上位 200 件のコメント全て表示する 385

[–]Balthanos 43ポイント44ポイント  (6子コメント)

I like the suits in the background just observing.

[–]illbeathome 11ポイント12ポイント  (15子コメント)

Can anyone explain why fast and furious is written on the tackle box.

[–]NerosBeard666 14ポイント15ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's the name.of a semi-covert gun running operation.

[–]JTRIG_trainee 20ポイント21ポイント  (0子コメント)

hook line and sinker. funnel guns through mexican cartels back into inner cities --> more violence among armed blacks --> more reason to increase gov't spending on restricting freedom.

[–]phallaciouslycorrect 6ポイント7ポイント  (2子コメント)

Someone already [did.]

(Brace yourselves, this is going to be a wall of text, with a lot of supporting articles and videos. The reason that they thought this was a good idea was because they had an ulterior motive of getting the Assault Weapons Ban (AWB) renewed in the US. Guns going to Mexico was merely the stalking horse used to achieve this. This was a coordinated, in depth, multipronged campaign aimed towards getting that one goal accomplished, with the US press more than willing to help them, both in building the case, and helping minimize the aftermath. Let's go back in time to just after the 2008 Presidential Election - Clinton was named Secretary of State, and Holder was named Attorney General. In February 2009, Holder stated in an interview that the President was seeking to have the AWB renewed . In March, Clinton went to Mexico and made noises about how US weapons flowing into Mexico were fueling violence. In April, President Obama and Mexican President Calderon appeared together and stated outright that the assault weapons ban should be renewed. At the same time, the ATF released "trace data" showing that America was supplying the majority of weapons turned in for tracing to the ATF. The press made a big deal about this, though it later turned out that the numbers were fudged - even FactCheck got involved and there's several articles at the bottom of that showing how much this was in the news. Politifact also evaulated the claim and found it half true The public wasn't having it. Polls showed that fewer Americans supported stricter gun control than ever Congress wasn't particularly interested in sticking their necks out either - they remembered what happened the last time the AWB was passed; the Republicans took control just 7 weeks later. The NRA wasn't going to let this slide and made their displeasure known - every time the administration made a statement about guns, their predictions were proven right. In May, Calderon appeared before a joint session of Congress urging a renewal of the AWB. Things were going on behind the scenes in June: In a statement Thursday, W. Larry Ford, ATF assistant director, said the bureau and Immigration and Customs Enforcement "are working to finalize a memorandum of understanding to maximize our joint effectiveness to combat violent crime along the Southwest border." This went on throughout the summer and into fall withthe press providing articles trying to help the administration build the case. In October, the US announced that it would support a UN treaty to regulate the arms trade, a reversal of previous positions. About this time, Operation Fast and Furious started. The objectives were clear - let as many guns into Mexico as possible and sit back and watch what happened. John Dodson later testified to Congress that for 10 months agents were told to stand down, and just watch straw purchasers buy firearms over and over again. He & his colleagues were directed by supervisors not to make arrests or interdict the weapons - even though they would show up at crime scenes days later. "Allowing loads of weapons that we knew to be destined for criminals [to walk] was the plan. This was the mandate." He testified that prior to this he had never heard of an operation that would "just let the guns walk" and when raising concerns he and his coworkers were told that they simply "did not understand the plan." Summing up, he stated "I can not begin to think of how the risk of letting guns fall into the hands of known criminals could possibly advance any legitimate law enforcement interest." The result was lots and lots of bodies, hundreds in Mexico alone. In hindsight, and viewing the greater picture starting from just after the election, the macabre goals become clear: The more deaths, the more ammunition the administration had to push for additional gun control. Thousands of guns were lost, and nobody gave a shit until Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry got killed in December 2010. Shortly after his shooting, the ATF traced the gun; it turned out that it was from the F&F operation. This sent shockwaves up the chain of command. The administration shit themselves and tried everything possible to mislead, misdirect, and cover up what had happened, and (at the time) largely got away with it. Concerned about how it was handled, a number of ATF agents went on CleanupATF.org and posted about F&F anonymously. This started the ball rolling; as word spread people wanted answers for how he was killed and where the gun came from. Issa started an investigation. Surprisingly, one of the ATF Agents involved in the Fast and Furious was also WTF about the directives he was given and wound up getting crucified by the agency when he blew the whistle to Congress. Here's part I of the F&F report, and it goes into detail about how it was a complete clusterfuck. The administration also stonewalled, slow rolled and delayed documents from the investigation to the point where Holder was held in contempt of congress for failing to turn over subpeonad materials. Internal ATF emails showed agents shopping for anecdotal stories to help build a case for "Demand Letter 3" - multiple long gun reporting, but this as sole justification for the operation falls flat. Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, is investigating Fast and Furious, as well as the alleged use of the case to advance gun regulations. "There's plenty of evidence showing that this administration planned to use the tragedies of Fast and Furious as rationale to further their goals of a long gun reporting requirement. But, we've learned from our investigation that reporting multiple long gun sales would do nothing to stop the flow of firearms to known straw purchasers because many Federal Firearms Dealers are already voluntarily reporting suspicious transactions. It's pretty clear that the problem isn't lack of burdensome reporting requirements." The Terry killing completely sidelined gun control efforts from that point on; the Administration was in CYA mode and hid what had happened so successfully that when Gabby Giffords was shot at a rally the following month (January 2011), gun control groups and the press both wondered why the President wasn't taking steps about gun control. We now know that they were trying to manage the F&F fallout. Everything possible was done to shield the administration from blame and criticism. Holder blamed Bush, trying to link the Wide Receiver Operation (that ended 18 months prior to F&F) to his failed operation. President Obama stated that F&F was a continuation of Wide Receiver during a Univision interview - Politifact rated this as false, but this lie continued to be repeated. In one of the most disgusting excuses for journalism I've seen, Katherine Eban wrote up a hit piece in Fortune that completely absolved the ATF & administration of any wrongdoing, pretending the gun walking wasn't intentional, casting Issa as a villian for investigating, and blatantly attacking the character of the whistleblower. This article was heralded far and wide as proof that nothing untoward had happened - this was debunked in detail but the damage had been done and little attention was paid in the run up to the election. Edit: In a last ditch effort, Obama cited executive privilege and hid 15,000 documents from Issa's investigation. Anyone raising a stink about this was ignored. Once the President was reelected, it no longer mattered, and slid completely off the radar. I don't remember exactly, but IIRC nobody involved lost their job over this. Certainly nobody responsible went to jail. Many of those involved were transferred and then promoted, but ultimately nothing was done.)

