BBS A, Academic English Basic, Mitsu Matsuoka, Nagoya University

School of Informatics and Sciences, Tuesday 3rd Period, 1st Term, 2016


新規投稿

HOME掲示板TOP一覧表示ツリー表示トピック表示記事検索記事修正・削除携帯用URL管理用


[85] Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Mitsu Matsuoka Date:2016/05/17(火) 09:56 [ 返信 ]
"In our time, specialists of all kinds are highly over-rated. We need more generalists--people who can provide broad perspectives." Present your perspective on this issue, using relevant reasons and/or examples to support your views. It should be between 250 and 300 words in length.



[87] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Hiroki Masuda Date:2016/05/22(日) 09:32
I think what we really need is not generalist but specialist. Nowadays, our society became more complex and our technology became more and more esoteric. Is it natural to think that; we need generalists instead of specialists in order to adapt ourselves to the society. It is a common answer, however, it is not the best answer.

We have a limited capability of learning, thinking and memorizing. It is difficult to be a generalist; we can’t understand all of everything. Thanks to specialists, our society and technology keep its progresses. Considering our capability, it is easy to understand that to be a specialist is more efficient.

In my opinion, most important thing is connection, integration and cooperation. Now, a number of science fields help each other and create highly unique inventions. We know that learning widely and shallowly is very useful at a glance, but it makes no progresses. We know that learning narrowly and deeply is very inconvenient at a glance, but it makes many creations.

Learn deeply and connect widely. This is the best answer of the question. We should not misunderstand a goal: to be a wide-connected person not a generalist. Is it difficult for us? You probably have a cellphone and you can use the Internet. You can find E-mail address or phone number with ease. What is lacking in Modern people, especially Japanese teens, is aggressiveness. They are reluctant to communicate with others. May be, we will teach how to communicate with others than how should we reach the Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything in the near future.

[88] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Ryo Suzuki Date:2016/05/23(月) 16:51
I am thinking that the thing that specialists of all kinds are highly over-rated is good. I am thinking that current condition should not change, yet. It is essential for the progress of technic to increase specialists. Of course, at present, the level of technic is higher than ever, but the level is not peak: technic does not realize the limitations now. I am thinking technic does not have the limitations.

At first, for example, we can go somewhere firstly or quite a ways thinking to trains, new trunk line and cars now. However, the possibility of proving technic of them exists. We may be able to make the machine that send human being on somewhere in a moment such as the machine in comics.

At second, due to spread computers, smart phone and I phone, the opportunity that we write someone in papers for pencils is less than ever. However, I am thinking that computers, smart phone and I phone are not the limitation area of technic. The possibility that we can make the machine that write what we are thinking automatically is not zero.

At finally, of course, nothing can be better than the thing that we increase generalists—people who can provide broad perspectives. However, due to increasing generalists, we may decrease specialists. If we decrease specialists, the progress of technic may be late. Moreover, the number of generalists are not zero now, of course, but the number is little. In the end, I think current condition that specialists of all kinds are highly over-rated is good.

[89] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Mayuko Deguchi MAIL Date:2016/05/23(月) 22:35
I think that we need more specialist. There are two reasons why I think so.

First, generalists need specialists when they want to solve difficult problems in the project. For example, generalists can come up with new ideas but they can’t carry out the project with no worries without the specialists when things must be decided and carried out by everyone who work in the company. People who can be counted for everyone are specialists when the project has a problem, because generalists seldom have a rich knowledge of a specific thing. Also, specialists can gain a various and rich knowledge when they work together in a place. In fact, specialists develop technology and invent many new projects such as communication line and an industrial robot today.

Second, almost all of people can’t take the specialist’s place. What the number of the generalists is increasing leads the phenomenon which that of the specialists is decreasing in our country. Specialists also include the craft persons such as ceramists. So, if we fail to pass down the technique to make traditional craft object, the culture may become obsolete. It is very difficult for us to restore the culture which become obsolete at once. If there were no craft persons here, ceramics will decrease because no one can make them. The situation will cause a lot of financial loss to Japan.

For two reasons, I think that we need more specialists who can be counted for us when we are in trouble and bring a huge profit to Japan.


[90] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Rui Fujitani Date:2016/05/28(土) 20:08
I think generalists must be valued as well as specialists.

It is difficult for specialists to pay attention to other fields they don’t specialize in. If they be conscious of only their own field, they may generate loss they don’t expected. GDP (Gross Domestic Product) is an example. GDP has been used for long time in the world. It, however, is not consider loss of natural resources. Although environmental destruction proceeds and affects a quality of our life, it does not reflect in GDP. It is a problem. So Green GDP was created lately. Unlike GDP, it takes the loss of environment into consideration. However, its standard is still vague. In order to decide it, it is need that economists and environmentalists’ cooperation.

In such situation, is it easy for specialists in different fields to work on problems with sufficient understanding about one another’s fields? I think it is not so easy because most of the specialists are spending long time for only one area. If there are generalists, they can become bridges among specialists. That is to say, generalists are helpful to connect various fields. If specialists can think with other specialists and generalists regardless of fields, research could advance and they could get new findings.

Specialist is very important position for human life and society. Many specialists have studied since the remote past. Generalists’ wide views will be need to make effective use of the specialists’ knowledges and techniques and to develop technology and studies in the near future.


[92] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Yuma Taguchi Date:2016/05/30(月) 13:59
I think that generalist is needed more than specialist. Specialist has the huge knowledge about their strong field. Generalist has the various knowledges about many fields. Both of them need in the society. Lately, however, generalists are needed more than specialists in the today’s society.

Recent technologies are developing year by year because of specialists. For example, Dr. Amano and Dr. Akasaki are specialists who are awarded a Nobel Prize. Thanks to their invention, our lives very comfortable and safety, so specialists are needed. These days, however, not only we have to develop the technologies but also maintain these. Generalist can maintain and make full use these because they have various knowledges. From this, I think generalists are needed.

The present day, the scene that is required the generalists is not only these situations. Grobalization is advancing in the world. We are required to familiar with foreign culture, situation and language. For instance, some company use English as official language in there, have the branch office or factory around the world and have to go on an overseas business trip. There are many foreign people in the city and many overseas student studying in Japan in the school. Because of them, we must acquire skills related these things. This is called generalist.

Today, having only one strong knowledge may be no good. Everyone have to familiar with variety things. In the coming future, I think, generalist is a worthwhile and everyone need to become a generalist. This is the recent tide.

[93] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Ryuga Kato Date:2016/05/30(月) 14:23
I think people should have wide knowledge. 4 are well-founded.First all knowledge is connected.When writing a scientific thesis as well as the one biology and chemistry concern closely, the language ability is also requested.

Second, communication is to work. There is much man different in the race, religion, a language and the values at all in the world. When communicating with them, the wide culture is useful.

Third, the knowledge by which I thought I didn't need that is useful. When I was a schoolchild, I went to a sea to go fishing with the family. A father could fish various kinds of fish, and said "He took today's supper for the fish which could be fished." I remembered the tuition who dealt with it about a harmful creature by science at school. Fish with recognition was also caught at the session. I spoke to a father about the thing. If we assume that that class is the one I don't need, and I'm sleeping, I don't know what happened.

A detailed thing was estimated by the various fields from the past at the end. It was said to be an ideal to have the universal interest in all things and show the ability without sticking to occupation and a hobby as a view of man in the Renaissance age. Leonard da Vinci who is conversant with a painting, a sculpture and architecture, enjoys music and literature and also has scientific knowledge abundantly at the same time is typical.

I think people should have wide knowledge from the above.

[94] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Takuji Kato Date:2016/05/30(月) 15:20
I think that we need more and more specialists above existing a lot of generalists in this world. There are two reason why I think so.

One, why I conclude that we need a lot of generalists is attributed to population explosion. While population is increasing rapidly, some countries can not improve their production levels as well, and in this world there are many poor people who need some help. I think that people who have wide range of knowledge, what is called generalist, can help those people with their thought and power.

The other, why I conclude that we need specialists above existing generalists is that there are some technical problem which could not be solved only by generalist’s knowledge, and in the future we will face a lot of unpredictable problem which ordinal people can not find answer to them. To solve these matters, we need some people who have highly technical knowledge, what is called specialist.

To make this world more better, I think that generalist and specialist should communicate each other more over than ever. If each side teach their skills and knowledge, they can be people who have highly technical knowledge in a lot of situations. With existing such people, we can solve some problem with a small number of people, and we can also tackle other problem which could have not done ever. Of course it is so difficult to reach this vision, but I certain that it is not impossible in the future.


[95] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Tamaki Yuko Date:2016/05/30(月) 15:27
I agree with this view. That is to say I think that generalists are very important in our society. There are two main reasons.

First, of course, generalists have less deeper knowledge than specialists. However, generalists also have a wide mind. These days, a lot of problems happen at the same time and they are complex. There are many problems which specialists cannot work on. This is because they would have the very sophisticated knowledge, but it is for only one thing. While generalists always consider several problems so they can look at things from many points of view. Thanks to this view, they could be very flexible.

Second, in my opinion, specialists are too intelligent for public people to understand. While generalists’ thinking are easy enough to understand. I want to explain it by using an example around me: teachers and professors. I suppose that teachers are like generalists and professors are like specialists. After I entered at college, I am feeling that it is difficult for me to understand classes which professors lecture for us. Therefore I cannot help thinking that I could take lessons at the high school again. Of course professors know more about their specialty than teachers know. Probably, however, teachers study not only the subject which they teach to their students but also education, they are always considering how they will be able to teach it plain.

That is why I think that generalists are as necessary for today’s society as specialists so the population of them should increase.


[96] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Banno Takahiro MAIL Date:2016/05/30(月) 15:42
This issue has been discussed for many years. Someone said “The issue that which are important generalists or specialist looks like argument that which do you like dog or cat.” Many people believe that it is hard to solve this issue but I think that we should have characteristics of both generalists and specialists. Nowadays, in japan, I feel that we are forced to become specialists, so I have looked for something which I study to be specialist for years. However I couldn’t discover it. It is not easy to find. I have been worry about it. So I talked with my friend who go on to graduate school about it. He said,”We should be a flexible man.” He once hope to study math in foreign university, so he submited a lot of application for admission to the universities and took exam, but he fall all tests. So he asked his foreign friend to check his reason of admission to a university in that application. His friend advised him not to write “I want to study my specialty.” According to his friend, It is not so important to have a speciality but we are required flexible thinking and broad view in foreign university. He said,”In the future, someone have two sides of generalist and specialist will be most attractive man.”

It is hard to be a generalist because it needs much knowledge about various fields and what we should learn is vague. To be a specialists has risk of taking place by new technology.
So we need two aspect of both of them.


[97] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Takumi Watanabe Date:2016/05/30(月) 15:57
I partly agree to this opinion because larger view should be got today, but we should not only go on increasing generalists. Specialization in something have made us understand them to some extent. However, today’s society are making slow progress than it used to be. It is because there are too much specialists. If we have more generalists, we can see things from various perspectives. Then, what we have never noticed will be realized.

I would like to present a story. An astronomer discovered a strange star. He searched the one in astronomy documents, but it was not found. One day, he read an old essay. There was the one that corresponded with the star in terms of any point. This story goes over a wall of literature and science. In this way, to have wide point of view play a vital role.
However, just increasing specialists is not good. The most important thing is a balance of number between specialists and generalists. If we keep it, we can make remarkable advances.

Some universities should abolish system which makes us major in what we want to study. Although most of students study many kinds of subjects in elementary schools, junior high schools, and high schools, deciding a department when we enter colleges is a little fast, and still fast when we enter high schools. Students cannot make the best decisions since they have not enough culture and experience. If someone want to study a specialized fields, he and she can go a graduate schools. If not, they can study or work as a generalists. As a result, the balance will remain good.


[98] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:kyu zuuyan MAIL Date:2016/05/30(月) 16:04
More and more people think the specialist who mastered his subject would be useful for the society.Of course, the specialists know everything about their study, and I don’t think it is wrong or useless.With the rapid development of technology , it’s too hard for us to understand everything , and we haven’t that much time to learn these; if we want to find out something that we never ever studied ,we need to catch the specialist and let them show us everything he or she know about it.For that reason , I do think the more specialist we have the more our society being completely.

So the generalist is useless? Of course not,I firmly believe that generalists are more useful for the society. Just like I said before, the world become completely , though you mastered one or two things, it is too tiny for the all study. Every study combine so much other study , if you want to understand one thing , you should learn much other things, at that moment, the generalist will help you. For example , mathematics and astronomy are cognate sciences, they could help each other’s study, and make their study completely, you contact with other people , you can learn much things you didn’t know before, then you will be the generalists,and you can use your knowledge to understand more things.

The specialist is useful but hard to be. Everyone can be generalist is the most important thing. 100 generalists can win 1 specialists with 99 normal peoples.


[99] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Hiroaki Doi Date:2016/05/30(月) 17:05
If asked, I think generalists are superior to specialists. The former focus on the width of knowledge than the depth of it, the latter focus on the depth than width. Students who try to become the former is faculty of informatics and sciences, students who try to become the latter is faculty of engineering.

Generalists are good at dealing with some problems of various areas, and they have management ability which they have got many experiences about various areas. However, they have some risks that they are useless because they are involved in various tasks. Specialists have great influence on their strong field, and they can have confidence and find their jobs rewarding. However, there are many great specialists, so they should compete hardly to get good position.

There are two reasons which I think generalists are superior to specialists.

First, there are few people who can deal with some problems, but there are many people who are familiar with one thing.

Second, the world has been changing rapidly today. I think the person who has broad knowledge can deal with the change, so generalists can have great success in broad social places because they have various knowledge.

I enter faculty of informatics and sciences because I hope that I could deal with some
problems of various areas. I study hard to become the person who play an active part of society. I said generalists are superior to specialists, however, both of them are necessary in the world, and they should cooperate each other to make the world better.


[100] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Nana Takao Date:2016/05/30(月) 18:25
Now, there are a lot of specialists. Some of them active in TV and various kinds of specialists discuss problems in a variety of fields. I think that they have made the world more knowledgeable and they will make it more vibrant.

In our daily lives, we often see a discussion which some specialists make on TV. Although they sometimes did not discuss but quarrel, thanks to the discussion, some things can be improved. For example, if people discuss environmental problems, they need detailed information about them and have to push forward the discussion carefully. Then, there should be at least one people who specialize in environmental studies, in other words, specialists.

However, there may be some people who think that it is not specialists but generalists that are needed by the world now. If only specialists discuss environmental problems, an unexpected problem may occur in the field where is different from the environment. We should be able to prevent such a situation. Generalists are well-read, but the knowledge about each field is poorer than an expert of the field. When generalists discuss environment problems, they can consider the problem from various viewpoints, but they cannot consider it deeply like specialists.

When considering these, I think that when people discuss environmental problems, there should be not only specialists about the environment but specialists about other fields. When people discuss other problems, it is similar. This will enable specialists to solve or improve problems in that they can think them deeply with a large field of views.

[101] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Masashi Ito Date:2016/05/30(月) 19:08
I do not think that we need both generalists and specialists. There are things that specialists can do but generalists cannot. There are also things that generalists can do but specialists cannot. So I think that we have trouble if either generalists or specialists are racked. Let me give two reasons for my insistence.

First reason is that specialists can deal with more difficult tasks than generalists. For example, a player of sprint can run faster than a triathlon player who runs, pedal a bicycle and swim. This is because a sprinter devote himself only to running fast, however, a triathlon player practices several events. In other words, a sprinter can practice running for longer time than a triathlon player. So specialists can show a high ability and is important for our life.

Second reason is that generalists can do more tasks than specialists. A generalist who study the study of several fields can see things from various viewpoints about one problem, however, a specialist can see from one viewpoint. That is why, generalists can find wider and more flexible solutions than specialists. So generalists is important for our life.

For these two reasons, there are a part that specialists is prefer to generalists and a part that generalists is prefer to specialists. That is why, I think that a cooperation of specialists and generalists is the most important. If specialists and generalists make use of each other's proud places, our life become more comfortable. So I think we cannot select the superiority and inferiority of specialists and generalists.


[102] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Yuma Hirano Date:2016/05/30(月) 21:13
A lot of specialists need at a sports place. These days, many countries are given big influence in Olympics and World Cup. They have an influence also good for national economy and politics as well as sports promotion on its effect. So the sports specialist who can play an active part at an international sports place needs now. The person who can play various kinds of sports doesn't attract attention so much at an international sports place. For example, Sou Takei dose.
Specialists were said that they were necessary in the field of the science and technology before. The future time, generalists that can do various ways of thinking will need to invent something new. But even though we gain knowledge of the various fields, we may not be able to become generalists. And, there would be few chances to use our knowledge we have gained ever after we go out to society. We should have an interest especially widely to become generalists. We should also challenge and notice everything. However, it isn't said that only generalists are needed. If all people aim at generalists, every field would hardly make progress and society would decline. An enterprise would put one above the others, but a country would find both talent. I can't decide which human resources are more excellent, but I'd like to be the person who can behave with foresight. If I become the person who can behave with foresight, I would be able to be the man need by society and a country.


[103] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Koki Hattori Date:2016/05/30(月) 22:58
I believe that generalists are more important than specialists. Of course, specialists are also important, but generalists are essential for success of projects.

For one reason, almost all projects are consisted of many factors. It shows us that many sections have to link with other sections. It proves that one factor can’t success projects alone. In this present state, what is needed? Projects need an ability to collect all sections. Generalists can coordinate many sections by their extensive knowledge.

The second reason is that generalists often have more expert knowledge than specialists.
Each factors are not completely independence from other factors and have relations. That truth often makes the situation that generalists have better ideas about one section than specialists. Also, generalists can have many point of view, so when they are troubled with projects, they can attack a problem from a different perspective.

The third, generally generalists interacted many people each have different philosophies in their student life. Students who want to be generalists have to study wide things. Being taught by professor and interacting with many people who have different ways of thinking and living produce ability to students. These abilities provide them helpful knowledge for not only working, but also everyday life. Knowledge enrich our quality of lives.

Human will want growth. One of the forms of growth is acquiring knowledge and skill. It comes to acquiring them, taking it widely and shallowly is easier and more instructive than doing it narrowly and deeply. Eventually, reason of my opinion is according to it.

[104] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Yuuki Nakano Date:2016/05/30(月) 23:29
I agree with this opinion. There are four reasons I can give for my agreement.

First, I think that, in the world there are too many specialists and communication among them is not so speedy and clear because one specialist knows better about only one fields, and doesn’t know about fields other specialists studying. The emerge of more generalists can help the contacts among specialists easier with the broad knowledge.

Second, ideas or conclusions are probably monolithic if only specialists about a specific of more generalists can also help the discussion to get a wonderful goal with the broad knowledge and various experiences. I’m sure that.

Third, take it into consideration that there are too many specialists, if you are a specialist, it is very difficult for you to beat them and get a job. However, if you are a generalist, you can get a job easier. People who can do more things is needed for company. The fact that to become generalist brings you benefit clearly will be connected to increase of the number of generalists.

Forth, if many people want to be specialist about the same theme, how many people does one specialist teach the knowledge for? People will appear who can’t learn real knowledges and skills on the site. Let’s think about the case of generalists. Because people who doesn’t have so deep knowledge can educate generalists and students visit many teachers to learn many things, the stress for one teacher is so little. To get more generalists also gives benefit for teachers.

From the above, the emerge of more generalists is natural and benefits the whole society.


[105] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Uwai Gen Date:2016/05/30(月) 23:39
I think that we need specialists more than generalists because the development of the technology need us to solve the much more difficult problems than the past.
For example, the computers have developed recently, but the problems with them are more and more complex at the same time. When some accidents happen, people who can do everything hurriedly are not necessary able to solve them. In that time, It is someone who familiar with the computer that be required.
Please imagine that you are so distinguished in a company. When newcomers enter your company, if they say that they are familiar with a field, you can decide what they work easily. However, If they say that they can do everything hurriedly, but they are not familiar with a field, you would be worried about their work.
I do not say that generalists are not necessary. Instructing people is suited to the generalists. However, the number of the people who obey the boss’s order is more than that of the boss, so the society needs specialists more.
Some people say that when the computer become more smart, works of humans will become less and less. Having professional knowledge is important in order not to lose our works.
I think that one of the reasons why I study in this university is in order to learn professional knowledge which help me when I work in the society. I want to study to become a specialist who can solve everything in my ground.


[106] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Kiyoshi TAKEDA Date:2016/05/30(月) 23:51
I agree with the idea that the number of the generalist-people who can provide broad perspectives should increase. That is because generalist-people can combine many things with his knowledge, I think.l
I heard one story about combination of knowledge.
One specialist of math was suffering from one difficult problems. One day, when he was talking with a specialist of physics. At that time, he hit upon a great idea.
And the idea helped him to solve the problem that he was suffering from.
In other word, talking with the specialist of other kind helped him to solve the problem about other field.
That is why I think the combination of knowledge is very important.
In this story, the specialist of math and physics solve math problem.
How about the generalist-people?
If one generalist is suffering from problem, the generalist may be able to solve the problem on his own.
In other words, generalist can think about one thing from many points of view.
That is why I think the number of the generalist-people should increase.
Generalist have many knowledge about many fields and is able to use them at all time.
For example, if a generalist is suffering from one difficult problem of math, he is able to think the problem from some point of view such as physics, biology, and so on. A specialist of one field can never do like that.
Of course there should be a number of specialist because specialist solve many difficult problems. However, we should recognize the importance of generalist-people.


[107] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Nakano Sakurako Date:2016/05/31(火) 00:02
I partly agree with this opinion. I think both specialists and generalists are important. There are two examples I can give for my opinion.

First, are teachers specialists? I once thought they are specialists because they teach one subject. However, a principal’s story changed my opinion. He said that teachers’ jobs are really diverse. Let’s think of primary school teachers. They teach Japanese, mathematics, science, history, English, music, and PE. Moreover, they teach how to play, clean and communicate with friends. They protect their students from dangerous as well. Not only that, but also they have other much work. Therefore, I think that teachers need many kinds of skills. Those who know only one subject deeply may be not good teacher.

Second, if there were not specialists in modern society, what would happen to us? Japan are hit by powerful earthquakes many times. We often watch TV about disaster. In the program, specialists in disaster, such as earthquakes, landslides, and floods are teaching us about how to survive. Then, these days, many kinds of specialists have developed science and technology. For example, cellphones and computers make our life more comfortable. Without specialists, modern society might not develop like this.

I am going to study many fields at the university and I want to be a generalist. According to a research, a half of Japanese young people seem to want to be a specialist and the other seem to want to be a generalist. In conclusion, both specialists and generalists should be highly rated.


[108] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Masakiyo Teranishi MAIL Date:2016/05/31(火) 00:03
It seems that generalists are required more than specialist. Specialists have the huge knowledge about their strong field. Generalists have the knowledges about many fields. Both of them are required in our society. Generalists are needed more than specialists in the today’s society.


At first, of course, generalists have shallower knowledge than specialists. They also have a open mind. These days, there are many problems which specialists cannot work on. This is because they would have the very sophisticated knowledge, but it is for only one thing. Although generalists always consider many fields , they can look at things from many points of view. Thanks to this view, they could be very flexible.

Second, in my opinion, specialists are too intelligent for public people to understand. Generalists’ knowledge is easy enough to understand. I want to explain it by using an example around me: teachers and professors. I suppose that teachers are like generalists and professors are like specialists. After I entered at college, I am feeling that it is difficult for me to understand classes which professors lecture for us. I cannot help thinking that I could take lessons at the high school again. Of course professors know more about their specialty than teachers know. However, they should study not only the field which is specialized but also the knowledge which is not specialized.

For these reasons, it seems that generalists are as necessary for today’s society.


[109] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Natsumi Oue Date:2016/05/31(火) 00:20
I completely agree with this opinion. It is a sensible opinion. Until today, specialists with advanced specific field skills are very useful. For example, seismologists, psychologists and political scientists. There are a few generalists, however. Let me give three reasons for my complete agreement.

The first reason is that generalists can cope with the passage of times flexibly. Specialists cannot follow the passage of times. Technology progresses rapidly today. We must change individual ability in sequence. Therefore, the ability of generalists is required.

The second reason is that generalists can connect the knowledge of specialists. In Japan, individual ability tends to become independent. It is strange; actually, the society is one. I think that we may not correspond to the future society each even if one ability excels. That is why existence to connect the ability with will be necessarily required. It is generalists.

The last reason is that we must develop the society while talking with people. The society consists of people. The society develop by the opinion of people. Generalists can solve a problem with adopting the opinion of many people positively. Therefore, the society does not develop without the ability of generalists.

For these reasons, I am justified in concluding that generalists should be useful. Generalists who have slight knowledge is worthless, however. I think that not only we increase generalists, but also we should produce generalists with the prominent knowledge. It will be necessary for society that the person who had the ability of generalists and the ability of specialists in the future.

[110] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Yoshito Kamogawa Date:2016/05/31(火) 00:27
I think that we need more generalists than specialists. Recently, our society has been developing dramatically and becoming more and more complex. So people who can cope with various accidents are required for it. Usually, specialists only can cope with one thing.

In 2011, March 11th, we, people in japan had a big earthquake in Tohoku area called “Higashinihondaishinsai”. Then a nuclear power plant in Fukushima suffered enormous damage. At the same time, radiation began to leak and a lot of residents were forced to refuge, so they had various problems. A lot of refuge goods were delivered to Fukushima. However, before this disastrous accidents, specialists of nuclear power plant have believed that it is absolutely safe and radiation doesn’t leak outside. Of course, the people who don’t have knowledge at all about it had no choice but to believe the thing. People believed in specialists about it. After the earthquake disaster, what specialists said proved not to be absolute.

In comparison with specialists, generalists have wide knowledge about various categories, so they can be good at handling sudden situations that specialists can’t do. There are such situations in our complex society especially in business.

However, it is true that specialists have a lot of good aspects that generalists don’t have. I think we need more generalists than specialists, but both are very important and essential. In the future, I want to be a generalist. Then I want to do what specialists can’t do and want to challenge various kinds of things.


[111] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Kumagai Keijun Date:2016/05/31(火) 00:48
I entirely agree with opinion that specialist should be more rated. It is a moderate opinion for me. Let me offer some reasons for my agreement.

First, there are many kind of jobs in Japan. I think however most of them is the jobs for specialist because of a few developing countries. they are quickly developing and the jobs for generalist stolen from us by them. Because it is easy. the people who can’t adequately do math may be able to these jobs. For example, accountant, bank employee, end so on. Ten years ago, my grandfather fired regarding of his high achievement in office. This is caused by foreign countries development. If the salary of Japanese businessman was not decrease, Japan would not win developing countries in it.

Second, someone may state that specialists are obstinate and don’t have the ability of communication. Although I think it is little problem. specialists can rise up their ability after entering company but generalists can’t wear special knowledge.

Last, most of the corporation access what you can do. Which person you choose? A can program for game, but the grade in university is low. B can’t do special things but the grade in university is high. We may choose A because A has special skill, program. Of course we have to teach A many other things but it is more easy than teaching program.

The reasons mentioned above lead me to believe that, in the future, specialist more rated, so I choose specialist.


[112] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Yuki Kawai Date:2016/05/31(火) 00:56
I think we need more generalist than specialist. There are three reasons why I think so.

First, I think we should utilize existing technologies. Thanks to specialists, our society and technology are progressing. Now, there are many great technologies in the world. However, some of them are not used because we can’t discover the field which we can utilize them. A person who have many different knowledges can find the field more easily. To discover the appropriate field is lower cost than to create new technologies. What is more, generalist can integrate different technologies and create a new technology. I think it is important to create new technology using an existing technology.

Second, I think we need cooperation coming years. I think generalist are suitable manager. A person who is a managerial post must put together different people. People need many different knowledge to put together different people. A company which have good generalists will be a good company.

Last, generalist is a person who has studied his favorite fields and also his hate fields, but specialist is a person who has studied only his favorite fields. This opinion may be my biased view. I think generalist is better for mental than specialist. People who can work hate fields are useful and can success in the world.

Specialists are also needed. They play important roles in the world. They are great people, too. However, for these reasons, I think we need more generalist. I want to be a great generalist.

[113] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Hiroki Nakagawa MAIL Date:2016/05/31(火) 01:19
I think what is more needed is rather generalists than specialists.

First, to have general knowledge make it easier to bear some new ideas, inventions or discovery. A man who graduated faculty of information science joined a company. Then, he told to make a shower for handy capped person. He never have the knowledge about mechanic, so he started studying by himself. Finally he found a new mechanism, and invented a new shower. It is often happen that what the company needs is very different from the thing we specialized at university. So, generalist are the best person that the companies need.

Second, generalist solve the problems more smoothly. Certainly, specialists also solve the problems smoothly. However, sometimes we don’t know which branch solve the problem. For example, if you have a serious headache that is cause from some different reasons, a doctor who specializes in one branch may not be able to solve it. But the doctor who have general knowledge of disease certainly can found the cause of it. If he don’t have enough skill to cure him, he may be able to introduce proper specialists.

At last, generalist can correspond to the even situation flexibly. Nowadays, the situation of the economy, politics, and society are changing. If specialist faced on the circumstance that is different from what they expect, they will get confusing. But, thanks to the variety of knowledge, generalist can work coolly.

Generalists are essential for us now. Generalists will change our society more convenient, comfortable, and creative.


[114] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Shogo Beppu MAIL Date:2016/05/31(火) 02:20
I quite agree with this opinion. Let me give two reason for my agreement.

The first reason is that it is necessary to understand things in wide area. In our times, wide range of study is deeply studied. This age, various area of things are deeply specialized. In the growth of the various industries along with the rapid development of society, division of labor and academic subdivision of the business in all areas have been promoted. However, organizations that have lost so much cross connection that emphasizes expertise, the situation that cannot meet the needs of complex intertwined modern society problem has born. In order for organizations and society as a group of human beings to go to continue to development, to understand the words in a variety of fields is the most important. We need human resources who can bridge the words of each other. He is essential in our times.

The second reason is much simpler than first one. We all should be the person that is literate. In the complicated modern society, anyone do not know when he or she would encounter difficulties. I think, if when it comes to such a situation, what will help me to solve and lead the resolution is wide range of liberal arts.

