(cache) Is this sub mostly Republicans circlejerking? : ShitWehraboosSay

6,424 人の登録者

~91 人のユーザーが現在閲覧しています

Rules

Vote brigading is prohibited. Don't link to comment chains that you've heavily participated in, don't invite people to downvote any linked comments, and do not comment in linked threads. It's not our goal to fight for justice in WW2 historiography on reddit but merely to entertain ourselves.

In line with rule #1, links must contain the np prefix for non-participation (np.reddit.com). Those that do not will be removed automatically by the AutoModerator and you will have to resubmit your thread or have your reply reapproved by a moderator.

No "low hanging fruit." This means white rights and neo-Nazi subreddits or websites, including /r/European and /r/conspiracy, and also submissions where YouTube comments are the main focus. Posts consisting of nothing but holocaust denial are also prohibited. All the material prohibited by this rule can be submitted in the weekly Low Hanging Fruit sticky.

No pro-atrocity counter-jerking. That is no praise of, or excuses for: Stalin, the USSR as a system, genuine war crimes committed by the allies (mass rapes, Japanese internment, Soviet invasion/occupation of Poland and the Baltic states, etc.), as well as no mocking of the victims of any of the aforementioned, or expressing any satisfaction at all with civilians, in Axis countries or otherwise, being unfairly victimized, under any circumstance.

No concern trolling or whiny meta posts/comments about our supposed love of allied mass rape and execution of Japanese prisoners because you cherry-picked a few comments with two upvotes that no one bothered to report. If you see someone defending allied war crimes, report it to the moderators to be removed under rule #4. If you don't report them, we can't remove them. If the comment wasn't removed, you probably missed the context; tu quoque is the wehraboo's most potent weapon, and criticizing the mention of allied crimes in topics about Nazis is absolutely valid SWS content.

What's a Wehraboo?

For the sub's purposes a Wehraboo is defined as someone with an exaggerated or sanitized view of Nazi Germany's accomplishments or conduct before and during WW2. This could be:

An overly generous take on Nazi Germany's military, such as "10 Shermans to 1 Panther," "astonishing Nazi scientists advanced human civilization by a century," vaguely homoerotic obsession with dashing German soldiers in their Hugo Boss™ uniforms, and downplaying of major faults with the German military's tactics, strategy, and technology or offering excuses for its failures ("if only Hitler listened to his generals").

Whitewashing or downplaying the crimes against humanity perpetrated by the Wehrmacht and SS in the field, as well as tu quoque arguments to establish false moral equivalency between allied war crimes and the holocaust ("Babi Yar was bad, but the allies bombed Dresden, so everyone's guilty!")

Exaggerating the accomplishments of the Nazis and Hitler as government administrators, i.e. Hitler miraculously fixed the economy, the Nazis discouraged smoking, the Nazis believed in animal rights, Nazis eliminated crime, etc.

Wehraboo testimonials

"Holy shit, that sub is hilarious. All the self-righteousness and hatred of SRS, but focused on an even more obscure and less real thing to bitch about."

"That sub is fucking disgusting. They are mocking the deaths of innocent Germans."

"Jesus, so acknowledging that Nazi Germany had some advanced technology and was a super power now qualifies for that sub? It's a known fact that a lot of German technology was far superior than the rest of the world"

"Humanization of combatants? Brace yourself for /r/ShitWehraboosSay you evil nazi!"

Repulsive_Anteater が作成コミュニティができてから 1年

•

Is this sub mostly Republicans circlejerking? (self.ShitWehraboosSay)

Das_Fische88mm of Fun が 10分前投稿

I'm probably gonna get downvoted here, but seriously, just after reading a few comments on posts on the front page today, common and debunked gems of Republican Parliamentary propaganda constantly pop out. Stuff like:

"Drogheda and Wexford was the only option and Cromwell did it to save lives" (this one's particularly bad),

"Robert Devereux, 3rd Earl of Essex was bad, but not nearly as bad as Charles I",

"Naseby was the beginning of the end for the Royalists",

"The civil war was between good (Roundheads) and bad (Cavaliers)" (I wonder where does Prince Rupert of the Rhine fit on this moral scale).

These sort of historical hallucinations are no longer taken seriously even in English academia (and regarded as what they actually are: post-war propaganda), but continue to be spouted by some Roundheads in the Commonwealth of England and are really just as bad as most excuses Grandees use. Seriously, do people still believe this mythology in 1657? And if you do, sorry for ruining your circlejerk.

(まだ) コメントはありません

トップ新着論争中古い順 Q&A

ここには何もないようです

π Rendered by PID 30191 on app-523 at 2016-07-31 20:37:26.055397+00:00 running 0c96786 country code: JP.

ShitWehraboosSay

Rules

What's a Wehraboo?

Subreddits you might like:

Standard places to mine material:

Other stuff:

Wehraboo testimonials

調停者