That's horrifingly wrong, a middle schooler could be more knowledgeable on political science than the author of that article.

(the KKK was founded by Democrat1s, did you know?)

First of all, that's simply ignorant of the context.
The democrats of today are not the same as the democrats of the early-mid 20th century.
White supremacists were part of the democratic party before the black freedom movement, after that they massively left for the republican party, the parties basically flipped their electorate.
Btw refering to today's democratic party as "leftist" is having a very americano-centric conception of the political compass. They're center-right. In America you basically have a choice between liberalism and neo-liberalism.

There’s an easy way to remember it, too. NAZI stands for National Socialist German Workers‘ Party.

Yes and the DPRK is totaly democratic, also if I put a "Dog" nametag on my cat, it becomes a dog.

What does National Socialist German Worker’s Party mean? Glad you asked. Is it different from “Democratic socialism”? Only in semantics. A Democracy is mob rule, which is why America is actually a constitutional, representative republic, NOT a democracy. A representative republic protects the minority from the majority, whereas a democracy is the rule of the majority. Leftists get caught up in words, getting tripped up over “National Socialism” as opposed to “Democrat Socialism.” But it’s just that. Semantics. So when Hitler ginned up hatred for the Jews, he could get the mob to agree with him. He could get the mob to believe him. There were no representatives to stop Hitler. He was one man helming the desperation of a majority of people. Spot the difference?

America is actually a liberal democracy but whatever, the author seem to think the term democracy doesn't apply to representative democracy. What he actually means by "democracy" is direct democracy.
I mean this guy didn't even know how nazi germany operated, by 1933 all parties appart from the nazi party were forbidden and laws that deprived jewish people from citizenship were voted by the Reichtag. Reichtag which was only a puppet parlement since the nazis were the only party around. Hitler basically made the decisions himself, since we was a dictator...
Also democratic socialism doesn't imply direct democracy, it's an ideology which advocates gradually transitionning to socialism through reforms instead of a revolution. If you want to talk about semantics, know what you're talking about at least.

When we examine Hitler’s Nazi Germany through the lens of history, most, if not all of us, think of the Holocaust. In fact the holocaust might be the only thing we associate with Hitler’s Nazis. We’ve all been told of the Jews being marched off to death camps where they were worked, tortured, then gassed. We’ve also heard of the experiments conducted by Hitler’s Dr. Mengele. All terrible practices which we rightly find horrifying. Unless you’re one of those people who think Planned Parenthood is great.

The only thing not wrong about this article, at least it's not an holocaust denier.
But is he really comparing concentrations camp experiments to planned parenthood?

What we don’t often hear or learn about is how Hitler ruled the rest of Germany, what his domestic policies were for the German people he didn’t march off to death camps. Hitler’s domestic, socialist policies will be the focus of this post. Trigger warning: they’re eerily similar to what American Democrats tout today. Double trigger warning? He initially had the support of the mob of people. So replace many of Hitler’s policies with something you hear from Bernie Sanders…

He killed 6 million jews but that's ok because his policies were great....
Also no, further down the post he talks about nationalised healthcare, gun control, "big" education etc. First of all, Hitler had nothing to do with nationalised healthcare, it actually dates back from Otto Von Bismark.
Also, just let me say one thing once and for all:
LIBERALISM IS NOT SOCIALISM, THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY ISN'T SOCIALIST FOR FUCK SAKE EVEN SANDERS ISN'T SOCIALIST

Hitler was a horrible human being. But aside from how he treated the Jews, aside from his monsterous ways, his polcies were anything but “conservative.” He wanted big government, he wanted big eductation, he wanted thought control. He hated political dissidents. He loathed free-speech. He feared an armed citizenry.

So stop saying “Hitler was right-wing.” No, he wasn’t. If anything, he was a full-fledged left-winger. With a horrible mustache.

I just knew it was coming to this when you linked an american article.
For the average american the political spectrum basically "big governement" vs "small governement". Well guess what it's a bit more complicated than that. Communism and its final stage and Anarchism are more "small governement" than any of your right wing parties, far leftist are pro-gun and pro-individual rights for all, the important premice is advocating an anti-capitalist stance and fighting for seizing the means of production. They despise liberals as mutch as you do because liberals still advocate capitalism.
Hitler had a political ideology called fascism, him and his friend Mussolini were the founding father of that ideology, it's neo-liberal, racist, imperialist and anti-communist.

It's the absolute opposite of socialism, actual socialists were litteraly sent to death camp.
You could send as many links as you want, your article is /r/badhistory /r/badpolitics /r/BadEverything .