In my conclusion, it is essential that you know about the study of a variety of fields in our time. Conversely speaking, I think that people who cannot make it may not be able to correspond to further changes in the modern society.


[115] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:niwa keisuke Date:2016/05/31(火) 06:54
I agree with this plan. I think that generalists are important for this world. To solve a lot of modern problems, a wide range of knowledge is required. If you have a great variety of knowledge, you can hit on many solutions in various fields. On the other hand, specialists may have narrow knowledge, and they are not able to respond to modern problems. Today, let me show you the differences between generalists and specialists.

First, I will tell you about specialists. They have professional knowledge. For example, specialists of machinery are able to make a significant contribution in the machinery fields. To be specific, there are specialists of car, IC equipment, and so on. In this way, many specialists work effectively in each area. This obviously made our life more comfortable. However, they cannot deal with problems when unprofessional things occur, because they have intensive knowledge.

On the contrary, generalists don’t have as specific knowledge as specialists do. However, they are familiar with many things. When a problem comes about, they can analyze from diversified standpoints. By doing this, they find various aspects of the problem. As a result, they solve it. Modern society is filled with a large amount of information, so narrow knowledge cannot meet demand. Thus generalist is very important for this complicated world.

I am in school of informatics and science. Its idea is that generalists are significant. I would like to study along this apartment’s idea, and in the future, I am eager to approach many problems with a wide perspective.

[116] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Kaede Morichika Date:2016/05/31(火) 08:25
Which is better, the specialist or the generalist? I will describe characters about both persons.

First, the specialist. The specialist is the person who know almost completely about one field. Perhaps, in that field, he can solve many problems and is respected. His intelligence is deep, but narrow. His solution may be correct but not best. Second, the generalist. The generalist is the person who know about various things, but shallowly. When he solves problems, he takes many things into consideration. He can find out the best solution.

Judging from these, I want to be a generalist. Why? I have two reasons. One reason is that a generalist can manage many problems connecting them to other things. If he encounters a new thing, he considers it deeply and understands it, which is perhaps impossible for a specialist. The other reason is that it is easier for a generalist to expand his intelligence. He already knows various things belonging to many field, so if he sees new information, he understands them easily. In the specialist’s case, he can learn new things belonging to his field, but he cannot learn other field.

Therefore, the generalist is more necessary than the specialist. For example, in the basketball game, let’s compare two players. First player is good at long range shoot but he can’t score in the paint area. Second player can score long range shoot, but worse than first player, and score in paint area. Which player is better player? I think second player is better. The ability to select plays in the different situation is vital.

Thus, I want to be a generalist.


[117] Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Akihiro Fujita Date:2016/05/31(火) 18:41
I approve of this opinion. In fact, I want to be generalist, so I belong to Nagoya University School of Informatics and Sciences. In this department, we can learn a lot of studies which can meets social needs. I will show why I want to be a generalist so by giving two reason.

First, it is said that generalist can provide broad perspectives. Knowing the society widely, we can have a wide field of vision and can find new ideas and can enjoy work. In reality president is generalist.

Second, Today has many changes by the technological changes, so we have to adopt the change of the work. However Specialist focus on one thing , they can not adopt the change of the world. Generalist have a lot of knowledge and perspectives, so they can gather up Specialist and adopt change of the world. Generalist is adaptable occupation.

However, Generalist also has bad aspects. In Japan, most of worker is generalist. Generalist can leave only an ordinary result for all things. Information is available easily now, so the market value of generalist may be falling now. There is an opinion that specialist is more important than generalist in the future. Generalist has an advantage and a fault as mentioned, so generalist should raise specialty first and collect informations and study a lot of things, so specialist can be generalist. I think that generalist who strengthened specialty is strong. Therefore I want to become such a generalist.


[119] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Yomi Morimoto Date:2016/05/31(火) 23:10
We tend to think specialists are greater than generalists because many specialists become famous by appearing on TV and being featured in journals. It may be true at one time, however, generalists are also needed in the world. Both specialists and generalists play an important role in our daily life.

First, I will say about importance of specialists. As we know, specialists are strongly needed in many situation. For instance, when your computer is broken, you will need a help by a professional of computer, and when you are sick in bed, you have to go and see a doctor. If the specialists are not exist in such situations, you will have difficulty treating them.

Second, I will say why generalists are needed. If there are only specialists, what problem will happen? You can imagine that a company producing cars. There are a lot of technicians who can make automobile parts and combine them in the company. The technicians are essential for the company, however, if there is no one who evaluate the company’s benefit and cost, the company is not hold up at all. Like such situation, specialists always are able to work thanks to generalist’s support.

Therefore, both specialists and generalists are essential in our society. Specialists have narrow and very deep knowledges and generalists have wide and shallow knowledge. When they make the most of their knowledge and help each other, they can show their real ability and it may lead the development of technology and economy.


[121] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Mitsuhiro Okamoto Date:2016/05/31(火) 23:18
I completely agree with this view. There are two reasons I can give for my opinion.
Let me give them.

First, generalists can work more efficient than specialists. Specialists are very likely to follow a way; they only have a kind of special information. Although the information naturally be useful, they are puzzled and cannot do anything when problems associated with the other field happen. On the other hand, generalists can follow various ways because they have many kinds of information. They can save a lot of time to work if problems of the other fields cause because generalists could have knowledge of the fields.

Second, generalists are likely to get ahead than specialists. If general public’s demands and interests about a specific field decrease, specialists with professional information of the field became not to be necessary. They must start to study the other fields; they cannot earn money and survive. In the case of specialists who have lots kinds of knowledge, they could quickly convert the other fields if the field they work decline. In addition, the bosses of them rely on generalists; generalists with many kinds of information are more useful than specialists with only a kind of information. When restructuring of the organization happens, the bosses leave generalists because they have more potential about various kinds of the fields than specialists.

In conclusion, generalists are more useful than specialists. The person with wide knowledge is important and the person with deep knowledge comes to be unimportant.


[125] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Kato Daiki Date:2016/06/05(日) 02:42
I think that a generalist is more important than a specialist. This is because you must become a generalist to become a specialist. For example, the student of the medical college must learn a body and pharmacology or immunology by all means to become the doctor.
In addition, I think that I am more likely to raise confusion if there is not a generalist even if I have a specialist. The generalist grasps it about the whole, and it can be understood, but it grasps it about the whole in the specialist, and this is because there are few intelligible people. Therefore I cannot deal with a state of emergency without being able to grasp the present conditions if there is not a generalist even if there is a specialist. For example, workers are less likely to be able to finish dealing when a trouble happened when they assemble a car if all of them are specialists. This is because they are not more likely to be able to find what a cause is immediately because they cannot grasp it in the whole. If there is a generalist there, I am more likely to be found because I grasp the whole what it is caused by.
In addition, a director of the companies has more generalists than a specialist. This is because it is necessary for the director to grasp the whole company. Thus, a generalist is more likely to be left to this work than a specialist more.
Thus, I think that a generalist is more important than a specialist.


[199] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Hidenaga Takahashi Date:2016/07/11(月) 19:29
I think that we need generalists.

First, social problems are getting more and more difficult and complex. Specialists have great ability and knowledge their own way. However, we need to put various field knowledges together in many situations. For example, when a company release new goods, they need economics, statistics and psychology. Specialists will suggest great opinions from only one field. On the other hand, generalists can combine their knowledge and suggest creative opinions. Creativity is most important ability in today. Generalists have larger “materials” than specialists do.

Second, generalist can be leader of group. In big company. There are many sections and each group must employ great specialists. However, president have to be generalist. Why? President plays a very important role in company “to determine”. It needs many knowledge and experience to make a right decision. If specialists become presidents, they must determine their own brain; deep but narrow brain. It may cause prejudice and twist. It means that project dies. To bring our leaders up, it is necessary for us to bring generalists up.

Lastly, specialists are more and more paid attention recently. In our country, there is such word”syokuninn”. It has very like meaning to specialist. They reach their skills the summit and be respected from everyone. On the contrary, our culture also has such word “tyuutohanpa”. It means not very good. Generalists were often criticized as tyutohanpa. However, they has wide vision and good judgement. In such epoch, we may need them as our leader.


[236] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Sakamoto Shunsuke Date:2016/07/26(火) 00:44
Specialists are a person with deep knowledge and excellent technology and a specialist in particular area. Generalists are the knowledge which is the wide range to which the field isn't limited, technology and a person who has an experience. I think a generalist is necessary in today. You can't turn a project only by a specialist. When the range such as the decision, the risk measure, the promotion planning and the promotion operation of a social strategy of media is a specialized project, only a specialist of the respective fields can turn it, these are compound, there has to be a person who can integrate those to advance the project which is being crossed, high analysis work and deep cooperation with mobility. A generalist can talk with a specialist of the respective fields by a common language, and Tsutomu who is gathering a team for a solution of a client problem and is promoting a project needs. And I have to build deep relationship of mutual trust with a client and suppress a parent language of crossing and interpretation in a minimum. In other words, a generalist and, the work by which communication ability is also asked an edge about is a fact.While various industry as well as social rapid development were growing, division of labor of business and subdivision of learning were being advanced in all fields. But the situation that a problem can't respond to the needs of the modern society which interlocks complicatedly is born by the organization which lost the so crossing connection which emphasizes specialty. The word the organization and the society which are a human group understand a word of the various fields in the purpose developing continually, and which is reciprocal, the work force it can bridge is that need is indispensable. I'd like to learn this skill by information sentence chemistry department.

[240] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:Katsuya Kikuchi Date:2016/07/26(火) 07:31
I agree with this opinion. Although both are necessary, I think we need more generalists. I will show you an example why we need generalists.
Here’s an example. SONY, the famous manufacture in Japan, had a great technology. SONY had many excellent engineers. They were specialists of making a precision instrument. They made a fantastic product called Walkman and send it all around the world. Before the Walkman, the common device for portable music was the portable radio, which could only offer listeners standard music broadcasts. The technology which enable to play people’s own music and listen privately was absolutely revolutionary. After few decades since Walkman became a great hit, SONY’s Walkman couldn’t stay at top of the market share even though SONY still has a top-level technology. Apple’s iPod became the top instead. The reason why iPod became a great hit is not because Apple’s technology is superior to SONY. Apple has not even a factory. What Apple is doing is connecting components and technologies they collected from all over the world. Apple connected their knowledge of art and beauty to those components which other companies made and completed the wonderful product which satisfied domestic demand though SONY had a superior technology of music player.
This shows that specialist will not win always though they have the greatest technology. What important is that how to use the technology and knowledge. I don’t think that everyone should be a generalists, and what is needed is the cooperation of generalists and specialists.


[247] RE:Topic 3: Generalists vs. Specialists Name:taniguchi yuknari Date:2016/07/26(火) 12:35
At first I give the opinion about one's thinking expert. I have wide knowledge with the expert about one's field and know you to it being hard to be understood to a commoner. In addition, I neglect eagerness , that I surely watch things from various points of view in such a field and overestimate it and may have a partial thought. On the other hand, I think that I point to the person who does not know it to a deep part even if I know various things without getting absorbed in the particularly specialized field with the commoner.
By it, I can watch various things from various points of view, but enough consideration about the part thinks that it is hard to do it to be missing in deep knowledge.
Then, I want to compare these two.
Even as for having thought that an expert is important, it is the result that thought about from the situation of the expert; and commoner . In this way, of the place where it establishes the main point to be born from the difference in viewpoint think that is different.


[160] Topic 5: Community Service Name:Mitsu Matsuoka Date:2016/06/20(月) 13:24 [ 返信 ]
Some people have suggested that everyone between the ages of 18 and 21 should be required to perform one year of community or government service, such as in the Peace Corps, Environmental Conservancy Corps, a hospital, the military, a rural or inner-city school, or other community outreach projects. Should government or community service be required of 18- to 21-year-olds? Support your point of view, between 250 and 300 words in length, with reasons from your own experiences, observations or reading.



[162] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Masuda, H Date:2016/06/21(火) 19:16
I agree this opinion partly. Let me explain some reasons.

First, in Japan, it has been actively said that a number of communities are on the verge of collapse. Many youths reluctant to get along with neighbors, teachers, adults and perhaps friends. It is problem that they dislike many kind of relationships other than SNS like LINE, Twitter, Facebook. Community service will cultivate proper knowledge of society, attitude towards others, manners and courtesy.

Second, university students, a large part of 18- to 21-year-olds, have enough time to join the community service. Many students perhaps argue that “We have to do our homework. We don‘t have enough time to do such things!”. I point out with ease that many of yours waste tremendous time using cellphone, watching TV and playing video games.

What is important I suggest is that student must join the community service positively and aggressively. If do it them against their will, there are no effect. There are no use doing community service without interest. Someone can compel them to join it by giving them reward: we call such relationship to work not to service.

In conclusion, doing the community service is very good for youth in terms of cultivating their common sense, however, we must not force them to engage in the community service. What should we do now is creation of atmosphere that encourage 18- to 21-year-olds to join it spontaneously. Now, in Japan, threat of earthquake coming steadily. This effort making the atmosphere may help many Japanese someday.


[163] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Ryo Suzuki Date:2016/06/27(月) 16:36
I almost disagree with this idea. Let me explain the reasons.

At first, I think that forcing people doing something is worse than everything. Speaking of study, for example, there are a lot of children who are forced to go to juku since they are young at resent in Japan. I think their parents force them to do in order to make them intelligence. Of course, they may be able to become intelligence in the beginning. However, if they hate study due to it, they will study little since the time. Adults even escape awful things, so pure children naturally will escape the things. And, the destiny that the result is bad thing contrary to true purpose will come. Of course, I think there are children who go to juku and are interested in study in Japan. However, the number is less than those of children who hate study. With above things, the chance that children are interested in study will decrease by forcing them to study.

At second, I think decreasing the time of last youth is bad. Why you force us to perform government or community service in last youth of us? I think you want us to work at government and so on. Let the time early or late.

I am understanding the thing that increasing the number of people who work at hospital and so on is good. However, human beings have like, hate, triumph and one’s weak point. So we hope for children in the future

[164] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Ryuga Kato Date:2016/06/28(火) 15:46
I think the man chosen as a government doesn't have to be 18-21 years old. 3 of the reason is enumerated.

First most of them is a college student. Service of a government or a community takes time away from them. I have to study the high contents by a college student, and there is a student who has to have a part-time job, too, to make school expenses up. To grow in human way, they should also participate in group activities or to play. The thing left from a university for 1 year takes their valuable time away, and means that future national power falls.

Next there is a problem of an experiential value. An experiential value is shallow and immature because their much comes to society and isn't here. Even if such person concerns free, it would be only a drag. I think it's better to summon after I put on reliable knowledge at a university, and goes out to society and adds to the experience.

After all I think these service should do by a volunteer and doesn't make all the members force it. When he makes all the members force it, a languid person mixes in the member, too, and you can't get any more command, and it's done. This is the fatal fault as service of a government.

The man chosen by a government from the above doesn't have to be 18-21 years old.

[165] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Yuuko Tamaki Date:2016/06/29(水) 20:50
I totally disagree with this idea. There are two reasons. Let me explain them.

First, of course, we would be able to have the opportunities to know more about our living world is if we the ages of 18 and 21 performed community or government service. However I do not think that service is not the thing which people offer when they are required by community or government. I think that it is done when we just want to do. Nowadays, we young people usually have the very useful tools, their own smart phones. They go well with today’s society because we can examine anything to use them. Young people should examine what service there is in today’s our society and they should decide themselves what kind of service they join in. Therefore, I want to say that it is more important to inform today’s community or government service for us in the way which attracts our interests and to make us do on our own initiative than require us to perform.

Second, it may be a little alike first reason. Requiring the ages of 18 and 21 to perform service means that they are forced to do nothing but to do it. They would not be able to do anything even if there are something which they are involved in. In Korea, for example, men of Korea are forced to perform the military service for about two years. Joining it of Korean stars makes many people be disappointed. I think it is also the bad thing in Japan.

By the two reasons I showed above, I disagree with the idea.

[166] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Mayuko Deguchi MAIL Date:2016/07/02(土) 09:35
I completely disagree with this opinion. It is a mistaken idea. Let me give two reasons for my disagreement.

First, I think that it is still too early for them to be required to perform community or government service. The ages of 18 and 21 will be students or member of society. Students will be very useful for our community or government after they graduate for the university. They learn about specialized skills that are advanced in our society. Getting a lot of knowledge and skills is more important for them than participating in it for one year. Of course, it is not necessary to force member of society to perform community or government service because they already help our society.

Second, it is useless to force everyone between the ages 18 and 21 to perform it unless everyone is highly motivated to do so. People who want to help our community probably do volunteer activities in order to help our community. For my experience, when we were demanded to do thing that we don’t like, someone usually try to escape this hard work without coming out by teacher and so on. So, I think that someone is sure to try to neglect community or government service and other people will also lose interest in community or government service. This is the worst situation for our nation.

For these reasons, I completely disagree with this opinion. They shouldn’t force us to help those service and we should have thought that we try to help our society.


[167] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Takuji Kato Date:2016/07/02(土) 19:39
I partly agree with this plan. Let me show you some reasons.

First, if we students graduate from university and get jobs, there will be too little time to spend our time freely; we should work for company and society to make our life better.

Second, I think that students should learn a lot about world where they don’t know. The other day, I had a chance to talk with Chinese students who belong AIESECJAPAN in APU-----Ritumeikan Asia Pacific University. She said “I think that the view Japanese have to China is so different from that of Chinese, and reverse is also.” So I think we should go some area by our foot to see what are happened in this world now and we have to think about this world’s present condition to solve questions such as poverty, refugees, and so on.

Third, however, is that most important things we do while we are students are learning and playing. I think that by learning what we are interested in during college students, we can approach dreaming come true. Why playing is important is that friends who become when we are in university may associate so long time, so I think by playing with we have to make good friends.

Above those, I can conclude that time we can use between the ages of 18 to 21 is so limited that we have to use it carefully for what we would like to do while those whatever the reason is.


[168] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Rui Fujtani Date:2016/07/02(土) 23:18
I agree this opinion on the whole. Let me give three reasons for my agreement.

First, youth’s participation in activity of community or government have good influence on their society. Those service carry out by adults basically. I think youth’s strength, idea and potential are necessary. For instance, today’s youth have a greater skill than adults. It is sending information by using SNS. When an earthquake happened in Kumamoto, youths contributed to supply of foods and commodities by using Twitter.

Second, especially communities should make the opportunities because youth tend to leave a community they grew up. The reason they leave local areas is that they cannot know good point and present circumstance of the community. Youth’ participation in community leads to revitalization of the community.

Second, youth’s participation in activity of community or government have good influence on themselves. It is precious experience for them to be a member of such organizations. If they become working member of society, they could not have the opportunities because they are busy. Through those participations, youth can get broad perspective, knowledges and new relations they cannot usually have. Those things may affect their future.

However, I disagree about one point. It is about the period. Performing one year of community or government service is too long. Certainly, university students are freer than others, but they have many things to want to do. It should make easier for them to take part in the activities.

Then, youth’s participation in various activity of community or government has many merits.


[169] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Niwa Keisuke Date:2016/07/03(日) 09:59
I am against the idea that encourage young people to participate in community or government service. Thus far, I have never thought trying to take part in the service and I will never intend to do. Let me show you my opinion.
In fact, the service have good aspects. If you join the Peace Corps, you will cope with various problems such as education, starvation and agriculture. In addition, Environmental Conservative Corps is marvelous activity. Its member work to preserve the ecosystem and coexist with nature. Beside these activities, there are many projects in the world. Through them, you can contribute to the earth, and at same time, you feel great sense of accomplishment. In your life, the experience have a major effect.
And, contemporary young people tend to decrease communication with others, even their families because of social networking service. To solve this lack of communication, the service can be a key to success. In doing these activity, they probably discuss and cooperate with others. They can overcome the problem.
However, we, university students have many things to do. We use long time for club activity, circle and part time job. Of course, it is important to study hard. You have to do so as not to fail to make earn a credit. Some college students are unable to graduate from college because they don’t meet a requirement condition. Although they must prepare for the exams, they are apt to have a great deal. To put it briefly, college students are busy.

[170] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Kawai Yuki Date:2016/07/03(日) 15:14
I am totally against this opinion. There are three reasons. Let me explain them.

At first, some people between the ages of 18 and 21 have to work to live. If they don't work, it becomes difficult that the income passes away and is living. It isn’t better to take time to work away from them because their life is painful.

At second, most of others are students of university. Some of them watch TV, play a video game, play too much and waste much time. I think such people should be required to perform one year of community or government service, but there are people who don’t waste much time. For example, there are people who play club activities hard, people who participates in volunteer activities aggressively, and people who study hard. It is too bad to take time to do their activities away from them.

At last, it may be a little alike first reason. Time from 18 years old to 21 years old is the period when time can be used most freely for many people. It's possible to challenge a new thing and try various things at the time. That experience may be useful in the future and the work which they would like to do may be found. It isn't better to take the valuable time away. I think we should spend time of 21 years old importantly from 18 years old.

For these reasons, I disagree with the idea. I wish that people between age of 18 and 21 are able to spend useful time.

[171] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Fujita Akihiro Date:2016/07/03(日) 20:45
I think everyone between the ages of 18 and 21 should be required to perform one year of community or government service. I have three reasons by my experiences and my opinion.

Now I am learning economics. I am very inspired by this class. If we are ignorant, we are deceived by politicians. And young people who do not vote for election, so we have to learn a lot of thing by passing through experience such as community or government service and absorbs much knowledges and young people’s voting rate should increase.

Second reason is that people between the age of 18 and 21 is best timing to do something. University student have a lot of leisure time, so they can spend more meaningful time. This experience must be very useful for there future.

Third reason is that the world will face many problems from now on such as the peace, the environment, the rural problems, the issue of population growth, and so on. These problems are what we should know as a citizen of one country even if we will not get such an occupation in the future. If whole nation know about this, the world will be more good.

Like this if we join one year of community or government service, the world will become better. I think the problem that world has now includes the ignorance of the citizen. I think that it is strange to complain without knowing the politics. So, I want to join community or government.


[172] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Hidenaga Takahashi Date:2016/07/03(日) 23:19
I partly agree with this opinion. I have two reason. Let me explain them.

First, I think that Japanese youth lose patriotism. They hanker after foreign countries’ culture and life. They regard Japanese traditional culture as something out of fashion and call them “dasai”. It make me sad. I think that Japanese culture is the most beautiful in the world. If they participate in this work they can get chance to stare at our culture from many point of view and realize excellence.

Second, Japanese youth also lose their interest to politics. We have to support our country in the future. We need to change our country for our children. Politics is only way to change. Apathy makes nothing. For example, in election, young man and woman often do not vote. This is why youth feel not to introduce their opinions and have a vague dissatisfaction. Through this work, they can learn what politics is and be take an interest.

However, they have tasks they must tackle. For example, university students must study and become specialist in their way. In these ages, there are many kinds of people. Some are university students others are workers. They can learn many things in various fields. In these situations, it may be useless to spend their valuable one year.

Lastly, youth’s interest for politics and government are essential. It is the best for us to solve this problem themselves. However, if they are not interested in politics, that work may be valid for them.


[173] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Yoshito Kamogawa Date:2016/07/04(月) 09:24
I completely agree with this opinion. There are three reasons. Let me explain these.

First, that is because I think that people between the ages of 18 and 21 should be think of as “adults”. For example, they have to vote for the election. In Japan, these days, young people tend to be indifferent to politics. I’m not the exception about it. Usually, the voting rate of older people is quite larger than that of younger people. Therefore governments do politics which are predominant for elderly people. Despite the fact, young people often complain about politics governments do. Young people have to consider well about politics and perform one year of government service.

Second, that is because I think that people between the ages of 18 and 21 should ready for their job in society. If they perform one year of community or government service, such as in the Peace Corps, Environmental Conservancy Corps, a hospital, the military, a rural or inner-city school, or other community outreach projects, they are able to acquire various kinds of skills which they can’t get in their college schools or vocational schools. For instance, maybe they would get courtesy and greeting skill.

Third, that is because I think that people between the ages of 18 and 21 need to have hardships in society so as to train their emotional strength. These days, young people are apt to be struck by their society because the society is quite different from the one they think.

For these reasons, I agree with this opinion.


[174] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Koki Iwata Date:2016/07/04(月) 09:33
I agree with this opinion. I have two reasons. Let me explain the reasons.

First, I do not think that a lot of people between the ages of 18 and 21 have a lot of knowledge about a government and community. Incidentally, I am one of the people who have less knowledge about a government and community. However, why do the people have less knowledge about them? I think the people are not interested in a government and community, and there are a lot of opportunities which they are able to be engaged in a government and community, but they are not interested in these opportunity, so they almost miss them. While the people, who are interested in a government and community, often are engaged in a government and community. So, the people who are not interested in them do not get more knowledge about them, while, the people who are interested in them get more knowledge about them. However, I think the people who are not interested in them would be able to get knowledge about them if they are in an environment in which people are able to be engaged in a government and community. So, I think they should be required to perform one year of community or government service.

Second, for example, in Japan, age with the right to vote was reduced to 18 years old. I think this means it is thought that they should be interested about a government and community more. In other countries, I think there are the opinion like this. A lot of people in the world may think that people between the ages of 18 and 21 have a lot of knowledge about a government and community.

From these two reasons, I agree with this opinion.


[176] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Kaede Morichika Date:2016/07/04(月) 11:18
I don’t agree with that thought. I think community and government service are very important things and joining them is better. Why do I disagree? Let me show some reasons which support my opinion.

First, to force the young to join community or government service has no meaning. Only who wants to join should do so, if there is no positivism, who feels fine? The answer is that “No one.” The one who is willing to join them can has good effect on them.

Second, young people should do what they want to do. The young in the age of from 18 to 21 seemingly has many free time, but free time is not enough if they try hobby hard. They must do many things such as working part-time, group activity or club activity and of course, studying. My hobby is watching sports game and playing the guitar, but I can’t do them sufficiently. Even if I am required to join community or government service, I can’t.

Third, joining community or government service is very good for all people, not limiting young people. If you’re an adult, you can join them, and adults who do those things should do them. The will to do things which help other people is very beautiful, the age has no correlation. The young are poor now, so they want money if they act.

For these reasons, I disagree the opinion, but I hope many people come to have interests in community or government service. If that realizes, the earth will turn more beautiful planet.


[178] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Yuma Taguchi Date:2016/07/04(月) 15:40
I agree this opinion. I will explain why I think so.

In my experience, I don’t have the hobby that is useful for the society and myself. Till now, I do nothing in the holiday. I think I want to do something that is useful for the society and myself. The people like that do not mind performing one year of community or government service.

Most of the students whose ages between 18 and 21 are university students. Generally speaking, university students have many time that can use by themselves for freedom. They should perform one year of community or government service and spend these free time significantly. Doing these things, they don’t waste time and are useful for the society.

But, many people don’t know these things, “what kind of activity do they carry out?”,” when do they activity?”, and “how should I begin these activities?” To solve these problems, we can some way that we should do. First, they increase advertisements. For example, they should advertise in the university by cooperation of university cooperative association. This way can advertise many university students between the age of 18 and 21. Second, these are taken up in media. People between the age of 18 and 21 are good adults. They should get many information in the society. One of how to get them is reading newspaper. If their activity is taken up in the newspaper, many people solve problems like this.

In this way, I think this opinion is good. If they solve the problems from the above sentence, it become better, more famous and more significant activity.

[179] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:kyu zuuyan MAIL Date:2016/07/04(月) 15:54
I actually agree with that thought.Community service is so important,and each of us should join it.

Some people say that we have nothing to do with the community service,only government should care about it. That is totally wrong. People who say like that are never do that before or in future, and that why we should let young guys between 18~21 years old to do community service. If they do it when they are young, they will do it for life, because they will think do community service is normal. In America, their school always let their student do community service ,and also their kindergarten began to do it. They sell cookies or newspaper or something, and make money to help other poor people.That will make them be used to help other people, and make them do it forever. So I think it is actually so slow for people to do it when they are at 18.

One more reason is that we have energy and time to do community service when we are at 18 to 21. We can also image that when we are 40 or 50 , the only way to do something for community is to donate money. But sometimes , money is not the only way to solve problem, actually the government can do that part, but government can give them love or encourage. Young people at 18 to 21 can do other part and make social feel in ease.

For these reason, I agree the opinion that let young guys do some community service, it will make them grow up.


[180] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Shunki Yamamoto Date:2016/07/04(月) 16:28
I do not think people between 18 and 21 must be sent to any communities, but government should back them up performing in the government and community in short term. Let me explain some reasons and examples.

First, I think people encounter important and large experiences when they are between 18 and 21 because more than when they are any other ages. This is because this age is between children and adults. This age is very important for their future, so it is too long that they join the community for a year.

Second, in Japan, job interview is too difficult to explain people’s personality. Nowadays, people who do job hunting have to prepare a lot of things which may be unnecessary and unrelated to their personality. In fact, if they are told “it is hot today, so you can take suit off.” by an interviewer and they do as he said, they completely will be failed because of taking suit off. Japanese job interview is unreasonable, however if they have big experience got in such communities, they must be in an advantageous position and they can pass this absurd interview.

My dream is to be good teacher, so I had pay attention to teachers in my old school. Mr. Saito, who coached our table tennis club, was one of them but he was “a lecturer”. He didn’t have pass the teacher exam. After all, he could work at our school in only one year and moved other place, making effort for the teacher exam. If the span of teacher training were more longer than now, he could have been “teacher”.

For these reasons and examples, I think this opinion some people suggest is a little extreme, but I hope that government will support people between 18 and 21.


[181] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Kumagai Keijun Date:2016/07/04(月) 22:02
I completely approve of this opinion. It is a sensible idea. Let me gave two reasons for my agreement.

First, most of the people aged from 18 to 21 are in university and I think it useful to spend a part of their university times in those communities. Because they can learn many things from those experiences, such as talking with old people, concentrate on one thing, and helping others. Some may say that “we are busy in joining club activity and part-time job”. However the ages of between 18 and 21 are important period for them. In that time, they have to decide what to do in the future so They are able to use these experiences. In my experience, when I was junior high school student I working in bookstore. I realize how wonderful to come up with best way to display many kind of books at that time. This experience helps me choose what to do.

Second, it is helpful for communities. Since they learn many things in community at the same time they help communities by working in it. Also, those communities may be able to cut the cost of personnel expenses. Therefore, this statement is fruitful for both students and those communities.

