13
14

culture & societyMilo Yiannopoulos on the Bolt Report (youtube.com)

Pragmatic_Shill が 投稿

全 75 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]Leadback 29ポイント30ポイント  (4子コメント)

High energy!

edit: low-energy cuck mods removed this

[–]Bea_OProblem 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

Possibly the most nimble navigator to grace our screens.

[–]iron_pi 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

MAGA

EDIT: wrong sub

[–]TempAlt0 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Every sub is the right sub.

[–]TonyBonanza 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Bolt was absolutely beaming with that amount of energy being shot at him!

[–]GrizzlyGoober 6ポイント7ポイント  (3子コメント)

On the last point, do you guys think he would get visa denied like certain others? I'd say there would be quite a few people flocking to change.org.

[–]Pragmatic_Shill[S] 16ポイント17ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't think he would be denied a visa. Or should be. I'm not conservative, but I still would go and see a speech of his at my university because in spite of his showmanship, he raises some interesting points.

As someone who identifies as being on the left (or perhaps centre-left) I think it's really important for people to be able to criticise and see the flaws in their own point-of-view. Yiannopoulos, while he does say a lot of inflammatory things, does a good job of pointing out the left's obsession with identity politics.

[–]_____D34DP00L_____ 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't care what someone says, but no one should be denied a visa because of their opinions alone. HOWEVER the only exception being if someone is inciting violence or intentionally spreading false medical advice (which like violence harms people).

[–]LordWalderFrey1 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

While Milo Yiannopoulos is an insufferable cunt, he shouldn't get his visa denied.

[–]nlakes 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

I disagree with Milo on nearly all his points, however he does offer some value. He forces some of our members on the left to take off their bubble-wrap and listen to something different, for a change. He also confronts our nasty tendency to demand a monopoly on conversations in certain settings (i.e. Universities).

[–]seocurious13 12ポイント13ポイント  (8子コメント)

I don't understand the source of this grand conspiracy of 'the left' to domesticate 'gays'? Do they meet on a monthly basis?

He is welcome to his views and he may or may not have some valid points of view in some areas (I'd want to read more abou him tbh) but this interview has him coming across as seeing everything as a boogeyman of the left.

He refers to himself as a bit of a libertarian, by that reasoning then isn't it up to each individual to decide freely to be a gay inventor OR a married gay man with a mortgage and car?

[–]Pragmatic_Shill[S] 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

I think from the interview he said he's come around to the idea of same-sex marriage in principle, just in his view gay people shouldn't get married.

[–]seocurious13 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Yeah, but he seems to say that whilst has come around to this idea - he doesn't necessarily like it because it's putting gays into boxes that 'the left' is trying to chose for 'them'.

Depending on the point he is making, gays are both a collective or atomistic individuals.

I get where he is coming from in terms of some people just assuming that becuase you are gay then you are 'of the left', but I don't really like the way he presents everything so adversarially. Left vs. right locked in some kind of cosmic struggle to collect as many 'groups' as they can to win the 'war' just seems dumb.

[–]ikrw77 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I dont think anyone goes on the Bolt Report for a genteel discussion of policy nuance :3

[–]Bea_OProblem 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

A lot of left-leaning people describe every right-leaning political candidate as "homophobic", even when most of these candidates have never exhibited any such behaviour. As such, it often appears that these lefties are pressuring gays to vote for them by stoking unrealistic fears that the right wingers all hate gays.

[–]TempAlt0 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't understand the source of this grand conspiracy of 'the left' to domesticate 'gays'? Do they meet on a monthly basis?

It's not a conspiracy, just a shared mindset among a few hundred million people.

He refers to himself as a bit of a libertarian, by that reasoning then isn't it up to each individual to decide freely to be a gay inventor OR a married gay man with a mortgage and car?

Yes, which is why he's saying he doesn't want to prevent that with laws, just discourage it with words.

[–]MasterEarsling -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

Oh yeah, we call our meetings the Gay Agenda. We're basically the Young Liberals of the Illuminati. Think about it - we've been nastily called bundles of sticks, but the name fascist comes from the Italian word for a bundle of sticks (notice his nice Italian suit?). We made those guys. Same reason why we made Bob Brown take out the loggers in Tasmania.

