全 149 件のコメント

[–]throwawayyourliberty 62ポイント63ポイント  (8子コメント)

Exceptional work. Especially that you are mentioning the anomaly Israel.

Jews are only favoring multiculturalism in white countries. They push multicultural societies in Europe but refuse to accept arabs as their peers in their own country.

A friend once said to me:

"You know, weak cultures are overtaken by stronger ones."

Our culture in Europe is nearly beyond repair. Hence, "rocket scientists", stuck in the Dark Age, overrun and outbread us.

[–]Questionablechoice 5ポイント6ポイント  (3子コメント)

What is going to be scary is 20 - 40 years from now all these countries will have elected officials from radical sects. Then they will have all the modern weaponry of the EU including biological and nuclear threats. If the EU goes down the rest of the western world could be headed for a nuclear war.

[–]playdontpay -1ポイント0ポイント  (2子コメント)

The mayor of London is a Muslim.

[–]Questionablechoice 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

The mayor doesn't have access to armies and weapon caches. There are plenty of muslim local leaders over the west. This isn't the concern it's the national leadership races and high ranking military appointments.

[–]Endorsed Contributor2comment 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

The US steel makers were apathetic about Japan's entry into the steel market once too, after the war. Afterall, they only were selling rebar, low margin and the US firms reasoned it would free some capacity up for producing higher-end product. Of course, up the product pyramid the Japanese went, by the late 70s/80s selling the high-end stuff and US steel makers fearing they go out of business. (Of course, since then, Japan stagnated, China happened, etc.)

The point is that organizations almost never get eaten from the top in demographic change, but from the bottom.

Europeans think these immigrants are going to basically subsidize their pensions while magically being perfect 1st worlders. HA! Idiots. The immigrants are the one that will cash in the generous european welfare until they retire and then their kids will take over once the numbers reach a tipping point, likely the whole system will collapse in a several decades if trends keep going.

[–]TheEagleAndTheSnake 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I wouldn't say Israeli Jews are the same as the globalist and elitist Jews... The latter have been breaking Jewish values since WWII (and before). They are simply the DT masters.

[–]Mudpielol 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Russians still hold strong. For now.

[–]getRedPill[🍰] -3ポイント-2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why is this on Jews? If so they have been trying to warn us. How is it Israel responsibility and not our leaders or ourselves as voters?

Oh the hamster, not only women.

[–]yomo86 -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I am not a jew I do not even like them. But what a group of independent jewish globalist push as an agenda is not the same the kikes as a nation have.

[–]forcevacum 31ポイント32ポイント  (0子コメント)

Good article. I think its worth mentioning that the end-game after barbarism is females getting inseminated by the toughest Alpha who will have his way with her, so for females it's win-win. Organised Society is created by the vast multitude of Betas so that they could all have a fair chance at reproduction. Do you think women care about this? No. They'd prefer to have the child of an Alpha that abandons them than a man who would stay to raise their kid properly and provide resources.

[–]UnpluggedMan 16ポイント17ポイント  (4子コメント)

Feminism is but one symptom of a society going soft from too much comfort. It's the underlying hubris that eventually leads to collapse. Not the feminism itself.

[–]tallwheel 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

Feminism is both a symptom and a contributor to the society's undoing.

[–]2Heathcliff-- 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

It is the pneumonia that settles in after HIV weakens your immune system. Symptom and contributor.

[–]bowie747 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

When our weakest individuals stopped dying, and began outbreeding the strong. Was when we started this mess.

[–]dudet23 21ポイント22ポイント  (3子コメント)

White people are destroying their nations (that were built by their ancestors) because of indoctrination and mental castration.

Multiculturalism for white countries. Monoculturalism for everyone else. Something is wrong with this. When will people wake up. Its not about preserving a purely european nation, its about preserving ANY european nation AT ALL. Our kids will grow up minorities fighting with other ethnic blocks over resources (and white women.... always fighting over white women, cause everyone wants them) their ancestors DEVELOPED for them ALONE. This alone is a betrayal of our ancestors.

Is there some reason that whites need to be minorities in their own nations? Is there some moral imperative? Can someone explain this to me? How does this benefit us white people AT ALL to become minorities in our own countries founded by our ancestors.

[–]BorisWestfall 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

We're being constantly told it's a terrific idea to give up our perfect First World heaven to some Third World shit hole. They literally destroyed their own countries by living in the religious stone age. They see the bright beacon of hope and prosperity that is the West. They invade. Our countries become diluted every single time another foreigner hooks into the welfare system and is paid money simply for being an economic migrant (READ: Parasite). This continues, as OP states, until the system becomes too top heavy with leeches and not enough creators of income. We become a Third World shit hole, the process continues. Meanwhile, which was stated, there's a percentage of women who want this vermin to cum inside them so they can have mixed abomination babies. It's disgusting.