For these reasons, I am justified in concluding that everyone between the ages of 18 and 21 should take part in those community. Although the people surrounding them should not force them to do so because working against their will may not be fruitful.

[182] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Nana Takao Date:2016/07/04(月) 22:33
think that government or community service should not be required of 18 – to 21 –year – old. There are a lot of things which people can do only when they are young. On the other hand, we can perform such service even if we grow up to be adult.

In my region, there are some community activities regularly such mowing and a salvage campaign. So, my parents go to cut grass. Until I was an elementary school student and I have more time, I often take part in such community activities. However, I could not have joined them since I was a junior high school student. Even now, I can rarely take part in such activities because the schedule of the community activities does not match my schedule.

We can perform community or government service not when we are 18 – to 21 –year – old. We can do them when we perform them. Should we take part in government or community service, we can act from ourselves. Moreover, it is better than that we take part in them obligatorily. If people who are not totally interested in such activities are ordered to perform community or government service, they may not concentrate on them. There are also a lot of things which people can do only when they are young, so I think young people should do things which they can then.

From these reasons, if young people want to join community or government service then, they should do it, and it is not a thing forced by other people.

[183] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Shogo Beppu MAIL Date:2016/07/04(月) 23:54
I quite agree with this opinion. It is ideal thinking. Let me give two reasons for my agreement.

The first reason is that we, the general citizen cannot live without community or government service. People should not be grown to up without knowing the service. In addition, by performing community or government service in one of the young period of 21 years from 18 years of age, it is possible for them to see things with a wide field of view. They can learn social role of the service.

The second reason is that people can learn to know real current situation of the service only by participating it. Through the process of being involved in it and facing variety of difficulties, they can learn true value of it and its system. They come to thank and respect it. People do not live on their own. They can live modern society thanks to the services. I took part in career experience when I was in junior high school. I went to local fire department and worked there. I experience a lot of work. When I did inspection of ambulance and fire truck, I was amazed the complex equipment in it. When I experience fire fighting training and emergency life saving training, I felt the difficulty of the work. I only knew the scene of fire fighting, but they did a lot of work where we do not see.

In conclusion, I think that people should be involved in public service to learn the importance of it and to have gratitude to it.


[184] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Gen Uwai Date:2016/07/05(火) 00:35
I disagree with this opinion. Let me show the two reasons why I think so.

First, most people between 18 and 21 are university students. They must study,do their club activity and do part time jobs. I think that they do not have enough time to spent to community or government service.
I will show my life as an example. I always go home at 7 pm in weekdays, and go to do part time job until 10 pm on Wednesday and Friday. On Saturday, I usually go to the university for club activity. On Sunday, I do part time job from 10 am to 15 pm twice a month. After it, I have to write some reports. When you know about my week, can you say that I able to join those services? Probably, you say no. The university students are very busy.

Second, They are too prematurity to join those service. Especially, those who are 18 years old have been living, relying on their parents. Even some those who are 21 years old have rely still. They have been protected by their parents, so they have not get ability to judge by theirselves and knowledge. If that kind of people participate those services, they may hold back others from achieving success. Before they begin to join those services, they should study in universities or work in the society in order to get the knowledge and technique.

To join those services, they are too young. I think that people should do that when they become the more grown people .


[186] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Yuma Hirano Date:2016/07/05(火) 01:54
I totally disagree with this idea. I have several reasons.
First, these events have some restrictions. Even if you do something, you will come into action within the limits because you get support from a country and a self-governing body. And it is not sometimes possible to want to do. If only the work to which you were given is being done, the ability to find your work probably becomes weak. I think it is very important to think you would like to do myself by oneself.
Second, it is also important to play the time. I think it is an important thing to enjoy oneself for oneself like contributing to society. If you play, you may be understood newly about the environment around you. Experience of a club and club activities have a big influence. These experience are also good for your health.
Third, when having participated in a strange event, danger may come to you. These days, a doubtful religion and a terrorist group cause happenings. If you are involved in these groups, you have a possibility that you lose your life. If you are killed by these groups, you will lose everything.
I am opposite to this opinion from these reasons. We have a lot of choices which decide our future. We have to ascertain what to use time we have. We should live so as not to regret it. But, a life is only the once so there are a lot of things which is not understood


[187] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Koki Hattori Date:2016/07/05(火) 02:08
I think that there is no volunteering they should be required for all of the people.

The first reason is that usually human be not motivated and not to work well when they are forced. Needless to say that volunteer activities bring some good influence. But benefit is not maximized when servant act spontaneously. The meaning of the activity may cannot be understood and success when volunteer cannot approve gist. I think if only makes people who understand meaning and agreed with it do volunteer, work efficiently and hard to be unpleasant to each other.

It will be mentioned that it was thought that one should emphasize there when there is intention want a different volunteer himself as the another reason. In these forced volunteer, it was considered that volunteer who has enthusiasm to other field is not able to exert a force in the forced place even if there is field that he can exert more than ability and enthusiasm that is being sought in the person. There was something like the following: Some of the former book I read. That is what that man found work with a strong willingness to change the society became civil servants who do only chore have lost their motivation. In roughly the form of these also wished I thought or not it be inefficient not to meet the detailed wishes of the person.

The last reason, just working has a bad influence on economy. Activity of economy is based on distribution of money. Just working such as volunteer inhibit economy.


[188] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Kiyoshi TAKEDA Date:2016/07/05(火) 10:12
I disagree with the idea that everyone between the ages of 18 and 21 should do community or government services. Let me explain some reasons why I think so.
First, doing those services is a heavy burden for young people whose age is between 18 and 21, even though it is good to do those services for welfare. For example, cleaning our town as a volunteer is very good thing because it makes us think that we are contributing to our town. But these days, it is said that young people's mental is getting weaker and weaker. so, I think that young people cannot stand hard services such as in a hospital or in a military.
If I were told that I have to do these work, I never want to do because I am not used to doing hard work and I will quit those work. many young people may think that are not sure that they will complete the work for one year like me.
Second, some young people whose age is between 18 and 21 already work and some put their heart into studying. So, although it is a good idea to do those projects, but everyone should not do these projects.
Some wise people are studying hard and they will contribute not only to their town but also to Japan and the World. So, losing their time of studying about very important things is not good for us all.
As stated above, it is a very good project but some wise people should spend time studying about more valuable things, and some people cannot do the project for one years long.
So, I disagree with this idea.


[189] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Takumi Watanabe Date:2016/07/05(火) 10:14
I completely agree this opinion. Let me give two reasons for my agreement.

First, everyone between the ages of 18 and 21 can learn what they cannot be taught in school. When they participate in community or government service, they realize how small their world is. It is very important. The things that they really want to do may be found. If they join community or government service firstly, when they are more old, it may be late because of their ages or their situations to aim for.

My sister led an ordinary life as s college student. She thought she would age not having what she wanted to do. However, she took part in the Peace Corps, which gives foods or medicine. After that, she said she wished to teach poor children in developing countries. Then, she has been full of life ahead of her aim.

Second, community or government service can take in the idea that young people have. If they have only old people, it may go forward smoothly because the world they live is almost the same, but the problems or complains may appear one of these days. However, people between the ages of 18 and 21 can point out something from a different point of view. Therefore, community or government service can keep up with the trend of the times and have various perspectives.

Society should make the environment that young people perform community or government service easily. Moreover, people who is not young should have an attitude that they want to listen the opinions young people have.


[190] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Hiroaki Doi Date:2016/07/05(火) 16:24
I agree this opinion partly. Let me show some reasons
.
First, a large part of 18 to 21 years olds are university students, so they have enough time to join community or government service. However, they don’t want to join community and government service and waste much time using smartphone, playing video games or watching TV. I think that they should join those things instead of wasting much time like these.

Second, they can get great experiences and knowledge by joining government or community service. Young people who join can interact with other participants. I think that these experiences, knowledge and interaction are going to help them in the future.

However, I think that we should not force them to join community or government service because they cannot get anything if they don’t act aggressively, so it is no use joining what we should now is encouraging 18 to 21 years old to join community or government service aggressively, and we should think how to make them have interests in such service. One of the way to encourage them is giving them reward for their actions, however, it is inappropriate because their actions aren’t service but work.

I hope that they join community service aggressively. I don’t agree to make them join military because joining military because joining military is dangerous and lose precious human resources who hold the future of our country in their hands.

It is the most important for them who join to act aggressively, so I hope that they have aggressiveness.


[191] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Mitsuhiro Okamoto Date:2016/07/05(火) 18:58
I completely agree with this suggestion. Let me give two reasons.

First, community or government service develops youth, people between the ages of 18 and 21 for our future particularly. We have actually studied for tests and then we will have studied for same reason. If we do not gain good scores, we might be not able to graduate from our colleges. It is natural that we pursue the goal in front of our eyes. However, we should not lose the real purpose in our colleges. It is making what we will be in the future. We need more practical activities for works in the future. I think community or government service makes us get the abilities to apply and action. These capabilities cannot be gained in our colleges.

Second, we are likely to grow into leaders through community or government service. It is clear that young people who participate in the service are positive while youth who do not take part in the service are negative. Therefore, the service makes us positive. Positive and active people are often required to be leaders of organizations. In addition, positive people more frequently be needed for companies than negative people. When the problem difficult to solve occurs, it is common that positive people who give a lot of solutions to solve it are necessary.

In conclusion, the service makes us change to a good direction. Although taking part in the service is troublesome and requires courage, I recommend to step into the service.


[192] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Masashi Ito Date:2016/07/05(火) 20:34
I partly agree with this opinion . There are three reasons I can give for my opinion.

First, in Japan, it has been said that a lot of communities are going to be broken. A lot of young people are reluctant to get along with neighbors, teachers, adults and friends. It is a problem that they do not like many kinds of relationships other than Social Network Services such as LINE, Twitter. The proper knowledge of society, attitude towards something will be cultivated by community service.

Second, collage students, a large part of people who is 18 to 21 years old, have enough time to join the community service. Many students say that they have to do our homework and do not have enough time to do such things. I suppose the ease that a lot of yours waste long time calling, mailing, watching TV and playing video games.

Third, what is the most important things we do when we are students are studying something and playing. I think that by learning what we are interested in during college students, we can dream come true. The reason playing is important is that we live with friends who become while we are in university for a long time, so I think we have to make good friends by playing.

In conclusion, joining the community service is good for young people in terms of forming their common sense, however, we must not make them engage in the service. What we should do is that we make atmosphere that encourage people who is 18 to 21 years old to join it voluntarily. This effort making the atmosphere would help Japanese.

[193] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:kaoru yoneda Date:2016/07/05(火) 22:42
I disagree with this opinion. Of course, we can learn many things from government and community. However, there are two reasons why I disagree. I will introduce those reasons to you.

First, most of the people between the ages of 18 and 21 is students. They go to school, do club activities, and play with their friends. Other words, they have already had what to do. Also, the most important thing for them is studying. They have to learn about technical and general knowledge for their future. Of course, doing club activities hard and playing with friends are also important. Because they can do those things only at the time. As they work, they may not have time to do such a things. Therefore, they don’t have to spend years between the ages of 18 and 21 engaging in government or community.

Second, a lot of people between the age of 18 and 21 are not interested in government and community. Therefore, if they are forced to engage in such a thing, they don’t do those hard. It makes them only waste times. Doing the things they are interested in are useful than doing those things. Also, they are happy to do the interesting things and trying hard.

Of course, government and community have many good points. However, in this way, I think those are not so important for us. Enjoying our lives between 18 and 21 and doing what to do at the time are more important than those things.


[194] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Yu Kataoka MAIL Date:2016/07/05(火) 23:29
It is done, and there are various arguments in the world, but I am agreeable in doing volunteer activity from 18 years old to 21 years old. There are two reasons.

The first is improvement of one's social evaluation. The modern youth is often told, "a heart does not have room", "I am selfish". Probably this cause will be an evil of provided education at ease until recently. Therefore what they must do is volunteer activity to overturn the bad evaluation for the youth in the world. This is because volunteer activity is non-for-profit homage. It is not readily possible to work in it being common that the human being requires a reward for work without pay.

The second is the stress emission. In the world where stress is easy to collect so as to be called stress society in the present age. The method to cancel it is each person, but I recommend volunteer activity as the method. This is because the volunteer activity is thanked for by all means. When the human being is thanked for, I can forget that I hate it only at the moment. Furthermore, I think that it is good to stress-relieving because the sense of accomplishment is born.


[195] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Masaru Tanabe Date:2016/07/05(火) 23:43
I disagree with this idea. It is a bit much. I have two reasons.
For one reason, such actions, called volunteerism, should not be done by people who are made to perform by someone. People who help someone should have goodwill, voluntary action, and gentle mind. When people who take part in volunteerism have these mind, it will give big effect to people who want help. If someone make young people perform the volunteerism, they won’t have these mind.
For the other reason, college students have a lot of free time. Adults almost work all year around. They have to rest 20 days at least in a year, but they are difficult to rest more than 20 days. High school students have a lot of classes, and short summer, winter, and spring vacations. On the other hands, college student can select various things, for example, whether they work part-time or not, how long they work, and what kind of subject do they study. That is to say, college students’ free time is longer than adult’s and high school students’ them. However, some people may think that if young people have a lot of free time, they can perform volunteerism. Surely the idea has no mistake, but they can do various challenge and experience that they couldn’t do something with a lot of free time.
Certainly volunteerism is very great action, and college students can select whether they join in these actions or not, but someone, such as government, should not force all young people to participate in them.

[196] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Nakano Sakurako Date:2016/07/05(火) 23:48
I partly agree with this idea. However, I think we should not force young people to perform the time. Let me give some reasons which support my opinion.

Firstly, if young people perform one year of community or government service, they can learn to fit into society. I have started a part-time job recently. I can learn a variety of things and know new things through the work. For example, I can learn ability to communicate, good manners and so on. I don’t have a dream. I don’t know what job I am adequate to. Therefore, I want to work in many places when I am a university student. Moreover, community or government service may become better because young people’s opinion can be incorporated to it.

Secondly, however, university students are very busy. They must study hard both at university and their house, earn money by working part-time and play with their friends. They may join some club as well. Actually, I belong to three clubs and I haven’t had enough sleep every day. Some students have a dream and they are on the way to realize their dreams. Therefore, performing one year of community or government service may be a burden to them.

In conclusion, we should give chances for people between the ages of 18 and 21 to work in many places. However, they should decide on their own about how they spend their time. For them, four years from 18 years old to 21 years old are very important.


[197] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Yomi Morimoto Date:2016/07/07(木) 00:48
I partly agree with this idea. I think there are both good and bad point in this. I will explain what it is.

First, the good point is that if people between the ages of 18 and 21 perform one year of community or government service, those people can know about contemporary society. Now that people aged 18 and over have the right to vote, it is necessary for young people to know about political situations and way of thinking of community. Today, however, many young people don’t know about it and are not interested in it. Joining political activities will useful for young people who hold the future of our country in their hands.

Second, people between the ages of 18 and 21 have many other things to do. Many of them are college students. Because their main work is study and it is also important for them to play in a club activity and experience a part-time job to lead a full life, they don’t have enough time to perform one year of community or government service. If they have to do it, they may neglect their duty as a student.

For these reasons, I agree with the idea if people between the ages of 18 and 21 can put study and what they want to do before community .and government services. I don’t think that all of them have to do it. Only people who want to perform it should do it.


[202] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Takahiro Banno Date:2016/07/15(金) 19:48
I agree with this opinion some extent. Let me give three reasons.

First, it is hopeful for community service that the members are young. In this activity, physical toughness and flexible thinking which young people are required. The japan population is rapidly aging. It is important for us to get young power to reduce burden of elderly person. It can increase working efficiency as well. In my local community, a picking trash campaign used to be performed by only elderly people. It took a lot of time to finish campaign and the atmosphere was getting worse so we decided to ask young people to join this campaign. Not only high school student but also even elementary school student participate in the campaign. The time to finish collecting trash became shorter than ever since and the atmosphere was getting better due to children.

Second, community services are able to strengthen our community relationships. These days community has little sense of sense of solidarity due to increasing nuclear family and declining birth rate. It leads a tendency to lose interest for administration of community and causes the growth of administration. What we can do by ourselves should be done by ourselves.

Third, to join community service make young people change values and broaden their field of vision. Through joining campaign, they meet various people who have their own thought and to interact them enable to modify their thought. It is difficult for young people to meet people whom they have not seen before. The campaign should be good opportunity.


[218] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Takumi Watanabe Date:2016/07/19(火) 10:14
I completely agree to this opinion. Let me give two reasons for my agreement.

First, the ages of 18 and 21 can learn what they cannot be taught in school. When they participate in community or government service, they will realize how small their worlds are. It is very important. The things that they really want to do may be found. If they join community or government service firstly, when they are more old, it may be late because of their ages or their situations.

My sister led an ordinary life as a college student. She thought she would age not having what she wanted to do. However, she took part in the Peace Corps, which help give the poor foods or medicine. After that, she said she wished to teach poor children in developing countries. Then, she has been full of life ahead of her aim.

Second, community or government service can take in the ideas that young people have. If they have only old people, it may forward smoothly because the world they live are almost the same. Yet, a problem or complain may appear one of these days.
When they face such a situation, they will be difficult to deal with it.
However, the ages of 18 and 21 can point out from the different view. Therefore, community or government service can keep up with the trend of the times and have various perspectives.

Society should make the environment that young people perform community or government service easily. Moreover, people who is not young should have an attitude that they want to listen the opinions young people have.


[243] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:Banno nanami Date:2016/07/26(火) 08:15
I almost disagree with this opinion. There are two reasons and let me show you them.

First, to force young people to join community or government service has no meaning. If people who are not interested in them or don’t want to join them are forced to join community or government service, they feel nothing and on the contrary think it’s waste of time. People only who is willing to join them can has good effect on them. For example, there are many children who are forced to go to cram school by their parents. However, children who cannot enjoy studying cannot be intelligent forever. As well as this fact, it’s no meaning to force young people to join community or government service.

Second, I don’t think that many people between the ages of 18 and 21 have enough knowledge about government or society service, so it’s too early for people between the ages of 18 and 21 to join community or government service. The thing they have to most is study, so I think it’s better people after graduate last school and before be members of society should join community or government service. People go through the experience makes people have various perspective and more active in society.

By the two reasons I showed above, I disagree with this opinion. However, people who want to join, it’s going to be very meaningful and useful their lives, so I think people only who is willing to join them should join those.

[245] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:谷口 志就 Date:2016/07/26(火) 12:22
I think that I should participate in local service and the service of the country or a volunteer at the age of 21 years old from 18 years old. I doubted and thought that I participated in activity like time of the high school student and time before the high school student, these which were why and would have to do it.
Most of oneself does not profit, and this is because it thought that it does it, and it will be in what. In addition, I thought that it should be over early when I worked as volunteers at the age of a primary schoolchild that it was troublesome. But there was the thing which got what it was after having been over when I did such a thing after I became a university student. At first I am that treasure is never different from looking in what I watch from the situation that I really do to the first. In addition, a conventional viewpoint changes, and even the mind that the world turned into assumes that I really do it.
It means that the second understands the feeling of the person who really does it. This thinks that even a byte is the same. Being thoughtless, and having square it because know how to contact to the person whom oneself really does at the time of viewpoint of the visitor when understand such a feeling think that come to rarely complain.


[246] RE:Topic 5: Community Service Name:taniguchi yuknari Date:2016/07/26(火) 12:23
I think that I should participate in local service and the service of the country or a volunteer at the age of 21 years old from 18 years old. I doubted and thought that I participated in activity like time of the high school student and time before the high school student, these which were why and would have to do it.
Most of oneself does not profit, and this is because it thought that it does it, and it will be in what. In addition, I thought that it should be over early when I worked as volunteers at the age of a primary schoolchild that it was troublesome. But there was the thing which got what it was after having been over when I did such a thing after I became a university student. At first I am that treasure is never different from looking in what I watch from the situation that I really do to the first. In addition, a conventional viewpoint changes, and even the mind that the world turned into assumes that I really do it.
It means that the second understands the feeling of the person who really does it. This thinks that even a byte is the same. Being thoughtless, and having square it because know how to contact to the person whom oneself really does at the time of viewpoint of the visitor when understand such a feeling think that come to rarely complain.


[91] Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Mitsu Matsuoka Date:2016/05/30(月) 11:42 [ 返信 ]
"Children waste far too much time playing games when they could be involved in more constructive activities."----E. Gorkin. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above? Support your position, between 250 and 300 words in length, with reasons and examples from your own experiences, observations or reading.



[128] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Ryuga Kato Date:2016/06/08(水) 21:41
When a game comes out as a representative of an example of how to have time wasteful time, I become sad.

Asking which is often seen for example, such feeling. "May I lead an important life wastefully by pinball, a game and a netsurfing?"

I don't know why a game enters here .If a game enters, a novel, a movie and listening to music may also enter. But those never enter. That's strange and worthless. A story is fascinating and impressive like a novel, and a good game sometimes cries. Creator's wonderful person is making a story like a novelist. There is much good game music, and there even is something played by an orchestra and becomes a concert. I went to a concert of a monster Hunter indeed, but I was moved with excitement. Even though it's a game, the composer who has the aptitude is composing a piece of music seriously.

Even if it's heard, how many times does a heart dance for BGM in a forest of an animal? That an opening of Dragon Quest flows, "proud that Dragon Quest is a born national person", tears nearly flow. When I listen to a song of Tokimeki Memorial, the thought that a memory with the respective character is revived like a revolving lantern and is hot as expected is springing.

There is an opinion to which I say because I stay behind no. After appreciating a novel, a movie and music, is everything left? If I say that an impression is left, even a game is same.

[129] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Takuji Kato Date:2016/06/10(金) 14:03
I little disagree the opinion of E.Gorkin. I have two reasons why I think so. Let me show these.

One is that, to play games, we can get some impressions; sad angry exciting cheerful, and courage, etc. Great games teach us those feeling and we can understand other’s feeling not only in games but also in our life. When I was discouraged to my surroundings, character’s word in a game motivate me, and at last, I could get over some matters. In game’s situation, unfortunately, sometimes character who share pleasure and pain with main character die by some reason. Of course, it is very sad. However, we can grow by overcoming these situations.

The other is that, through playing games, we can meet some good songs. Several games use a lot of BGM; back ground music, and they are so wonderful that they make players excited and courage. These days, CD which include those music are sold so well. These music is very attractive.

Surely, playing computer games have positive points, however, they also have negative points and in this point I agree E.Gorkin’s opinion. Negative point is, for example, that people may cause and be caused some problem. In net world, there are a lot of temptations and we may be injured by someone who use nickname. Also, there are many dangerous situations in the world.

Above those, playing games have merits and demerits, so we have to be careful to avoid some risks, or we can enjoy good life with games.


[130] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Keijun Kumagai Date:2016/06/11(土) 23:20
I largely disagree with this opinion and believe it is wrong. Let me offer some reasons for my view.

First, I don’t understand why E. Gorkin refers only to playing games. There are many other activities such as listening to music, watching TV and drawing pictures. These are indoor activities. Thus I think playing games should be treated like some way. I feel the opinion that children should study all times is not right and I believe doing what we love is the most important things in our lives. I love games deeply, and therefore, I proudly say my favorite thing is playing games!

Second, according to some studies playing games increase children’s concentration. If children play games for 16 hours in a day, I state it is absolutely bad thing for them. Although, if their parents decide how long they can play games in a day, they may increase their children’s concentration.

Lastly, playing games gives you a chance to talk many people about it. I changed school many times because of the job of my father. When I made new friends, games always help me to start conversations. Moreover, games make the opportunity to talk with my old friends. I get in touch with some friends who are my junior high school friends.

These reasons I mentioned above lead me to believe that playing games is not bad things on condition that you don’t overly play them. Doing what you like to do is necessary to make our life valuable. If you do only to study, you may be rich but may not be able to be happy.


[131] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Mayuko Deguchi MAIL Date:2016/06/12(日) 11:20
I largely agree with this opinion.
It is a good opinion.

There are many games in Japan recently such as role-playing games, puzzle games, racing games and so on.
I think it is not a bad thing that we play games for a change of pace, but it is a bad thing that playing games too long may harm children in terms of getting fundamental skills which they should learn in their childhood.

One of the thing which children have to learn in their childhood is to ride a bicycle.
It is necessary for children to ride a bicycle, especially in the country.
If you can ride bicycles skillfully at very fast speed in the racing games, can you ride them actually in spite of lack of practice to ride them in reality? The answer is probably no.
If you want to be able to ride bicycles, you must practice hard. I also practiced hard to ride it when I was in elementary school. I hurt myself many times when I practice, but I didn’t give up. As a result, I became to be able to ride a bicycle safely. It is not an easy thing for adults who have never ridden bicycles to be able to ride them. On the other hand, it is not difficult thing for adults who haven’t ridden bicycles for a long time even though they could ride a bicycle when they were children to get back how to ride them.

For this example, I think that children shouldn’t play games too long to do things which they have to learn in their childhood.


[132] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Tamaki Yuko Date:2016/06/12(日) 11:58
I agree with this opinion. Of course I find that playing games is fun, so I love playing games. However, I think that children waste too much time doing it is not good thing. There are two reasons.

First, if children begin playing games, it is difficult for them to stop doing. In actual fact, when I was an elementary school child, I could not stop doing it and I often stayed up late at night. I thought that I should went to bed early but I could not help doing in my quilt. I think that games have the strong special powers that attract children’s interests very well. Needless to say that staying up late is not good for children’s health.

Second, more and more time children spend playing games, less and less time they are able to communicate each other to their face. They would connect with people who they never meet. For example, one of my high school’s friends devoted to playing on lined games. Gradually, she did not come to school. I was getting along with her, but other class mates had not cared about her absence. Even if she came to school, she did not talk with them but her very close friends. I thought that this bad class’s mood made her feeling not wanting to come. Eventually, she could not attend our high school’s graduation ceremony because she lacked her attendance which she must came to school. Because of that I cannot think playing game is good.

That’s why I agree with the topic opinion. I think that wasting too much time playing games causes several problems.

[133] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Hiroki Nakagawa MAIL Date:2016/06/12(日) 20:20
I agree this idea. Playing game too much make the children worse than they play game moderately.

First, playing game lose a lot of time. When I was a high school student, I addicted to the music game that was introduced to the game center near the school. I visited there and play the game almost every day. Owing to the decreasing of the time to study, my academic score went bad and I was scolded by the teacher. Like this, if the children are crazy about playing game, the time he spent will be in vain. But if they interest in reading, exercising, or studying, their life will become better.

Second, playing game before going to bed prevent you from sleeping well. The light of screen contains short wavelength light, called “blue light”. It stimulates brain and keep you awake. Besides that, blue light affects your daily rhythm. You may feel sleepy in the daytime and you can’t concentrate on the class.

Last, children playing game on the Internet may have some trouble. Nowadays, social game have a function to make your character’s status strong. Children who want charge points in the game use parents’ credit card without their approval. Some days later, parents have to pay a lot of money. Besides, disputes sometime happens among the children. Not playing game too much save children from incidents.

Too much playing have nothing but harm. Parents save the children from the danger or harm of playing game. Playing moderately is the best way to keep good company with the game.


[134] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Nakano Sakurako Date:2016/06/12(日) 23:45
I completely agree with this opinion. There are many problems caused by computer games. Let me give three reasons which support my opinion.

First, computer games are so addictive that many children spend many hours playing them. When I was an elementary school child, I was absorbed in computer games. After school, I used to play them with friends in the near “park”. After then, I played them late at night. That is to say, children who are enthusiastic about computer games have no time to study hard, communicate with friends and families and sleep enough.

Second, computer games are bad for the health. When you play them for a long time, you may have eye strain and your sight may get worth. You may have a stiff neck and a headache. Moreover, as I have said above, there are many kinds of the effects of sleep loss. Sleep is very important for children’ health.

Third, computer games even cause murder and suicide. However, it is not true for everyone. I heard that a killer said he wanted to reset everything like computer games. These days, some young people seem to confuse virtual worlds with reality. That is to say, computer games may have bad influences on children’s minds.

Finally, children waste much important time playing computer games. However, parents can’t take them away from children in modern society. I think parents should decide several rules which limit use time. Children have important time which only children can have. I don’t want them to regret!


[135] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Shogo Beppu MAIL Date:2016/06/12(日) 23:48
I am not very in favor of this opinion. Let me give three reasons for my disagreement.

In the first place, I think that it is not a bad thing to take time for video or computer games. However, I think it is problem that time to constructive activities is deprived of because of using too much time for games. It is not problem children can enjoy playing games properly without children becoming addicted to games. I think that they can learn role playing, communication, and forecasting things through games. They can grow up themselves through the process.

Secondly, when they are enjoying playing games, they feel happy. I think it is important for children to enjoy. As far as they work on study and homework, parents should forgive their children to do what they like. While playing games, they feel excitement and inspiration. I think these help children to grow their mind.

Thirdly, I think that playing games is constructive activity as same as playing outside. Most of anti-game ideologist suggest that playing games is valueless and playing outside is valuable. I wonder whether this opinion is right. I think that playing games and playing outside is same thing in terms of using their time in unnecessary thing. They can live if they don’t play either of the two. They do that to enrich their own life. Some people are attracted to the game, the other people do not feel. How to enjoy the leisure time depends on each person.

For above reasons, children who like games should play games for enjoy.


[136] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Kiyoshi TAKEDA Date:2016/06/13(月) 13:14
I agree with this opinion perfectly. ?Please let me explain my opinion.
It is certain that games are getting more and more entertaining. There are some reasons games are entertaining.
One reason is that the screen is very clear now. Thanks to the technology, we can enjoy games more clearly. so, many children tend to devote themselves to the ?games. ?
Other reason is that we can play many games anytime and anywhere. These days, many children have smart phones. we can do many things ?with one tablet. For example, when we are on the train, we have few things that we can do there, so we tend to play games on the smart phones.
But this tendency that children play games is very bad. Because of this ?tendency, children are wasting too much time.
There is no bad point in playing games to kill time. But there is more things we can use time efficiency, especially children.?
I heard that according to one report, ? playing outside has ?many good points. ?For example, Playing outside makes children more active and makes children’s body much more ?strong. What is more, ?thanks to playing outside, children can communicate with others easily.
And, we can do more constructive activities despite of wasting time by playing games.
For example, we can read books. Especially for children, reading books makes children have more and more knowledge.
I think that playing games to kill time is good, but wasting too much time by playing games is the worst for children.