[–]hillbilly_joe 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Crooks always play both sides--see WWI, WWII....

[–]TheGhostOfDusty -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's not referencing the trash movies.

[–]thesarl 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

The goal of F&F was to claim US weapons were arming the Mexican cartels and use that as an arguement to infringe on the 2nd amendment.

If you recall, years before the operation became public knowledge, Hillary was already touting this. I'm proud to say I predicted something like F&F was happening. Can't say I'm surprised it turned out to be real...

[–]Nixplosion 31ポイント32ポイント  (10子コメント)

This a post Id see on FB from a bunch of 40-50 somethings with no concept of whats happening in the political landscape

[–]magnora7 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Despite the obvious Republican bias and the kind of lazy choice of things in the tackle box, this comic does have a point in some ways.

[–]hazehk 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

Exactly, it's sad to see Americans not understand that Trump is the one benefiting from terrorism, not Obama or Clinton.

It's as if all the people who had gone through 9/11 and the rest of the false flags didn't learn anything but only used it to further their right wing bias.

If Trump gets anywhere near the presidency I'm losing what little respect I have left for the American people.

[–]ruleten 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

[–]hazehk 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

What the fuck has that got to do with anything? Everyone knows Hillary is just as much of a warmonger as Trump is.

[–]ruleten 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

If Clinton gets anywhere near the presidency I'm losing what little respect I have for the American people.

You condemn Trump for things he has said.

Try condemning Hillary for the things she's actually done.

[–]hazehk 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm not supporting either Trump or Hillary. Hillary's crimes are well known, but for some really weird reason a lot of useful idiots seem to think Trump is an outsider who's got nothing to hide? The guy got bailed out by Wall Street 3 decades ago but yeah, he's an outsider...

It'd be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.

[–]prodota2player 4ポイント5ポイント  (7子コメント)

is this supposed to suggest sandy hook was an inside job

[–]Ghostface_Grillah_ 37ポイント38ポイント  (39子コメント)

You really think Black Lives Matter is just a tool of Obama to pass gun control? Black Lives Matter also opposes the militarization of the police black people are already getting murdered every other week you think BLM wants the cops to have bigger guns? U.N. Involvement? We already run the fucking U.N. it'll never have the potential to damage U.S. sovereignty.

