あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]ChangeThroughTruth 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

Hello, the Flat Earth model does not work (Southern star trails, required size of Southern 'hemisphere', etc). However Flat Earth theory does point out problems with the official cosmology (you can see too far over water, way too far). This is why the Flat Earth operation has had some success. People make the logic fail of seeing problems with one model as proof for the other. Both models do not work and the trick is framing it as a choice between the two of them.

GPS - http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-29758872 In WW2 they had a system that had these capabilities, before satellites were claimed to be launched(http://support.radioshack.com/support_tutorials/gps/gps_tmline.htm). In this article they suggest it as a backup should GPS system go down. So satellites appear to not be required in order to provide GPS service, it could all be ground based. Have you ever seen an image of a satellite in space? All the ones I see look like CGI.

every astronaut and scientist that has been into space

Did you know that this number is somewhere in the neighborhood of 300? NASA is part of the US military which makes extensive use of compartmentalization, many people just staring at screens. Contrast this with the Manhattan project which managed secrecy for years with hundreds of thousands of people involved.

[–]LupinePeregrinans 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

We.. We can see too far over water?

[–]ChangeThroughTruth [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

We can. For a sphere of circumference ~25,000 miles a decent approximation for the drop below a parallel at the observer is 8 inches * (distance in miles)2. Assuming light travels in straight lines through the atmosphere, we should not be able to see all that far. Here is an example: https://np.reddit.com/r/toronto/comments/3e9nly/photo_i_took_today_of_the_toronto_skyline_from/ctcvjzc

It gets interesting when you remove the assumption about light traveling straight through the atmosphere. Our brain assumes straight light when we interpret photons at our eyes, we don't get information about their path to reach us. But if you perform an experiment to determine how light bends as it travels, then reinterpret the image you see in that context, you get led in a different direction.

[–]AutoModerator[M] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by prefacing your reddit link with np.reddit.com.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.