that often to be the case.
[–]the_bob 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
Okay maybe I was pulling my knob with spray tan. So what if I was?
[–]seweso 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 9時間前 (4子コメント)
You are right Bob, I should atone for my Ethereal Sin, which is incidentally also the name of a band from 1997. In that year Hong Kong returns to Chinese rule. Hong Kong’s official name is the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, or Hong Kong SAR. SAR also stands for System Activity Report, a Unix/Linux command to display various system loads. A guy named William Della Croce Jr. registered the name Linux and demanded royalty for using its name and mark. However he agreed to handover the trademark to Linus, later. Did you know the British Monarchy do not use surnames like the rest of the other people? Instead, they use surnames which represent their houses or dynasties .Dynamite was invented by Alfred Nobel and was the first safely manageable explosive stronger than black powder. Nobel obtained patents for his invention in England on May 7, 1867, in Sweden on October 19, 1867. What was I talking about?
[–]the_bob -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 9時間前 (3子コメント)
Ah, the ever illusive Wikipedia'd-Wall-of-Text troll. Upvote for effort.
[–]thederpill 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 8時間前 (2子コメント)
elusive
Rule 475b: a troll should at the very least spell correctly except for comic effect.
[–]the_bob -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 8時間前 (1子コメント)
il·lu·sive iˈlo͞osiv/ adjective: illusive deceptive; illusory. "that illusive haven"
il·lu·sive iˈlo͞osiv/
adjective: illusive
deceptive; illusory. "that illusive haven"
[–]thederpill 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
Where did you graduate?
[–]NewToETH 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 10時間前 (0子コメント)
I see what you did there.
π Rendered by PID 7196 on app-601 at 2016-08-02 05:54:58.006768+00:00 running 31843a8 country code: JP.
[–]NewToETH 64ポイント65ポイント66ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]TheHeavyRocksteady 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]bitp -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]xdacoolinvestorx 41ポイント42ポイント43ポイント (75子コメント)
[–]Sharden 54ポイント55ポイント56ポイント (68子コメント)
[–]BruLee 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Gunni2000 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (16子コメント)
[–]svlad 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]Ihaveinhaledalot 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]TheHeavyRocksteady 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]openbit 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]DavidDann437 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SammieData 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TheHeavyRocksteady 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SalletFriend 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]Gunni2000 -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]SalletFriend 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Gunni2000 -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]SalletFriend 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SalletFriend 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Gunni2000 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]SalletFriend 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]jordaninthesky 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Ihaveinhaledalot 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]cakes 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Onetallnerd -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]FaceDeer スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7ポイント-6ポイント-5ポイント (12子コメント)
[–]Sharden 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]gynoplasty 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[+][削除されました] (6子コメント)
[deleted]
[–]Sharden 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]cakes 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–][削除されました] (3子コメント)
[deleted]
[–]Sharden 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]AroundTheBlock_ 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]terpnation13 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]FaceDeer 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]JP8080NL 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]the_bob スコアが基準値未満のコメント-32ポイント-31ポイント-30ポイント (32子コメント)
[–]ItsAConspiracy 24ポイント25ポイント26ポイント (2子コメント)
[+]the_bob スコアが基準値未満のコメント-21ポイント-20ポイント-19ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]ItsAConspiracy 27ポイント28ポイント29ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Sharden 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント (17子コメント)
[–][削除されました] (1子コメント)
[deleted]
[–]Sharden 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]the_bob スコアが基準値未満のコメント-11ポイント-10ポイント-9ポイント (14子コメント)
[–]Sharden 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント (13子コメント)
[+]the_bob スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8ポイント-7ポイント-6ポイント (12子コメント)
[–]Sharden 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]aminok 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Sharden 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]the_bob -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]happythots 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]huntingisland 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (9子コメント)
[+]the_bob スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]huntingisland 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]the_bob -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]huntingisland 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]the_bob -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]huntingisland 14ポイント15ポイント16ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]twigwam 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TreeOfLibrty 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ubermicro 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]bitp 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]smartbrowsering 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TommyEconomics -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]bitp -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ChinookKing 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]CrystalETH_ 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント (8子コメント)
[+]the_bob スコアが基準値未満のコメント-31ポイント-30ポイント-29ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]hmontalvo369 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]linksss 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]jordaninthesky -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]hmontalvo369 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]jordaninthesky 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]the_bob スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]thederpill 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]georgeblairRedditor for 2 years with less than 100 comment karma. 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]M-alMen 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]vbuterinJust some guy 26ポイント27ポイント28ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]cosurgi 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]M-alMen 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]adrianclvRedditor for 2 years with less than 100 comment karma. 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]newretro 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]liskhq -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]eyecikjou567 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]benjaminionredditor for less than 1 month 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]bullfightsonacid 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]hmontalvo369 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]benjaminionredditor for less than 1 month 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]the_bob スコアが基準値未満のコメント-22ポイント-21ポイント-20ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]swoopxRedditor for 2 years with less than 100 comment karma. 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ConradJohnson 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]BusyBeaverHP 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント (1子コメント)
[+]the_bob スコアが基準値未満のコメント-10ポイント-9ポイント-8ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]thouliha 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]clarkster 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]BCNext 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]vbuterinJust some guy 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]krakrakra 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]vbuterinJust some guy 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]killswitch 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–][deleted] 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TruthTaco 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]twigwam 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]akombaRedditor for 2 years with less than 100 comment karma. 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]smartbrowsering -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]STCJOPEYredditor for less than 1 month 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TheRandyMagnum 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]PhiStr90 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]HandofBitcoin 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]seweso スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7ポイント-6ポイント-5ポイント (17子コメント)
[–]FaceDeer 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]ringokid1redditor for less than 1 month 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]newretro 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]the_bob スコアが基準値未満のコメント-10ポイント-9ポイント-8ポイント (13子コメント)
[–]seweso 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]the_bob -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]Facelikeawolfredditor for less than 1 month 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]jonesyjonesy 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]the_bob -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]happythots 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]the_bob 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]seweso 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]the_bob -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]thederpill 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]the_bob -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]thederpill 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]NewToETH 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)