But yeah shut me out I'm a shill. Convenient way to dismiss any information that contradicts your view of the world. Chomsky is having Dinner with the Rockefellers, Sandy Hook was a fraud whatever whatever.

[–]br00tman 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

Theres a term that gets thrown around a lot called "useful idiots." I think it came from a speach or some shit, idk, i try not to look to into the nutjobbery. But that's what people think BLM is in the conspiracy circle, just a pawn.

[–]Znivek 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Pretty sure it was Stalin.

[–]jav253 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Lenin actually I think. And BLM are mostly useful idiots led by a few black leaders who have sold out to the beast IMO.

[–]Nogrim3 5ポイント6ポイント  (3子コメント)

black lives matter didnt start as a tool, but as soon as soros started funding it it became one.

this is a bonfire they have been prepping for quite a while.

[–]magnora7 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is what they always do, they wait for something to naturally develop, then they swoop in and puff it up with a ton of money to give it more momentum. They don't build these things from the ground up, they just expand existing ones that serve their purposes

[–]NuKsGn 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Same way CIA snuggled up to black political movements back in the day.

[–]AkiraDeathStar 1ポイント2ポイント  (4子コメント)

The type of person who likes this comic hasn't the ability to empathize, and is most likely lacking a really recent history lesson. A part of history they probably lived through or at least were raised by even more oblivious people who lived a part of that history. The type of person who is unable to understand their surroundings and why they are that way is doomed to live a life of fear.

[–]jav253 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

The type of person who likes this comic is someone who is fully awake, and can see the big picture. Who realizes that the welfare state, and drugs have destroyed the Black community. And that it is tragic. As it creates this situation where the majority of the arrests Police make are going to be Black Men.

But then we also understand that TPTB are going to use this to their advantage to create controversy. They create the "problem". Then provide the "solution". Which in this case is gun control, and federalization of the Police.

[–]phohunna 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Do you mean empathize?

[–]thesarl 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I like this comic.

I am also very awake. Perhaps it is you who is still sleeping?

[–]Sciencenut1 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I wouldn't say you're a shill. No, the BLM movement is not advocating for any of these things, and is in many cases against them. However, as the movement grows, the chance that some incident (probably a large multiday riot, or something similar), will eventually happen, and that will be the justification for government intervention. Remember, whether or not the Dallas shooter was a member of BLM, or a government plant, or WHATEVER, he and especially the events are being associated with the movement. This gives an excuse to go for gun control, and give 'reason' for police militarization in response (tac vests, bomb robots, etc.).

No, none of those things are the goals of BLM, but they are the consequences.

On the other hand, I'll grant that 'UN involvement' doesn't really belong in this comic.

[–]bbernardini -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

They've been saying every little thing that's happened over the past 8 years is part of Obama's plot to take away our guns. ("Ow, I stubbed my toe! Now Obama's gonna take our guns!") Oh, look...We still have our guns.

[–]thesarl 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

You have to understand they don't want unnecessary bloodshed. People are valuable.

[–]tttggg333 -1ポイント0ポイント  (20子コメント)

black people are getting murderd every other week

A black person is 99x more likely to be killed by another black person than a cop. Why is everyone so concerned about getting killed by a cop when there is a bigger, more dangerous and likely threat to their life? It's like if I smoked two packs a day and worried more about getting struck by lightning than getting lung cancer

[–]AkiraDeathStar 8ポイント9ポイント  (1子コメント)

Cops are supposed to protect us. Not gangsters. Gangsters kill. We expect that. It's also not just about the killings. It's about the injustice. It's about the fact that black people get randomly searched and pulled over at far greater rates. Jury's judge black kids differently than they do white kids, and judges give black kids harsher sentences. Employers are far less likely to set up an interview with a person if the name sounds black. Black schools generally are in poor neighborhoods, and therefore have no support from local government. Shitty education in a town with no jobs leaves people very few options. What would you do to get out of that situation? Move to another town right? Well then you run into the fact that your name is Darnell Hendricks, you try and try and finally get an interview, but you never get a call back. Because your clothes that you thought were perfectly fly, were slightly too ethnic. Your nice church jacket was just two inches longer than the average blazer. You have a deep accent and a different way of speaking. You smell different because you use different products. All of this was slightly intimidating to Bob Mcgillicutty, the manager of Office Depot in the white town 55 miles from your home. Bob wants to be a good manager and maybe one day move up to district manager. He doesn't want to take any risks. He would have to have the bosses see that he hired a guy that only lasted a few days. What does that say about Bob's ability to manage? So Bob stickers your resume near the bottom of the pile and grabs a new resume. One with a bame like Kyle or Tod. This story can go on and on and on.