[137] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Koki Iwata Date:2016/06/13(月) 13:44
I largely agree with this opinion. I have three reasons.

First, children are often said that they should play outside, I think so too. A study shows that whether or not you often play outside and exercise intensely in your childhood, your exercise capacity is going to be largely influenced. So, if you played outside and exercised intensely in your childhood, you exercise capacity would be good and you would spend your life healthily, but if you spent much your childhood playing games inside, your exercise capacity would not be built up and you might not live healthily. So I think if children have leisure time, they should play outside and exercise, not play games inside.

Second, I think that when children play games, they feel time which they are spending playing games shorter than time that has actually passed. When most children play games, they concentrate playing games, so I think that this phenomenon occurred. I think a lot of people have experienced this phenomenon, by the way I have experienced this phenomenon. I think children should not spend wasted time.

Third, if not only children, all people play games for a too long time, their eyesight will be getting worse. When children play games, they concentrate playing games, so the distance from their eyes to the screen of the game. This causes their eyesight worse.

For these reasons, I think that children should not play games for a long time, but it is fact that all can enjoy playing games. I think that when you want to play games, it is important to decide time that you are going to play games before starting playing games.


[139] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Takumi Watanabe Date:2016/06/13(月) 16:59
I completely agree with this opinion. Let me give two reasons for my agreement.

First, children do not have a chance to communicate with their friends. Communication is one of the most important things that we should acquire to live in modern society. Without this skill, they would not be able to express themselves and understand other’s feelings. For example, unlike playing games, when they play soccer in a park, they have to think about and discuss various things, such as who their team-mates are, which these plays are foul or not, or how they should do to win the games. Sometimes, they may quarrel, but through such experience, the ability will be got to mingle with others.

Second, children cannot experience confronting difficulties. If it were not for, they would spoilt children. I was a member of soccer team. Of course, playing soccer is interesting very much, but there is not only fun. To win the games, I overcame the pain like running on summer day or training my muscle. Playing games may be almost fun, but it does not demand efforts for aims. When they are a member of society, some difficulties are befallen. Success in dealing with them will make us confident.

If all children always play games, when they become adults, do our progress? I don’t think so. It will be bored and crow people who are much alike. Children should play with friends and put their hurts into clubs. Consequently, they can become great persons who have individualities and confidents. Especially, I recommend sports because playing them, we can move our bodies and talk with friends or strangers easily.


[140] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Yoshito Kamogawa Date:2016/06/13(月) 17:53
Although I think that playing games have a lot of good aspects, I agree with this idea. There are three reasons about it.

First, that is because I think that spending too much time playing games harms your health. In fact, if you take care of the television screen or the screen of machine excessively, your eyes are affected badly. When you are enthusiastic about playing games, you are apt to concentrate to see the screen and come to have the poor posture. In result, you have stiff shoulders or become in bad condition. So you had better not play a game too much.

Second, that is because playing games too much prevents you from sleeping enough. It has a lot of bad aspects. For example, there is a possibility that you will oversleep or you will not be able to concentrate on your study or work during your class or job. In particular it is important for children to save enough time for sleeping because they exist in the midst in a growing time. They have to go to bed early instead of playing games.

Third, that is because playing games can harm children’s pure heart. Some games show children grotesque or cruel scenes. As a result, there is a possibility that children will not be able to judge things right and then commit a crime. I think that children have to spend more time playing with their friends or their family. Children develop through their contact with many people.


[141] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Rui Fujitani Date:2016/06/13(月) 20:41
I agree with the opinion. I think, however, playing games moderately do no harm. I will show why I agree with the opinion and think playing games itself is not bad.

First, playing games too long time may cause dependence on the games. It affects their real life. If they put playing games before what they have to do such as study and proper lifestyle, their grade would get worse and their body would become weak. It is great problem for growing children. Moreover, I hear playing games for long time influence cognitive ability.

Second, dislike the old days, online games and social games become more popular lately. These games make trouble. A child who was absorbed in a social game used his parent’s credit card. Arguments among players are sometimes occurred in online games. It is so dangerous for children. I think parents these games away from their children because children don’t have adequate skills to use the Internet and knowledge about society.

I mentioned the reasons above, but I do not reject playing games itself. I saw research that playing games so long time affect children’s intelligence badly and playing games moderately affect their intelligence well. Playing games is good as a pastime. It is the most important to control themselves. Parents had better communicate with their children because it is difficult for children to do so. If parents talk with their children, they can know whether children are absorbed in games terribly.

Then, I think moderation is best about playing games.


[142] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:kyu zuuyan MAIL Date:2016/06/13(月) 21:26
Although many people think children play games will ruin their life, I still think it's not that bad. I disagree this opinion.

First, many people think that child plays games will make their eyes worse, exactly it is right , but all parents say this only at their gaming time , so studying not destroy their eyes? Though child studied for 12 hours , their parents don't care about their eyes, but they will be so much angry at one hour gaming and blame games for destroying their children's eyes.

Second, some parents think game making their child being lonely .Thats wrong so much, we see the children play games with a computer, and think it's only a machine not a real person .The true thing is not what it looks like , we live with internet , internet can make us contact with each other , they are not alone , they have their community .We know man is a social animals ,these children who play games are also lonely in their real life, they want to contact with other people ,and they need to be affirmed ,so playing video games with other people who don't know them is the best way.

For these reason , I don't think prohibit children playing games is the best way to make them not playing games, though they don't play computer games anymore ,they will also do other things that make parents worry.The right way is playing game with them , know what they are doing , be a friend with your child and after that , they will change their mind and listen to you, and they will make their life widely .


[143] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Gen Uwai Date:2016/06/13(月) 22:00
I do not agree with it.
I think that some adults misunderstand about computer games. Computer games is not absolute badness which take over times from children, but give nothing. They give us avail things t times.
When I am a junior high school student, I am not good at history. I was not able to take an interest in history. However, I became to be interested in history once.
It was a video game that create an opportunity. The stage of that game was onetime Japan, and the history description was very correctly. I played it everyday,at the same time, I wanted to know about the stage of this game. It is the chance I was interested in history. After that, I came to study history hard, and my result had been increasing.
It is very famous topic that video games make people’s brains flexible. You can not say that when children play computer games, they waste their time.
Of course, if they play games too much, it is able to be said that it is the waste of time. To decide the time and to keep it is important.
If you study without playing computer games, you would learn benefit ability. It is right. However, there are what you can learn from playing games. Playing computer games is not waste of the time. Whether playing games become beneficial or not rely on children. If they can do self management, it can be valuable thing which help their lives


[144] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Yu Kataoka MAIL Date:2016/06/13(月) 23:48
I am against a thought that the game wastes time. There are three reasons.

The first is that there is the role as the communication tool with the friend to the game. As for modern children, a portable played a game than baseball and playing soccer, and playing in comparison with old children in a house in vacant land and came to often play. There is not one common topic with the friend if I do not play a game.

The second is that I may learn from a game. For example, I can learn the importance of not only refreshment being born, but also cooperating with a person by achieving the mission of the game in cooperation with a friend. When I do that I was not able to do it with a friend alone, and it was possible, I remember a thing pleasant at all.

The third is economic effect to be provided by a game. The game of Japan is popular in not only the country but also the foreign countries. The popularity has a foreigner visiting Japan for the reason of wanting to play a game of Japan. The economic effect to be provided by the world advance of the game of Japan is considerably big. For example, it is said that the game called Pokemon has economic effect more than 4 trillion yen. I did Pokemon in old days and have seen a foreigner played Pokemon. The fact to have economic effect more than 4 trillion yen was surprised at such Pokemon which was an imminent person very much.

Of course there may be the opinion that study becomes negligent by playing a game, but I think that it is a problem of the will of the person.


[146] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Yuma Hirano Date:2016/06/13(月) 23:53
I agree this opinion. I have several reasons.
First, because it is said that you can't sometimes exercise satisfactorily after you grows, you have to put on a way to move of a body when you are a child such as schoolchild. For example, you should put on sense of balance and a way to throw a ball at a child. The movement which throws a ball is more difficult than you are thinking. It is better to put certain degree of muscle at a child. Some people were made sports players in the sports experience when being a child.
Second, it is possible to learn how to concern with a person by playing sports. A recent video game make you and the person in the far place feel fun by using Internet. This is very convenient, but the chance to concern a person directly may be reduced. That will be a bad thing for a child. To utter a word makes person's brain be activated. Child's brain would develop by this activation.
Third, playing video game leads to a decline in eyesight by seeing a screen long. If you decline eyesight at a child, your life would exert big influence. For example, the vocational choices may decrease because of the bad of the eyesight.
So, when playing a game at a child, it is better to consider time and play. It is not the reason which should not play a game. You should find the best life-style as soon as possible.


[147] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Masashi Ito Date:2016/06/14(火) 00:02
I largely disagree with this opinion. I think that it is not bad for children to waste too much time for playing games. Let me give three reasons for my disagreement.

First, children can grow their abilities to manage themselves by playing games. Children often continue playing games for a long time forgetting time. Then, their parents make a rule about the time of their playing games. For example, parents make a rule that children cannot play games for more than two hours a day. In this way, children get ability to endure to play games.

Second, the talk about playing games is the main topic of conversation for children. When I went to school with my friends, I would often talk about games we play and TV program we watch. The talk is very enjoyable. And now, though we became university students, we sometimes talk about games we played once. We cannot this talk if we did not waste too much time for playing games.

Third, it is enjoyable to play games for children. I think that it is the happiest to do what is like for humans. So I think that children, who have a lot of time should do what is like such as games. I think that if children waste time for what is like when they are young, they can try a hateful thing hard.

For these three reasons, I am justified in concluding that children may waste too much time for playing games.


[148] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Yomi Morimoto Date:2016/06/14(火) 00:05
I almost agree with the opinion. These days, more and more computer games are sold anywhere. There are a lot of temptation which make children feel to play in their daily life. Children want to buy and play games because TV commercials and advertisements make the games look very enjoyable. If their friends have and talk about the game, it is natural that they want to do it. However, playing games for a long time causes many dangers.

First, if you play a computer game for a long time, your eyesight will get worse. Then you will have trouble without glasses in your daily life, but it is inconvenient. Looking screen for a long time makes your concentration lose and it may be bad influence on your study, so you will be told to quit the game by your parents.

Second, once you hook a game, you will play it as long as you can. Then you stay in your house and hardly move, and you will fall into lack of exercise. Your life style will be worse and you will be easy to catch a disease as well. You will fall into a vicious circle of your health.

However, if we take games away from children completely, we can also deprive children’s amusement. When I was an elementary school student, I played computer games with family almost every day. Because I had decided the time I can play it, I wasn’t give bad influence. Thus, I think children shouldn’t play computer games except they play it moderately.


[149] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Koki Hattori MAIL Date:2016/06/14(火) 00:46
I believe it is not necessarily that playing the game is a waste of time. We believe that rather sometimes to play in the game consequently increase the work efficiency of some person. There are three reasons.

As a first reason, because there are people who have the game as the best means for a breather. Human beings cannot always only do constructive activities. By sometimes change the pace of using and resting the mind and body, we should able to demonstrate the power of concentration when needed. Optimal means for relaxation depends on the person. It becomes the most effective recovery method to play in the game for some people.

Secondly, because sometimes the game will give a broad perspective that helps us to make a constructive activity. There are a variety of types of games. Although there are many things that much of entertainment not to be helpful, some game include a wide range of knowledge. there is also the one that gives how to capture the things. Such an experience of useful game will help you to have diversified views when do the constructive activities.

Finally, a lot of people there is no problem because it has taken the balance of the game and construction activities in the unconscious. We cannot continue just constructive activities. Similarly, most people also get bored or tired when they only play games. Without stopping we can be adjusted by ourselves. Of course, if someone plays game in poor health, we must stop it. However, that case rarely happens.

[150] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Yuma Taguchi Date:2016/06/14(火) 01:09
I think we can’t say, “This opinion is completely right.” Because playing games is not only bad effect but also good point.

Recently, there are various games around the world. Some of them give the children bad effects, other are not this situation. For example, Puzzle and Dragons that is one of the smartphone games is the good games for children to use brains. This is the game like the puzzle. Playing puzzle is good activity for children. Many parents make their children play it. I think this game don’t give bad effect to the children. In addition, Mahoutsukai to Kuroneko no Wiz is one of the games to give good effect. This game belongs to the genre of Quiz RPG. When this game play, we have to solve various quizzes. This game can acquire culture.

Some people say that “Playing sports is more important for the children.” This opinion is not mistake. However, I think we can exercise to play some games. One of the games is Wii Sports. This is the game which can play some sports in the house. This game gives us good exercise. Another is Wii fit. We can do running, play Yoga, and work out. This is more effective than Wii Sports. In this way, we can exercise with playing games.

Some games give good effect like this, but some games are no good with too much playing. We should choice the game which can give us the good thing and keep balance playing games and constructive activities.

[151] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:kaoru yoneda Date:2016/06/14(火) 01:45
I agree this opinion. I think playing games too much time makes bad influences on children. Now, I will introduce two reasons why I think so.

First, games create some problems of health. For example, blue light which games send out makes children’s eyes bad. The more time children plays the games, the worse their eyes are. Not stopping games and stayed up late, they may be sleep during classes and cannot concentrate on studying. Also, playing outside makes them more healthy and active than playing games. They can use time more effective in spite of playing games.

Second, children may become not to communicate each other. While playing games, they see the TV alone and play games alone too. The more time they play those, the less time children talks each other and communicate face to face. Of course, they sometimes play games with friends. However, that is not face-to-face communication. By talking face to face, they understand the other’s mind more.

In conclusion, playing games too much time has many bad influences. However, there are not only bad. Playing games is fun and when you are disappointed, playing games may cheer you up. I don’t think that playing games for a few time is bad. It is important to decide how many times they play games not to do too much time. In this way, I think playing games too much time makes children waste times, but there is no problem that playing games for a few time.


[152] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Hiroaki DOi Date:2016/06/14(火) 13:03
I think that we allow children to play computer games to some extent, because there are some advantages.

First, some children can raise motivation to do something. When I was a elementary school student, I was allow to play computer games after I do my homework, so I study very hard to play it as soon as possible. Like this, playing computer games can be a good way to raise their motivation, and children can enjoy efficiently.

Second, children can many topics by playing computer games which they can share among their friends, so prohibiting them playing it may decrease the possibility of their getting used to other children. I could make some friends by sharing some information from computer games when I was an elementary school student. Like this, playing computer games give children many opportunities to make some friends.

Third, children can sometimes broaden the width of their interest by playing computer games, so playing them can broaden their view of future.

However, there are some bad aspects to play computer games. Children’s eyesight gets worse by playing computer games, and they become lack of exercise and obesity. It is the serious problem which children who are absorbed in playing computer games too extremely shut themselves in home without going to school lately.

I agree to play computer games, but playing computer games surely has bad aspects, so we should impose children restriction on children if we allow them to play computer games. I think it is good to allow children to play computer games after they study hard.


[153] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Kawai Yuki Date:2016/06/14(火) 13:08
I agree with E.Gorkin’s opinion a little. I think it is a good opinion, but I can't agree to this opinion completely.

Many children like a video game. There are a lot of children who play a video game at a house without playing outside. They don't exercise so much, so it's unwholesome. Actually, children today has lower exercise ability than children in the past. That is a very wasteful time. If they don't play a video game and do a sport and study, their ability will probably become very good.

However, it isn't only a bad thing to play video games. We can also study to play a video game. For example, we can remember English words through playing a video game. A word using an English word often comes out in a Japanese video game. I liked a video game and spent a lot of time, but it also became studying English. What is more, video games which we can study English, math and so on are sold these days. We can enjoying study by use them. Playing a video game is fun and can also be enjoyed by itself. I think a video game is very convenient thing, but it is not better to spend a video game too much time.

Nevertheless, children should exercise more and study harder. They should not rely on convenient thing. I think if they decrease playing a video game time and increase exercising and studying time more, they will be better lives.

[154] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Mitsuhiro Okamoto Date:2016/06/14(火) 18:15
I completely disagree with this opinion. Let me offer two reasons for my disagreement

First, the violence scene of computer games may get children to be formed their violent characters. For instance, a main character battles with a big monster in the games. As a result, if he wins the monster in the battle, the person who operate him or the child is lifted mood and make a misunderstanding. It may lead to violent behaviors. Because he experienced that a person defeated the enemy by violence in the virtual world, he is likely to battle with the person he does not like much by using violence in real world. This trend is not good and does not tell the children right engagement with the others.

Second, the computer games can have bad effects on the children’s intellectual powers, visions and physical strengths. I think, in particular, the effects on physical strengths are large. Once the children are used to playing games inside, it is difficult for them to play outside. Consequently, they lack of exercise. Then their physical strengths decrease. The educational games may have good effects on them. Even though it is good point on the games, the effects of games are largely bad.

In conclusion, parents should tell their children not to play games and to play outside. Playing games in early life increases the time to play games in later life. If parents want to raise up their children healthy, they make their children stop playing games.


[155] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Akihiro Fujita Date:2016/06/14(火) 21:04
I partly approve of this opinion. Whether I approve of this opinion depend on perspectives. Many people say that computer game is bad for children, but there are a good aspects and a bad aspects for a computer game.

If daily life do not suffered, there is no problems. However computer game sometimes influence on children. Children may feel fatigue of the heart and suffer from a dependency. The communication between children and their parents will be also lost. For example, my friend refused to go to school by depending on it when I was junior high school student. Many youths become neat recently. In such a meaning, children waste far too much time playing computer games.

There are a lot of bad aspects as above. However, I could play computer game in meaningful way. Last year, I studied hard to enter the university. I felt much stress and fatigue then. I did computer game for a break well in such a case. Thanks to it, I was able to concentrate on study. Now I am a university student. I have quit playing computer game, so I was a children who used it most significantly.

There are a good aspects and a bad aspects for a computer game as above. In reality, most people could not do so, so children wasting too much time on playing computer game is social problem now. I think you should play it with setting time which you will play it and keep time which you have set. If you can play it significantly, you should play it as a break.


[157] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Kaede Morichika Date:2016/06/14(火) 22:37
I think that playing games is very constructive and we can learn many things from them. Let me show reason why playing games is constructive.

The first reason is that if one wants to complete a game, he must make a strategy. In the role playing game, we probably make a schedule to raise our characters and we consider enemy’s weak point to kill the last boss. The other game such as the first person shooting game require us to make strategies. The person who often play games can do various things with a schedule which gives him success.

The second reason is that we can know many things in the games. Recently, many games have a background related to the real world, and we can learn famous spots around the world. historical events or persons and so on. Moreover, to make a game, many professionals are involved in it, so we clay games with enjoying high quality things such as music, expression, graphic. When I was in junior high, I found the very impressed game and I first thought it was the best game I had ever seen, but I was not able to say any concrete things. As I played it more and more, I noticed beautiful BGM which matched the theme and very good expression, when I completed it, I cried. The games are wonderful.

I have said these things, but I think doing only games is very very bad. The things we can learn from games is non-valuable unless they connected with the phenomenon in the real world. I think the experience in both the game and the real world is essential for better life.


[158] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Nana Takao Date:2016/06/14(火) 23:15
I think that it is not so bad for children to use a lot of time for playing games. Of course, it is not appropriate for them to spend most of the days playing games and it is also important for them to play outsides.

When I was a child, I always played outsides with my friend. In my kindergarten, we often spent a lot of time playing outsides such as hide-and-seek, tag, and mud dumpling. After I came back home, I used to play in the park near from my house and sometimes went to my friend’s house to play. There was not much memory that I played games.

However, it is said that there have been more and more people who spend more time playing games insides such as DS and Wii than playing outside. I often see the commercials which introduce new game softs, so a lot of children ask their parents for them on their birthday or Christmas. My brother often did that as well. It is said that the physical ability of the children decreases now in comparison with old days and that the decline in academic ability of Japanese children advances because they are absorbed in games and they do not have enough time to study.

Considering these things, playing games seems to have bad points. However I think it has also good points. Because there are various types of games, they develop children’s imagination. So, I think playing games is not useless at all and playing them moderately is important in the growth of the children.

[159] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Shunki Yamamoto Date:2016/06/14(火) 23:45
I disagree the opinion that children should do other things, not computer games, when they are free. Thanks to a lot technical innovations, we can play the computer games on the computer, communication with unknown friends, and consume many time very easily. E.Gorkin’s opinion is a little exaggerated because this situation is natural in this time. Of course we are today’s youth, but this is not reason of this opinion.

The reason why E.Gorkin’s opinion is exaggerated is that he is almost “old people”. I think the idea that Today’s children play outdoors less than previous children because of the computer game’s appearance, old people often say, describes their jealousy and envy. When old people were children, their enjoyment is playing menko, koma, and jumping rope for example. They didn’t have any computers because the computers for homes didn’t exist, so I think they must feel a little jealousy and envy.

It is said that today’s children waste too time, playing the computer games. However is this bad fact? I don’t think so. I know a lot of friends who consume many time by not only studying but also playing them but become respectable people. Why person is got hooked the computer games is by his or her personality, not by the computer games. They are not evils if we use them properly.

I am angry incidentally about the old people’s idea that today’s children is not good because they play indoors, not outdoors. Who occupies local park by playing gateball? Who prohibits children’s play, such as soccer and baseball, because it is danger for themselves? Old people, of course including E.Gorkin, should reflect on their arrogant attitude.


[161] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Masakiyo Teranishi Date:2016/06/21(火) 17:52
I almost agree with the opinion. These days, more and more children play video games. There are a lot of temptation which make children feel to play in their daily life. Advertisements make children buy video games. If their friends talk about the game, they will want to do it. However, playing games for a long time causes many risks.

First, games create some problems of health. For example, blue light which games send out makes children’s eyes bad. The more time children play the games, the worse their eyes are. Not stopping games and stayed up late, they may be sleep during classes and cannot concentrate on studying. Also, playing outside makes them more health and active than playing games. They can use time more effective in spite of playing games.

Second, I think that when children play games, they feel time which they are spending playing games shorter than time that has actually passed. When most children play games, they concentrate playing games, so I think that this phenomenon occurred. I think a lot of people have experienced this phenomenon, by the way I have experienced this phenomenon. I think children should not spend wasted time.

Third, if not only children, all people play games for a too long time, their eyesight will be getting worse. When children play games, they concentrate playing games, so the distance from their eyes to the screen of the game. This causes their eyesight worse.

For these reasons, children should not play games for a long time, but it is fact that they enjoy playing games. This is because I suggest that they should decide the time to play video games before playing video games.


[198] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Natsumi Oue Date:2016/07/10(日) 22:03
I basically disagree with this opinion. Most children love computer games. Adults criticize the computer games, however. E. Gorkin’s opinion is extreme. Let me give three reasons for my basic disagreement.

First, the computer games are very fun. Playing the computer games blow off fatigue of study. In other words, the computer games are most suitable for change in pace. Even the smart phone that everyone has enables us to play games. You can play easily by yourself.

Second, the relationship with friends deepens by the computer games as well as by playing outside. It is possible that children communicate with their computer games and play while cooperating. Furthermore, they can take on people of all over the world. It is larger scale than they play in the neighborhood. This is attractive.

Third, there are also the computer games that you can study while enjoying yourself. You can get along with your study by using your computer game more than by using paper and a pencil. The computer games are not only anything for an entertainment.

The computer games have the dependence, however. You might play your computer game while you study. When you begin to play your computer game once, you can’t stop playing. Moreover, you might become poor-sighted by looking at your computer game’s screen. The computer games have a lot of advantages, but they have also many disadvantages at the same time.

For these reasons mentioned above, I am justified in concluding that it is important that not too much play the computer games.

[233] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Yuuki Nakano Date:2016/07/24(日) 23:09
I partly agree with the opinion. It is surely true that E.Gorkin says. Today children spend many hours a day on computer games on the average and the chance to participate in for constructive activity. Computer games are only data and produce nothing in real. Moreover, downsides are included in digital games, such as worsening eyes or causing “Game brain”. In worst case, some die or cannot distinguish real from a computer game because they played a game for too much time. When children play computer games at home and they don’t go out to play outside, they are getting weight. It is also bad for their health. Actually, I have gotten weight much and my eyes have gotten bad in my childhood because of computer games.

However, computer games have many merits, so I said “partly” in the beginning. In the game, the players clear a quest and get sense of accomplishment. To clear the quest, they should work their brain and solve a mystery. This brings their research feeling and curiosity. Computer games have an influence on the reality. In the modern world, for example, playing a popular computer game can lead to making friends because it is a common topic among children. I made close friends thanks to a computer game. Not only real friends, but also friends in game you can get, if you play an online game.

As above, computer games are partly constructive. They have both merits and demerits. I cannot judge unconditionally whether games are bad for children.


[238] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Katsuya Kikuchi Date:2016/07/26(火) 07:28
I roughly agree with the opinion, but I think that playing games is not bad in itself. Let me show you a reason for my opinion.
Truly, children could be involved in “constructive activities” while they are having fun playing games, but why do children have to be involved in “constructive activities.”? Originally, the way of spending time depends on the person. People should not interfere in their other’s way of spending time. However, many adults are thinking that studying is a “duty” of children, and studying is a “constructive activities.” Adults also think that spending too much time playing games and not doing “constructive activities” such as studying will not be good for children in the future to live a “good life”. Live a “good life” means to enter a “good high school”, “good university”, “good company” and success in life. Then here’s another question. Why do children have to live a “good life” in the future? I think many adults know –or maybe believing- that having a “good life” is the closest way to live a happy life. I do not deny with it, but I don’t like it. I don’t like it just to live a life to make a success. I think that people are living to enjoy their life, and I think we need not only “constructive activities” but also a nonconstructive activity to enjoy. Doing only study will probably let you have good score at school, but it will not make your life happy.


[239] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Kato Daiki Date:2016/07/26(火) 07:30
I agree to this partially. It uses the brain well to play a game. It is pleasant to play a game. Besides, by the result, they will become intellectual. A child is more intellectual than an adult. When they are small, they should play a game. Then, they come to use the brain than before.
However, eyesight decreases when children play a game too much. People having lower eyesight than old days increase. Traffic accidents will increase when the eyesight of children decreases. This is because they do not look at a car and the people when eyesight decreases.
As a result, traffic accidents will increase when their eyesight decreases. In addition, they must buy glasses if their eyesight decreases. Eyes, the mirror become cheaper now. However, the salaries of Japanese people decrease now. Therefore, in both the present age and old days, the glasses are expensive for people. In addition, they must buy a contact lens if their eyesight decreases. The contact lens becomes cheaper now. However, the salaries of Japanese people decrease. Therefore, in both the present age and old days, the contact lens is expensive for people,too.
Therefore it has good and bad points to play a game. The parent must let a child find a job. They must be intellectual so that a child finds a job in the good company. However, they may not work well when their eyesight decreases. Thus, their parent should control it. Their children should control it, too. So I do not think what I should do.


[241] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Banno nanami Date:2016/07/26(火) 08:13
I agree with the opinion of E. Gorkin. I have some reasons why I think so. Let me tell you those.
One is that they are not going to study hard if we let our children play video games for a long time. Because it’s very interesting and satisfying for children to play video games and there are lots of kinds of games such as computer game, cards game and video game now.
And they are not going to go outside to play with their friends after school as well. Because they can play games on the computer instead of going to outside, you know. They can make many friends on line if they don’t have many friends at school or whenever. It might be easier to make friends on line than for real at school or whenever. But that is not good for them and like for their future.
The other is that they are going to become to unable to see clearly due to deterioration in their vision if they keep playing games for too much time. And they will have to wear the glasses and put their contact lenses in.
The last one is that they are not going to get enough time to sleep because they keep playing till midnight and stay up late. At result of that, that prevents them from growing up.
In brief, there is no good effect if they play games for a long time by above those reasons. So don’t do it. And their parents need to know about it and it’s important not to let their children play games for too much time.

[244] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games Name:Sakamoto Shunsuke Date:2016/07/26(火) 10:02
I am affirmative in a child playing a video game.
I speak below the reason.
When I play a game and feel that it is fun, dopamine is secreted, and places of the brains controlling a thought and memory, exercise come to work well. Judgement is found depending on the screen situation, and a deterrent and the concentration are required. The button operation of the game console activates brain through the minute movement of the finger. A memory is necessary to advance to the next problem during a game, and an accomplishment function is forged to push forward a game well. It promotes teamwork when I played with friends. When I cleared a game, I can have confidence toward oneself. I can develop reading, arithmetic, the skill of the solution to the problem. There are various advantages.
However, to a child, it is hard to be able to tell the difference between reality and the world of the game. Light stimulation to be given from a game console lets brain be tired. It is necessary to be careful for ten minutes.
I keep early hours for the growth of the child, and a result that a basic lifestyle to eat breakfast properly has a bigger influence than TV and a game leaves. In the situation not to eat the breakfast which cannot keep early hour even if it limits a game and lets you keep just time so much well, that place is a large problem. "The software of the violent content" that the stimulation is too strong in a child does it on a day not to give it and decides good game time and is that it is necessary for a protector to supervise it well in conclusion.


[1] Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Mitsu Matsuoka Date:2015/10/13(火) 18:50 [ 返信 ]
Wikipedia is a collaborative online encyclopedia that is written and edited by its users. Anyone may contribute information about a given topic or edit information posted by other users. A city official has posted a short entry on the town that provides only basic information. In an effort to collect as much information as possible, the official is encouraging each resident to share his or her local knowledge by writing about an aspect of the town that is particularly familiar. Write a short essay, between 250 and 300 words in length, to add to your town’s Wikipedia entry. Be sure to choose a topic that you know a lot about.



