1255
1256

PhotoSchool's Changed (i.imgur.com)

DanielJrD が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]GutchSeeker 7ポイント8ポイント  (5子コメント)

Because that's the appropriate thing. If Beyonce was walking across a stage and stepped on someone's hand - would she not get sued?

Hoodie person is acting appropriately while she is acting like an idiot.

[–]kindreddovahkiin -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

If she walked on someone's hand, would it be appropriate for that person to intentionally grab her leg and drag her to the ground? Beyonce should be more careful and would definitely be responsible for hurting that person, but the person who lashed out at her as a result would not be in the right either. That's all I'm arguing here. I don't agree with what she was doing on the desk but I don't think it's appropriate to respond by potentially giving her a back injury.

[–]googltk -2ポイント-1ポイント  (3子コメント)

She wouldn't get sued? Or at least she shouldn't? Not that I don't agree with you, I support hoodie, but if someone has their hand resting in the area where they KNOW someone will be walking at some point, then they're kinda asking to get hurt.

I don't wanna combat you or anything, I was just confused by your wording I guess lol

Edit: she'd probably get sued in America lol, but that doesn't mean she should. She reasonably would expect to walk on her walkway without interference, at least in my personal opinion

[–]GutchSeeker 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Beyonce would get sued - accident or not. It would get settled out of court. It won't hit Reddit.

Hoodie wasn't putting his hand anywhere he wanted it to get stepped on. The idiot behind him was the one who upped the ante.

I was just comparing the claim that it was "not intentional."

Beyonce stepping on someone could be a complete accident and Beyonce would be sued. This was purely a situation where dancing queen didn't GAF and got schooled.

[–]GutchSeeker 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Because I submitted my comment before my brain stopped thinking I'm going to add...

she'd probably get sued in America lol, but that doesn't mean she should.

I completely agree.

I've heard a lot about "if you sue and you lose you pay for the other sides's attorney" rules in a lot of countries. I think that could help the US tremendously.

We actually have (If you're from the EU and don't have commercials for prescription drugs... we have those commercials here... so shocker #1) commercials for "if you think you lived in a house that might have lead based paint - that is paint made before 1980 - anywhere in the house - you might be eligible for a cash setllement. Call this attorney and find out more!" There is a certain amount of common sense that is lacking in the US system about who can sue who for what.

If this had happened when I was in high school? The chick deserved it. Lesson learned. Move on.

[–]googltk 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm from the US and had no idea if you lost, that you don't pay for the defendants attorney. That's hella fucked up, bringing someone into expensive legal matter and not having to accept complete responsibility of negatives, assuming you lost, like you would the positives if you won. No wonder we're so sue happy, that and all the idiots that want a quick payday for their own fuck ups. Smh.

Thanks for expanding your thoughts, much more clear lol.