あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]ThoughtsAreThings -17ポイント-16ポイント  (8子コメント)

In saying that, thank fuck I'm in Australia

Do you say that because (1) Australia confiscated guns owned lawfully by citizens or (2) Australia doesn't have what America has--a large, poor, violent black populations which starts unneeded conflicts?

****6% of America's population commits 59% of its homicides. Oz doesn't have this ignorant population. THink that's mean to say? Too bad. Most gun deaths in USA are SUICIDE, and of the remaining murders, half are GANG RELATED (blacks). Think that's mean to write? Too bad. It's true.

You aussies will wind up like the Brits--depressed, overrun by high taxation and MENA 'refugees' who shoot up your churches, shopping malls and special events, with no arms or courage to defend yourselves. You'll eventually take up heavy drinking, and enact laws from preventing people to speak the truth. LOL

[–]rawker86 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not OP, but i'm guessing it's because (3) our gun-nuts don't own the senate and as a result we're able to enact effective gun laws.

[–]CX316 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

People who need guns have guns (also the gun buyback wasn't a confiscation, and compensated people the value of their firearms, AND was only for semi-automatic rifles. Handgun rules vary from state to state but they're mostly legal). The average fuckwit who'd take a gun into a club because he's got a problem with someone there, however, doesn't need a gun.

[–]InMySafeSpace 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

confiscation

the action of taking or seizing someone's property with authority; seizure.

It doesn't really have anything to do with whether you compensated the person or not

[–]Greedeater 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

I say it cos we haven't had a mass shooting since 1996, that may or may not coincide with strict gun laws being Introduced.

[–]ThoughtsAreThings -2ポイント-1ポイント  (3子コメント)

that may or may not coincide with strict gun laws being Introduced.

it may also coincide with not having tons of black ghettos and gangbangers.

Also, your violent crime rate WENT UP, not down.

mass shootings are RARE, and one is more likely to die of a lightning strike.

[–]NorCalTico 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Never heard of the Aborigines? Did you think Australia was empty when the British arrived?

[–]CX316 -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

First sentence is racist, also wrong.

Second sentence is wrong.

Third sentence ignores the number of mass shootings in the US over the last several years. Just because a particular person's chance of dying in one is low doesn't make them rare.

[–]InMySafeSpace 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

First sentence is racist, also wrong.

Might be racist, definitely not wrong.

Second sentence is wrong.

IDK, looks like it did spike afterwards

Third sentence ignores the number of mass shootings in the US over the last several years.

Meh, most of those are gang members killing other game members. Nothing of value lost