[2] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Sugino Yahiro MAIL Date:2016/04/17(日) 23:10
Wikipedia is a very useful website .
It is a collaborative online encyclopedia that is written and edited by its users .
Anyone may contribute information about a given topic or edit information posted by other users .
And now, I will show you a Wikipedia about my local town`s aspect.
My local town` name is Mie prefecture .
The topic that I add to Mie`s Wikipedia is about Isejinngu .
It is one of the most famous shrines in Japan .
It was built about in 60 B.C. It consists of two shrines , called Geku and Naiku .
The shrine called Geku enshrines the god called Toyoukenoookami .
The shrine called Naiku enshrines the god called Amaterasuoomikami .
People says that Amaterasuookami is the god of son .
And, there are many kinds of stores in Okageyokotyou .
It is street to Naiku . You can do shopping , eating , sightseeing , and so on , on that street.
For example , you can eat Akafuku at there.
Akafuku is one of the most popular sweets in Japan .
It is a rice cake that covered by sweetened been paste .
And you can eat any other Japanese sweets .
So , you can walk to Naiku over sopping , eating , sightseeing .
But, you must not walk over eating in Naiku , because it is the gods area .
Add to , GEku and Naiku are not praying place , there are place that you tell gods your


[4] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Mayuko Deguchi MAIL Date:2016/04/24(日) 18:46
Asahi town is located in the Mie Prefecture northern part. It is the smallest town in Mie. There are a lot of farmlands, so frogs often croak in summer.

It has community activities. For example, children’s gathering hold a lot of events such as bowling competition, radio gymnastics, and Christmas party. It consists of elementary students. Asahi town community also holds mainly three big festivals. First, there is the welfare thanksgiving in March. There are many booths such as bazar corner. Game and lottery are done, so residents who take part in the festival are excited. Second, there is the summer festival in Jury. Bon dancing is announced at the festival, and people can eat and drink in the booths. Last, there is Hatiouzi festival in August. It is called Hadaka festival. It is held in Obuke area. People hit each other with straw on the fire. The sight is very powerful.

Lately, Shiraume area is completed in Asahi town. It is a residential area and it has also a supermarket and convenience stores and a hospital. It is the most convenient area in Asahi town.

Because of Shiraume area, the population of Asahi town is increasing rapidly. In 1970, it has a population of 6800 and in 2016, it has a population of 10500 in 2016. The population growth rate in Asahi is the largest in Japan. And, 26 percent of population in it are under twenty. The rate of young people in Asahi is high relatively. Due to population growth, Asahi elementary school is expanded rapidly. The number of students at present is about twice and a half times as many as those of it ten years ago.


[5] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Hidenaga Takahashi Date:2016/04/24(日) 19:54
Uwazima City is located in the Ehime Prefecture western part, and the population is about seventy million. There is a castle with a tower in the center of city. This city is famous for oranges, but not only fruits but also red snapper and pearl are famous. The number of farmed red snapper is largest in Japan and they have received good evaluation from many people. In this area, bullfighting is traditional sports. Now, by reducing of young people this culture is declining. And

Uwazima plays an important role in Japanese history. Especially, in Edo era, this city was governed by Date Hidemune who is son of Date Masamune, and last days of that era, this clan plays a central role to establish new government.

Tsushima town is located in mountainous region in Uwazima city. In this town, the marine products industry is prosper. Especially, “icefish” (Japanese say “shirauo”) is the most famous product. Therefore, the festival called “shirauo matsuri” is held in every January and many people visit the festival to eat “odorigui of shirauo”. Moreover, other local foods are also sold.

In Tsushima, there is a park famous for its very beautiful Japanese-style garden and cherry trees. It has athletic playground equipment and wide lawn. Therefore, it is good to enjoy pick nick and hanami. Moreover, there is a hot spring. Local people gather there and talk with their friends with taking their tired. There is a requisite place for local people as a place of relaxing and refreshment.


[6] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Sakurako Nakano Date:2016/04/24(日) 23:23
Ogaki is a city in Gifu Prefecture. There are several festivals in Ogaki.

Ogaki Festival is held on May once a year. It lasts over 360 years. Many people visit from outside every year. It has two attractive features.
First, visitors enjoy looking at portable shrines. Some towns in the city have them. Totally, there are 11 portable shrines. There are decorated with beautiful and gorgeous paintings. One of them has a doll which writes letters in calligraphy. Some children dance on them. The residents parade the floats through the streets at the festival. Moreover, some people play the yokobue and tap a tsuzumi. Its parade is very powerful.
Second, the festival have many stalls. Many visitors buy Mizumanju and shaved ice. Ogaki is famous for clean water. Therefore, Mizumanju and shaved ice made from water in Ogaki are very delicious.

Jumangoku Festival is held on October once a year. Primary school children parade along the streets, playing the musical instruments or dancing. Moreover, adults who work in Ogaki parade handmade portable shrines. This festival is very fun.

Genkihatsuratsuichi is held once a month. Specialty products of Ogaki and local vegetables are sold at low price by the residents. Visitors can buy fresh food.

Tanabata Festival is held on July once a year. The town is decorated with colorful papers and there are many stalls. The festival is sometimes called “Mizumatsuri”.

In the festivals in Ogaki, the residents can feel four seasons. Moreover, they can communicate each other. Therefore, all residents love these festivals.


[7] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Hiroki Nakagawa MAIL Date:2016/04/25(月) 00:06
Yokkaichi is one of the biggest cities in Mie prefecture. Yokkaichi is to the north of Suzuka and to the south of Kuwana, Komono, Kawagoe and Asahi. The number of people is 307800. The population had increased until 2000, but now decreasing.

In Edo era, Yokkaichi was on the way of Tokaido, the route to the Ise shrine. So Yokkaichi was developed as the staging post for the people to go to Ise shrine. Hiroshige Utagawa, the famous Ukiyoe artist, draw the picture of Yokkaichi staging post. In Hinaga, the Hinaga fan was sold for souvenir. Now, it is one of the famous traditional craft objects in Mie.

Yokkaichi port was one of the most important port in Japan. Oil is imported for Yokkaichi complex, and cars are exported. In recent years, it is beginning to decline because Yokkaichi complex become old, and ships become so big that they can’t enter the port. But now thanks to the brilliant night view of port and complex, many sightseer visit to see it.

The famous product is green tea, named Suizawa tea or Ise tea. Mie is the third largest production area of tea in Japan.

The famous sightseeing spot is Mt.Gozaisyo. The height is 1221 meters and located on the border of Mie prefecture and Shiga prefecture. Many people visit for climbing or enjoying hot springs. If you are lucky, you may see deer, monkeys or Japanese serows. You can also enjoy watching red leaves in autumn, and skiing in winter.


[11] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Kaede Morichika MAIL Date:2016/04/25(月) 16:01
Have you ever heard of Fujioka? Fujioka is the area I’m living in.

If I’m asked about Fujioka, I’ll say that Fujioka is a very beautiful country. There are many kinds of animals such as wild boars, monkeys, bears, deer, and so on. In addition, we can go to hot springs there. I often visit a near foot bath in winter. That makes my body hot and I can feel comfort. Furthermore, the air is very clear and I realize that this air makes me healthy.

Despite of these good points about Fujioka, I always feel its inconvenience, which is that there is not enough public transport. If I want to use trains, I must spend 30 minutes on going to the nearest station by car. Moreover, there are only a few shops in the Fujioka. Even convenience stores, I must spend 15 minutes on going to. It’s surprising that I always watch weather forecast of Gifu prefecture, although I’m living in Aichi prefecture. That is because a land height above sea level of Fujioka is high and the climate of Fujioka is similar to that of Gifu prefecture. I think the worst point of Fujioka is that there are a lot of crickets. When I was junior high school student, the lunch service of the school got verminous and we finally couldn’t eat lunch on that day. Not only crickets but bears and monkeys are very dangerous. These animals often attack people and hurt them.

I think there are both good and bad points anywhere and I love my home town. Maybe many people regard Fujioka as an inconvenient area, but I want to live there forever. Why don’t you visit my beautiful home town?


[13] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Mitsuhiro Okamoto Date:2016/04/25(月) 16:16
Miyoshi City is located between Nagoya City and Toyota City in Aichi Prefecture. Thus, the city has developed and increased its population as bed town of these cities. There are mountains and forests in the northern part of the city, two large ponds there.

Miyoshi city is known as the city of canoe. In junior high school and high school of the city, there are canoe clubs and they have achieved excellent grades in some canoe competitions. As an aside, my friend in my high school is ranked second in a competition in not Japan but Asia. And the city is ranked first in “Livable Ranking” in 2010. In this ranking, cities are evaluated in five point of views, security, convenience, comfort, wealthy and the standard of housing conditions. The city is ranked first by the overall evaluation.

The name of the city was Miyoshi Town before 2009. Also, Miyoshi was written using Chinese character. The number of the city’s population, however, has increased to the number to meet the requirement as a city, so that Miyoshi town changed to Miyoshi city at January 4th, 2010. Miyoshi City using Chinese character also exists in Tokushima Prefecture and Hiroshima Prefecture, so that Miyoshi is written using Japanese cursive character.

The dialects of the city are “Jan”, “Dara”, “Rin”. These are called Jandararin together. “Jan” is used as making sure, “Dara” is used as seeking approval and “Rin” is used as proposal. In the greatest festival in the city, Iijan festival, “Jandararin” and “Just rolling” are hung and residents who dressed up unique fashions dance. This festival makes summer in Miyoshi climax.
(270 words)


[14] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Rui Fujitani Date:2016/04/25(月) 18:20
Gifu city is in Mino area. It is lower half area in Gifu prefecture, and the northern tip of Nobi plain. It is prefectural capital in Gifu. Traditional specialties of Gifu city are Japanese umbrellas, fans and lantern.

There is Mt. Kinnka in Gifu city. And Gifu castle is built on it. Gifu castle was called “Inabayama castle” and a city extended under the castle was called “Inokuchi” in the remote past. But when Oda Nobunaga came to Inokuchi, he named the area “Gifu.” He greatly affected Gifu. Buses running in Gifu city are printed paintings of Oda Nobunaga and Nouhime; she is wife of him. And golden statue of Oda Nobunaga stands in front of Gifu station.

The Nagara River is first-class river running into Gifu city. It is famous for Ukai: a cormorant fishing. Ukai is a fishing method come down from the past and it is a specialty in summer in Gifu. The way is handling cormorants and making them catch sweetfish. And the way was designated important intangible cultural property in Gifu. We can watch Ukai while riding a boat in night. It is so beautiful that the fire lights in the dark.

Gifu city is famous for young soybean pods and Japanese radish. In Gifu, there is Moriguchidaikonn. It is one of Japanese radish. It is very long and used for making pickles.

Yanagase is a downtown by Gifu station. In the past, the downtown flourished very much. But it declined and many stores in there closed. Now Yanagase is trying to redevelop.


[15] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Masuda Hiroki Date:2016/04/25(月) 20:03
Shizuoka City is the second largest city located in Shizuoka Prefecture, and became Government-ordinance-designed city in 2005.

Shizuoka City is consisted of three wards called Aoi-ku, shimizu-ku and suruga-ku. Aoi-ku is the largest ward of the three. Aoi-ku also has prefectoral office, municipal office and ward office.

Shizuoka City is famous for seafood. Yaizu Port has the largest catch of tuna and bonito. Therefore, Shizuoka is the largest consuming place of tuna.

In Edo era, Tokugawa Ieyasu built the castle called Sunpu jo in Suruga-han (han means clan in Japanese). Now, Shizuoka City has Sunpu jo Park on the ruins of Sunpu jo.

Shizuoka City is very warm and there are no snows because of climate and terrain. Akaisi Mountains changes cold wind into dry warm air in winter. In ten years, there are only 18days observed snow in Shizuoka City (2005~2014).

Climate of Shizuoka City is very characteristic. In summer, there are many rains and typhoons. But in winter, there are few rains. Change of temperature is very mild. Despite of the fact that Shizuoka City is very comfortable place, its population is decreasing.

Shizuoka City is famous for soccer. Shizuoka Prefecture has 2 teams, Shimizu S-pulse and Jubilo Iwata. Shizuoka City has Shimizu S-pulse. This team was very strong, but now, Shimizu S-pulse was demoted from J1 to J2.

Shizuoka is famous for green tea. Thanks to climate, tea leaves grows very healthy. Shizuoka Prefecture has many brand of tea. Shizuoka City has a brand of Honyama-tea. Hamamatsu City has a brand of Tenryu-tea for example.

When big earthquake happen, Shizuoka will suffer from its damage badly. So, now, Shizuoka City is creating disaster prevention measures.


[17] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Yuma Taguchi Date:2016/04/25(月) 20:58
Nakatsugawa city is one of the most famous cities in Gifu prefecture. This city locates next to Nagano prefecture. There are a lot of special points in Nakatsugawa.

First special point is beautiful nature. There is Mt. Enasan which is one of the most famous mountains in Gifu. Elevation of Mt. Enasan is 2,191 meters. In winter, this mountain is covered with the snow and a side turns white. This scenery is very beautiful. So, this is my recommended point in the city.

Second point is food. One of them is Kurikinton. Kurikinton is Japanese sweets using chestnut. Nakatsugawa is the birthplace of Kurikinton. So, there are many Kurikinton shops in Nakatsugawa. Kurikinton is very delicious food. I like it. Further, there are some kinds of Kurikinton. One of them is Kakinomi-Kinton. This is Kurikinton wrapped in dried persimmon. This is delicious too. Another special food is Goheimochi. Goheimochi made in rice and miso. This form is like Waraji. When I was a child, Goheimochi is the famous and popular. But, now, this popularity is decrease. I want to be popular like the olden days.

Third point is that Nakatsugawa city is historical place. Magomejuku in Nakatsugawa is post station of Nakasendo. So, there is stone pavement and many tourists visit them. In Edo era, many people visited there too. Magomejuku is the important place for the long time. There are many delicious foods too. You must visit there when you visit to Nakatsugawa city.

From the above, I think that Nakatsugawa city is very special place.

[18] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Koki Iwata Date:2016/04/25(月) 22:21
Hadano City is located in the west of Kanagawa Prefecture.

More than 170,000 people live in Hadano. Hadano city has rich nature such as mountains, rivers, forests, and so on. Particularly, many people who like climbing are interested in Tanzawa, mountains in Hadano city, and come to Hadano to climb Tanzawa, So, Hadano recommends Tanzawa.

Foods in Hadano are very delicious. Particularly, a famous food in Hadano is peanuts. Students of elementary schools in Hadano eat peanuts as school lunch. Likewise, Hadano’s water is very delicious, because Hadano has a lot of mountains and air in Hadano is very clean. Hadano’s water is selected “Zenkoku Meisui Hyakusen” by Ministry of the Environment. There are a lot of spring water spots in Hadano. Hadano’s water is named “Oishii Hadanono mizu” and sold in Japan.

A lot of celebrities were from Hadano. LUNA SEA, Japanese rock band group members (RYUICHI, SUGIZO, INORAN, J, SHINYA), Yoshida Eisaku, Kikuchi Rinko, Yamada Ryosuke, Japanese idol group, Hey! Say! JUMP member, and ZARD were from Hadano.
At Shibusawa station, “MAKENAIDE”, ZARD’s most famous song is used as a station melody.

Tabacco is one of the famous industries in Hadano. To celeblate tabacco industry, in November, there is “Tabako Matsuri” Tabako matsuri is a big festival which has a lot of stands and events. Tabako Matsuri’s main event is a lot of fireworks. Many people who participate Tabako Matsuri enjoy fireworks.

Like these, Hadano city has a lot of charm points. It takes about 2hours to go to Hadano from Nagoya by trains and Shinkansen. If you are interested in Hadano city, let’s go to Hadano!


[20] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Masashi Ito MAIL Date:2016/04/25(月) 22:38
Toyota City is located in Aichi Prefecture, and the population is the second largest in Aichi. It is famous for Toyota Motor Corporation. The name of the city was Koromo City, but the city was named after Toyoda Kiichiro, who established Toyota Motor Corporation in 1959 because Koromo City became a city which is famous for cars.

The head office of Toyota Motor Corporation is in Toyota City. So many cars run in Toyota City, but the number of the accidents in Toyota City is the most in Japan. This is a problem which we must solve.

The city absorbed a lot of towns, and Toyota City is the largest city in Aichi Prefecture. But I am disappointed that there is only one movie theater. And it has no more than two theaters, and they are very small. So there are few spots to enjoy. I am looking forward to being built entertainment facilities.

Toyota Stadium is in Toyota City and it is home ground of Nagoya Grampus, famous soccer team. The Club World Cup and rugby games are held there. When I was an elementally school student, I often went there to watch soccer game and swim in the pool.

Asuke Town is in Toyota City and famous for Kourankei. There many kinds of trees there. So people can enjoy and watch sakura in spring and colored leaves. A lot of people come to Kourankei not only from Aichi Prefecture but also from around Japan. Especially, I think that the colored leaves which are lighted up at night is beautiful.


[21] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Yuma Hirano Date:2016/04/25(月) 23:24
Shizuoka City is located in the center of Shizuoka Prefecture. And this city is prefectural capital. The population of this city is 702,689. A bird in the city is a kingfisher.

Shimizu-ku where I lived was originally Shimizu City. But, it became Shimizu-ku on April 3, 2003. Shizuoka City was the biggest city then in Japan.
By the way, Shizuoka City has a land area of about 1400 square kilometers.

This city has a lot of famous companies and headquarters. For example, there is “HAGOROMO FOODS” famous for tuna fish and a factory of BANDAI for a plastic model of GUNDAM. There is also snack factory of MEIJI.

And this city is a stage of one of the most popular animation “Chibi Maruko”.
It also seems to be a stage of recent animation “HARUTIKA”.
I have never seen the animation, so I do not know conversantly.

Shizuoka City is many famous person’s home town.
Atsuto Uchida, Suzu Hirose and Hollywood the kosisyo is from Shizuoka.

Shimizu is often called a soccer kingdom. But all residents are not playing soccer well.
There is a soccer team called Shimizu S-Pulse in Shimizu.
The team was in J1 before. But the team is not playing an active part recently.
A lot of local fan are supporting and wishing that the team plays an active part again.

When it is your lucky time, Mt. Fuji can see anytime from Shizuoka City.
Would not the person who has not seen Mt. Fuji actually like to come to Shizuoka City once?


[25] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Yoshito Kamogawa Date:2016/04/26(火) 00:15
The town where I was born is Sasebo City in Nagasaki. Sasebo is located in northern part in Nagasaki prefecture. To my pleasure, it is famous for Huis Ten Bosch. Huis Ten Bosch is a theme park which is modeled on the city in the Netherlands and one point five as large as Disney Land in Tokyo. The buildings, the flowers and its view are very beautiful. It also hold a variety of events. Therefore, not only Japanese tourists but also ones all over the world visit it every year.

Sasebo City is also famous for Sasebo Burger. Sasebo Burger is bigger hand-made burger than general hamburgers and there are many kinds of ones. There are a lot of Sasebo Burger shops in Sasebo City. And, to my surprise, Sasebo Burger is the hamburger which is made in Japan. A lot of tourists come to eat them.

In Sasebo City, there is U.S. military base. So, not only U.S. Forces but also many American live in Sasebo City. We can see them if we walk around the city. Usually, we, Japanese can’t enter U.S. military base without permission, but once a year, American Festival is held in the base and we can enter it and join the festival. If we join it, we can eat a variety of American food which we rarely eat in Japan.

There are a lot of islands in Sasebo City. In particular, “Kujukushima” is famous. Despite the name, there aren’t 99 islands in Kujukushima. There are islands more than 200. “Kujuku” means “many”. Its view is very magnificent and beautiful.


[26] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Ryuga Kato Date:2016/04/26(火) 00:24
Nagoya is a seat of a prefectural office in Aichi-ken. There is Disneyland in Tokyo and there is Universal Studios Japan in Osaka. But there are no famous theme parks such as this in Aichi-ken. There is nothing in Nagoya. When saying forcibly, there is NAGASHIMASUPARANDO. But it's boring there. There is nothing in Nagoya.

I just have famous food. Including the dish boiled in miso and a fermented soybean paste cutlet are popular. The salinity is included much, so these are bad for a body. It's said that the Japanese takes salt too much . When it comes to Nagoya, "SUGAKIYA" is famous. But the Chinese noodles are equal to the salinity for one day. The other wings are also popular. But after eating that, a hand gets soiled.

There is a team of a baseball called Chunichi Dragons. That isn't good compared with a giant and Hanshin. There is Nagoya Grampus in a team of soccer. That's weak compared with Urawa Reds, Kajima Antlers and Hiroshima of Sanfrecce. If Toyota takes out more money, Nagoya Grampus will become strong.

There is Nagoya University in Nagoya. Nagoya University raised a lot of careles affairs. A practical professor of Nagoya University reported to the prosecutor by an overt obscenity charge in a regrettable thing. He lowered pants on the road in Midori-ku, Nagoya-shi. He showed the lower part of the body to people. He admits a crime "He has felt pleasure."

Thus NAGOYA is the town where much is really charming.


[27] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Takuji Kato MAIL Date:2016/04/26(火) 00:37
Asaka city is located in the Saitama Prefecture southern part, so Tokyo’s prefectural office is as near as that of Saitama from Asaka.
Asaka’s population is increasing because of traffic convenience.
Tobu-Tojyo-line is setting up around this city and in this line trains from Asaka to Ikebukuro are running every few minutes.

The name Asaka is originated by a royal “Asaka-Yasuhiko-o”
A central town Hizaori-tyo was a post town on Kawagoe road, and Hizaori-mura is named by a horse a Samurai was riding broke his leg around here.

Asaka is famous for having a garrison “CAMP DRAKE” and grand self-defense.
Garrison is United States military base.
When Vietnam War was happened, this camp was used for caring warriors who was got injured in this war.
And now part of this area is used for parks, libraly, high school, junior high school, Ball Park, traffic field, and grand self-defense.
Grand self-defense is, for instance, saving our lives from other country’s attack such as North Korea’s weapon.
A lot of warriors are training every day in case of something.
So I used to hear gun shoot and see many helicopters during my childhood.
And now, this grand self-defense is going to use for Tokyo Olympic game.
Shooting is going to be placed in this area.
So I think that many people will visit Asaka, and this movement will revitalize this city’s economy
What a fantastic event Tokyo Olympic is!!

And in this city, famous festival “saika-sai”is taking placed every august.
In this festival, a lot of team from this city’s school to other prefecture’s team participate in“YOSAKOI-FESTA”, and spectacular fireworks adorn the festival’s night.
It is so excited.

Above this, Asaka is an attractive city.
So if you have some time,please visit there once!!


[28] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Shogo Beppu MAIL Date:2016/04/26(火) 00:43
Ise City is located in the Mie Prefecture southern part, and the number of people who go on a sightseeing to is the largest in Mie. Not only Japanese people, but also people from foreign countries such as the USA, China come to Ise. They come to Ise to visit Ise Shrine, the greatest shrine of all shrines. In 2013, approximately 26million people visited Ise city.

Ise Shrine is shrine architecture of Sinto Religion, the Japanese most popular religion. Many Japanese people visit it in January 1 to do hatumoude, thanking gods for giving peaceful life and society. It is very sacred place. Even Japanese Emperor and Prime Minister visit it every year. Since I lived Ise city, I have seen many famous people. They are, for example, members of National Diet, TV performer, sports athletes. Every time I see them I can boast of the experience.

In Ise, there is Ise Senior High School. It is prefectural school. I was the student of it. It is the most intelligent and greatest school in Ise. It won the championship in Science Grand Prix, and got priority of taking part in World Grand Prix. It was also famous for the baseball team. They final selection of taking part in National Convention, Kosien, but they are not selected regrettably.

Ise will hold Ise-Shima G7 summit. It is the chance to get people all over the world to know Ise City. I expect that many people notice the splendor of Ise and the visitor to Ise increase.


[29] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Hiroaki Doi MAIL Date:2016/04/26(火) 00:49
Wakayama City is located in Wakayama prefecture , the population of Wakayama City is the largest in Wakayama prefecture and there are 363000 people in Wakayama City , which account for about 40 percent of the population of Wakayama prefecture .
However, the land area of Wakayama City is about 210 square meters , which account for only 4 percent of that of Wakayama prefecture. The population density of Wakayama City is about 350000.

In the Edo period, Wakayama flourished as a castle town which was governed by Kisyu Tokugawa , which was one of three major branches of the Tokugawa family.
However, the population of Wakayama City is decreasing and Wakayama is going downhill today. These problems should be solved as soon as possible.

There are few amusement facilities in Wakayama City, but there are beautiful ocean , so many tourist from other prefectures. Last year, Kinokuni Wakayama National Athletic Meet was held in Wakayama City , so many tourist came and Wakayama City bustled with them.

Although Wakayama is famous for the production of orange . In fact, orange is not grew in Wakayama City ,but in Arita City. Instead industry is prosperous in Wakayama City. There is a large factory of Kao corporation which is famous for chemical product.

In center of Wakayama City , there is Wakayama Castle. It is famous for its cherry blossoms, many events is held in it , and many local people visit in order to go for a walk and go jogging. Around Wakayama Castle, there is a zoo which we can enter for free, so many people go to Wakayama Castle.


[31] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Koki Hattori MAIL Date:2016/04/26(火) 01:21
Nagoya city is located in the west of Aichi prefecture. It is the biggest city in the Chubu region. It is famous for the Nagoya castle and cooking that use miso. It has many well-known persons such as Nobunaga Oda: Japanese Warring States Period. In addition, it has some good sports team. For example, soccer team: Nagoya Grampus and baseball team: Chunichi Dragons.

One of Its feature is convenience for transportation, because it is close to Toyota city which makes very many cars and there are many subways and busses. It has wide road to run many cars, so we can move smoothly but it cause many traffic accidents. The number of them in Aichi prefecture is many than other prefecture, so they are serious problem of Nagoya city.

Nagoya city has many festivals like other cities. Its major festival is Domatsuri. It is contest of arranged Japanese traditional dance. Last year, 23 thousand people danced and 2 million people watched it. A scene of many young people are intent on dancing will make us be impressed.

I live in Mukojimacho Nakamura-Ku. Nakamura-Ku consists of central part which has many office buildings and the other part which has many houses. Central part has Nagoya Station which is the central station of Nagoya city. There is Midland Square which has many shop, restaurants and office.

Mukojimacho has two landmarks. One is a red big torii. It is one of the biggest torii in Japan. Another is Acthenon which is very big practice center for acting.


[33] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Katsuya Kikuchi Date:2016/04/26(火) 02:40
Miyoshi is a city located in central Aichi Prefecture, west of Toyota city. I’ll write about Miyoshi lake which is located in center of Miyoshi.


Miyoshi Lake

Miyoshi lake is one of the regulating pond of Aichi irrigation canal. Until the 1950s, there were many small ponds. By the construction work, which began in 1957, it became a big lake which exist today. The construction ended in 1981, and the lake has become possible to store 2200km^3 of water. The lake supplies irrigation water to Miyoshi city and Togo town. Completion of the pond made ​​it possible to attract many plant and to develop agriculture. Maybe there was no richness of the city of today, if the pond did not exist.
There is a circuit course of length 4.5km around the lake, and it is used as a jogging and walking track of the local residents. Since the well scenery and the paved road, some people come to ride a bicycle. Marathon has also been held by utilizing this course. Around the lake there are about 2,000 cherry trees, and you can see very beautiful scenery in the spring. Those three will form a tunnel of trees that allows people to walk cool in the summer.
There is also a canoe course in the lake. Many canoe competitions were held in this lake.
Miyoshi lake is a part of a comprehensive park called Miyoshi park. There are many sports facilities like baseball field, tennis courts, gymnasium, athletics field, archery field. These facilities are making it possible to open a variety of competitions.


[34] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Yuko Tamaki Date:2016/04/26(火) 07:47
Nara City is located in the northwest of Nar Prefecture, and it also located in the north edge of Nara basin. Nara City is has 260,000 people.

First, Nara City is famous because it has a lot of monuments and temples shrines. For example, Heiyokyuseki, Kasugataisya, todaiji and so on. In Todaiji, there is The Great Buddaha of Todaiji, everyone call it “Nara no daibutsu”. It is about 14.7 meter tall. It was going to made in Shiga Prefecture at first. However a lot of unlucky events happened, so that plan was off. Therefore it was made in the present place.

Second, there is Nara Park in this city. This park was opened on the February 14th of the Meiji 13 year. In fact, some temples as Kofukuji, Todaiji, Kasugataisya which are famous for people all over the world are included in this park, so the area of this park is about 660 hectares. This park is also famous. That is because there are a lot of deer. There are about 1200 deer in this park. There is not owner for them. They are wild animal. They are one of the most symbol of Nara City. There are some traditional events. For example, their horns cut down and sikayose. Shikayose is that a person plays horn, and deer hear this sound and they gather for the person. Deer of the Nara Park is also famous because they bow when they get food from people.

That is why there is about 14,000,000 tourists for a year to visit this city.

[35] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Keisuke Niwa MAIL Date:2016/04/26(火) 08:57
I live in Kuwana city. Kuwana city is in Mie. In Kuwana, there is Nagashima Spa Resort. It is a very popular amusement park, and pool. Every year, many people visit there, so the local station is crowded with people. Fee is not so high, so I recommend you should visit there.

To tell the truth, Nagashima was not in Kuwana, but in 2004, Nagashima was merged into Kuwana, thus we, Kuwana citizens confidently say that Nagashma Spa Resort is in Kuwana.

The famous food in Kuwana is hamaguri. It is very delicious. I like hamaguri steamed with sake. After all, it is the best when it is eaten as miso soup.

Nabana no Sato is very good place. In winter, many illuminations are beautiful. Every year, many couples enjoy watching illuminations. I have never been there with a girlfriend.

In 1959, Ise Bay Typhoon happened. The number of the victim of it was 1.53 million. According to my grandmother, sanitary condition was very bad, and the smell was awful. Recently, various natural disasters often occur, therefore more and more people having concerns about the emergency are increasing. If we learn from the experience of past, we can make use of it.

In summer, people enjoy Ishidori festival which is regarded that it is the noisiest festival in Japan. I have never taken part in the festival, but my father participates in it every year. In the festival, people beat a drum, ring a bell, sing a song, and drink a lot of alcohol.
There are also many stalls. To be honest, I want to join the festival forever because most of the participants are terrible drunks.


[36] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Akihiro Fujita MAIL Date:2016/04/26(火) 09:00
Hiroshima City is one of the most flourish prefecture in Hiroshima prefecture. Hiroshima City has a population of about 1200000. There are many kind people there. Hiroshima City developed by car industry. There are many industries like shipbuilding and the steel industry now. Hiroshima City has many rivers, so agriculture and the fishing industry is also very prospering. The principal product of Hiroshima City is Kaki which is very good for health. Okonomiyaki which concludes noodles is very delicious food. People in Hiroshima loves this. If you come to Hiroshima, you should eat this.