[–]PantsonFire1234 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

This could explain why white women are such insufferable cunts nowadays. They know everyone wants to fuck them. God help us.

[–]getRedPill[🍰] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

White people are destroying their nations

Ehm, cultural marxism and postmodernism negation of reality, which both were made by whites in Europe, so, yes you are right but need to be more precise

[–]Azzmo 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hall of fame material.

It took me many years to come around on these things. It's so fringe from what we're brainwashed into believing in a modern Western education that it's going to hit a lot of people as extreme. 2008 me would be furious at you.

The quality of people is a concept that has been abandoned and vilified.

This is another Red Pill and I think we're going to see these notions spread in the next 20 years as people are forced to swallow it.

[–]Party_Olive 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is one of the best non-sexual strategy posts I've read this year. Not much that I was not already aware of from my own reading and research, but it's very well written, structured, concise and referenced. I have been concerned about these issues for the past couple of years, ever since I truly became aware of how sick Western culture is.

The scary thing is that, if the sectors of our society that are aware of this problem do not act soon, European society and culture will be damaged beyond repair. I, for one, intend to do everything within my own power and ability to stop it. I know that a large part of this community preaches to 'enjoy the decline', and I am strongly opposed to this.

[–]perplexedm 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Feminism fucks every man equally. No need to bring skin color, ethnicity, etc. which is ridiculous.

Check the status in some third world countries, their men will have to say the same thing you said, irrespective of their skin color.

And say what, white men deserves this scourge because they fed this dragon first.

[–]1JamesSkepp 7ポイント8ポイント  (11子コメント)

It is not a coincidence that Sweden, the most feminized country on the planet, took more refugees per capita than anyone else

You draw a wrong conclusion here. Sweden is feminized, but this is not the reason it took most refugees (immigrants actually).

The reason it took most refugees is b/c once a person gets into EU it can, by law travel to any other country in the EU. So, they got into EU and chose, firstly, the countly with the higest social benefits possible aka. free money.

It took Sweden (and rest of EU countries) months to react to the problems created by the immigrants (after you couldn't handle them, and couldn't handle the opposition to free entry). Part of it was by, most likely, design, part of it was b/c of the law EU and the countries have. You couln't just deny entry in EU, now you can, b/c the law cought up with the need to stop the influx.

[–]ObserverBG[S] 9ポイント10ポイント  (9子コメント)

Did you read the article carefully? :) Ask yourself why is it that the refugees decided to go to Sweden, and not somewhere else.

First, Sweden was deliberately taking refugees long, long before the crisis started. Second, feminisation creates a society that is great for low IQ migrants, because:

1 Female influence leads to less intolerance and less nationalism in society. Nationalism is like an immune system against immigration.

2 Female influence leads to the creation of a welfare state and the endorsment of parasitic behavior, so it becomes a magnet for refugees and low IQ people who depend on the welfare state and behave like victims (just like women).

3 More female influence leads to easy sex for the migrants.

[–]1JamesSkepp 1ポイント2ポイント  (8子コメント)

Ask yourself why is it that the refugees decided to go to Sweden, and not somewhere else.

High social benefits. Sweden basically gave money for free, you just had to show up.

Female influence leads to the creation of a welfare state and the endorsment of parasitic behavior

Welfare state didn't appear b/c of women. It appared as a result of Indusrial Revolution and high concentration of workers in cities. Than came the strikes for workers rights, then came the labour parties, socialism (economic, not the CCCP one). These were the times when a woman couldn't even vote without beating ( :P), much less influence any politician.

More female influence leads to easy sex for the migrants.

Highly doubtful. Most of them are low(est) status you can get in any county in Europe, they have no real logistical capability to pull (no real house, no real money). This might happen much later tho.

[–]ObserverBG[S] 9ポイント10ポイント  (4子コメント)

High social benefits. Sweden basically gave money for free, you just had to show up.

Yes, and all feminised countries have welfare states. :)

Welfare state didn't appear b/c of women. It appared as a result of Indusrial Revolution and high concentration of workers in cities.

This study says otherwise: Suffrage coincided with immediate increases in state government expenditures and revenue and more liberal voting patterns for federal representatives. http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/%7Eiversen/PDFfiles/LottKenny.pdf

Plus you do not have a welfare state ala Northern Europe in Israel or Japan. What i argue is that you have welfare states in rich feminised countries, but you do not have welfare states in rich masculinized countries.

