全 22 件のコメント

[–]finalhedge 12ポイント13ポイント  (2子コメント)

/u/americanpegasus is truly the George Washington of our time.

[–]americanpegasus[S] 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I have left the potential Indictments and Denunciation in this document to another author, hopefully more eloquent on such matters than I.

[–]Introshine 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

I cringed a bit. But then I read your username.

[–]uboyzlikemexico 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

Shouldn't it be ETCdependence?

Are you rallying for ETH!!?!!? :)

[–]ChuckSRQ 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

should be "will dictate that blockchains*" but other than that, I was reading it with some quite amusement the other day haha.

[–]americanpegasus[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Change is incorporated and merged with master; thank you for your contributions/commits.

[–]textrapper 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

That sounds like using social consensus to perform a hard fork, which is the exact opposite of the argument you are trying to make, and which makes ETC sound more like King George in this analogy.

Also the American revolution started bc of the belief that England was stealing from America with taxes that were too high (like the attacker stealing funds). So the Americans took up arms (hard forked) to right the situation, which again puts ETH on the side of America and ETC on the side of England in your analogy.

Anyway, good luck!

[–]juansgalt -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

lol well played sir. Well played.

[–]TravisPatron 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Where is your Twitter handle so we can follow your writing /u/americanpegasus?

[–]juansgalt 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Lmao. This is the best.

[–]RandomRealityChick 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

ETC needs developers not pretentious, wannabe politicians.

[–]americanpegasus[S] 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

I'll do my thing, you do yours. I'm just glad we have prestigious and expert coders like you who can help where it matters.

[–]RandomRealityChick 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

What happened to "We need masons and farmers", that was nicer.

[–]americanpegasus[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I thought it didn't properly represent the all-encompassing role of a developer, and could have misinterpreted.