There are many sightseeing spot, so the city is thronged with people. Itsukushima Shrine is world heritage. Itskushima Shrine was made by Kiyomori Taira. It has a lot of beautiful sites and is the three great views of Japan. There are a lot of deer, so many tourists visit there. I have been there three times and it was very exciting experience. Genbaku Dome is also world heritage. This is very painful building. There is Genbaku museum next to this. It has very fearful material which reflect the misery of war. We have to tell this fact next generations and think how to implement the peace of the world. In this way, many foreigners visit Hiroshima City, so we can make friends with them and learn a lot of cultures.

Hiroshima prefecture has produced a lot of celebrity. For example, Perfume, Koji Kikkawa and Eikiti Yazawa are musecian from Hiroshima. Haruka Ayase is actor from Hiroshima,

In this way, Hiroshima is very interesting. If you do not decide where to go in Golden Week, you should go to Hiroshima.


[37] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Keijun Kumagai MAIL Date:2016/04/26(火) 10:01
These days, I found out wiki of Koga city, my home town, has little information, therefore, I think we should put more information in the page. For example, many big events, the picture of the town, the special commonwealth system, etc. Since the events are paid attention by many people, they can know the wonderful point of Koga and come these events, if we put more date on the wiki. Putting some pictures and introducing some systems of Koga are also good way to let many people know its beautiful atmosphere and great human realtionships.

I believe the information of events is what the wiki of Koga especially should has. We have Koga Momo-maturi, Koga Kikyuu-maturi, Koga Hanabi-taikai, Kantou Domannnnaka-maturi, Koga Saomomi-maturi, etc., However, there are only name of these events in wiki and no other information, thus, I’ll explain two of those events.

First, Hanamomo-marason is famous in these area. In this marathon, runners can enjoy looking flower called Hanamomo. Also this marathon’s time limit is so long that, even if you are marathon beginner, you can cut goal tape.

Second, Koga-hanabi-taigai is very attractive firework festival. It is chosen as the three big firework festival in the Kanto region. I’m proud of this festival of my hometown. I’ve been this festival many times, and still, it is enjoyable all the time. Sansyakudama is the main event of this festival. Sansyakudama is 0.9meter in diameter firework bomb. It’s just like very big flower in the sky. It is so beautiful!

I think when these information add to Koga’s wiki, it will be much better and let many people know what it’s all about Koga town.


[38] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Shunki Yamamoto MAIL Date:2016/04/26(火) 12:28
Hamamatsu City is located in the Shizuoka Prefecture western part, and it is blessed with a lot of nature and industries, so as many people as 800,000 live in this city now.

A lot of nature, Lake Hamana and Tenryu River for example, are located in Hamamatsu City. Lake Hamana is famous for natural and formed eels, and Tenryu River is the ninth longest river in Japan. Also, Hamamatsu City northern part is surrounded by mountains. Hamakita Forests Park and Kawane no Sato are popular tourist site which uses nearby natural environment efficiently.

Musical instrument production is main industry in Hamamatsu. Grand piano is produced all in Shizuoka Prefecture. Many companies, YAMAHA and KAWAI for example, have bases in Hamamatsu. In Hamamatsu International Piano Competition, many players use YAMAHA`s or KAWAI`s piano This is a part of reasons why people call there `The city of music`.

In Shizuoka Prefecture western part, there are a lot of sport teams. In particular, Jubilo Iwata, YAMAHA Jubilo rugby club, Hamamatsu phoenix, Agleymina Hamamatsu are professional sport teams. They are always eager for “jubilations” for their supporters. They use Hamamatsu arena or YAMAHA stadium when they have a game. These stadium`s seat is very near from court, so people can enjoy their games more vividly. In addition to this, many sport players are from this area. Jun Mizutani and Mima Ito, who are very good table tennis player, are from Iwata City, which is next to Hamamatsu City.

Although the capital of Mie Prefecture is Shizuoka City, the population of Hamamatsu is bigger than that of Shizuoka. This is one of causes of conflict between Hamamatsu City and Shizuoka City.

貼り付け先を間違えたかもしれないので、こちらに再送いたします。遅くなって申し訳ありません。


[42] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Yomi Morimoto Date:2016/04/26(火) 23:42
Nagoya City is in the east of Aichi prefecture. Nagoya is known as one of the three biggest city in Japan. There are about 2,262,000 people in Nagoya.

Nagoya is famous for many local foods such as Misokatsu, Hitsumabishi, and Tebasaki. These foods are called “Nagoya Meshi” and loved by many people who live in out of Nagoya as well as local people. Some people come to Nagoya only in order to eat them. These days, “Nagoya meshi” is sold in many places and we can eat them almost everywhere, so they will be more famous.

Nagoya Dome is also famous in Nagoya. In there, baseball games and concerts of various popular artists are held many times a year. At the time, some fans come from far place and the dome and the shopping mall located in side of it is alive with a lot of people. The shopping mall contains restaurant, accessory shops, and boutiques.

Sakae is the most flourishing town in Nagoya. Sakae is in Naka ward of Nagoya City. There are many department stores and companies, so many people coming and going along the street in the daytime. Underground shopping center is one of the features of Sakae. It is very convenient because it connects place to place in underground and people can move without going out. People often use “Crystal Hiroba” in there as a place where they meet their friends.

As the above account suggests, Nagoya has many places people should visit at least once.


[234] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Sakamoto Shunsuke Date:2016/07/26(火) 00:35
I live in Kita-Ward. Even if I say Kita-Ward, it's Kita-Ward in Tokyo metropolis, not Nagoya. There is commutation out wards and a going to school person from a thing near Saitama prefecture, and there are very much people in the morning. A bar is many again, so an office worker at the end of work often comes across it in the evening. It's only to share an area in the Yamanote Line, touching a capital border between prefectures at 23 ward. Therefore when delay on the train forms, a person is flooded and is very crowded at the station.

There are a lot of traditional festivals, and there are Jujo Fuji shrine festival, a big Akabane festival and Ouji shrine grand festival. A big Akabane festival is called an another name stupid festival, and local store dominance is momentum for April fool in April, and held one is a first.

The national scientific sports center in Nishigaoka is center engine of sports science, medicine, the information study promotion installed for the purpose of international competition power improvement of sports of Japan. In cooperation with a sporting event group, sports research organization, I perform support to international competition improvement of a contestant of promotion, the top-level of the study and the team to be placed under the organization of the incorporated administrative agency Japan sports promotion center, and to achieve a policy objective of "the sports promotion basic plan" that a country established.
Kosuke Kitajima of the swimming has ever practiced at this place, too.

Kita-Ward is a town with the friendly feeling in this way. When you visited Tokyo, please visit.


[235] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:KATAOKA YU Date:2016/07/26(火) 00:37
The town where I live in now is Yagoto in Nagoya-shi. The charm of Yagoto that I yearn for is three mainly.

The first has many restaurants. It is essential, but it is hard to make it with oneself every day, and the meal gets tired for a human being. Yagoto is lined with ramen and spaghetti, the a great variety of restaurants including the fast food restaurant. Because there are many kinds of the shop by the eating out every day, I will not get tired for a while.

The second is that there is the shop which can buy much life articles. The name of the shop is called "EAON" and is a famous shop developed in the whole country. Because it has a large selection, and the price is reasonable, it is the strong friend of a housewife supporting the family budget. In addition, it is convenient at all without appearing on the ground from nearest Yagoto Station because I can just enter the shop.

The third is that every university is near. Foot and the distance that can move by bicycle include "Nagoya University" and "Nanzan University", "Chukyo University", and one of a university student is a considerably convenient town. When there is a house near a university, I return as soon as I was tired in a lecture and a circle and can be absent.

I like Yagoto that is the town which it is very livable, and is convenient for a student and a housewife very much. I am glad from now on if the charm of this town is handed down to the people of the circumference.


[242] RE:Topic 1: Wikipeida Name:Banno nanami Date:2016/07/26(火) 08:14
Inazawa city is located in the Aichi Prefecture Western part. There are a lot of people about one hundreds forty thousands people.
We have a festival which is called Hadaka festival. It’s the one of the biggest festival in Japan. Its held on January 13 every year. We walk to the Konomiya Shrine from their each area with wearing only Fundoshi like underwear in winter. The Olympia city is the sister city of Inazawa city because they used to play sports as be naked in Olympic like who we are in the Hadaka festival and both city have many traditional ruins and cultural properties. That’s why they are sister cities each other and have cultural exchange.
Inazawa city is Japan’s number one garden plant tree – producing city. So you can see a lots of garden trees there. You can also see Ginkgo biloba which is produced there of that one of the most famous cities in Japan.
And we have one Guinness world record about bowling. The bowling alley in Inazawa city has one hundred sixteen lanes on only one floor. A bowling alley in Nagoya city has one hundred fifty three lanes on three floors.

There are people who were born in Inzawa city.
Oda nobunaga is one of that. He was governing the area around Inazawa city which is called Owari.
Itoh Junki is also one of that. He is the professional baseball player who belongs to
Chunichi Dragons.
Syuko katoh is one f that as well. He is the curator of Imperial library which is the biggest library in Japan.

[45] Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Mitsu Matsuoka Date:2016/04/28(木) 14:21 [ 返信 ]
New technology can solve problems, but it often creates new problems. The invention of the automobile, for example, created the need for speed limits, driver's licenses and traffic lights. Can you think of an invention that created problems when it was introduced? How were these problems solved? Explain your position, between 250 and 300 words in lenght, with reasons and examples from your own experiences, observations or reading.



[46] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Ryo Suzuki Date:2016/05/02(月) 18:01
At present, trains have spread well in the world, especially cities. If trains are disappear, there will be people that do not make a living in a big city. So trains have been essential for people in big cities now. However, there are many problems in trains, of course, there are much profits in trains.


At firstly, the problem that someone fell from the platform onto the track and died has increased now. The countermeasures against it are the thing that when a train comes platform, a door opens and when a train does not, the door continue to slam. If the door exist in a platform, it is hard for someone to fall from a platform onto a track. And if someone will straddle it and fall, station attendants or people around him immediately notice him doing and will stop him. In fact, I saw the door in somewhere and thought this.


Secondly, there is the danger that someone hurry and is injured with trains. The countermeasures against it are simple. It is the thing that the period of trains which stop in the same area is short. The reason that people hurry is that they are late if do not get in a train. So the period of the train is short in order to get rid of surroundings. In fact, I moved out and came not to hurry.


Lastly, new technology increases now, it often create new problems. And people have coped with them. They will continue from now on. At the result, human beings make progress in technologies.

[47] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Mayuko Deguchi MAIL Date:2016/05/03(火) 09:13
I think that airplanes created new problems when it was introduced.
An airplane is very useful transportation. It is very fast and comfortable. It solved the problem that people took a lot of time to go abroad. It is necessary to go abroad. So, people have many opportunities to ride in airplanes for business trip. Many people have ever ridden in airplanes.

But, airplanes have some problems. One is hijacking. It is a criminal act which prevents airplanes’ service due to an illegal occupation and makes a driver accept their party’s demands. Hijackers can take a passenger as a hostage easily because he can’t escape from the airplane. People are afraid of the accident by hijackers. There are some cases that hijackers killed a passenger. There are many cases that hijackers made them scared in Japan.

Second is the overcrowding of airplanes. Two airplanes have ever collided with each other because of the traffic jam in flying field. This accident occurred because many airplanes were made by technical improvement.

People are putting a lot of efforts into solving these big problems. They prevent people who have hazardous material or weapon from riding airplanes by means of boarding check as measure against measure. Also, control tower prevent the overcrowding of airplanes. In this place, they contact airplanes each other and provide directions about place and time that airplane can take-off and land. Airplanes can do it thanks to their work. The accidents of airplanes each other are decreasing because of their works.


[48] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Shogo Beppu MAIL Date:2016/05/06(金) 12:45
Now technology of information is developing very rapidly. However, at the same rate, more and more problems are increasing. Most Japanese people use Internet. I think, however, that the number of people who know how to use Internet appropriately is very little. I think that there are two great problem.

The first problem is reliability of data on the Internet. We can get much data on the Internet. A lot of university students search on Internet when they do homework, write report, and preparing for classes. We can get data easily, but we never know who wrote it and whether it is true or not. We must not write on report or do homework using data we get on the Internet inadvertently. Books are what writer wrote responsibly. On the other hand, everybody can write on the Internet freely. We can write whatever we want to write on the Internet, which means that data on the Internet cannot always be trusted. Therefore we can trust data on books more than on the Internet, although the information on the Internet enables our life to be more convenient.

The second one is infringement of various human rights such as privacy and portrait rights. Now, the number of people who use Social Network Services (SNS) is more and more increasing. Many people take photos and upload. It is okay. But when you see a famous person in private, it is infringement of portrait rights if you take photos and upload without notice.

I think that the development of information technology is so rapid that legislation cannot be made up. Japanese Government should take measure on Internet related lows.


[49] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Yuma Taguchi Date:2016/05/07(土) 22:13
Nowadays, there are many useful technologies in the world. Especially, electronic equipment develops rapidly. I think smartphone is one of the great technologies. With smartphone, for example, we can watch the Internet, call anyone, play the game and check the latest information. But, there is some problem.

One of these problems is using too much time. Smartphone is very useful and enjoyable and many applications in it. For example, “YouTube”, “Twitter”,” Facebook”, “Puzzle and Dragons” and “Mahou Tsukai to Kuroneko no Wiz”. So, we are absorbed in it, forgetting all about the time. This problem solves to put the smartphone away. This is the first bad point.

Second, some of smartphone user use it with walking. This is the so-called “Aruki Sumaho”. This act is very dangerous. If they do “Aruki Sumaho”, they will collide with anyone. These days, some phone companies start an action to deter this accident. For example, they put an advertisement in the paper and the station. In addition, an application to warn the action appears.

Third, we expose the risk with the smartphone. On the internet, there are much risky information and many dangerous files. The more people can use it with the smartphone, the more risk were exposed by us. This problem can solve to use some services. One of these is filtering system. This system guards us from these dangerous point on the internet. Another is security application. This protects us from many viruses.

Most important point to use the smartphone is our attention. We must protect ourselves from many dangerous things these days.

[50] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Mitsuhiro Okamoto Date:2016/05/07(土) 22:46
I agree with new technology because I think the advantages brought by it are large, new problems created by it considered. Moreover, I think new problems are likely to be solved. I show smartphones such as iPhone and Android as example of new technology.

Smartphones have three problems. First, customers are puzzled because various kinds of them exist. Second, communication fees increase. This is because it is easier for us to enjoy videos and access websites. As functions of them improve, the speed of network is quick. This is also the one of that reasons. Third, the dependence of them increases and damages us. I have depended on iPhone instead of studying. At that time, I communicated with my friends by social network service and played games much. I didn’t study much because of that.

 Although smartphones have many problems, each problem have the solution. As for the first one, many companies show the recommended product. Thanks to this, it is easy to choose the better one. As for the second one, the contracting company controls communication if the amount of communication increases. As for the third one, the harder study is, the less the use of smartphones becomes. When we really need to study, we come to study naturally instead of using smartphones.

Like example of smartphones, new problems are likely to be solved if new technology creates them. I think technology should be used much to get much more benefits and we should study about technology harder than now.


[51] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Hiroki Nakagawa MAIL Date:2016/05/08(日) 09:58
One of the inventions that create problems is smartphones. Many problems about smartphone are now being discussed since it was invented and sold around the world.

“Walking with using smartphone” is the big problem and it causing many problems. When you get a mail from your friend, want to change a music listening, or think up interesting thing to tweet, some people start turning on his smartphone and do what they want to do. Depending on the place, it would become the very dangerous issue.
You may walk to the lot car street. You may fall to the plat form. I like to listen to the music, but sometime I nearly bumped into other people when I tried to change the music which I was listening then.

“Can’t stop using smartphone” is another serious problem about smartphone. By using smartphone, you can enjoy many contents. But if you can’t control yourself, you may addict it. Somebody can’t stop using SNS, playing game or chatting with his friends. When I was a high school students, I love watching watch video clips on youtube until midnight, so I always sleep in the class and my academic score is awful. I think it is one of the reason that I failed the school entry exam for the first time.

To solve both problem, what is need is social action. To get rid of the accident by “walking with using smart, government must advertise about not to do it more widely. Teachers must talk with their students, and keep their student not to addict to smartphone. Clinic for smartphone-addicted people may also be need. Wide social actions are essential to solve these problems.

[52] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Kiyoshi TAKEDA Date:2016/05/08(日) 11:35
These days, information devices have been developing.
Our life is filled with many information devices such as smartphones and personal computer and so on.
It is certain that according to information devices, our life has become more and more comfortable.
We can use the Internet and get a lot of information anytime through those devices.
For example, when we do not know the meaning of English word, we will search the Internet and get the answer soon.
What is more, we can store a lot of information.
We human being can’t remember everything around us, but smartphones and computers can store a lot of information as long as there is memory.
This is the greatest thing that information devices can do, I think.

But there are some problems related with information devices.
One problem is that because it is easy to use money on the Internet,
Because there are too many informations, children may get some dangerous information.
What is worse, children might get involved in crimes.
For example, children only play games online, but, some bad people may hack the children’s computer and use it for crimes.
What is bad in this case is that children do not know that they are gotten involved in crimes.

These problems are caused by the lack of information literacy.
So, we should teach children that the Internet may be dangerous.
Whether the Internet is dangerous or not depends on ways to use it.
If we all can understand the risk, information devices will be safer.


[53] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Takuji Kato Date:2016/05/08(日) 12:57
LINE, Twitter, Facebook, Skype, etc―――SNS is used by many people all over the world.
Until they were made, it is difficult and take a lot of time to communicate with others lived in other countries.
But now, using them, we can contact with people all over the world in a few minutes.
Surely these tools solve this problem, they are also making some new problem.

For instance, in these servicies, we can attack others’ hearts with ease when we speak ill of others even though we do not think these words make people sad and discomfortable.
Within SNS, we could not understand feelings each other, which could cause burning problem.
Using these tools also involve some risks too.
There are lots of temptations in these services, for example, “IF YOU RESISTER YOUR INFORMATION IN OUR SITE, YOU CAN GET GOOD INFORMATIN FOR YOUR HEALTH, FOR IMPROVING YOUR SKILLS, FOR YOUR BETTER LIFE, ETC・・・
As you know, if we resister our information in those sites, our information could flow in network ,and at last, far from spending good life, we could spend bad life.

To solve these problem caused by creating new technology, we should think that whether words using for communicating with others in SNS is attack other people’s feelings or not before sending.
Also, we ourselves should be careful for information and confirm if we can truly trust them before accepting.

Information Technology is expanding rapidly, and SNS is useful and essential for our life in the future.
Surely these services have bad aspects, they also have good aspects as well.
If we can use SNS correctly, our life will be better!


[54] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Hidenaga Takahashi Date:2016/05/08(日) 13:47
I think that internets created new problem when it was introduced.
Today, people depend on internets at many situation. For example, we can buy items and communicate with others by using internet.

However, the internets have some problems.
First, false information. We can search webpages for information. They are useful for us in many times. But sometimes, there is false information and we misunderstand what searched. So, we are requested having good sense and searching many sources for one thing. Good sense protect us from ill will and troubles on not only the internet but also dairy life. Searching many sources is useful to identify true or false

Second, the risk of leaking secret. Today, people leave secret protection to computers because they think this way is the most safety and convenience. However, there are many computer virus to break or stole secret. If you suffer damage, you may be injured economically and emotionally. To deal with this problem, we need to change password frequently. We are required taking steps to protect our computers for our self than ever.

Third, abdicating to internet. Many users of internet use SNS or electronic bulletin board. Some change their character between real and virtual. Finally, they show an aversion to real world and become resident of virtual world. These people are called “hikikomori” and they are become social problem. This problem come from bullying. They escape from their mental pain. Therefore, we need to snuggle to them and give hope.

Lastly, we cannot apart from computers to live today’s world. We must use its good points and be careful bad points.


[55] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Rui Fujitani Date:2016/05/08(日) 13:59
Computer and smartphone are inventions human beings created. We can not only send mails or call, but also listen to music, play games and surf the Internet through them. They have made our life so comfortable.

After smartphone spread, people get to use online service more. When we use it, there are various dangers. For example, we could get computer virus from a harmful website, mail and application. If computer virus comes into our computers or smartphones, we may have our personal information stolen by it. In addition, we could become the victim of fraud on the Internet. Especially children are more careless than adults. We must install antivirus software and filtering software to protect ourselves. And we pay attention not to access suspicious website and mail. When children use online service, parents can set a time limit and a restriction on access to websites. It is necessary to teach children risk of the Internet.

Another problem is about health. Although light radiated by computer or smartphone do harm to our eyes, we cannot notice it. Sitting for long time to use computer do harm to our bodies. Using them too long time is a burden on our brain. The case that we get exhausted without our noticing is by no means few. In order not to ruin our health, we should take a rest and walk around regularly.

The number of the people depending on the Internet is increasing. There are people using smartphone all the time. Depend on the Internet may have a bad influence on real life and our bodies as above. It is difficult to stop depend on the Internet. It is necessary that people themselves try to keep a distance from computer or smartphone. And people around them should cooperate with them.


[56] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:tamaki yuuko Date:2016/05/08(日) 18:52
These days, more and more people use cellphones not only in the developed countries but also in the developing countries. If people just have them, people can call, use Internet and enjoy playing application and so on. Therefore, it is no exaggeration to say we cannot live without them. I think that they are so useful, but they also have some problems.

First, people depend too much on them. Because of this, a lot of bad things happen. For example, people can be bad form when they use cellphone. This is not good for our health. Another example is that more and more people use them, less and less people talk with friends and family. People possibly do not out from their room because they cannot believe their real world.

Second, people must pay a lot money for them. I do not know how much money foreigner pay to keep them, but Japanese people pay incredible money for them. In addition, some people use them very often, others do not use them very often. However everyone pay about same price. In my case, for example, I use my cellphone onece by the hour. While my sister use her cellphone almost all times. However I pay more money than her. I cannot be satisfied about that.

Finally, people will rarely think themselves. This is because as soon as people find something new, they look up it by using their cellphone. People will not be able to have a good imagination. Today technology is being promoted, so present society want creative people. I think that people do not think is the most serious problem.


[57] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Masuda hiroki Date:2016/05/08(日) 22:27
I think that plastic which is made from fossil fuels creates large number of problems. Although it solves considerable problems, it makes many other problems.

Firstly, plastic bag, for example, was created in order to reduce amount of natural resource consumption. Based on the idea that reduce amount of such resource consumption help the environment. Ironically, spread of plastic bag created considerable amount of environmental problems.

Increase of plastic bag consumption caused garbage problem that bring about Global warming and breaking ecosystems. Many kind of species died out or suffered from plastics as garbage.

I wander if this problem was inevitable? I don’t think so.

Plastic related problems is mainly caused by its usage. I mean that plastic is Innocent and guilty is human. In order to decrease problems which occurred with new technology such as plastic, we must study and learn about its features.

Plastic bags, for example, we should know that plastics can’t be decomposed naturally. Because of its material, we should know that plastics is not unlimited material.

Most important thing is information. When we create new technologies, we must study this technology enough, consider its problems fully and inform its data everybody.

It can write very easy. I can say it with ease. But, we can’t do it with ease. So we must continue studying about new technologies and telling its information globally.

[58] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Koki Iwata Date:2016/05/08(日) 23:59
Have you ever played video games or computer games, such as Nintendo DS, Wii, PlayStation, PSP, and so on? I think a lot of people say ‘Yes.’ In 1983, Nintendo developed ‘Family Computer’, a video game, and a lot of people enjoyed playing it. Then, Nintendo developed SUPER famicom, GAMECUBE, GAME BOY, DS, Wii, and so on, and SONY developed PlayStation, PSP, and so on, and other game companies developed new video games and computer games. These games make people happy and excited. So a lot of people, particularly children, enjoyed these games.

But these games have some bad points. For example, if you play these games for a long time., your eyes would go bad, if you spend most your time when you can play outdoors playing these games, your exercise capacity would go down, like these, if you play these games, your capacity would go down. Actually, these problems are discussed in Board of Education, schools, families, and so on.

Considering these problem, various companies which develop video or computer games and families make plan to improve these problems. For example, these companies make their games which tell these game’s player that they should take a short rest during playing them, parents make rules about their children’s playing games. Recently, glasses companies developed new glasses which can reduce blue light of game screen, which would make your eyes go bad. Like these, some countries think of these problem.

You would think you should stop playing these games, but if you think of these problem and learn knowledge about these, you can enjoy games healthily. Like games, new technologies have positive points and negative points. But, you learn technologies’ knowledge, you can use them efficiently. Let’s learn about technologies positively!


[59] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Sakurako Nakano Date:2016/05/09(月) 01:01
One of the most useful products for us is a cellphone. It has sold since 1985 in japan. Now, many people can’t live without it. Some people use it during eating or in bathroom. While it brought many benefits, it created some problems.

First, there are some troubles about lifestyle. Some people can’t keep life rhythm by the overuse of their cellphones. Some schools decide their students’ use time for their cellphones to prevent the overuse. Many schools keep their cellphones during class to concentrate on studying. Otherwise, there are traffic accidents by driving and walking while using cellphones. To prevent them, control about driving while using cellphones was strengthened. In the United States of America, CM which a driver who concentrated on his cellphone caused a horrible accident is being broadcasting.

Second, there are troubles about health. The light of smartphones includes blue-light. Blue-light has a bad influence on eyes. Therefore, glasses which block the light from smartphones are sold and there is an application for screen dimmer.

Third, some people get involved in cyber-crimes. Especially many children suffer damage. To prevent them, mobile operator advises parents to filter. Otherwise, there is the problem of bullying caused by exchanges on SNS. In my high school, the students took lessons about how to use SNS properly. I heard that users should think whether messages don’t hurt other person’s feeling.

Finally, there are many solutions to problems caused by cellphones. However, many kinds of troubles still remain. We should use it attentively.


[60] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Kaede Morichika Date:2016/05/09(月) 15:49
Today, many people take advantage of the train to go to various places, especially go to the office or school. It takes us anywhere quickly and enables us to travel across Japan. It’s very useful. In the morning, however, too many people get in the train.

Here, some problems occur. I use trains every day and, of course, I am stuck in the crowded train. In there, I’m pushed by many people who surround me. Since I’m young man now, I can be there, but for old persons or children, it is very hard place. In addition, in the crowded train, I can’t get off the train smoothly, sometimes finally remain there. Thus, trains are very convenient, but have these cruel aspects.

To solve these problems, I think there are two ways. One is to reduce the numbers of train users. The innovative means of transportation, which replaces the train, can attract many people. However, I think this way results in failure. New problems about the new automobile will occur and the thing appear in the train will cause in the new automobile. I think this way can’t solve problems completely. Another is that anyone has consideration. Many people should try to make the train the useful and safe area. The fact that too many people use the train is not avoidable, but these too many want to change the train, it is really good for our lives.

I hope that many convenient things which are full of consideration occur in the future. The future will be beautiful.


[61] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Hiroaki Doi MAIL Date:2016/05/09(月) 16:26
Today, many electrical appliances like smartphones , personal computers ,TV and so on. We can enjoy by using them. So they are very useful for us. We develop them in order to improve our life. For example, the appearance of personal computers solved the problem that we were hard to get various information. On the other hand, the development of them causes new problems.

First, we are often too absorbed in these useful tools to do what we should do. For example, I was absorbed in a smartphone game, and I did not study as much time as when I had not been absorbed in it. Like this, many appliances have bad influences on us. However, I think that this problem can be solved depending on the reformation of our awareness.

Second, if we overuse electrical appliances, our eyesight get worse and we fall into lack of exercise. As a result, they cause bad influences on our body. Actually, my eyesight has been worse since I got a smartphone. And this problem will become more and more serious as time passes.

To solve these problems, each of us try to work on reducing the time which we use electrical appliances. Today, there are some lessons to know the proper way to use electrical appliances and we are developing new products which give us less bad influences than ever.  

After all, I think that coming up new problems as technology developed cannot solve completely. So, it is important that we try to solve problems.


[62] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Kyu zuuyan MAIL Date:2016/05/09(月) 16:30
New technology makes our life so comfortable. Our phone,TV,refrigerator really do well for making our life more convenient than before, but we also use so many nature resources to make these things and put our earth in danger.

Now,China is called "The factory of the world", and China's crude steel output also tops all over the world, China also make cars about 25% of the world, computers about 98% of the world. There are 3 million factorys in China, and they make smoke every single day.What's that smoke made from? The scientists gave us the answer, Pm2.5.

Pm2.5 (Particulate Matter 2.5), the size of the matter is only
0.0025mm, it can stay in air for long time, so we can intake them easily. Actually, Pm2.5 hasn't poison so much and it can't damage us by itself, but it can make other dangerous materials more active and get in our lungs easily than before.That makes us in danger, the scientists said people who live in Beijing will take the poison as much as a person who smoke 40 cigarettes every day.

The size of it is the strongest weapon of it, it is impossible to
clear all of it. Even we stop all factorys, we still need 10 years to make it disappear from us. It's not easy to solve the problem, but there's one thing we can do, Don't waste your things. So many people change their things so quickly, waste money,waste the resource. Keep that in your mind,then the earth will be better.


[63] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:keisuke niwa Date:2016/05/09(月) 16:54
Recently, many inventions have developed people’s life. More and more people are using the useful tools. However, they have bad aspects. As a result, it can cause many problems. Let me tell you about the problems and the solutions working out them. I will focus on the smartphone.

Today, many people use Social Networking Service (SNS), such as Twitter, Facebook, and Line. Thanks to these service, we can communicate with other people. Moreover, we are easily able to get in touch with people all over the world. Appearing to be very useful, this caused some problems. For example, because of overusing the service, people were tend to lose the chance to talk with others face to face. The other day, I went to a restaurant, and I saw two people using smartphones, instead of talking with each other. I thought it was quite a sad sight. At the same time, I am sometimes apt to be in the situation too. People used to meet in person to schedule, but nowadays they don’t have meet and talk because they use smartphones. I heard people these days lack of ability to plan due to that. Like this, the amount of conversing has decreased.