The welfare state simply replaces the family, and male influence. You redistribute money from men to women via 2 ways: Either via the family (a patriarchal system). Or the via welfare state: a highly feminised system. In all feminised countries, you have destruction of the family and its replacement with the welfare state.

Highly doubtful. Most of them are low(est) status you can get in any county in Europe, they have no real logistical capability to pull (no real house, no real money). This might happen much later tho.

I do not think this is doubtful. Intermarriage is not accepted in many of the more masculinized countries, and there are vigilante groups looking for women dating non-natives in many of them (such as Israel or Muslim countries). Plus everyone knows that white women have a sexual fetish about black men.

Feminism leads to resentful white women sleeping with non-white men simply to make white men/fathers angry, the so called daddy issues. Eastern european women, who live in more masculine countries for example, do not care about non-white men.

Look at this clip. You will not see anything like this made in Turkey, Poland, Israel, or Japan.

https://vimeo.com/150271055

Have you heard about Rotherham, Britain, where muslim men had sex with hundreds of native young girls and children? If this happened in Turkey, Israel, or Japan, they would be killed.

[–]dudet23 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Japanese marched by the thousands because ONE American solider raped/killed some japanese girl. What do the brits do when THOUSANDS of white girls get raped and abused by fucking pakistanis? Nothing. They sit on their ass and talk about how liberal they are (puke).

[–]returnofthemack2 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

lol that vid is unbelievable, and you're right-you woudlnt find that in Asia, Eastern Europe, Turkey, etc.

[–]1JamesSkepp -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

simply to make white men/fathers angry

This is the reason for white chicks sleeping with blacks? Not b/c he's more alpha, not b/c the popular opinion of "having a big dick", but to spite her daddy? Be resonable...

Eastern european women, who live in more masculine countries for example

Eastern Europe doesn't have any significant non-white population, therefore it's impossible to say whay they want race-wise untill that happens. However, it's almost 100% certain it won't be any different than any other country that has mixed (or non mixed) population: looks, status, game and so on. The usual stuff women respond to.

What i argue is that you have welfare states in rich feminised countries, but you do not have welfare states in rich masculinized countries.

Google "welfare state in japan" and "welfare state in israel". When you do, google "welfare state in saudi arabia".

What I am arguing is this: welfare didn't appear b/c of women but as a socio-economical consequence of Industrial Revolution. I agree that feminism is somewhat connected to CURRENT welfare programs, but the connection is not "ideological" ("i'm a feminist so welfare is great" or vice versa). Rather - the conncetion is based on pure money distribution and statistically (and steoretypicaly) the random "single mom" is more likely to be a feminist than a redpillwoman. I would also argue that a current "single mom" had NOTHING to do with feminism and welfare from the moment she had first sex ever, to the moment that she became pregnant whan nearing the Wall and daddy would not commit.

[–]ObserverBG[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

In Eastern Europe it will be different due to the greater nationalism there, non-white migrants will simply have a harder time getting native women without resistance.

In Sweden, for example, this is what muslim migrants are saying: " “It is not as wrong raping a Swedish girl as raping an Arab girl,” says Hamid. “The Swedish girl gets a lot of help afterwards, and she had probably fucked before, anyway. But the Arab girl will get problems with her family. For her, being raped is a source of shame. It is important that she retains her virginity until she marries.” It was no coincidence that it was a Swedish girl that was gang raped in Rissne – this becomes obvious from the discussion with Ali, Hamid, Abdallah and Richard. All four have disparaging views on Swedish girls, and think this attitude is common among young men with immigrant background. “It is far too easy to get a Swedish whore…… girl, I mean;” says Hamid, and laughs over his own choice of words. “Many immigrant boys have Swedish girlfriends when they are teenagers. But when they get married, they get a proper woman from their own culture who has never been with a boy. That’s what I am going to do. I don’t have too much respect for Swedish girls. I guess you can say they get fucked to pieces.”

http://fjordman.blogspot.bg/2005/12/immigrant-rape-wave-in-sweden.html

Feminisation leads to less nationalism. Lack of nationalism is why migrant sex gangs are rampant in Western countries. Less nationalism leads to easier availability of sex for migrants. For example jewish women are not allowed to marry non-jews in Israel and muslim women are not allowed to marry non-muslim men in most muslim countries.

The welfare state in Saudi is specifically caused by the great oil income this country has. If you look at a muslim country which is industialized, but does not have oil, such as Turkey, you wont find any major welfare state, and you will see lots of income inequality.

