DOW JONES, A NEWS CORP COMPANY
Sections
Aim higher, reach further.
Get the Wall Street Journal $12 for 12 weeks. Subscribe Now

Many Voters Think They’ve Seen Trump Ads On TV — But He Hasn’t Run Any

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, shown in a July 6 file photo. ENLARGE
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, shown in a July 6 file photo. Photo: Associated Press

Nearly half of voters in a recent survey said they had seen TV ads supporting Donald Trump in the last week.

There’s just one problem: His campaign hasn’t aired any, and his friendly super PACs have run very few.

Meanwhile, 52% of respondents said they had seen an ad promoting Democrat Hillary Clinton—just six percentage points more than the proportion who said they had spotted Trump ads. Mrs. Clinton has aired more than 20,000 TV ad spots since June 8, on top of more than 11,000 aired by her friendly super PAC, according to the Center for Public Integrity, which analyzed Kantar Media/CMAG ad data.

 

The survey, conducted by the digital marketing firm Fluent, illustrates the challenge that Mr. Trump has long posed for his rivals: He may not be running ads, but he is always on TV.

“I have a little TV in my office. If I put it on right now, I have a 75% chance of seeing him,” said Jordan Cohen, the chief marketing officer at Fluent. He attributed survey respondents’ belief that they had watched a Trump ad to Mr. Trump’s ubiquity on TV and social media.

Indeed, Mr. Trump has mastered the art of getting on TV without paying for it. His rallies are frequently carried live by cable networks. He often calls into the networks for interviews. And networks regularly splash his most controversial tweets across the screen for pundits to dissect.

The media-coverage tracker mediaQuant estimated that Mr. Trump has received more than $3.8 billion in such unpaid media exposure in the last year, compared to $1.7 billion for Mrs. Clinton.

To be sure, while Mr. Trump’s campaign hasn’t run any ads in recent weeks, some super PACs have aired spots on his behalf. But those buys have been relatively small—certainly not enough to be seen by 46% of poll respondents. Great America PAC, the most active pro-Trump group so far, has not aired any ads on broadcast or national cable TV, but has run ads on satellite and local cable TV.

It remains to be seen whether Mr. Trump can get away with airing so few ads compared with Mrs. Clinton. Through the primaries, Mr. Trump spent $20 million on ads through May—compared with $62 million for Mrs. Clinton.

While Mr. Trump’s fundraising had lagged in recent months, he said last week that he had raised $20 million for his campaign, on top of about $32 million for two joint funds with the Republican National Committee—a fraction of which will be transferred to his campaign. That was a substantial increase from May, when he raised just $3.1 million. That burst of fundraising could translate to more TV ads in the coming weeks.

The Fluent poll surveyed 1,248 registered voters online on June 2, and has a margin of error of plus-or-minus 2.8 percentage points.

MORE:

Obama Calls for Unity in Visit to Dallas

Bernie Sanders Endorses Ex-Rival Hillary Clinton, Ending Democratic Primary Campaign

Clinton Campaign Vets James Stavridis for VP Slot

8 comments
Donald DeWitt
Donald DeWitt user

Free publicity is worth what the candidates pay for it.


It does not build a governing coalition - or build popular support for ideas/programs to enact in the future.


It is all empty noise, signifying nothing.

Bob Acker
Bob Acker subscriber

Well, many Trump voters, in fact most Trump voters, are irremediably stupid.


Alan Kuska
Alan Kuska subscriber

As opposed to Clinton voters? Her close confidant Rahm Emanuel has a 10% approval rating here in progressive Chicago.

Alan Kuska
Alan Kuska subscriber

Whether he wins or loses Trump will make history as the first candidate who ran a 21st century campaign. TV ads are a waste of money in the era of Netflix, DVRs, Twitter and Facebook.

Donald DeWitt
Donald DeWitt user

@Alan Kuska  It's one thing to bombard the media with endless "viral statements" - it's another entirely to control a message well enough to lead a nation.


Contrast the emptiness of a "30 second pitch" to the timeless Gettysburg Address.


Sales pitches don't match statecraft - ever.

Alan Kuska
Alan Kuska subscriber

As if Hillary is a statesman?

Trump proved that the worst critics of Citizens United are wrong. (S)He with the most money doesn't necessarily win in politics. Trump spent less than most of his rivals and won the nomination. Hillary wants to spend up to $2 billion to fight the influence of money in politics but may well be caught off guard by someone spending 1/10 that.

Alan Kuska
Alan Kuska subscriber

Trump is a master persuader. Hillary hasn't shown she can actually negotiate a deal. Bill did a lot better after he shoved her to the sidelines.

Donald DeWitt
Donald DeWitt user

@Alan Kuska  Compared to Trump your average pit-mix dog is a master diplomat


He has burned enough bridges in business and lost billions for those who invested in him - not a record for national leadership


His catchphrase is "You are fired" (and now "Mexican rapists") - not "Ask what you can do for your country"

Show More Archives
Advertisement

Popular on WSJ

Recommended

House GOP Super PAC Raises $4.6 Million in Second Quarter