In addition, the crime using the internet have occurred. One click fraud is the representative example. It is vicious problem. Once you click URL, you are regarded that you contracted, and you are forced to pay. On screen, “Thank you for your entering.” is displayed.

To solve these problems, many seminars which takes measure to cope with these situation have been held. In this way, people learned how to use smartphones properly. However, they are not perfect. We should reconsider the usage of them again.


[64] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Shunki Yamamoto Date:2016/05/09(月) 20:45
In about twenty years, technology of cellphones rapidly develop. When my mother and father are as old as I, they cannot bring telephones. Even about twenty years ago, the size of a cellphone is not as small as the present. You are going to understand how fast development of cellphones are. However, invention of them created some problems.

First, the invention of cellphones influenced people’s literacy. Thanks of keyboard, we don’t have to write letters, memos, mails, and so on by hand now. So unfortunately our literacy gradually decreases. I often forget kanji for the moment or perfectly because I always use this kanji in the computer with tapping the keys. The less chances of writing by hand are, the worse our ability of handwriting is.

Second, communication trouble between people and people newly changes. Until about fifteen years ago, when new communication tools which use the Internet develop, people communicated by letter which use postal services or in person. However because of the appearance of new communication tool, e-mail and SNS for example, we come to be able to communicate with unknown person and a lot of people very easily. This development also increased a number of communication trouble, such as bullying. In the computer we can send and reply messages very fast, so we don’t have much time of proofreading. So a lot of people send thoughtless messages.

Last, recent cellphones, which generally called “smartphone”, have many functions, so many people are suffering “a smartphone addiction” now. Cellphones are handy so we use this longer than we expected. Moreover badly, “a smartphone addiction” influences user’s health.


[65] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Masashi Ito Date:2016/05/09(月) 21:37
The Internet was developed on the purpose of the military affairs in America, and the Internet has been developed since then. It supports the society, but it also causes a lot of problems. I will show you three examples.

First, there are too much information on the Internet because everybody can send information easily. So some of them are always not correct, and we need to ascertain right information. If you believed the wrong information, you would cause a large trouble. Also there many fraud sites. You must be careful of them because if you are cheated, you lose large money.

Second, your consciousness about privacy becomes light. Thanks to the Social Network Services (SNS), you can dispatch pictures easily. Then, you often dispatch pictures that other people are photographed without getting the permissions. Because this is taken for granted now, this is a difficult problem to solve.

Third, the Internet has a bad influence on you physically. Modern people often use computers to use the Internet. If you use computers for a long time, it is said that your eyes get tired and you have stiff shoulders. And because children play games on the internet, they play less outside. So the Internet prevents the children from improving their physical power.

The Internet has a lot of great parts, but if you do not use it in a right way, it may damage you. I think we have to reconsider how to use the computers so that everyone can the Internet safely.

[66] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Yomi Morimoto Date:2016/05/09(月) 22:56
These days, there are so many people who have a smart phone. People use it wherever and whenever. Specially, in train, I see almost all people look down and use it. By using smartphone, of course, lives of people have become more convenient and abundant, however, many bad problems are happened.

Many people use social networking services, called “SNS”. Some people post their picture, location information, and information of their friends on Internet without seriously thinking about the dangers lurking in it. Such things lead to some accidents. For example, some people were broken into their house and targeted by a stalker by using information offered by themselves.

Trading products through SNS is also dangerous. On the Internet, we can’t know which information is true. Few years ago, I tried to trade a product with a friend who came to know through Twitter. Then I tell her my address and name, and she said the preparation of mailing money was ready. However the mail haven’t come yet. Luckily, I had not sent the product, but I felt unpleasant. After then, I know such trade is very dangerous, so I must not do it. Many people do such thing and are stolen money and their individual information.

We depend on smartphone too much. Depending on it make our action slow, make our attention to around us distract, and make our eyesight bad. Therefore, we have to use smartphones with a rule that we can use it only decided places and times.

[67] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Yoshito Kamogawa MAIL Date:2016/05/09(月) 23:07
I think that one of new technology that created many problems when it was produced is smartphones. So many people use it in various situations. For example, they can search online, enjoy shopping, communicate with their friends through using SNS, and even enjoy playing many kinds of exciting games. There are many useful tools in the smartphone, so it has been gathering more and more attentions of people, in particular young people, in every year. Despite smartphones have a lot of good aspects, they cause many problems.

First, they sometimes prevent people sleep enough. Young people tend to use them till late at night without studying. Then they mainly communicate with friends using SNS, in particular “LINE”. It has bad influences for young people. In fact, a study show that people who use them for long time gain lower academic performance level than people who don’t use them at all. But I think that it is good for young people to use applications which help them study efficiently.

Second, it is problem that more and more people come to be bad at communicating with others because of excess communication through SNS. I think it is important for people to do face-to –face communication.

Third, old people tend to have more difficulty using smartphones than young people. Now there are many kinds of smartphones that is easy for old people to use, but mobile phone company need to further products that are useful for them.

Smartphone is very useful tool. Therefore, we should consider its problem and improve its level.


[68] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Koki Hattori MAIL Date:2016/05/09(月) 23:10
I think that cellular phones create problems.
Spreading of cellular phones cause various problems, such as weakening of communication ability and attention.

Cellular phones have us send e-mail and make a call to other phone. E-mail can reach for receiver in a moment, so they are very useful.
But We may have an illusion that we can communicate with other people completely by Convenience of e-mail. In fact, sending e-mail is me different from indeed talking. Talking conclude many elements that e-mail can’t contain. One of the things is expression. E-mail can exchange only sentences, so it often can’t tell real intention and emotion. Calling has almost same problems.
Recently, development of cellular phones enables us to use them for a videophone. A videophone let us be face to face with receiver while calling, so we can have communication that similar to indeed talking to a certain degree.

Also, many functions of cellular phone that are interesting make us be carelessness.
Recent cellular phones have many functions, such as watching movies and social networking service. In some cases, people use cellular phone as do something: speaking and walking. Most people can’t do many things well, so they who do them often ignore the red light, hit other people, and have some accidents.
To counter, some companies such as cellular phone companies and transportation companies advertise that call attention to using phone as do other things. Also, when cellular phone start functions, reflecting attention on the screen has some effect to stop it.


[69] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Banno takahiro MAIL Date:2016/05/09(月) 23:23
Nuclear energy is generated by nuclear reaction or converting atomic structure and is a tremendous energy. It is used for the generation of electricity. It is called nuclear power generation. The rate of nuclear power generation is about 10% in the world. The merits of nuclear power generation are generating a lot of energy in the stable and economically , the emission of greenhouse gas which causes global warming and acid rain or phone chemical smog which causes air pollution is little. So this new technology have contributed to our life.

But nuclear energy has also demerits. If there were an accident in the nuclear power generation, it affected not only humankind but also natural environment including animals or plants like Chernobyl’s accident or Fukushima’s accident. Once the accidents break out, it pollute land by radiation and people are impossible to live there for years.

In Japan, Japanese government had taken preventive measures against breaking out accidents of nuclear power generation until Fukushima’s accident. This leaded them making myth that something is completely safe about nuclear power generation and prevented them from making measures against accidents.

So I think making plan for the situation after the accident sufficiently is important. In fact , after Fukushima’s accidents, the delay of the designation of evacuation sites and announcement about polluted area was bad. I think breaking out accidents is hard to prevent, so we need plan against the situation after accidents.


[70] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Keijun Kumagai MAIL Date:2016/05/09(月) 23:23
The invention of the Internet made many things possible. For example, I can get great deal of information about my history course to answer the course teacher’s questions, I can communicate with my aunt who lives in Canada for 30 years, and a girl who is in relationship with foreign boy can communicate with him just after dinner.

The use of the Internet called ICT: Information and Communication Technology. However, ICT also created many social problems. I will especially write about one out of them.

Digital divide, a new word, was created to explain new situation made by the rapid spread of the Internet. The digital divide is the gap between the one who know much information and others who know little information. For instance, you go to a large shopping mall and buy an apple for 200 yen. However, you have no idea the small vegetable store near your house hold a sale and you could get the fruit for 180 yen. This means you lose 20 yen. This tragedy is caused by the lack of information. If you had looked up using the Internet, it wouldn’t be happened. Some who are familiar with the Internet get much information from it but some who are not familiar with it get little information.

This is dangerous because these people not using it well sometimes lookout even very important information. For example, changing from analog TV to digital TV, where you have to hang on your changed postcode.

Thus, as solution to this divide, I believe we need to teach information skill to our children from early childhood. In all cases, education plays important part to our society. Knowing how to use google can help you to get good grade on history class and lovers to strengthen their love.


[71] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:nanami banno Date:2016/05/09(月) 23:52
These days, many kind of electric technology has developed, for example, auto mobile, computer, TV. But I think smart phone is the biggest invention in the world. Appearance of smart phone has changed our lives and the way we think. It seems to be good, but in fact, it is very scared.

At first, using smart phone can make us use Social Network Service so easily. We can use SNS wherever we are, so we can always see people on the train who use smart phone.
Not only on the train, restaurants, schools, home, and many place. They almost use SNS or send messages to someone. We are used to see the sight and don’t care so much, but actually it is so weird.
Second, smart phone addict many people especially young people. Young people use smart phone not only be alone, but also be with their friends. They use their smart phone without talking with their friends or lover. It can be the reason that a couple break up.
Lastly, we depend on using smart phone to keep in touch with others deeper and deeper, we don’t come to communicate with other people face to face, and the connection only on the Internet can be broken easily. I send messages to mom even though both of we stay home, mom got so angry and said to me that we have to cherish our conversation.

Thought these things, it is important to communicate with others face to face and not to be constrained by smart phone.


[72] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Gen Uwai Date:2016/05/10(火) 00:04
These days, information technology has been developing. Thanks to the internet, people can get information earlier than the past and generate information. For example, Wikipedia is so useful internet dictionary what whoever can write and read.
But, when you use the internet, there are a lot of problems.
First, informations in the internet are not necessarily right. There are lies and wrong informations. That whoever can generate information means that people can lie.
When I was junior high school student, I watched 2 channel and believed what written in the site, but I think that some informations were fake. The solution of this problem has not been found yet. All we can do is to try to get the ability which enable we to decide what is truth and what is fake.
Second, there are those who want to hurt the other people in the internet. Some people try to rob the money or to send computer virus into the PC. I sometimes hear that my PC says that this PC is infected with a virus. You have to download security software in order not to lose your important information.
When you face to these two problems, the important thing is to study and get right knowledge. These days, more and more young people have smart phones, so they use the internet more. In the same time, The number of people try to lie them.
Learning “IT literacy” is the duty in order to protect yourself. In a sense, it is able to be said the license.


[74] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Masaru Tanabe Date:2016/05/10(火) 00:09
I think thermal power generations caused two problems.

People can`t live comfortably without electricity since Thomas Alva Edison invented it. Thanks to it, we can work until night, go to far places, and talk with people who can`t talk directly. Because of this, they continue to use a lot of electricity and want more energy, so they invented power generation which can generate much energy by using fire. It need fossil fuel such as cool and oil to burn. The power generation`s cost is low, so people abused it. This action made bad situation.

First, it caused air pollution. When fossil fuel are burned, a lot of smoke and smog which include toxic chemicals and CO2 which bring about global warming. Second, we can`t use fossil fuel permanently. They are made from ancient creature`s carcass or plants, and it takes long time to make the fossil fuel, so we can`t use them eternally and the rest of them which we can use is little.

How people solved these problems? They invented new ways of power generation. New main ways are using water, solar, wind, and heat of ground. These resources are natural energy, so people can use these power generations semipermanently and these ways don`t pollute the earth.

However, not all problems about power generations have been solved. Those new power generations have own issues. For example, wind power generation causes big noise by spin of wings. Our life became the more convenient and comfortable, the more problems occur, so we must be going to continue to think about new problems.

[75] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Yuuki Nakano Date:2016/05/10(火) 00:21
I think that that new inventions created some problems is natural and there is nothing we can do about it, but I believe that these problems are solved someday.

For example, how greatly the TV changed our life. At the same time, how many problems the TV produced? When TV started to be sold, it was sure that many problems occurred. It costed much money in those days. It created a problem about TV reception fee. It would be a replacement for newspaper. Broadcasting stations were build and that greatly affected the economic world. The problems were just countless. However, we have adapted to almost all problems in about only 50years. TV was made cheaper by the progress in industrial technique. TV coexist with newspaper now by the demand for newspaper. Broadcasting stations are now natural for us. But young people are watching less TV because of the rapid spread of smart phone. The smart phone age is coming, and problems by spread of smart phone are coming too.

I think that we can solve new problems and adapt to new inventions like this example. But new problems are produced one after another, and we just cannot adapt to this situation. The number of problems are just too large to deal with. Industry is progressing and new inventions are produced day by day. Even though the number of problems don’t decrease, I believe that to try to decrease is important.


[77] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Takumi Watanabe Date:2016/05/10(火) 07:51
Thanks to TV, we can get a lot of information quickly. Moreover, a large variety of programs are always televised, so we can enjoy watching TV every day. However, the invention of TV created some new problems.

For example, first, some people watch TV at any time. Although they have enough time to move their bodies, to cook dishes, or to study something, they lose their time by spending on watching TV. Continuing leading such lives, their eyes will be being bad or they will be gaining weight. In the worst case, they will have lifestyle-related illnesses.

Second, TV can have a harmful influence on children. This has some programs that have what does children bad, such as violence, drugs, or bullying. Children cannot judge rightly, so many children imitate what they watched.

Third, since TV can inform the same things on many people, an idea that each has is controlled. If someone telecasted something that is wrong, any person would believe it to be right. In fact, for instance, I thought that a movie of UFO that a man observed is real, but it had been made for attracting attention. That is why, there is fear that no person has a new idea because we have prejudices.

As solutions of these problems, we understand them in the first place. Next, we should make rules that restrict time when we can watch TV. Of course, we should have children make such rules. Furthermore, we should learn many kinds of idea by reading many books or newspapers. By acquiring culture, we can think and make some ideas by ourselves when we watch TV.


[78] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Akihiro Fujita MAIL Date:2016/05/10(火) 08:41
SNS is popular among young people. In reality, I use SNS many times. For example, LINE and Twitter are very useful for me to communicate with my friends. SNS is called the Social Network Service, too. It is the thing called the network of the membership system if I easily say SNS. We can perform communication between members in SNS. The particularly great thing is that we can make friends with a person not to know. It is effective for the acquaintances formation with a human who is sharing sense of values including a hobby and the taste. We can communicate with others without showing each other’s opinions easily.

SNS has a lot of advantages , but there are many demerits, too. We are at risk of the personal information outflow. In fact, the cases by this occur frequentry. Many people read a contribution , so it may make a misunderstanding. Misunderstanding may make a people who was addicted. In fact, I know people who contribute many times in a day. To use SNS safely people should think many thing carefully and should not use service unless it is necessary .
For this reason, SNS has a lot of merits, but there is a lot of demerits, too. It is important for users to use it appropriately considering these things. Then, we can avoid a risk.


[79] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Yuki Kawai MAIL Date:2016/05/10(火) 15:24
I think internet is very useful technology. Because of Internet developing we can get much information immediately. But, we often have trouble because information on the internet is too much to judge that the information is true.

Internet is rapidly developed and spread all over the world. Now anyone can access the internet anywhere by using smart phone so we can get information around the world. These days, internet is used to confirm someone's safety when disaster happened. In addition to, we can contact our friends who lived far away and know many news in the world. Thanks to the internet developing our lives are better.

But these days, there are many problems on the internet. First, there are many false information on the internet. For example, a wicked person send bomb warning on SNS, pernicious chain email, and so on. People have trouble by these false information. Second, outflow of personal information is serious problem. Because anyone can access the internet, if personal information are flowed out, people all over the world could see them. In addition to, there are many copyright problems, too. Copyright problem may become big suit. We should not send information carelessly.

Advantage of internet is that anyone can send information anonymously, but because of anonymity, there are much irresponsible information. Now, advantage of internet is also disadvantage. If we abolish anonymity of internet, we will not get information immediately. I think this problem is not solved. We should be careful when we use the internet.


[80] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Katsuya Kikuchi Date:2016/05/10(火) 15:40
Virtual reality(VR) is a computer technology that replicates an environment and simulates a user's physical presence and environment to allow for user interaction. It is a technology that has become a hot topic recently.
One thing that VR can solve is the problem of medical care. The technology is to be used in the treatment of mental illness, such as fear of heights and Communication Disorders. It can also provide a space in which masquerade as if the whole body satisfaction to those who suffer from physical disabilities, such as the absence of limbs. The technology is useful not only for patients but also for doctor. It was difficult for surgeon to have a practical training of a surgical. Using technology of VR will enable training that does not involve the risk of medical accidents. Training using VR is not only for a professional thing, such as surgery, it can also be used for general public training such as driving.
One of the problem which VR caused is the increase of the number of people not currently being employed, educated or trained(NEET) and “withdrawn” people, called “hikikomori” in Japan. Because people can enjoy and immersed in virtual world, some will not return to the real world. This problem had already been a social issue by the spread of Internet. If VR hardware, such as HMD, become more popular, the issue will deteriorate at an accelerating pace. Since it became able to experience pseudo-romance or fake love in the virtual world, number of people who do not seek love partners in the real world is growing. This problem will spur the declining birth rate problem. There are still many other problems such as privacy and border of the two world. We must think carefully how to use VR technology.


[81] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Yuma Hirano Date:2016/05/11(水) 23:58
Nowadays, various machines are developing. Cars, train, airplane, PCs, mobile phones, TVs are developing now and influence many people.
The development of music player influenced us.
Music player become small and light. When people go out, they can listen to music easily. This thing produced the dangerous situation. For example, you could not notice approach of a car if you listen to music at a high volume, and an accident may be caused when you walk while using a music player. The earphones that can heard surrounding sound has been developed to settle this problem.
Music could be downloaded as data with development of a music player. CDs were not bought any more than before. Sale method was changed to settle this problem. For instance, you may not buy songs when you do not download its, and CDs with an addition is sold.
Today’s youth are losing their hearing by listening to music long by earphones. The hard of hearing by earphones can not be cured of this disease by modern medical technology. Difficulty in hearing causes various illness; low spirits, dementia. When I was a high school student, I used earphones long time and felt losing my hearing. The chance to listen to music recently has decreased, so it would be possible to suppress losing my hearing.
Modern technology give us much benefit and problems. We have to choose by ourselves for oneself. You have to consider the future and choose us carefully. Don't do the failure which can't be taken back.

[82] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Masakiyo Teranishi Date:2016/05/12(木) 06:51
Becoming it goes ahead through the auto-pilot of the car now. This can hope that the traffic accidents named others caused by an operation error by the human being decrease very much.
However, must be settled before this technique is completely put to practical use; have a problem.

And the first problem that I think about is who is responsible for the traffic accident that a car woke up for automatic driving.
The company which develops a technique of the automatic driving if the production side has all the responsibility will disappear.

But, the technology development of the automatic driving can reduce the number of traffic accidents surely from the present. I let a driver having a car license take a car of the automatic driving as before, and a driver should bear the responsibility of the traffic accident except the system trouble of the car.


[83] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Natsumi Oue Date:2016/05/16(月) 18:21
The smart phone has been developed rapidly today. Thanks to it, we can communicate very easily, we can get a lot of information, many things make progress very fast. It is necessary for us to live in modern life Our life is very comfortable, but the smart phone has created many problems.

Firstly, our communicative competence is falling. We often talk by e-mail or LINE. We can say that it is hard to say by using e-mail or LINE. Because of this, less and less people talk directly. E-mail and LINE is very convenient and necessary today. But I think that we promote our communicative competence.

Secondly, our personal information may leak. Many sites ask us to enter our name, address, phone number, and age. Many of them may be bad ones. We must acquire the power to distinguish whether it is good or not. It is necessary for us to be careful when we enter our personal information.

Thirdly, more and more minor’s case today. We can easily communicate with people who do not know by using SNS. The minor meets without thinking deeply. Thus, the minor may be rolled up in the trouble with the adult. The minor must think more deeply.

To solve these problems, the mobile company carries out service to prevent minors from accessing the bad sites. Furthermore, teachers educate students not to depend on the smartphone at school. Though all the problems were not solved, these will be solved steadily.

[84] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:kaoru yoneda Date:2016/05/16(月) 21:00
Recently, many people use smart phones. The smart phone has many useful functions such as phone, e-mail, and SNS. However, the smart phone especially SNS is creating many problems.

First, personal information is exposed by using SNS. By exposing the information, a person who is strange can know your name, face, and address. It is very fearful that such person who loved you can visit you and may do stalking.

Second, people use smart phones everywhere and any time. For example, a person walks across the road playing a game on the smart phone. Then, since he is absorbed in the game, he cannot find a bicycle approaching him and hit the bicycle. In this case, a person who walks using the smart phone is completely bad, but a person who ride a bicycle is punished.

Well, how are these problems solved? Exposing personal information is solved by protecting yourselves. For example, you can lock and make only your friends see your SNS. However, only that thing cannot protect you perfectly. You must be careful not to write your personal information on the SNS. By doing so, your information are seen by strangers. On the other hand, the problem that people use smart phones walking on the road isn’t solved. If they are told not to do, they don’t stop because they think they are safe and they aren’t involved traffic accident. I think it is by being careful that you can solve the problems which the smart phone has. Therefore, it is very important to protest yourselves by being careful.


[86] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Kato Daiki Date:2016/05/19(木) 23:28
The Internet is very useful. Anyone can use the Internet everyday, if they know how to use it.

We often use the internet to do something. However, we sometimes need to give our very important infomations: our adress, our birthday, our blood type, number of our credit card, number of our cash card our many password and so on. If they are known to some people, we may be dangerous because they can be used by any people. For example, if when we use the Internet bank, our ID number and our password are known to some people, they can use our money, which is in the bank.

My important informaions were leaked by Benesse.
They are my name, my adress, my telephone number,my birthday and etc. After it happened, I was sent many direct mails from people and companies which I had known. Because they were too a lot, they were not in my mailbox.
We must protect our many important infomations ourself. To protect our many important informations we should many things. For instance, when we are using the Internet, we should not give our informations which had better not be known to any people. If the informaions are not known to them, we are safe. We should make software which protects the informations.

I want technology to be better but if we want to make it better, we should expect what problem it can make. To create and use New technology safely, we should make the world and our lives better.


[237] RE:Topic 2: Adapting to New Technology Name:Sakamoto Shunsuke Date:2016/07/26(火) 00:45
I consider smartphones. There were many people from the era of the previous popular smart phone features phone in town and station stare cell phone, smart phone, walking while you are working. Would not have realized their own very unsafe.

Looking from inside the car, but many clever people manipulate the Smartphone while riding a bicycle in the recent and very dangerous. I wonder if what people watch only Smartphone walking? I wonder if depends on the games and videos. I wonder if the comments by email or social media comes to mind. I wonder if while walking "tweets you want to".
 However, I had an accident cannot enjoy them in from.
No longer "walk without a Smartphone" in that situation. Accidents fell from the platform of the station in fact, according to the Ministry of land, infrastructure and transport, Smartphone, game consoles and mobile devices while you're working in fiscal 2011 throughout 18 people, 2012 as 19 people up. Walked home and work phone at JR Yotsuya station 5/2013, fifth-year male students slipped beneath the home of the central line. Was entering the train bound for Tokyo shortly after the children were exempted into the gap between the home and the line's worst.

There are numbers, was transferred in an accident in Tokyo "while" use of the Smartphone and mobile phones is seen causing the number 2013 is 36, increased significantly from 23 people in 2010. Signs in Nevada State of the United States using mobile phones while driving to be fined $ 250, but the law uses the cell phone when walking if you try to apply. This is Japan soon to subsidize should.

We are certain that further increases due to release new Android Smartphone walking because.


[177] Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Mitsu Matusoka Date:2016/07/04(月) 13:24 [ 返信 ]
Many consider the current standard retirement age of 65 a relic of a time when health woes often hampered the productivity of older workers. Today, with life expectancy in the United States reaching 80 years, many older workers argue that they are fit and willing to continue working into their 70s and beyond. Medical research, however, seems to indicate that while older Americans are fitter than they used to be, they are nonetheless physically and mentally slower than their younger counterparts. Should older workers still be compelled to retire at age 65? Explain your position, between 250 and 300 words in length, with reasons and examples from your own experiences, observations or reading.



[200] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:H, Masuda Date:2016/07/12(火) 16:44
I partly agree with this opinion. Older workers should retire at age 65. Let me show two reasons.

First, all companies must employ young people in order to maintain their business. If we increase employment of older workers, the number of freshman employee will decrease. Naturally, it has bad influence on economy: demand decline, decrement of revenue, recession.

Second, retiree have many important jobs other than work. They can help their children in any ways. If their children have baby, and retiree take care of that baby, labor rate of women may be increase, for example. Of course, retiree can enjoy or find hobbies using their abundant time.

Retiree may insist that “we can still work”. To establish their own company is the easiest answer of their insistence, I think. They can work anytime, anywhere, as much as they want. If such enterprises have been existed, many retirees will get together immediately.

The system of retirement is created not for older workers but for freshmen employees. The time changes, and all company must change on stream. Replace of employment is unavoidable. Retirement is a kind of goal of life, and we can say that it is an honor. What else can you ask for?

In conclusion, everyone aged 65 must retire. Retirees can enjoy their hobbies, find new hobbies, help their son or daughter. If you want, you can found a company and raise retiree fellows. You can do everything what you want except for working without retirement. Protagonist of society is always younger people. You has had enough.


[201] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Ryo Suzuki Date:2016/07/13(水) 19:06
I agree with that. Let me explain with two reasons.

At first, the possible that aged people disturb youth is high. For, example, if an inflexible old man looks to teach youth in the new type the old type, they may give up their style and do old type and efficiency is bad or built up stress and give up the work. To make matters worse, it is difficult for the leader in their area to scold elder people and they will not notice it. I think there are a lot of aged people doing it in the world. The world is cruelty.

At second, the number of working people is not always good. If, the retirement age extends, the number of working people increases. However, the area that people work doer not always increase. As Oshikura Manju, the possible that working people disturb each other will be high. Of course, in the area that the number of working people is less, the idea may be good. However, I think that the area is less than the area that the number of working people is high.

I agree with that for above things. I think that it is difficult for elder people to work in the area that the number of youth is high, but it is good for aged people to work in the area that the number is low. I saw the information that the number of children is decreasing at resent. So, let’s everybody give birth to children

[203] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Kamogawa Yoshito MAIL Date:2016/07/15(金) 23:36
I disagree with this opinion partly. Let me explain some reasons about it

First, that is because I think that many old people still can work vigorously even if they become the age of 65. Not all people with the age of over 65 weaken. Actually, my grandfather and grandmother, both are over the age of 65, are working energetically. When I asked them about the reason why they work despite they are able to retire their work, they answered that they work because they want to keep their health good. I realized that some old people work asking for the health body. However, I think that it is sometimes necessary for many kinds of companies to make their elderly staffs retire so as to employ more skillful young ones. Not all old staffs are experienced, skillful or useful. If companies keep being particular about old methods, they will not continue growing. I think that various innovations and new methods.

Second, that is because I think that it is efficient for economy in Japan. For, if older workers still not be compelled to retire at age 65 and continue working after age 65, expenses of a pension in Japan are reduced largely. Now it is a big problem that there is too much fiscal spending about public welfare in Japan. So reducing expenses of a pension can lead the problem into the good way.

For these two reasons, I think that older workers should not be compelled to retire at age 65.


[204] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Hidenaga Takahashi Date:2016/07/16(土) 21:17
I disagree with this opinion completely. Let me explain some reasons about it.

First, their experiences. Experiences are very important for everyone. Adults faced various situations. They saw changing world in economy, technology, politic. For example, after war, they must face many big problems and solve problems with a united effort. At bubble economy, they experienced many glories and saw after burst shock. These their situations cannot face in our self today. They must tell young people their experiences. It leads to youth growth.

Second, young man’s mental weakness. Youth think that they can get promotions after ages retire and their posts are empty. It lead to their negative views. They cannot take a risk because it may be a spot on their career. Such situation takes the aggressiveness of people and promotes the manner that seems to perform only one's work. Creativity and uniqueness may vanish. A football player once said,”If the youth think we age and get chance spontaneously, their idea is very optimistic.” The expert people do not easily hand over a position to young people, and it is necessary to promote their further growth by the fight with them with guts

Lastly, I think that the ability is not proportional to age. The people who have ability and passion should utilize the ability positively. In addition, the worker population of Japan continues decreasing, and their power is necessary. Their mature skill is necessary now.


[205] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Mayuko Deguchi MAIL Date:2016/07/17(日) 09:04
I completely disagree with the idea that older workers still be compelled to retire at age 65. It is a bad idea. Let me give two reasons for my disagreement.

First, working can be your reason for living. It may be a good thing to increase free time because of your retirement, but many elderly people can’t enjoy using free time fully. If you can’t use this well, you will spend your rest of your life in boredom. In the case that they are specialists, they may want to study and work in their specialty area. Studying about their fields might be their hobbies. Those people must be hard to lose their job suddenly. In addition, many elderly people are full of energy recently. Of course, it is too hard physically for them to do hard work, but can’t they do any job? The answer is no. So, it is important to allow them to work if they want work.

Second, many elderly people need to save money because pension is too low for them to live on healthy. If they can work and earn money adequately, they will be able to buy a lot of thing they want and eat out and travel with their grandchildren or friends. If they can earn and use money as they like, their life will be more wonderful. Also, their income is bound to help their children’s lives.

For these reasons, I think the society must be changed that the elderly people aged 65 and over can continue working if they want to do so.


[206] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Takuji Kato Date:2016/07/17(日) 15:12
I think that there are some merits and demerits in which older workers continue their works still they are 70s and beyond. Let me show you reasons why I think so.

In terms of merits, first, we can have more people who can work than ever. Currently, there are many old people who receive pension compared to a few young people who pay it. So, if standard retirement age rise, this balance stabilize; young people’s life will be easy, and old people can kill the time in 70s.

Second, if people who are old but have a lot of knowledge of their works are increasing, they can transmit their ways to work, young people use and improve them, and their work levels will be better.