The welfare state in Israel and Japan is smaller than that in Northern Europe, and income inequality is greater there. Income inequality is a good indicator for the lack of real, effective welfare state in Israel and Japan. I also never heard about alimony in those countries.

Why feminism leads to more welfare state: 1 A study shows that suffrage immideately led to more government taxes, spending, and more liberal voting patterns.

2 Women consistently vote for more left-wing parties, for parties who want to raise taxes, for parties who want to increase welfare, etc.

3 Women pay 30 percent of taxes, while consuming the majority of welfare. So it is quite logical that women will be one of the biggest advocates for the welfare state.

The single mom thing is mostly caused by feminism, because in 100 percent of feminist countries you have implosion of marriage, but you do not have implosion of marriage in Israel, Turkey, South Korea, Japan, and the vast majority of non-feminist countries.

If you look at feminist countries you will notice two things: in all of them you have major welfare state, and in all of them you have implosion of marriage. Things like no-fault divorse, and the welfare state contribute to the implosion of marriage.

Efforts to put more women in the labor force in feminist countries also have negative effect on marriage, since women are hypergamous and are more likely to reject men who earn less than them, which then causes a lack of "good enough" men.

When you remove marriage from the picture, then the welfare state tries to replace it. Single women for example vote for the left and for more welfare, married women vote for the right and less welfare. Therefore a society where feminism broke the family unit and constantly attacks marriage should become more left wing, and with more demands for a welfare state, while countries with more male influence should be (generally) more nationalist, and with less welfare state.

[–]HAMMURABl 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

Welfare state didn't appear b/c of women

Yes IT DId You fucking monkey

[–]Mianro9 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Oh, so well thought out. You struck down each of his carefully considered points like a lightning bolt. Certainly changed my mind, you non-primate you!

**Better to be a monkey than not even a primate in the first place **

[–]firmness 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wrong answer. Please share this god damned video. I must post this twice a week and it has no views. The answer is people like Barbara Lerner Spectre. This video is about as explicit a smoking gun as has ever been produced and Reddit continues to say "Meh..."

[–]Rufferto_n_Groo 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

Good.

One critique:

High republican state birthrates do not equate to falling IQ in those states.

Immigration has a far greater effect on IQ due to hispanics being aggregated with whites for those statistical purposes, hence the need for the "White, non-hispanic" category.

Otherwise, bravo.

[–]getRedPill[🍰] -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Aren't just all those labels a dumb thing? Only US obsesses about such labels.

That's why they call you racist in first place, even if you aren't because those labels are a spark for where initially there wasn't racism

[–]Endorsed ContributorNeoreactionSafe 15ポイント16ポイント  (8子コメント)

 

The Globalist Tyranny does not want opposition.

 

So they give us the Blue Pill to dumb us down.

Most of us already know all this stuff (not even in doubt) but if there were any betas who are in need of facts that this is happening you have provided "plenty" in this post.

 

When you want to conquer a people you use "Pacification" techniques that make that people more feminine.

Males fight the tyranny.

Females want to get fucked by the tyranny.

The tyranny prefers all females and no males.

...same story as always but this time the tyranny seeks the "big goal" of world conquest.

"Absolute power corrupts absolutely" so expect it to get weirder as we near the climax.

 

[–]1JamesSkepp 14ポイント15ポイント  (6子コメント)

When you want to conquer a people you use "Pacification" techniques that make that people more feminine.

Most of history shows that conquering was done by sword.

Males fight the tyranny.

That is just plain stupid. Men fight tyranny, sure, but who created all of the tyrranical states in history? Jeusu, I get bluepill is bad, but what you just wrote is plain fucking LIE.

facts that this is happening you have provided "plenty" in this post

You should learn from him, instead of manipulating people with words, obfuscating, deliberate vagueness, and, as some dude pointed out "deliberate formatting to make your post seems profound" when in fact thay are, in most cases, contentless.

[–]AntiWhite -3ポイント-2ポイント  (4子コメント)

That's what he does here. He is either spectrum level autistic or he is Jewish.

[–]getRedPill[🍰] -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

What the feck is the Globalist Tyranny. You keep saying that but how you who they are. do they issue a newspaper periodically, can I see them on TV so I learn what they say? What are their names , where they from? What language do they speak, since they are Global but you need an specific language to communicate. You can't talk 'Global'.

Please inform me

[–]LOST_TALE 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

women are less xenophobic, and more foreigner friendly, compared to men.

No shit, they want that conqueror dick

[–]beginner_ 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Economic decline – as share of world GDP.

Doesn't this have to include per capita GDP? Eg. population growth? Europes population grew far, far less (or not at all) than rest of the world and especially Asia and Africas population. Hence far less potential of GDP to grow.

