全 21 件のコメント

[–]LoveLord1000 9ポイント10ポイント  (1子コメント)

The DAO "attacker" wasn't an attacker. The coins are his according to the contract and he can do what he wants with them. Stop begging.

[–]keepdoing2[S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

I actually agree with you. The problem is one of "Reality". The "DAO Genius"- which is my pet name personally - has an assett, but can't easily move it in a way that unlocks its stored potential value. I thought this might be a win-win-win scenario. I actually like it and think I will continue to promote it.

[–]Interesting3 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

You stink of fear of losing your bag, thats not the way to negotiate.

But ye, i always knew that ETC nutters are cucks who crave the hackers dick.

[–]keepdoing2[S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

LOL. OK. That was coherent :) Obviously I'm not the only "crazy" at the party :)

[–]linksss 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

haha that would be hilarious.

This is similar to what I think may happen in that he should at least get to keep what is rightfully his...

[–]keepdoing2[S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes. Would be interesting indeed :)

[–]lethos3 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Does he really have full access to the funds? I keep reading there could be counter-attacks indefinitely thus locking the DAO funds forever and making ETC 12m coins short, is that true? Also if he has full control of the coins ETC simply has no leverage, dumping all now would be the best one could hope.

[–]danielmcclure 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

They likely already have the ETC coins, the Dark DAO address appears to be empty on the ETC chain whilst the White Hat DAO still has their coins from before. The stalemate mainly exists if both sides are paying attention as there was no Soft Fork and as the focus appears to have remained with the winning chain I wouldn't be surprised if no action is being taken to prevent the hacked DAO tokens from hitting the ETC market.

[–]keepdoing2[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

i think he/she/they have them. Most likely no one on ETH chain even cares anymore. I think they would love to see them dumped on ETC Chain.

[–]i3nikolai 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

Donation to a "foundation" is fucking idiotic. He should pay it to miners or delete it if he really wants to be a troll

[–]Nichoros_Strategy 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

But eth classic strictly stands for decentralization, so every man for himself.

[–]keepdoing2[S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (2子コメント)

Wow. With an intelligence like yours, I'd have to guess you were on Stephen Tual's advisory committee? Yes?

And to think that I sometimes lose hope in the human race. Go figure. CLARITY EDIT: This is directed to i3nikolai

[–]i3nikolai -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

I have a long history of publicly disowning/disavowing/warning-about schlock and mister tual, read my reddit post history

[–]keepdoing2[S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

What does that have to do with your previous post. I am simply judging you by the stupidity I see before me.

[–]eeksskee 0ポイント1ポイント  (5子コメント)

Or the hacker, if she is risk averse, can liquidate her ETC now for millions and not have to take the substantial existential risk that ETC faces from lower hashing, lower network effects, market manipulation by BTC traders, and low dev support. ETC might succeed but it has all the risks of ETH with 5% of the critical mass and other unique disadvantages. Those are tough odds.

Would you cash in $2mm and be done with it or take on all of the risk above?

Would any developer want to be funded by those kind of funds and be complicit? It's all fascinating but it seems very risky for everyone involved.

[–]keepdoing2[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

I don't see any complicity in accepting legally acquired funds (taken from idiots that wrote weak code and weak Terms, and that blatantly risked customer monies and jeopardized an entire cryptocurrency community out of arrogance and haste) to develop a technology. I'm down with it. I'm guessing we can find some developers that think this money spends just as well as any other money :)

OH, and my guess is that if the "Attacker" actually issued a verifiable acceptance of this plan - then issues like "low critical mass"(?) and "other unique disadvantages"(??) will disappear pretty quickly.

ADDITIONAL EDIT/ADD: Another group of IDIOTS that one can hardly feel sorry for is the idiots that invested in the DAO nonsense in the first place.

[–]eeksskee 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

Then you have different ethics than I do. We can agree to disagree.

We'll see what kind of econ the hacker is: is she risk averse or risk seeking?

Or maybe we've already seen but don't know it?

[–]keepdoing2[S] -2ポイント-1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Yes, you have the ethics of a whiny hands out bail me out because I am an idiot that put myself and/or others at risk and am crying for help. I am more of a realist. DAO ATTACKER did everyone a favor and you are just too dumb to be aware of it.

[–]eeksskee 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

You're a lawyer and you treat people like that? I don't treat people I disagree with Iike dog shit. That's also not part of my ethics. It's also both unproductive and unprofitable.

Good luck.

[–]keepdoing2[S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Seriously? Have you ever met any lawyers? Have you ever met a single lawyer that wasn't arrogant and treated people like dogshit?

[–]keepdoing2[S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

People wishing to stand up as Committed Ethereum Classic Developers should make comments here. All Community comments, thoughts or ideas on implementation welcome.