Speaking of continuing working of old people, however, there are some problems in communicating of older and younger. Of course, by communicating each other, we can make our workspaces be better. However, in our current world, it is clear that old people have powers compared to young people. I think that if there are more old people than ever, when deciding company policy, old people’s opinions likely to be adopted. In those world, it is easy for old people but difficult for young to live. We can say this to current politic style.

Above those, there are some points we have to take into accounts to hamper standard retirement age. In my opinion, we should hamper it and young people should challenge to old people.


[207] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Shunki.Yamamoto Date:2016/07/17(日) 17:08
I think that older people should retire their job if they are advised retiring because of the mandatory age or recommendation by their boss, but this is not simple problem like this. Let me explain my opinion with several reasons.

First, when they remain in their company after aging at 65, what is a role of new employee? What should new employee do in his or her company? Older people want to remain there because they can work yet, even though they reach retiring age, but young people, who are eager to find a job, exist each year. In “Kohaku Utagassen”, veteran singers tend to keep appearing on this TV program although they didn’t release their new song, so many singers have not be able to appear on Kohaku. Older people should transfer their part to young workers.

Second however, if older people who have great talent in their work, craftsperson and researcher for example, all retired at 65, this industry would collapse because of lack of experience and technique. It is very difficult for the academic industry to carry out generation change. If older people want to retire, they may not be able to do it because their apprentices are not mature enough. Retirement system varies between general and academic jobs, so we cannot standardize clear regulation of retirement. This is why I think this problem NOT simple.

We must respect the will of the individual and obey the rule pf retirement, but when retirement age differs with people, this phenomena will lead to discrimination. This problem is complex, and should be reformed.


[208] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Rui.fujitani Date:2016/07/17(日) 21:59
I think the old should continue to work until they become 70 years. Let me give three reasons for my agreement.

First, there are problems about aging population with a declining birthrate and pensions. Expense of a government for pensions are increasing year by year because population of the old is increasing. Burdens of the young are more increase than in the past too. If the situation goes on like this, a financial become more difficult. It is said that the age that pension can be received become 70 years. If it is truth, the old have to live for five years without their job and pension. If old people work for a longer period, the situation could be saved.

Second, there are not only problems about pensions, but also about lack of labor forces due to aging population with a declining birthrate. In order to make up for it, it is necessary for the old people to work without overstrain. Certainly, the old people have less physical strength than the young, but they have more experience and technique. Their working will support young people.

Third reason is about physical and mental health of the old. They may become lack of exercise by retirement. It do their body harm. Moreover, some persons make their jobs their reasons for living. For such people, retirement affect their mind. Therefore, retirement age should be raised to 70 so that old people who want to work can do.

Then, I think the old people should work until 70 years.


[209] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Fujita Akihiro Date:2016/07/17(日) 23:56
I think that older workers still should be compelled to retire at age 65. As the title say, young people can work more effectively than the people who over the age of 65 is one reason, because young people have creative thinking. However, I have other two reason by my experiences.

First reason is that the people who over the age of 65 should enjoy the rest of their life and relax at home. In fact, my grand mater go for a trip once a month with her friend. She worked desperately in her youth to enjoy in her old age, so she told me that it is very fun now because I worked desperately in my youth. To hear that I thought that I will work hard during my youth and will enjoy my old age.

Second reason is that finding employment is difficult for young people and it is the issue of many countries. If old people allowed to work longer, the situation turns worse. Decreasing birthrate and aging population, but it is a fact that an operation rate of the youth falls now. And it is very important to bring up a promising youth in the future.

When I think about a disease, I think the age of 65 is the best timing to quit the work. Old people should hand over the employment opportunity to the young people. In doing so, economy will turn around well.


[210] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Mitsuhiro Okamoto Date:2016/07/18(月) 00:10
I largely disagree with this opinion. Let me give three reasons.

First, the elderly people have more knowledge than the younger people. I show the example of the company employees. They often hold a conference. It is the elderly person who has many meaningful and important opinions there. This is why the elderly people have experienced many problems and barriers. They have more knowledge, more solutions of problems than the younger people. The older people become, the more their amount of experience increases.

Second, the elderly people concerns their life after their retirements. As life expectancy extends, the term of them also extends. Still, many elderly people had contributed much their time to their companies. Without works from them, they would do nothing and feel hollow. In order to lose their purposes of life, they should continue to work while they survive.

Third, the elderly people in the present is very active. Thanks to improvements of medical products and the trend of exercise, they become more active than the elderly people in the past. Their activeness is likely to be larger than that of younger person. Although they have a little physical strength, they have much mental strength. They still active in their companies even though they became 65.

My conclusion is that the elderly people should continue to work as possible. Although the company where the younger people active, of course, is good, the need of the elderly people also exists. Much major company for the country is born when youth and the elderly people will cooperate.


[211] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Shogo Beppu MAIL Date:2016/07/18(月) 02:04
I disagree with the opinion. It is, however, basically. I don’t think retirement age should be longer than before. I think, however, the option that people want to work don’t retire is nacessary. I think that there are three conditions needed when those who are at the age of 65 and older work. Let me give these conditions for my basically disagreement.

At first, willingness is needed. If they don’t want to work, they don’t have to work. On the other hand, if they have willingness to work, their thought should be respected. Employee must not waste their will. If they cannot work in spite of their will, it is felt sorry.

At second, ability is needed. Even when they want to work, if they cannot work physically due to their age, they shouldn’t work. It is a waste of efficiency and wages. They should do what they can do. They have experienced more things and know more things than younger worker in their field. Their experiences and technics are usable as resource.

At third, environment is needed. Suitable environment in accordance with willingness and ability is necessary. It is natural for them to work more slowly than younger worker. Employees should have generosity that recognize it. They have to make good relationship between young worker and older worker. One of the go way is to hire the old at cheaper wages than the young or performance based wage with guaranteeing minimum wage.

If three conditions above is put into place, I think that working at the age of 65 or older should be promoted.


[212] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Tamaki Yuko Date:2016/07/18(月) 10:15
I think that older workers should not be compelled to retire aged 65. There are two reasons.

First, older people will be able to stay healthier if they continue working. It means that they will keep using their mind and body as long as they work. My grandfather, for example, was a doctor a few years ago. I did not know him very well as a doctor, but He was probably very great as a doctor. However, he has had nothing to do after he retired. Since then he has doted as he get old. I think that this is because he had lived depending on his work. For him, retiring means that he lost his life. This is not only for my grandfather but also some older people. They should work until they do not want to do.

Second, those who work with older people can have valuable opportunities. It means that older people usually know a lot of things about everything. They are, so to say, expert in their own work. Of course they are not be able to work as hard as they used to do. However they will be able to tell younger people who work with them what younger people do not know. I think this is very important. In fact, my grandmother tell me a lot of things. I am always surprised them. I think that the same goes for workplace. Working is also important not only for older people but also for younger people.

That’s why I think that older people should continue working as long as possible.

[213] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Masashi Ito Date:2016/07/18(月) 18:26
I partly agree with this opinion. I think workers should retire at 65. There are three reasons I can give for my opinion.

First, many companies must employ young workers and make old workers so that companies continue to manage their business. If old workers continue to work even if they become very old, the number of freshman employment is small and there are no spaces young people work. In order to make the unemployment rate recover and improve the business, old people should retire early. And however thanks to the pension, old people have enough money and live, young people must earn money to live.

Second, if the same workers continue to work at the same companies, the companies make difficulty in think a new idea because the member who think the ideas are always fixed. So young freshman is so need for companies to produce a new idea. The circle that old workers tell their skills and knowledge to freshman and they think a new ideas is the best. Companies can continue progress eternally by repeating this cycle.

Third, there are something old people do after they retired. If their sons or daughters make difficulty in taking care of their child, instead they can take care of their grandchild. This is helpful for their child and grandchild and they can concern their child and grandchild. Also old people can concentrate themselves on their hobbies. After retirement, they can do anything they want to do because they have a lot of time.


For these three reasons, l think old people should retire early.

[214] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Kiyoshi TAKEDA Date:2016/07/19(火) 00:37
I do not think that all the old workers should be compelled to retire the works at age 65. However, most of the workers should retire the work at age 65. Let me explain some reasons I think so.
Old workers cannot move and work like the younger workers. So, they might make the speed of work slow. That makes the atmosphere of the work place worst. For example, we young people will feel uncomfortable when we work with old people who cannot do many kinds of work. And what is worse, young workers will have to help old workers. That makes the speed of work much slow.
But, it is not right that all the workers should be compelled to retire the work at age 65. That is because there are many old people who can do a lot of work better than young workers even though their age is over 65. For example, there are many kinds of skills that can be stored only by doing it for years. These skills must be inherited, but in many companies, these important skills are lost because of the forcing to retire. And, there are many acknowledge that should be inherited, too.
Many of the important acknowledge should be inherited orally. That is why I think some people should not be compelled to retire the work at age 65.
As stated above, some old people should go on their work because they have very important skills that should be inherited, I think.


[215] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Koki Iwata Date:2016/07/19(火) 01:45
I disagree with this opinion. Let me explain two reasons about it.

First, recently, the life expectancy has been increasing. Not only in the United States, but also in many developed countries, the life expectancy has been increasing. I think that more than half of the people somewhere around 65 who want to continue working into their 70s and beyond if the statistics about the life expectancy is correct. To be honest, while older Americans may be fitter than they used to be, they may be nonetheless physically and mentally slower than their younger counterparts. While I thought of this opinion, I came up with a new idea that young and energetic people work harder and support the elderly people. If the new idea come true, the elderly people are able to work without a care to the people around them, motivation of young workers would rise, and work efficiency would be increasing.

Second, if the people somewhere around 65 continue working into their 70s and beyond, their physical and mental ability would be improved by working with a lot of people. It is said that while they get older, their physical and mental ability is decreasing. However, if there are a lot of facilities which be able to accept the elderly people and a lot of chance that they be able to work, their ability would not be decreasing easily. If they can work, speaking with people would improve their ability of communication, working hardly would improve their physical and thinking ability and so on.

For these two reasons, I want a lot of people to rethink the question.


[216] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Niwa Keisuke Date:2016/07/19(火) 02:18
I partly agree with this opinion. If we employ old people, we have some advantage, but we have possibility to have disadvantage. I live with grandmother who don’t have any jobs. I want her to work because it is dangerous, however I often see her appearing to have free time. Let me show you about my opinion.
First, I will explain demerits of employing older workers. By hiring the old, the work efficiency may decrease. Old people less have physical ability than younger people. The older we become, the less we have things that we are able to do. In this way, productivity may decline by old people. In terms of other things, there is possibility that unemployment rate of young people can increase.
In addition, retired old people have important roles. Two income families are recently increasing, so they don’t have enough time to take care of their children. However, if old people don’t work and often stay home, they can look after their grandchildren instead of parents. I think this is wonderful thing. Old people don’t become lonely, and children are able to be raised with the complete love of grandparents. Thus, standard retirement age of 65 has good aspects.
I would like to explain opposite opinions. In the world, by development of medical technology, life expectancy has been increasing. After retiring jobs, old people may have no idea how to spend the rest of their time. They can be lonely. Moreover, they may be in great difficulty in living in terms of their economic situation. If we provide old people with easy jobs, we can solve the problem.

[217] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Kato Daiki Date:2016/07/19(火) 05:07
I agree to this opinion partially. I think that I should work if old men are healthy. And I think that you should work if they want to work. I am available whether they work freely, or they retire. Therefore they want to come and think that they may work if they are healthy.
In Japan, there is more population of old men than young people because of the low birthrate and aging. Young people will come to have to support them if all of them retire at 65 years old. Therefore I think that old men should work if they are healthy. And I think that you should work if they want to work. However, they must keep health if they work. They will trouble their work friend if when they are not healthy they work. Thus, they must be healthy if they want to work. I think that they do not need to work effectively. However, they fall sick and must not trouble the friend of their workplace.
Therefore and they have a motivation for themselves to work and think that old men 65 years or older may work if they are healthy. I think that they should support young people even if they do not work efficiently. I think that they should quit work if I think that they do not want to work. I think that they should quit work if they are not healthy. So, I think that you should decide whether they work by themselves if they are healthy.


[219] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Yuki Kawai Date:2016/07/19(火) 10:58
I think older workers shouldn’t be compelled to retire at age 65. There are three reasons why I think so. Let me explain them.

At first, older workers has technology of skillfulness. They have worked lengthily, so they understand work well and have wonderful technology. Their technology comes in handy for the work to make a thing in particular. A young person can't get the technology grown via long years immediately. They should be able to work to tell the technology to the young generation.

At second, the declining birthrate and a growing proportion of elderly people are developed at an advanced countries now, and the laborer population is declining. Some people say that younger people can't promote if older worker keep working, but because there is little laborer population, older workers should keep working, too.

At last, old people can't have a pension sufficiently in recent years, and it is difficult for them to live. There are some aged people who can't work, but aged people who can do to work should work. I think it is so bad that people who want to work can’t work. It is better that aged people work for themselves to earn money than that people consider policy to increase pension. If the aged people who can do to work can earn money by themselves, it's better by can hand money to the person who can't work.

For these three reasons, I think that older workers should not be compelled to retire at age 65

[220] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Kaede Morichika Date:2016/07/19(火) 11:20
Today, many old people want to work longer and they are allowed to work till they become 65 years old. I always see old people is working in the city. However, I don’t think they should work at their old ages. Let me show reasons why I think so.

First, it is clear that young people can work actively than the old. If they do the same thing, young people are faster than the old. Moreover, a manual labor is very dangerous for old one, but old man can’t use his brain effectively.

Second, in Japan, too many old people exist and many young people can’t get their job. If these many old get their job, more and more young can’t gain jobs. So, we should not expand job time, should contract it. The government must do that and give old people more pension. If old people feel boredom, they should find their hobby. For it, many amusement places where the old can take advantage of should be built.

I showed these reasons which help my opinion that we shouldn’t expand job time, but I don’t think old people are obstructive for us. Old people’s roll is not working but leading happy lives. Young people should work actively and support old people. If such society is idealized, almost people can live happily.

For these reasons, I think we should contract job time and encourage young people to work more and more. I hope that it is done and wonderful world birth. I think it can’t be idealized.


[221] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Yuma Taguchi Date:2016/07/19(火) 16:50
I partly agree this opinion. Workers age 65 retire for the time being. If they do not retire at age 65, some of bad effects may appear some places.

Many workers, especially, are belonging to the large corporation from young people to old people. If the old workers do not retire at the age 65, staff of the company increase more and more and the chances which young people are active in decrease. Young people don’t think very well of this thing. As a result, the company decline.

But, elderly people can be military power in the society and the company. They have good skill about some field. So, we can make the place which they can be active in. For example, one of them is the place which bring up the young people. Elderly people work the company for a long time and have many good experiences. Good skill need spot of working. This skill has to pass on the young people. Another example is that they communicate with the children about ancient things. They live long years and know many things in the ancient. The world is changing. Some things now are better than that in the ancient. The converse is also true. So, elderly people have to put across these good things to the children.

As a result, elderly people at age 65 retire for the time being and should start so-called “second life.” If this thing spread, the society is good effect in the many field.

[222] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:KATAOKA YU Date:2016/07/19(火) 19:44
I think that the old worker should retire himself from the work at street 65 years old so far. There are two reasons to think so of.

The first is a problem of personnel expenses. Many companies advocate personnel expenses reduction all over the world now as well as Japan because it is the social conditions that are recession. The youth who is promising in the future that passes only as for several years after sometimes enter the company; if is targeted, take a long view, and it may be with a big loss for the company. When such a thing happens, it will be depressed more and more. I think that it is to contradict it very much that a company employs an elderly person 65 years or older as a worker though I advocate personnel expenses reduction.

The second is efficiency of the work. The human being repeats it if I repeat age, and every thing declines by just that much. One of those is that transaction speed of the work becomes slow. Of course there will be the elderly person that transaction speed of the work does not become slow among them, and there will be the person whom a new employee says to that the transaction speed of the work is slow. However, the elderly person whom transaction speed of the work does not turn into in one's youth is considerably limited, and the transaction speed of the work of the new employee will be improved because of youth in a short period. There is not the reason to prolong the retirement age of the elderly person expressly on pushing forward efficiency of the work.

A thought to prolong the retirement age of the elderly person may be given because it is recession, but I think that it is not important to the present society than I do so it how I convey their experience to a youth.


[223] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Gen Uwai Date:2016/07/19(火) 20:39
I think that people who are 65 years old do not have to retire their jobs.
I have two reasons. Let me show them.

First, elderly people in these days are healthier and motivated than the past. Once, as they got old , their bodies and spirits were wasting away. When they were 65 years old, they were at the limit and were not able to work moreover. However, thanks to the development of the medical technology, elderly people became healthy and be full of go. Even after they get old, they can work well.
My father is 62 years old, but he says that his body has not gotten weak yet and he will be able to work more 10 years.

Second, after they retire his jobs, some people have nothing to do. There are those who can enjoy their life, spending the time for their hobbies such as fishing, reading books, and playing board games. However, some people dedicated all of their lives for works, and it can be said that their hobbies are working. After they retire their jobs, what do they do?
If they are not able to find new hobbies, they would not enjoy their last time.
In order to prevent this case, people should work until they satisfy, during they can work .

The criterion of retirement was made in the past. The situation around workers in these days changed much from that in the past. I think that people have to consider about the age limit again.


[224] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Nana Takao Date:2016/07/19(火) 21:19
I disagree with the problem. There are a lot of people who are at over-65 years old and still working around me. Are there something good things if the elder who have a mind to still want to work are forced to stop working? I have two reasons for my opinion.

First, it has been said that an aging society is progressing more and more recently. So, we will support them for their pensions when we begin to work. Moreover, not only an aging society but also declining birth rate have been progressing and both will be progressing than ever. As a result, we will be faced to have much more charge in the future. There will be some people who cannot do things they want to do because they must support the elder and a part of their salary will be collected. I think that this will cause more progressing an aging society and declining birth rate.

Second, what should the elder do after they were made to stop working without their wills? Especially, the old people who have lived for their jobs and enjoyed them cannot find new things which they can forget themselves.

For these reasons, I disagree with the problem. If there are some old people over 65 years old who do not want to continue their work, then they should stop working. And they will continue to have a good health. That will lead both the elder and the young to better life. I think the old people should be given choices for working.

[225] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:keijun kumagai Date:2016/07/19(火) 22:04
I entirely agree with this opinion. It is new idea. Let me give three reasons to support my opinion.

First, the elder people who retired in their 65-year may have too much free time. They can’t spend these time in something because they worked before retirement, and it is their reason for living. It is reasonable they don’t have something to waste time for it. Since they should work longer.

Second, working help the elder people enjoy their life. they can have a good time, talking with someone and making something by working. Also working supports them not only in mental but in physical side. Working let them moving more and it prevent them from a lot of disease, such as cancer, myocardial infarction, stroke. Their health lifetime increase as they more use their body.

Lastly, making the elder people work save a lot of money. In these days, much money is used to take care of them. For example, pension, sentry, and nursing care service. Changing retirement age from 65 to more longer means that it decreases money used pension for the elder people and we can make the best use of the remaining money, such as, enhance medical service, reduce school fees.

Someone may say ‘the elder people working longer will steal the chance of employment. I think it is may be so but I believe there is more advantage than not to it.

For these reasons mentioned above, I am justified in concluding that let them work more long time is profitable.

[226] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:kyu.zuuyan MAIL Date:2016/07/19(火) 22:28
Actually I agree with this opinion.I will show you some reasons.

First,many people say that our population is getting low an low, we must postpone the olds retirment age.This is absolutely wrong.The problem is we don't have fresh blood,and we work so hard that make our rich,so we don't have to have child ,and that will make our socialty wores.Though 70-year-old guys have experience, but not all of them have energy to work.The only way that not postpone the retirement age plus make company have fresh blood is making foreigner come.We have nice company,nice environment,perfect city, amazing industry.Only.We only less of people,so let them come and we will make this win-win.

Second,gentalmen who over 65 are exactely not good at work, their eyes become worse, their bones become weak, they can work but not over 5 hours, why not let them live quitly after 65? They don't have much time, they have already worked for over 40 years, that's their half life,they earn money cause they want their later years happy.Age 65 to 70 is the gold time, cause they still can move.There is no reason that take that big risk to work and wasting there most important time for them.

Maybe we still think postpone th retirement age is good for socialty or something, but that is too selfish.We should more think about the olds life for them.


[227] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Koki Hattori MAIL Date:2016/07/19(火) 22:35
I think that elderlies should retire. I believe that it is better to retire before become a 65-year-old.

As the first of the reason, the purpose of man's life is because not always work. Humans have two types. The person who found in the labor purpose to live and them who found it in others. Might some people live for the purpose of labor in, but it is considered that it has a lot of people it may be like others than labor. My uncle enjoys fishing is their hobby after retirement. My uncle has been very happy after retirement. Employment of the elderlies should be thing only people who like do, I hope that there is no one to be forced to work.

As a second reason, the labor of the elderlies takes away the environment to work from young people. Young people need to work in order to feed their families and develop the country. Their responsibilities are more serious than the elderlies. Taking away the opportunity to work from young people is caused by working of the elderlies who are not in trouble in life. If the elderlies have worked, they should work in the field that young people do not want to do too much or cannot do such as traditional crafts. In recent years in Japan, young people are unable to work due to the elderlies don’t retire and in poor.
Generational change for the development of the world is needed. I think elderlies should retire quickly in order to keep young people alive.


[228] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Hiroaki Doi Date:2016/07/19(火) 23:02
I think that people whose age are over 65 should keep working if they have motivation for their jobs. This helps not only themselves but also our society. Let me explain some reasons.
 
 First, the average lifespan is longer and the proportion of old person is higher and higher today, so it is difficult to support them by young person. This is very terrible problem in Japan. I think that working old person as much as they can is necessary to solve this serious problem. The term of their getting pension is shorter and the burden of young person is smaller if they work longer.

 Second, old people who keep working can get a reason for living and have a better life
According to one research, old person who keep working after they become 65 years old is healthier than who don’t. This is very good. My grandfather is 70 years old now, but he enjoys working and stays healthy. Like these, old people who have will had better work.

Third, old person have wide knowledge which they get during their long life. They can protect an old good tradition. These days, it is a serious problem to fade away traditions.
They can teach young people traditions, so they can protect.

However, working longer has not only a good aspect but also a bad one. It may deprive young people of chances to work. To prevent this, we should some rules. It is very good for society to work moderately.


[229] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Sakurako Nakano Date:2016/07/19(火) 23:51
I partly agree that people who are over 65 years old continue to work. Let me give two reasons that suppose my opinion.

First, because elderly people have much free time, they should find purposes in life. If they work, they can exercise and communicate with coworkers. Staying home for a long time is bad for people’s health. Moreover, if they are paid, they might enjoy travel and shopping. I want to go many foreign countries in my old age. Every people hope that they live happily in their old age.

Second, there are also bad aspects. These days, many traffic accidents are caused by elderly people. They often confuse pressing the accelerator with applying the brake. As human beings get older, they lose their grip and their eyesight are declining. Their strength gradually decline as well. If someone makes a mistake at the office, he or she might cause many people a lot of trouble. For example, if a pilot faint suddenly, the passengers may be killed. That is to say, every worker take responsibility.

In conclude, people who are over 65 years old might need jobs to lead rich and happy life. However, I think that their family and coworkers should watch them carefully and help them. If the elderly person overextend himself, someone should make him resign from the job. Now, the number of elderly people is increasing more and more in japan. That’s why we should think about workplaces that is comfortable for them to work in.


[231] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Yomi Morimoto Date:2016/07/21(木) 00:37
I think that people over 65 years old should be allowed to work in the same working conditions to young people. In fact, many people over 65 continue to work in Japan today. Let me explain the two reasons of it.

First, in many cases, elder people can work more efficient and deal with problems more smooth than young people because they undergo a lot of things. If their ability to work is not weak, they should receive the same amount of salary which they received until then. However, many elder people cannot work like as when they were young because they have a disease or their physical strength is decline. Then I think the salary ought to be paid according to the results of their work. Then young people also can work with high motivation.

Second, there are many old people who enjoy working. If they quit their job and spend most of their time at home, they seldom talk to others and may lose their reason for living as well as they don’t exercise adequately. However, there are colleagues in work place and they can talk and laugh with them. They can also exercise and use their head. It can makes old people’s health better.

For these reasons, I think people over 65 years old should continue to work if they can or want to do it. I think it is good idea that the age at which a pension is paid is extend to 70 years old.


[232] RE:Topic 6: Retirement Age Name:Hiroki Nakagawa Date:2016/07/24(日) 12:23
I partly agree with this opinion. Let me show you why I think so.

First, if elderly people keep working, it becomes more difficult for young people to join the company. There are many competent people among the young. However, elderly people don’t retire the company, elderly people have less the chance to entry to the company. Also the company less the chance to get good people.

Second, some elderly people can’t adjust to new ideas. Today, technologies becomes better and better, and ideas what didn’t exist before appear one after another. We have to adopt great ideas, but some elderly people refuse them. A company which had made TV game for many years decided to make only games which can play with smartphone when the president changed. Now the company into the black. Elderly people who particular about old-fashioned thinking may not be able to make the company better.

Third, elderly people are weaker than young people. Elderly people can’t work hard longer than young people. Besides, elderly people tend to become sick. If more young people work instead of elderly people, it is more efficient.

Nowadays however, the number of elderly people are increasing, and the number of young people are decreasing. I think the new idea is “Elderly people should work after his retirement”. Each company should recruit elderly people. Elderly people should do not an ordinary work but easy work like cleaning or security. Our society should prepare for the aging society and make the proper employment situation.

[230] Retirement Age Name:Gokuu Kurobe MAIL Date:2016/07/20(水) 00:40 [ 返信 ]
I disagree with this opinion. Let me explain three reasons.

First, elderly people are healthy, today. For example, my grandparents is 70 years old. But they are healthy. I think that they can work. I think that some elderly people want to work. They wanted to continue their works. I think that we give them works. They have a lot of knowledge. It isn’t difficult for them to work.

Second, working keeps their health good. If working adversely affects to their health, I agree with this opinion. But I think that working has a good effect in their health. Some elderly people leave home rarely. It has bad effects for them. They leave home, walk and talk many people to work. It keeps their health good.

Third, the number of young people is decreasing in Japan. As a result, the number of worker is decreasing. It is a big problem. We should solve it. We have two solution. Increasing the number of young people is first thing. But it is very important. Many politician tried increasing the number of young people. But it didn’t success. Second idea is that the elderly people work. If they work, the number of worker increases. Some said if the elderly people don’t retire, young people’s works are nothing. But the number of workers in Japan is decreasing. As a result, the works won’t be nothing.

For these reasons, I think the elderly people whom health is good should work. I think it is good for the society and their health.


[185] Community Service Name:Gokuu Kurobe MAIL Date:2016/07/05(火) 01:13 [ 返信 ]
I almost agree this idea. Let me show me some reasons.

First, we can do the community or government service. But we can’t do it between the ages of 22 and 60. We should do our works in adults. We can’t spend the time to the community or government service in adult. We can’t do it in adult, if we want to do them.

Second, they are useful to the society. Example, Environmental Conservancy Corps make the environment of earth good. But I said at first “I almost agree this idea.” I oppose to them to go the military. I think that they should do better things.

Third, we can get the invaluable experiences. We can’t get it in everyday lives. And we can meet many people who we don’t know. If we don’t do the service, we can’t meet them. They may make us better. We may know thoughts different from ours. The experience is useful to work and live in adult.

Fourth, young people may have interests in their community or government. It is important that we have interest in politics. In Japan, many young people don’t have interest in politics. The rate of votes in the elections in young people is very low. If they do community or government service, they learn much knowledge. As a result, they have interests in their community or government. If the rate is higher, their lives is better.

For these reasons, I agree this opinion. I think we should become active.


[175] topic5 Name:taniguchi yukinari Date:2016/07/04(月) 11:02 [ 返信 ]
I think local service and the service of the country or a volunteer to participate at the age of 21 years old from 18 years old.
It was why, and I thought that I would have to participate in the activity such as these in a question time of the high school student and time before the high school student.
Most of oneself does not profit, and this is because it thought that it does it, and it will be in what.
In addition, it was troublesome or thought that it should be over early when I worked as volunteers at the age of a primary schoolchild. But there was the thing which got what it was when it was over when I did such a thing after I became a university student.
At first I am that treasure is never different from looking in what I watch from the situation that I really do to the first. In addition, a conventional viewpoint changes, and even the mind that the world turned into assumes that I really do it.
It means that the second understands the feeling of the person who really does it. This thinks that even a byte is the same. Being thoughtless, and having square it because know how to contact to the person whom oneself really does at the time of viewpoint of the visitor when understand such a feeling think that come to rarely complain.
So i think that young people should participate in these activity if they can.


[156] RE:Topic 4: Computer Games  Name:Masaru Tanabe Date:2016/06/14(火) 21:22 [ 返信 ]
I agree with this opinion. Certainly, we can play computer games easily because they don’t need wide space and many tools, and we can play them by ourselves. We can play many kind of games. However, playing games makes children growing bad. If children don’t grow sufficiently, they may not live a happy life when they become adults.

Playing games prevents children’s bodies from growing adequately. When they play the games, they look at a screen and they only use fingertip, so their eyesight and muscles of legs and arms weak. People grows sharply and largely when they are childhood. If they don’t grow or waste, they become sick or injury easily when they are adulthood.

We decrease chance to communicate by playing game. Of course, we can communicate people on the Internet with on-line games. However, they don’t talk directly. That is to say they don’t know sex, age and character each other. Moreover, it is difficult for them to speak fluently because when they use chat, they can think words for a long time. As a result, their skill of communication declines.

In conclusion, I think that children should play outdoors. We use our all body when we play outdoors, so our bodies become strong. What is more, we can make real friends and we need to communicate. That improves our skill which we have to use when we become adults. Electrical appliances will develop in the future, so computer games will be more convenient. However, we have to tell children that they must resist temptation of computer games.


新規投稿

HOME掲示板TOP一覧表示ツリー表示トピック表示記事検索記事修正・削除携帯用URL管理用
1件〜10件(全34件)  134       <RSS>    【管理者へ連絡


無料レンタル掲示板 WEBでき