[–]WizardFingaz 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Even if this was true, the important factor here is that civilians are not sworn to protect and not kill each other. Black people don't have institutional power over each other, so when a cop kills a black person, it is completely different than 'black on black' murder.

[–]ieatthestage 4ポイント5ポイント  (7子コメント)

Not true, gang members kill other gang members which happens in the white people world too but its romanticized as 'gritty crime.' Black people who aren't even remotely involved in that lifestyle are getting killed by racist cops. What you're saying is like why worry about Isis killing Americans when Americans kill Americans?

[–][削除されました]  (6子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]ieatthestage 5ポイント6ポイント  (5子コメント)

    Its from gang violence. You really think black people just go around shooting other black people they see? What planet do YOU live on? Keyword being suspect cops don't get to be judge, jury and executioner. And Castiles gun was legal, the cop killed him because he was scared, because everyone's apparently afraid of black people.

    [–]RobertELee420 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    When I was in high school I saw two black kids get stabbed and one get shot over a pair of shoes. I've only seen it in real life once but I've heard of stuff like that happening a lot.

    [–][削除されました]  (1子コメント)

    [removed]

      [–]SovereignMan[M] 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Rule 10. No personal attacks. Removed. Final warning.

      [–]jav253 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

      People are scared of Black people it's true. As statistically they commit a lot more violent crime per capita. Is it fair? No. But racial profiling by Cops or that little old lady who grips her purse more tightly when a Black man walks by has a basis for it. Believe me this would be even worse if the MSM actually reported the true reality of the situation too.

      It doesn't justify Cops killing innocent Black suspects. But there isn't a lot of evidence to even suggest that is happening often. Many of the martyrs of the BLM movement were criminals who resisted arrest.

      [–]ieatthestage 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Thats not true at all. That's the medias portrayal of black people. The most violent crimes have been committed by white people. Most mass shooters are white. But no one is scared to be in a public place with other white people. Its just pure racism with no basis in anything other than pure racism. https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2014/crime-in-the-u.s.-2014/tables/table-43#disablemobile

      [–]Ghostface_Grillah_ 1ポイント2ポイント  (5子コメント)

      First of all people are concerned about the rate of black on black crime, but the reason Cops murdering blacks gets more attention than black on black murders is because when a black person kills another black person he will go to jail, this does not happen a cop murders a black person.

      Very important difference.

      [–]tttggg333 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

      this does not happen a cop murders a black person.

      BOTH guys were armed and suspects of a crime!!! What the fuck is wrong with people. The guy in the car was the suspect in an armed robbery and the other guy had an illegal gun and BLACK PEOPLE CALLED THE COPS to be there. When he resisted with a gun on him they had to neutralize him.

      Do you honestly think that the cop in that situation was thinking "OH YEA! I get to kill this nigger now!!! Hahah"? He wasn't thinking that. He was thinking "Oh my god. My wife, my kid, my family. I don't want to die." WHY are you psychos rallying around scumbag criminals? What the fuck is wrong with you?

      This BLM shit is being funded by Soros. It's MEANT TO DESTABILIZE THE US. Watch as democrats call for Federalized police. Watch the UN start chiming in. Watch EVERYTHING become racist as our country twirls down the toilet bowl. Black people are being used. BLM are useful idiots.

      [–]Ghostface_Grillah_ 6ポイント7ポイント  (3子コメント)

      You've totally misrepresented the Philando case. Philando Castille was pulled over by a cop for apparently looking like someone reported to be involved with a robbery, Officer Yanez stated because Philando had a "wide set-nose" (A trait shared by the majority of black people) came up to his car which had his girlfriend driving and a four year old child in the back seat. Philandro has no criminal history beyond traffic violations(Ooh what a scary thug!). Castille informs the officer that he is licensed to carry and has a gun, the officer instructed him to get his license and registration then when he reached for it the officer panicked, opened fire on Castille and killed him. Then they stuck assault rifles in the face of Castille's girlfriend, arrested her, threw her in the back of a police car and separated her from her daughter in a jail cell for the next 13 hours, even though she did nothing wrong. If you think this is acceptable procedure for law enforcement you are a fascist.