Looking at per capita GDP still shows a clear decline in Europe but the Growth in rest of the world is corrected for the population increase and it looks much less dramatic.

EDIT:

Here a different view of GDP per capita showing that population increase does matter. You can't assume that a steady population keeps the same percentage of total GDP compared to an exponentially growing population.

[–]ObserverBG[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

GDP also has a good correlation with the IQ of the country's population. As IQ of western countries, according to various studies, is dropping due to dysgenic behavior and immigration policies (but it is not dropping in developed countries like Japan, South Korea, or Taiwan), as the scores of western students are dropping, but are increasing for most of the rest of the world, there should be serious negative consequences for the future economic well being of western countries.

[–]getRedPill[🍰] 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

A text wall bigger than Trump 's on Mexico for a thing can be explained so easy:

It's simple. Feminism is a means to an end: give power to socialism. Socialist societies ALWAYS fail -- economically, morally, ethically, military, pride goes down, cuckness goes up.

Try this and you'll see feminists always leans left: What's biggest thing a feminist voter wants in politics ? A female president, of course. Now ask her/him what's her opinion on Margaret Thatcher vs any other left leaning female leader and if she wants someone like Thatcher as president. Wouldn't matter much, after all she wants a female president no matter what. Well, she will course you and Miss Thatcher just for considering the idea of Thatcher as president.

• Test #2 ask her/him if she prefers a MALE socialist president or a center or capitalist FEMALE president. Same choice, the male socialist always.

• Test #3 ask her/him of valuable women that made real contributions to mankind, like Marie Curie a scientific. They won't mention Marie Curie ever. They will mention rioters, famous 'victims™' of the system. If so, if they ever mention a figure made somewhat important contributions is some politized female figure with bias towards leftist status quo.

[–]blackchadthundercock 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Europe can burn. So can white women who's "careers" are more important.

Bitches brought it on themselves. I hope I'm alive to see it when whites are declared a minority in America.

[–]Azzmo 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you're alive in 30 years you'll enjoy festivities.

Not sure why you'd be happy about native populations being exterminated though.

[–]drallcom3 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

80% of all newborn in Paris are non-european. A number that is very well hidden.

[–]ajomojo 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Right on the money. Great job!

[–]bhaknu 3ポイント4ポイント  (4子コメント)

As a white guy who likes Vietnamese girls... yea. If I ever have kids they wont be white. That's what happens when all the women in your race are "modern".

[–]neveragoodtime 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

I think this is the most important take away. When you take race out of the argument, I don't care what color the pussy is as long as it submits. I don't care about sustaining a white society, but I would like to see a masculine society. I think TRP would agree with that side of the argument. Our country is living in the feminist frame right now. We need to understand our own frame before we can even begin correcting the societal ills the OP describes within a self destructive feminist society. We shouldn't reject the argument because it sounds racist, we should learn what truth we can from it. TRP isn't just about slaying pussy, it's about men controlling their lives. And when we control our lives we can control society.

[–]grindingnoise -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

So maybe you should move to the middle east where woman are more controlled? TRP is more like traditional Muslims than they like to admit!

[–]torodinson 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

No we freely admit their culture is more likely to survive and out compete others just for that reason.

[–]Red_SL4 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Your genes may be safer in a Vietnamese womb.

[–]orange_juice007 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

So because of contraception -> women have more presence in important roles in society -> they make country more open to outsiders because they're not as xenophobic as men -> men from outside take over local women -> old society is dead, long live new one.

Did I get this right?

[–]Azzmo 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Women also have less investment in their society if they don't currently have kids. Increased influence in decision making + less investment in maintaining the current society + bleeding heart + instinctual desire to welcome in barbarian alphas = Decline.

[–]UnberZed 7ポイント8ポイント  (46子コメント)

The mods should add "TRP is for WHITE MEN ONLY!" to the sidebar. Taking the Red Pill seems to involve adopting a racial ideology as well. If you're not white, how could you ever read posts like this and still want to swallow TRP? Am I missing something or is that the message?

[–]beginner_ 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

What you are missing is facts.

Men are different from women and it's not inequality that makes women avoid tech jobs, it's because the prefer other jobs like nursing. Same thing goes for race. Whites on average have higher IQ than blacks and Asians higher than whites. That is just a fact. And hence if you country is invaded by low IQ migrants the average IQ will go down.

IQ by country

Many African countries have an average IQ of below 70. Meaning most of migrants from these countries will have trouble with the most basic jobs and with daily life complexities (taxes, insurance, paying bills,....). Of course the environment has an impact as well. if you grew up in US as a black your IQ will be higher than the average IQ from your region of origin. But genetic component is estimated between 60-80%.

