As a Christian, I think homosexuality is a sin, but the disposition itself isn't, and it is something to be defeated through the Holy Spirit, given freely through Jesus Christ from God the Father. But I assume that most people here are not Christians, and that you yourself likely do not identify as a Christian, so this argument does not hold merit for you personally.

That being said, there are reasons that homosexuality does not receive a warm welcome in this community. For starters, the rate of sexual disease in the homosexual community is very high, with nearly 20% of sexually active gay men being HIV+, and rates of other STDs much higher in the community than out of it. What makes matters worse is that bisexual men are active in both communities, and spread these diseases to the straight population at large, rather than keeping them contained within the gay community. This is a problem.

Furthermore, homosexual behavior does not serve the procreative desires of this community. The decline in numbers of the white race is a big concern here. Now no intelligent person would put the blame for this entirely on those with homosexual desires or who act on these desires. Feminism, the oppositional attitudes nurtured by elites between men and women, no-fault divorce, and a culture of sexual promiscuity, have led to this decline. But in the past, gay men were forced into straight marriages, and their genes would be passed on in childbirth. Today, it is much harder for gay men to find a willing woman to marry them and have their offspring, and if they do so they put themselves at the risk of divorce rape that other men face. Most gay men have deemed that a losing situation.

The solution presently accepted by the majority - that we should just 'let gays be gays' - is seen by Christians as morally wrong and by those with concern for the sake of our society and people as degenerate (inasmuch as it leads to degeneration and decline of our people, and inasmuch as many simply see it as an inferior lifestyle choice to heterosexual marriage). To me, I think the present solution is completely lacking in compassion for a group of people who are condemned to being weeded out of the genetic pool because of their sexual desires, which are something that are not passed on to children. Gay men with perfectly good white genes have been uprooted and removed from the gene pool, and this is something we are supposed to celebrate. I feel hurt for all homosexuals who feel they have no other option. Churches have stopped ministering to homosexuals in the name of political correctness, people have stopped voicing their belief that this is not a healthy disposition of mind. The homosexual finds himself trapped in a cage of desire and is told that the only way out is to embrace the cage for what it is, rather than to seek the one who holds the keys to the door.

In conclusion:

• There are moral concerns for the state of the homosexual;

• There are health concerns for the homosexual and, because of bisexual men, for the straight population at large;

• There are reproductive concerns for the white race. Gay men ought to be encouraged to reproduce. Of course, with this encouragement would have to come quite a large shift in the culture we find ourselves in today.

• Saying that gay men should just 'go be gay' is tantamount to completely ignoring the problem which they face, and is utterly lacking in compassion; it is sentencing them to an end of their bloodline and to not passing on their genes; it is sentencing them to a sexual condition which a great many view is depraved, without any concern for the man who will go about living this life; it is the ultimate show that we do not care about the homosexual or his life.