      You are an apologist for police brutality. And you're insane if you think black people wanting police to be held accountable is some scheme to destabilize the U.S. I think I've wasted my time engaging you at all.

      Edit: I'm not as familiar with the Alton Sterling case so I can't argue that one as in depth. Regardless I don't think it's a good thing when police murder people, that seems to be where we differ.

      [–]JemsMckinley 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

      It's never a waste of time to be the one telling the truth

      [–]tttggg333 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Officer Yanez

      Wait. Is this dude Mexican? Why the fuck are BLM specifically pissed at white cops?

      It's weird that people don't understand that BLM is being funded by people with a lot of money and a globalist agenda. The leaders of BLM do it as a full time job. George Soros did this to Ukraine, the Arab Spring and now it's coming here. Just as Bill Cooper said in 1991. More info here: http://www.infowars.com/black-lives-matter-progressive-financed-vanguard-of-socialist-control/

      [–]victoria_bitters 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

      1. Because how the Police treat blacks in the inner cities is a moral outrage,

      2. We can do something about that outrage,

      3. The motivations of the cops involved are often suspect,

      4. "First they came for the blacks, and I said nothing", etc.

      5. We are all Palestinians.

      [–]tttggg333 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Because how the Police treat blacks in the inner cities is a moral outrage,

      This study, done by a liberal black man, proves that blacks are treated no different than white people by cops.

      We are all Palestinians.

      Oh my god. We have a fucking moron.

      [–]H0ID 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

      BLACKS ARE KILLING BLACKS. NOT COPS. NOT WHITES. BLACKS ARE KILLING BLACKS BY THE FUCKING BOATLOAD. BLM IS A FUCKING JOKE ITS SOROS. ITS 1984. YOU ARE NOT HELPING.

      http://www.reddit.com/r/sandersforpresident/comments/46sfvs/_/d07vnm7

      JESUS CHRIST MY MAN. GET A FUCKING GRIP. PAY YOUR PARENTAL LOAN PLUS OFF BEFORE CHUCKING $500 AT BERNIE FUCKING SANDERS.

      THEY ARE GROWING HUMANS IN COWS AND YOU ARE SINGING KUMBAYA WAKE THE FUCK UP

      [–]AutoModerator[M] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

      While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by prefacing your reddit link with np.reddit.com.

      I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

      [–]armada127 90ポイント91ポイント  (73子コメント)

      /r/The_Donald is leaking

      [–]minneapolisboy 14ポイント15ポイント  (69子コメント)

      Seriously. Who fucking up votes this garbage?

      [–]armada127 8ポイント9ポイント  (1子コメント)

      This sub used to be good, but then right around when all the reddit drama started happening with Ellen Pao, there were tons of posts on here that hit the front page and every other reddit drama event just added more and more users. So now you have a bunch of people subbed and the moderation isn't exactly strict so you get low effort shit posts that make it to the top all the time. It's a pretty big problem with any small sub that had a small following and didn't have to do much moderation and then blows up overnight.

      I'm not even saying its the mods' fault, because it's tough to make a call of strict moderation and allowing a sub to thrive. Too strict of moderation too early can kill a sub, especially if its removal of posts, I mean look at the fiasco over in /r/news after the Orlando shooting, and that's a fairly large sub.

      [–]average_shill 8ポイント9ポイント  (48子コメント)

      Which part specifically is incorrect?

      [–][削除されました]  (16子コメント)

      [deleted]

        [–]minneapolisboy -3ポイント-2ポイント  (14子コメント)

        It's an interesting perspective but I really don't buy that this is all orchestrated. The War on Drugs and systematic racism is why black men are being targeted for arrest far more than white men (who are actually twice as likely to have guns and drugs on them). I don't think this is anything other than the racism of the police and the desire to maintain white supremacy in America. We already have unchecked police militarization, why would starting a race war change anything?

