全 17 件のコメント

[–]PM_ME_YOUR_TAXRETURN 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Have you actually seen these things happen or are you reading these in the news? You do realize that the media tends to only report on things that will get them attention and clicks, which is usually rage-inducing, not always factual, or uncommon occurrences?

I feel like if you glean all your information from the internet, you're going to gain a pessimistic outlook on life in general, which affects your opinions on others.

[–]not_much_left 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I've seen cases of whores being beaten by sandniggers and when a white guy beat the sandnigger, the girl(white) who was being attacked went to the cops and said that "the arab struck me cause he was mad, but the white attacked him because he's a RACIST"

Did you...uh...did you see this, or did you read a tabloid article about this?

This post sort of feels like someone got really drunk and really angry and tried their best to make a moving speech on why this stuff was bad but ultimately just started randomly ranting about things. Not to say these problems don't exist but I felt like I was reading some old person with dementia's diary on why they really don't like "the blacks".

And de-education is roughly the active effort on part of the national education system and all the media to keep people as dumb as possible so they'll never question what I just told you.

Just want to point this part out because it's a good example of something that's sometimes called the unwitting co-conspiratorial argument because it implicates everyone else in the conspiracy (that they did not know they were a part of) and has the debater on the "right side" because they are not implicated in the conspiracy they're talking about, despite not giving any concrete evidence to their point or giving any concrete evidence that there is a conspiracy. E.g., "You guys wouldn't understand that cheese is made with small amounts of poison because the school system tells you that milk isn't poison for your whole life so you just believe it." The argument is damning because (a) it gives the debater power (albeit imaginary power) over those listening because those listening have been tainted thus making any argument they make unusable, and (b) it signals a point when anyone talking to this person should just stop talking to this person because they will not learn, change their mind, or debate properly for the remainder of the debate / their lives.

[–]LooksDoMatter 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Or maybe you're just ugly and/or autistic.

[–]XXYukieXX 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Move to the east then, bitch.

Worry about getting your dick wet before spouting that racist shit online.

[–]Lebrart -3ポイント-2ポイント  (0子コメント)

There is no white shsming