This is the data. Why should we take up so many people that are basically useless for our society? It's not racist, it's the truth. Do your own research of course and then either accept it or deny it.

[–]Relevantex 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

Sounds like we various-shades-of-brown dudes need to be making vacation plans to Sweden ASAP

[–]UnberZed 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

So you can do your part to lower the IQ of the Swedish people. [sarcasm]

[–]ObserverBG[S] 8ポイント9ポイント  (35子コメント)

Well, this is a somewhat valid viewpoint. But i'm just a single user, that has no influence in TRP circles. I just made my study and decided to post it in several places, thats it. I have nothing to do with the people who run this place, and so on. Actually one of the moderators refused to accept my post, until i made it better.

So i think that this has nothing to do with the TRPs "official position", with the mods position, and so on. This is just a single post made by a single individual, thats it. So i think that if you do not like the position of the article, you should just talk to me, and you shouldn't blame everybody else or the whole community.

I believe that this is a "politically incorrect place", that is why i decided to post this here. But i don't want the TRP to "officially endorse" this, or anything like that. I think that this post contributes to the diversity of opinions, thats it.

I don't have negative feelings towards you just because you are non-white. I just care about my people and what will happen to them. And rest assured, that you can learn new things from this post too. One of the lessons from it is that you should not allow too much female influence in your country, or this could have fatal consequences for your people. There are other lessons too, but they are more subtle.

[–]untitled_redditor 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

I am also a white male who sees white males as "my people" Because they are.

[–]Blackbeard345 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Really protect your people. That's the main reason I hate all this race shit everyone is a victim. Should we stand with ppl because of their race or because of their values. I mean look at all those white ppl trying to stop free speech. Do you stand with them? Are they still your ppl? And if they are not who are your ppl? How do you choose them?

Race is fucking meaningless at least to me. Look at how ppl use race it's always to control ppl how they think, how they act and what's the right position to have.

I'm against black/white/asian/hispanic pride. What's the use for that kind of pride? All I see is division. The latino man wants me to stand with him for no other reason that I'm latino too. They want me to stand up for every latino out there it doesn't matter how bad they are or how they act. You don't find that fucking dumb?

I really wanna know if there is some kind of benefit I'm not seeing from having this kind of pride?

[–]Endorsed Contributorbalalasaurus 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

For future reference, more racially based posts will be better received on dark enlightenment.

Signed, a black man that likes to fuck blonde girls.

[–]AntiWhite 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

There is no faster way for a White girl to lose SMV than to fuck a Black man. 40% of all African Americans have herpes. Not good.

[–]makeshift98 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Why would it make you uncomfortable? I'm half-black and I see no problem with white nationalism or white pride. White people make cool shit, and there are plenty of minorities that desperately want to live in a white dominated society. You don't see a lot of people fleeing to South America or Africa.

[–]UnberZed 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

You may not have a problem with white nationalists but they certainly have a problem with you. One of your parents is of an inferior race and the other is a race traitor.

[–]Gumpool 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Idiot you think blacks and muslims will galavant around without a care in soviety after the last white person is gone (im looking at you western white men not the slavs since they will always exist since they got balls) you guys will be put in either comcentration camps ore will go back in being slsves for your masters

[–]UnberZed 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Slavs as in Slaves. The Vikings bitch fucked these people and named them. Slavs of Mother Russia have a negative birth rate do to migration and declining health. They're dying off.

[–]Gumpool 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I never understood why western society never liked slavs but will put muslims and blacks on pedestals

Western europe have fucked with slavs for a long time but they are still standing and will never fall

[–]AntiWhite -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

So TRP should be about fucking white chicks only? That is what this sub is about, how to use emotional manipulation to bang hot white chicks? Sexual strategy isn't even needed to bang minority chicks, just a credit score higher than your age.

[–]UnberZed 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Said white men, not white chicks.

[–]IKickHorses 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

and in the event of race mixing, you will need more than 2.1 in order to simply sustain the white population at one level.

Your credibility didn't even make it past the first paragraph.

[–]10211799107 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

You have any book recommendations about the evolution of societies and also their fall due to feminism? I'm interested to read more about what happened in Rome and all that.

[–]BorisWestfall 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I read the entire thing a few times. OP, I have rarely seen such terrific formatting and source documenting IRL, let alone on Reddit. This must have taken you a lot of time. Thank you for sharing it with us.