        [–]godlameroso 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Anything they can do to divide the population, divide them, get them to fight amongst themselves and when they're weak after fighting, they become easier to control and oppress because they're not going to go to their enemy for help.

        [–]nduece 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Delusional racist fucknuts, that's who.

        [–]tttggg333 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Triggering a race war to usher in martial law was the subject of Behold a Pale Horse (the conspiracy bible)....

        [–]victoria_bitters 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

        It's nearly comical how they pretend to be all about gay rights, all of a sudden.

        [–]jav253 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Well the Left pretended to be all about gay rights until all of a sudden they decided they preferred Muslim immigrants instead.

        [–]magnora7 15ポイント16ポイント  (1子コメント)

        This would be perfect if George Bush and Dick Cheney and Putin were lounging by Obama, drinking a beer and watching him fish. They're all on the same team, the pro-authority team.

        [–]bomber991 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Cool, no mention of obama care.

        [–]macsenscam 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

        The funny part is that Trump is the one who is really going to put the police-state on steroids when he finds a way to deport 11 million illegals.

        [–]beatyatoit 4ポイント5ポイント  (3子コメント)

        this is the antithesis of a good political cartoon. I can't even figure out what the fuck they're trying to say here.

        [–]jav253 -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

        If you can't figure it out it's a sign your still deeply blue pilled. I'll give you a hint though. Soros funds BLM. Hillary was in trouble an losing ratings fast after the FBI failed to indict her. So all the sudden here is Soros funded BLM rioting to save the day an distract. Meanwhile Obama is on TV saying this is precisely why we need more gun control, and federalization of the Police.

        [–]beatyatoit 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

        lmao. you don't get it. I see what it's trying to say, and I think it's stupid. My point is that as far as political satire goes, it's woefully ineffective. it's trying to say too much and in the end, says nothing of substance.

        [–]thesarl 7ポイント8ポイント  (5子コメント)

        Nominated for Best Garrison award!

        I'm not sure why martial law is a cat fish, but I imagine it has something to do with kung-fu, and I like it.

        [–]magnora7 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

        Because only bottom-feeders would support martial law

        [–]jav253 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        I dunno Garrison's recent EU Brexit cartoon was also pretty good. Even prophetic since it accurately predicted Leave would win.

        [–]dead_all_along 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

        Because people will welcome martial law with open arms before they realize what it is.

        [–]thesarl 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Sounds like a rockin' rollin' good time, a literal blast!

        [–]iShootDope_AmA 13ポイント14ポイント  (40子コメント)

        Ben Garrison? Really?

        [–][削除されました]  (2子コメント)

        [deleted]

          [–]the_illuminati_666 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

          But it isn't true, it's a bunch of bullshit. Just like when everyone was freaking out about Y2K and how Clinton was going to use it to extend his presidency. Just stupid bullshit.

          [–]Gaijinfag[S] -15ポイント-14ポイント  (36子コメント)

          Is that an argument?

          [–]iShootDope_AmA 14ポイント15ポイント  (33子コメント)

          No. It's a criticism.

          [–]Gaijinfag[S] -14ポイント-13ポイント  (32子コメント)

          No it's not.

          He's offered no criticism of Ben Garrison at all.

          [–]iShootDope_AmA 20ポイント21ポイント  (31子コメント)

          That was me. OK Ben Garrison is a racist shit head.

          [–]R3dTim -3ポイント-2ポイント  (10子コメント)

          That was me. OK Ben Garrison is a racist shit head. /sigh

          Just because you dislike or disagree with something someone says doesn't make them racist.

          How many times do we need to cover this for you liberals?

          • Just because someone dislikes homosexuality or gay marriage doesn't make them homophobic.
          • Just because someone dislikes Muslims doesn't make them an Islamaphobe. (What a stupid word.)
          • Just because someone dislikes Obama doesn't mean they're racist.
          • Just because someone criticizes the Black Lives Matter movement doesn't mean they're racist either.
          • Just because someone has guns and likes them doesn't make them a redneck or a wingnut.

          You liberals have so many bully-words to censor people and stifle free speech and expression it's really quite amazing that you also claim to be pro-freedom of speech, pro-freedom of expression, and "tolerant" and "open minded." Yea, so long as the opinions expressed marry up with yours.

          [–]the_illuminati_666 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

          Just because you dislike or disagree with something someone says doesn't make them racist.

          You're right. It's their racist words that make them racist.

