•
•

Just wondering.... (self.reddevils)

bobcrap50 が 投稿

Would Pogba have cost us or anybody else way more than 110mill if he individually had a great Euro 2016 tournament? Is it a blessing in disguise that he didn't play so well in the Euro's because otherwise, he could've been valued at a way higher price had he been France's star player or something. Is that how it works? I also remember Bayern's president saying something like it would be nearly impossible to sign Renato Sanches after the Euros's because he played amazing and would therefore cost a fortune afterwards.Would love some insight! Thank you very much! :)

全 5 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]DJkoolkidzklanMartial 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

I mean it's already a record price so I don't know if it would have been that much more. But it definitely would have influenced the transfer, in my opinion.

[–]njpatelAnder Herrera 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Potentially, but the issue with that is who else was going to buy him at a higher fee? When you take into account the fee + wages + Riaola's fee, there was no other club that was going to match that (for various reasons, e.g. Real's issue with the wage).

So, even if he single-handily bought France the cup, the reality was that as long as we could deal with the other two issues, the fee itself just needed to break the transfer record to make Juve happy.

[–]deanjokerHerrera 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Now that's a good opinion op. Yeah i guess if he performed well during euro his price must be more higher. Because he will be more marketable and lot more clubs will interested in him.

[–]CalimariaeSolskjaer 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

The ~100 million was being thrown around before the Euros had even started.