全 47 件のコメント

[–]LennyFackler 8ポイント9ポイント  (3子コメント)

They want Donald Trump to lead them into violent revolution. I can't imagine anything more absurd.

[–]WorseThanHipster 8ポイント9ポイント  (1子コメント)

It would be very flashy and ultimately completely impotent, like everything trump has done.

[–]Duke28 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Just like the man himself.

[–]skimitar 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Especially as he would sell them out in a heartbeat if he thought there was a benefit to be had.

[–]Counterkulture 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

I like how they put the original Star of David Hillary poster back up on their sidebar.

NO RACISM HERE, GUYS!!! HOW DARE YOU?!?!?

[–][deleted] 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

What, no posts calling for a literal civil war? I'm on mobile rn but there's at least a dozen I've seen going through the meta sphere and boy is it glorious.

[–]LIATG[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

I've admittedly been a little busy and have been using methods that wouldn't pick that up, please link and I'll add!

[–]Counterkulture 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Our last shot is just that. A shot Civil war anyone?

I hate to admit it but it looks like that is the direction we are heading. God forbid it comes to that, but if it does let it be in my time so my children may know peace.

By, no doubt, a seasoned combat and military veteran... just like all the other lowlifes on the_donald.

[–]Duke28 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

[–]WildBizzyUK 22 points 2 days ago Wouldn't that be a Civil War against Gun Control supporters? Sounds like a short war

As a gun control supporter I think they'd be very very surprised by the not insignificant number of fire arms I own in a very controlled manner. And the skill I have with them after my time in the Army.

[–]Halfy_ -1ポイント0ポイント  (2子コメント)

Why are you taking a joke subreddit seriously? It's only worth linking comments from serious places of discussion. Of course the comments are going to be positive, every subreddit is an echo chamber that enjoys hearing its general agenda.

[–]Duke28 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

A joke sub?

[–]Halfy_ 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

As opposed to a sub for serious discussion and debate? I don't know what anyone expected.

[–]SnapshillBot -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - 1, 2, 3

  2. FUCK THE ESTABLISHMENT AND FUCK EVE... - 1, 2, 3

  3. Everyone behind this decision shoul... - 1, 2, 3

  4. Its a revolution now, DEATH TO THE ... - 1, 2, 3

  5. WHY ARE THESE 2 STILL BREATHING? - 1, 2, 3

  6. Burn the witch! - 1, 2, 3

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

[–]JermanTK -1ポイント0ポイント  (29子コメント)

Ironically I can sorta agree with the fuck the establishment comment (not the second half though)

Clinton literally won the primary by having the media suppress coverage of Bernie Sanders and the DNC suppressing voters.

[–]TheOneFreeEngineer 9ポイント10ポイント  (28子コメント)

No, she won by being a household name, national campaign infrastructure that didn't rely on new voters, and having a solid Democratic political history.

[–]JermanTK 4ポイント5ポイント  (27子コメント)

She won because she had 500 free delegates at the start.

Fuck the DNC.

[–]darkangelx 5ポイント6ポイント  (25子コメント)

and the DNC helping her from the start, and superPAC money and special interests backing her, She and the DNC are why I am leaving the party, most likely, after the convention.

Edit - and as I have reminded the DNC. I have spent money supporting them for years. That ends. They do not get to act like republicans and then ask me for money. If i wanted a non-progressive party, I'd vote republican.

[–]TheOneFreeEngineer 4ポイント5ポイント  (23子コメント)

So you're upset that an established Democratic candidate who has worked within the party for decades is well liked by the party compared to someone who isn't even a Democrat? And that's why you're leaving the party?

[–]darkangelx 6ポイント7ポイント  (22子コメント)

No I am leaving the party because they lied to me and everyone claiming to be neutral when we have direct evidence they were colluding with ONE and only ONE candidate, even after others were running.

This would be like the RNC working WITH trump behind the scenes while publicly saying they were neutral.

Then, at every chance, their allies have closed polling locations to keep new voters out - something 100% AGAINST democratic stance on inclusion and bringing in more voters and a blow to ANYONE that cares about democracy, and getting more people involved.

If you want a system that denies people the right to vote, join the republicans.

So, no, strawman, a guy that won 43% of dem votes + 70% of indie votes lost - barely due to name recognition, corruption, collusion and that is why I am leaving.

Because they are too stupid to see that Bernie can crush Trump and I would watch the party burn than ever vote for that liar[Clinton] - ever.