[–]uniquevoid 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Want it or not, as it is said in the Quran, Islam will always end up winning (this was written 1500 years ago)

At this point there are two choices: Be part of Islam/traditional societies or be a part of a doomed feminised society. I think my decision is clear

What i do not understand is why there is so much hate towards muslims. They are simply winning the battle through superior strategy and as a man you have to acknowledge that, not cry on a forum

We lost the game, there is no coming back

[–]Man_from_Poland 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

YEA!! What the fuckin post! Best wishes man :)

[–]Pastelitomaracucho 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Fertility rates go down when you give women access to education. As simple as that. Less education, more kids. This is not about race, ethnicity or feminism. This is about giving women access to education.

Get second or third generation immigrants through the education system and fertility will go down. People from other races or ethnicities overtaking Europe will not be a problem as long as their women of the next generation are subject to education. Yes, they will not be blonde and tall, but they will not reproduce like rabbits.

Israel is a fantastic case: their sense of cultural attachment, patriotism and religious heritage is so strong, that it tends to go above any personal desires: it is your responsibility as an Israeli to breed. And to breed enough so your not outbred by the foreigners living there. Regardless of whether you are religious or not (and many Jews are not practicing their religion), you still have a debt with your country. And they fulfill it!. And not because they are machos: even Judaism asks their men to keep their women happy and sexually satisfied. Jews are not pushing a feminist agenda to get us fucked. Fucking hell, go to Tel Aviv and see how progressive that city is. If there is a haven for social justice warriors, Tel Aviv is a candidate.

Third-worldization as you see it, its just a combination of brain drain and loss of economic power. America is highly developed, has the best universities in the world, massive industries, highly educated people and yet its economy is plunging down. It this because feminism and immigration? Or is it because erroneous economic policy that has failed to keep up over the decades? The brains are there, but the corruption and the bad policing is also there.

And the cultural shift in Europe is not new. Europe has been importing people from other countries since WWII and it is going to continue like this. If there was any islamization, it would have happened by now. guess what happens? All these second and third generations turks, arabs, and asians speak the local language and are as German/Dutch/Belgian as anyone else, just with a different skin colour and a different heritage and these people are as infertile as the local whites as long as they take on the opportunity to get an education and to rise out of poverty.

[–]cottoncandyjunkie -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't understand what makes a poison less or more anything because of where they were born

[–]LOST_TALE 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I laughed my ass off reading it as an analogy: populations of X as individuals. Feminists want to open borders. to let the alpha do the cuckolding.

!!!

[–]CommentsAndCriticism 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Feminism the state of society where responsibility and privilege are out of kilter. Women get the privilege of men, without any of the responsibility, and this creates huge problems. You can see it very easily at face value with people like trigglypuff but also on a much deeper level, permeating everything, if you look well enough.

[–]aanarchist 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

serious question, should i avoid the idea of having a family with a woman of spanish descent because she's not white? a lot of trp points towards the necessity of preserving white heritage. for me it's like good fucking luck finding a white woman who isn't a degenerate in this society. it's the same with other nations, russian women have been polluted by feminism, the uk, sweden. i figure if i find a "unicorn" it shouldn't matter what nationality she is, as long as she has her head on straight and i can pass on my legacy uncorrupted by all this bullshit.

[–]dudet23 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

TRP doesn't point to that. It is a separate discussion being held in a thread every once in a while on TRP.

The thing all these hedonists on TRP get wrong is that kids are actually worth it if you put yourself in the right frame of mind and think of them as extensions of yourself. Children can be VERY fulfilling.

Maybe you are right. But in reality there are plenty of good white women. I mean its not as though hispanic women are less whorish than white women. I do not believe this.

[–]Azzmo 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you find a good person you should enjoy your life and take the opportunity to be with that person.

[–]Red_SL4 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

That EXACTLY what I was talking about with my red pill grand mother yesterday. I went from wanting to be childfree (incel hamstering) to wanting at least 3 kids (though later in life, with a young woman). There's a demographic war in the West. We need soldiers.

[–]mgtowmirror 0ポイント1ポイント  (5子コメント)

You've skipped over sociology 101:

Developed countries have high birth rates AND high death rates.

As countries become more developed, first death rates begin to decrease, and birth rates decrease accordingly-especially with larger access to birth control.

AWALT. Given the opportunity, African women would be just as hypergamous as European western women.

[–]ObserverBG[S] 3ポイント4ポイント  (4子コメント)

Well, sir, this is not entirely correct, as birth rates also appear to correlate with religiosity. For example you can have rich areas/countries, such as Utah state, USA, (Mormons), Israel, or Qatar, that have quite high birth rate.

I also believe that there are differences in the possiblity for feminism emergence in different groups, for example my view is that feminism is unlikely to emerge in non-white groups.