          [–]br00tman 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

          You use the word liberal to shut up opposition, so are you any different?

          Just because you have a list of "just because i do this doesn't make me a racist" doesn't mean you're not a racist. Only you know that, and I bet you know it well.

          [–]R3dTim 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

          You use the word liberal to shut up opposition, so are you any different?

          Oh, did I hurt your feelings? Because no, it's completely different. You can't be foolish enough to think "liberal" is seen as a bad word, or a bad thing to be. I don't call you a liberal because I think that it's going to shut you up. I know it won't shut you up. You're just a liberal and so you're called it. However if I criticize President Obama for race baiting or Hillary for her e-mails, some would call me racist or sexist. If I disliked illegal immigration and think they should come in this country legally, some would say I'm just racist against Mexicans. Big difference between racist and sexist, and liberal -- but you know that and you're playing purposefully obtuse. Your hint that I'm also a racist is cute, but frankly I don't care what some anon on the Internet says, because you're right - I know I'm not a racist and I don't care what you speech bullies say. If being called liberal hurts your feelings then hurry back to your fucking circle jerk safe zone and hide from the world.

          [–]TheGhostOfDusty -1ポイント0ポイント  (7子コメント)

          You have been trolled. Garrison has never shown any racism.

          Losers upset by his comics deface them with racism and leave his signature on them. The allegedly dual Israeli citizen who ran /r/coontown was deeply involved in defaming him.

          [–]jav253 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

          It's interesting they downvoted the guy just for stating the fact that Garrison's art is often shopped to make him appear racist, and anti-semitic.

          [–]StopNoAndDont -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

          when you see something that isn't an argument

          Wish I had that pick of Stephan handy.

          [–]Harbltron 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

          "Zyklon" Ben Garrison getting voted to the front page?

          You people have lost your fucking minds, racist sentiment in this sub used to at least be subtle

          [–]jav253 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

          You do know the racist Ben Garrison stuff was a 4chan trolling campaign don't you? When people call him Ben "the one man Klan" Garrison or something it's just a joke.

          [–]tttggg333 -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

          Best. Cartoon. Ever.

          [–]Lamont-Cranston 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

          U.N. Involvement

          Lol its 1995 all over again

          federalisation of the police

          Oh that's why they respond with extreme force, confiscate property without trial, can just take any large wads of cash you have on you. Its the federal government.

          gun control

          Lolno

          martial law

          Only in your paranoid revenge fantasies

          sandy hook

          Dude, like, whoah, in that Batman movie, right, there was a map, and it had on it, like Sandy, or somethin', and then, like man, the Sandy Hook shooting happened! Dude, like whoah, right?

          fear

          Pot, meet kettle.

          [–]WadeWilsonforPope 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

          Honest question:

          If gun control is the end goal then why are gun sales increasing and there hasnt been any serious legislation for gun control?

          It looks like they are doing a shitty job of getting guns out of the hands of Americans that want them.

          [–]the_illuminati_666 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

          This subreddit is becoming as bad as r/aliens

          [–]Tombstonesss 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

          Oh fuck me with the comments, please go away if you weren't here 6 months ago :( every sub is the same argument. Folks there all the same democrat or republican.

          [–]endprism -4ポイント-3ポイント  (2子コメント)

          Wow. This is 100% spot on.

          [–]YeahThisIsMyAccount 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

          It really isn't though. I believe you have no empathy.

          [–]jav253 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

          The no empathy insults seems fly around a lot these days when people call out the puppet masters for their schemes. You can in fact feel bad for Black people, and see that they are being used to push a Fascist agenda at the same time.

          [–]nonconformist3 -2ポイント-1ポイント  (19子コメント)

          This guy Ben Garrison has a lot of these on his website. He is a pro-Trump guy from the looks of it. Ehh, I guess we can't all be completely intelligent about life, just partly. His heart seems to be in the right place, more or less, but supporting Trump is just another version of supporting a crooked politician once again, and then the cycle continues.

          [–]ragecry -3ポイント-2ポイント  (1子コメント)

          Ben is always capturing those twisted moments on everyone's mind, like a political Kodak. He's good at making toons, and I like them.

          [–]facereplacer3 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

          Downvoted because "BERNIE" or something.

          [–]wiseprogressivethink[🍰] -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

          Ben Garrison is perhaps the most based man on this planet.