It's really easy to come up with a conspiracy theory. And when your little lines of correlation agree with your political views? You might even get yourself a following.

[–]Red_of_Head -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

The sinister gay cabal, Australia, you have fallen victim to the sinister gay cabal.

[–]blue_yellow_manfruit shown are illustrative of flavour only -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't understand the source of this grand conspiracy of 'the left' to domesticate 'gays'? Do they meet on a monthly basis?

Second Tuesday of every month. Our grand plan: 1) domesticate gays 2) allow them to marry 3) marry ALL the domesticated things

[–]Gibmyster 13ポイント14ポイント  (4子コメント)

Milo is an absolute shit-stirrer. His occasional good points are completely marred by the rest of his inconsistent diatribes that he can't even justify when pushed (see Joe Rogan podcast).

I genuinely believe he just likes shitting people off, and that's really his only goal out of his media career. Hell he's often funny, but he cant be taken seriously.

[–]Pragmatic_Shill[S] 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

It's why there was a big public spat between him and Ben Shapiro. Shapiro, rightly or wrongly, thinks Milo is only in it for the attention and for the online shrines set up in his name. He also dislikes Milo's (and other alt-right commentators) penchant for dismissing a lot of arguments by shouting 'cuck.'

To Milo's credit, he's never shied away from his label as 'provocateur' or 'professional troll.'

[–]LordWalderFrey1 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Shapiro is your classical conservative, whereas Milo is a mouthpiece for the alt-right. Shapiro believes what he says, whereas Milo is an attention seeking provocateur. Both are young rightists fighting for a similar base, so it's easy to see why they don't like each other, plus Shapiro took issue to Milo calling Trump "daddy" and calling people "cucks". Admittedly Shapiro is right there.

[–]RedHourMagic 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

He is first and foremost a fame whore.

[–]MexicanSpaceProgram 6ポイント7ポイント  (18子コメント)

He has a good point or two, especially when he's talking about being a gay conservative Catholic, which the left doesn't like very much because he doesn't fit their notions of what gays are supposed to be or act like in their minds. Also, the social expulsion thing is very much true.

[–]megablast 7ポイント8ポイント  (17子コメント)

Um what? The left doesn't hate him because he is a gay conservative Catholic.

They hate him because he is a conservative, pushing a conservative agenda.

Setting up a bogey man of "the left" might make it fun and easy, but it just comes of as silly and childish.

[–]MexicanSpaceProgram 0ポイント1ポイント  (16子コメント)

Tell that to the hippy-dippies that crap on about conservatives and you get the same result.

[–]megablast 6ポイント7ポイント  (15子コメント)

hippy-dippies

WTF are you talking about? You are doing the same thing. Are you so afraid of the hippy-dippies?

[–]whoregoblin 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

Smart fellow if you're able to get passed the joking vitriolic nature of his.

[–]Gummikoalabarchen -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

Vitriolic joke if you're able to get passed the smart fellow nature of his

Fixed it

[–]MasterEarsling 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Even though you're getting downvoted to hell, I enjoyed your word farce.

[–]thinkingdoing 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

Two narcissistic, reactionary queens bitching about "the left". So edgy.

[–]Pragmatic_Shill[S] 15ポイント16ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't think it's edgy to criticise the left. You know what you're getting with The Bolt Report, just like you know what you're getting if you read the Guardian of watch Waleed Aly. Personally, I think Milo appearing on The Bolt Report creates the mirror image of the echo chamber that a lot of /r/Australia threads devolve into.

[–][削除されました]  (1子コメント)

[removed]

    [–]AutoModerator[M] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Your comment was automatically removed because you linked to reddit without using the "no-participation" np. domain. Reddit links should be of the form "np.reddit.com".

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

    [–]iokError: Failed to retrieve flair 304 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    That was a disappointment. For all the hype there was a lot of tired strawman generalisations and bogeyman fears

    Hasn't the role of outspoken Catholic Conservative gay that annoys the sensitive left wit mere existenace already been played?

    There are better foils to the left then this guy.

    [–]LordWalderFrey1 -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

    So who looks worse? Bolt for having Milo on his show, or Milo for appearing on Bolt's show?

    [–]hear_the_thunder -3ポイント-2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Milo: "Andrew, Look at me, look at me. Andrew, Andrew!, Look at me... I have three words for you: Look at me!".