[–]xx69bootyhunter69xx 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

feminism is unlikely to emerge in non-white groups.

You're forgetting Japan and India. I don't know how old your views are, but a combination feminism and MGTOW has already started causing negative birth rates in Japan, and it's only a matter of time before the same happens in India.

[–]ObserverBG[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think it will be harder to happen there, because feminism is also caused by weak men who allow it to happen. My view is that the world wars broke white men, and made them start apologizing for everything, including for being sexist, racist, etc. This created a void in the West, that was filled by women.

The other thing that i will mention is that East Asian/South Asian women are physically weaker and smaller than white women, so this feeling of weakness will cause less feminism among them compared to white women, plus those weaker women will not be able to compete in the police and the army the way white women do.

[–]mgtowmirror 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

I thank you for giving me the opportunity to go straight back to my Behavioral Sciences book. Quote:

Demographic Transition

"Demographic transition is a specific example of demographic shift referring to changes in birth and death rates in a country as it develops from a preindustrial to industrial economic system. This transition has been seen in the US since the Industrial Revolution. Demographic transition can be divides into four stages:

Stage 1: preindustrial society; birth and death rates are both high

Stage 2: improvements in healthcare, nutrition, sanitation, and wages cause death rates to drop

Stage 3: improvements in contraception, women’s rights, and a shift from an agricultural to an industrial economy cause birth rates (births per 1000 individuals per year) to drop. Further, with an industrializing society, children must go to school for many years to be supported by parents for a longer period of time than was formerly the case; families thus have fewer children

Stage 4: an industrialized society; birth and death rates are both low”

I took a break from watching: Afghanistan - The Great Game (on Netflix) to type all this. After WWI, one Afghan king wanted to modernize. Guess which colonial power did not want Afghanistan to modernize - if you guessed Britain, you'd be correct.

It's not just stupidity, religious extremism, and laziness that is holding many African/Middle Eastern countries back. Jews, Christians, and Muslims used to live in relative peace in Palestine before WWI.

This will be my last response, as I'm not sure if you're just a troll at this point, or just one of those guys who can't admit when you've overlooked quite a lot of contradictory evidence.

[–]ObserverBG[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Don't worry, i'm not a troll. I do not know who wrote the Behavioral Sciences book, but he is wrong, and i will be happy to debate him, because:

Even if you have an industrialized society, you can still have high birth rates, because:

In rich developed countries/areas, such as Utah state (USA), Qatar, or Israel, you still have high birth rates, as long as their population is religious. In Europe and the US for example, the muslim minority is one of the groups with the highest birth rate.

My argument is this: it is not only development that afftects birth rates, but also religiosity. For example you will notice that the white women with the highest birth rates are those from countries that banned abortion on religious grounds, such as Ireland and Argentine.

Have a look how religiosity affects the birth rates of Israeli women:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-EyUgSBP6eNA/UiD8FrTX4SI/AAAAAAAAAyA/EIv7zc9SxBU/s1600/Screen+Shot+2013-08-30+at+1.07.09+PM.png

[–]Goontang420 -4ポイント-3ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is fucking retarded people like you give TRP a bad name

[–]ah_24 -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is true. TRP is finally waking me up. I was always wondering why I see my women with those white boys instead of responsible, traditional men in my culture. Now I see why. No loyalty.

[–]disposable_pants 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

TRP is about:

Discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men.

Wide-ranging conversations about race and demographics are off-topic. This thread is off-topic. What's so hard about sticking to sexual strategy here? There are plenty of other subs for this content.

[–]unicornh_1 -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

thats like wikipedia article..

[–]WillyWonka321 -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Your assumption that immigrants are "dumb" amuses me.

[–]peruvianlurker -3ポイント-2ポイント  (4子コメント)

I'm fucked? What to do, can you have a positive outlook in life? I lost my job, I live in one of the shittiest places in a thirdworld country, culture is toxic as fuck, I have education, no money and less than a year without having to worry about rent, what are the safest places to move? Is going off the grid posible?

[–]LordThunderbolt 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

Move to the US and don't look back.

[–]peruvianlurker 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

U sure? I thought if Hillary wins, US is doomed as the next europe, and if Trump wins, who the fuck knows whats going to happend.

[–]LordThunderbolt 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

It would still be better than where you are now.

[–]HungLikeA_Moose -4ポイント-3ポイント  (0子コメント)

The replacement rate is 2.1, and in the event of race mixing, you will need more than 2.1 in order to simply sustain the white population at one level.

That's where I stopped reading. Wtf is wrong with you?