[–]TheOneFreeEngineer 5ポイント6ポイント  (17子コメント)

I mean the Republican party did work against Trump while saying they were neutral. But overall nothing that happened this election was any different than the last election for democrats. These claims about the party and super delegates against Obama were around in 2008 and he still beat Clinton. While Bernie is great and got a lot of people involved, he simply didn't have the ground game and did poorly in many traditionally democrat demographics. You complain about it being undemocratic but Clinton had the majority of voters vote for her and Bernie is gonna vote for her in November too. To vote Trump to spite her really just says to me that you don't care about poor, African Americans, Hispanics, Muslims and various other demographics Trump has preached hate against. It tells me you are well off enough to not be too hard hit but Trump's hate and bad policies and you don't care about those who aren't. As a Bernie supporter, goodbye and good riddance to you. The Democrats don't need people that throw hissy fits when their candidate doesn't win. Be like Bernie, be a principled independent and don't throw the poor and minorites under the bus just because you feel cheated. Vote for the candidate that best represents Bernie's policies, and that sure as hell ain't Trump.

[–]darkangelx 0ポイント1ポイント  (14子コメント)

Oh really Every year dems close polling places to try to reduce the number of people able to vote? News to me.

Bernie might vote for her over Trump, but lots of his supports and independent voters will not.

I dont care what you think about why I vote for whom. I do not care about the party. Not supporting Clinton does not mean I will vote for Trump, it means I wont vote for Clinton.

I voted against her in 2008. I voted against her again this year. I will never place a vote for that corrupt scum ever.

Wow you think this is because he didnt win and NOT about Clinton and the DNC's actions, fuck you. People like you are why corrupt people keep getting in power. You sheepishly say oh well they won so must vote for the blue flag!

You are a moron. Clinton doesnt represent anything that bernie supports at all. None. Every one of his platforms was shot down by lobbyists from her side.

You deserve Trump.

[–]TheOneFreeEngineer 2ポイント3ポイント  (12子コメント)

I'm sorry I happen to belong to one of the demographics Trump and his supporters hate. He is simply unacceptable. Full stop. No if ands or buts. I'm not throwing the fate of me, my family and my family's future away for political points. I'm not supporting a hate monger. I'm not basing my politics on petty spite.

I can't afford for Trump to be president. Grow up and think about all the people who will be fucked over Trump, do they deserve to be burned?

[–]darkangelx -1ポイント0ポイント  (11子コメント)

Oh shut the fuck up You honestly think americans with their plethora of guns would allow anything to actually happen to you?

Are you expecting hitler-like genocide? Is that your fear? Good, propaganda works on the stupid.

[–]P8zvli 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

You're misunderstanding the voters I think, if the alternative to Sanders is Hillary then I suspect many independent voters are going to stay home on election day.

[–]TheOneFreeEngineer 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Independents staying home on election day is fine. people who say fuck Hillary , I like Bernie so I'm voting Trump which aren't, like the above poster

[–]pieohmy25 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

No. There is no "direct evidence of collision". The documents leaked show that when the DNC started to look into who they were going to run in 2016, Hillary Clinton was the only obvious candidate to run. The fact that Bernie Sanders showed up and provided a fight was unexpected to say the least.

I think many older Democrats remember Carter and don't want to repeat the mistake ( I liked him but that's my opinion ). And really Bill and Hillary's brand of moderate politik has been popular within the DNC for years, so I guess I don't understand much of the populist rhetoric now.

Personally, I had hoped Biden would run. Listening to him speak about the death of his wife and child during the Vice Presidential debates was one of the few sobering moments in the last 20+ years of debates.

[–]darkangelx 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

No. There is no "direct evidence of collision". The documents leaked show that when the DNC started to look into who they were going to run in 2016, Hillary Clinton was the only obvious candidate to run.

FALSE one MONTH AFTER Bernie was in, they were ONLY talking about CLINTON and defending CLINTON.

You are wrong. Period. Ignorant clinton supporters can stop talking. You are uninformed and support a corrupt thug.

Go away.

[–]pieohmy25 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah nothing you said is in conflict with what I posted.

Sanders wasn't really considered a contender for some time. Even that early his odds were incredibly dim. So yeah it makes sense to favor the most popular horse.

Oh and before going on another tantrum I'm not a Clinton supporter. Feel free to peruse my comments. But I'm sure me explicitly stating such won't be enough for you.

[–]pieohmy25 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

No snarky comeback this time? No more wild accusations?

That's a shame. Looked like you were getting pretty riled up there.

[–]TheOneFreeEngineer -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Which Bernie could have convinced to change there vote at any point.