(cache) HoundDogsが“Vote your conscience:” Ted Cruz fails to endorse Donald Trumpについて記入したコメント


Be civil	Treat others with basic decency. No personal attacks, hate-speech, flaming, baiting, trolling, witch-hunting, or unsubstantiated accusations. Threats of violence will result in a ban. More Info.
Do not post users' personal information.	Users who violate this rule will be banned on sight. Witch-hunting and giving out private personal details of other people can result in unexpected and potentially serious consequences for the individual targeted. More Info.
Vote based on quality, not opinion.	Political discussion requires varied opinions. Well written and interesting content can be worthwhile, even if you disagree with it. Downvote only if you think a comment/post does not contribute to the thread it is posted in or if it is off-topic in /r/politics. More Info.
Do not manipulate comments and posts via group voting.	Manipulating comments and posts via group voting is against reddit TOS. More Info.


Articles must deal explicitly with US politics.	See our on-topic statement here.
Articles must be published within the last 31 days.	More Info.
Post titles must be exact headline or exact quote.	Your headline must be comprised only of the copied and pasted headline of the article, a continuous quote taken from the article, or both the headline and a continuous quote taken from the article. If using a quote, it should reflect the article as a whole. More Info.
Submissions must be an original source.	An article must contain significant analysis and original content--not just a few links of text among chunks of copy and pasted material. Content is considered rehosted when a publication takes the majority of their content from another website and reposts it in order to get the traffic and collect ad revenue. More Info.
Spam is bad!	If 33% or more of your submissions are from a single website, you will be banned as a spammer. More Info.
Submissions must be articles, videos or sound clips.	We disallow solicitation of users (petitions, polls, requests for money, etc.), personal blogs, satire, images, social media content (Facebook, twitter, tumblr, LinkedIn, etc.), wikis, memes, and political advertisements. More info: Content type rules.
Do not use "BREAKING" or ALL CAPS in titles.	The ALL CAPS and 'Breaking' rule is applied even when the actual title of the article is in all caps or contains the word 'Breaking'. This rule may be applied to other single word declarative and/or sensational expressions, such as 'EXCLUSIVE:' or 'HOT:'. More Info.

5925

5926

5927

“Vote your conscience:” Ted Cruz fails to endorse Donald Trump (cknw.com)

IDUnavailable が 13時間前投稿

トップ新着論争中古い順 Q&A

あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]HoundDogs -12ポイント-11ポイント-10ポイント 12時間前 (28子コメント)

[–]Mongfight 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 12時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]seifer93 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]purelyforpolitics 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント 12時間前 (11子コメント)

[+]HoundDogs スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8ポイント-7ポイント-6ポイント 12時間前 (10子コメント)

[–]purelyforpolitics 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 12時間前 (7子コメント)

[–]theALIENwoman 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 10時間前 (0子コメント)

[+]HoundDogs スコアが基準値未満のコメント-9ポイント-8ポイント-7ポイント 12時間前 (5子コメント)

[–]purelyforpolitics -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 11時間前 (4子コメント)

[–]HoundDogs 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 11時間前 (3子コメント)

[–]purelyforpolitics 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 11時間前* (1子コメント)

[–]TA332214 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 11時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]zellyman 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 11時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]Anony82 [スコア非表示] 7時間前 (1子コメント)

[–]HoundDogs [スコア非表示] 4時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]ThatFlyingScotsman 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 10時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]BigBrownDownTown 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 10時間前 (3子コメント)

[–]HoundDogs [スコア非表示] 4時間前 (2子コメント)

[–]BigBrownDownTown [スコア非表示] 2時間前 (1子コメント)

[–]HoundDogs [スコア非表示] 2時間前* (0子コメント)

Except she's not a criminal at all

No, she definitely is. The FBI director was quite clear. She just got away with it because of who she is and whatever her husband said to the Attorney General on that plane.

Trump's career is built on swindling people.

Nonsense liberal propaganda. Over 400 companies and projects carry the Trump name. The amount of them that are actually controversial is less than 1%. Most are simply businesses that operate and profit daily without much trouble.

Vote for the con man vs the person with the actual experience needed to run a country because she's bad at e-mail. Totally rational.

The e-mail system is not the only damning thing about Hillary. She's completely bought and paid for by special interests. Our country has been absolutely broken by people just like her. Electing someone that's EXACTLY the same as her predecessors and expecting a different result is the definition of insanity.

Even if you want to play the lesser of two evils, a rational mind still wouldn't pick her.

[–]CSKorndawg [スコア非表示] 3時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]ObeseMoreece [スコア非表示] 3時間前 (1子コメント)

[–]HoundDogs [スコア非表示] 2時間前* (0子コメント)

[–]Aidtor -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 10時間前 (3子コメント)

[–]HoundDogs [スコア非表示] 4時間前 (2子コメント)

[–]Naimzorz [スコア非表示] 3時間前 (1子コメント)

[–]j_la 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 10時間前 (0子コメント)

π Rendered by PID 24887 on app-201 at 2016-07-21 15:25:55.870596+00:00 running 098c547 country code: JP.

politics

Welcome to /r/Politics! Please read the wiki before participating.

Our full rules Reddiquette

Comment Guidelines:

Submission Guidelines:

Other Resources:

Full list of Related Subreddits

Chat with us on OrangeChat/IRC

Follow us on Twitter

Events Calendar

Apply to be a mod

Register To Vote

調停者