/tv/ BTFOHOW WILL /tv/ RECOVER?
nice try
STOP BLAMING /pol/ AND /tv/ ITS FUCKING /v/
Whelp, I guess it's time to admit you were wrong, /tv/. Apologize to Paul Feig and the poor women you've been harassing for months. Now.
>>71842114
>>71842132Based top critics always looking out for cinema
>>71842232I will never understand critics undying love for linklater
>>71842114BvS started at 90The week is young.
>>71842232Linklater made his most inoffensive movie possible.It was deserved.
>>71842114What do the people that paid to see the film say?Oh...right....
>>71842114Thats a shitty ratingNoone wil see this, we know, only a 85+ is a sign that a movie will overcome the common opinion on films.GB2016 will tank
Why are women just the worst?
>>71842331apologize
>>71842319According to the children like >>71842132 when it came out it wasn't
>>71842114>35 reviews counted now>69%it's dropping
>>71842357I am so sorry. What a fantastic piece of cinematic excellence and I am very, very sorry.Thank you for listening.
>>71842396It's at 37 reviews, 71% now. Refresh
>PG-13 so not for kids>non stop women being vulgar jokes so not for men in groups>ghostbusters so not for the women in groups>ghostbusters so not for people going on dateswho is the demographic of this film?
>>71842430for no oneit was made launder money
>>71842132>>71842114FUCKING KEK
>>71842430GhostsWho else?
AHAHAHAHHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAAis /tv/ right about ANYTHING? BBFFFTTAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
The movie is trashIn the endWho really cares?
> Alison Willmore> BuzzFeed News > Top Critickek
>>71842114Why do people lie when things like this can be checked with one click on google?
>>71842461Well, we were right about this being a shit movie that is going to bomb.
>RT>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull>77Just a reminder
>>71842615>we>he started posting in the last year/2
FUCK
>>71842522it's 73% now
>>71842522Did you check, dumbass?
>>71842114>read the critics names>most of them are females>most of them say something along the lines of "it's it's own movie, has an underwhelming ending and has a few laughs"This score is gonna drop hard, just wait.
>>71842615>71%>"bomb"It's OK bitch boy you'll have another chance
Looking up Ghostbusters on rottentomatoes, it has a user rating of >90% with nearly 70k people voting...Now, seeing how this game only recently premiered and the official release is tomorrow evening in the UK and Friday in the US, who is supplying this score? Am I supposed to believe the premier was held in an NFL stadium with 70k watchers?
>>71842675>almost every good review is from a woman or a jewish sounding namePure coincidence though.
/TV/ BTFOBTFO!!!!!
>>71842678Are you retarded? What do RT scores have to do with box office numbers? A movie can have a 100% RT score and still be a bomb.
apologize
>opening at 70%It will be at 40% soon enough.
>>71842114How do you get blown out by a 70%? That score basically means the movie exists and doesn't set people on fire as they watch it, good job. Do you really think a 70% will change anybody's mind about this movie who was on the fence for seeing it?
>take a look at who gave fresh ratings to Ghostbusters>first guy gave Star Wars Episode VII a 94%
>>71842816VII was great.
>>71842774>Do you really think a 70% will change anybody's mind about this movie who was on the fence for seeing it?yes
>>71842754What is this creature?
>There’s been so much furor over this Ghostbusters reboot since it was announced, almost completely focused on the fact that all the leads are played by women.Why even bother?
>>71842824>it's a tourist post
>>71842816>furshit meme movie imagehuh
>>71842913shut the fuck up
>>71842913>http://desuarchive.org/_/search/filename/1449389945321/>https://boards.fireden.net/_/search/filename/1449389945321/>a tourist calling people touristLOL
>>71842932>it's a butthurt post
>>71842429Yeah and apparently a writer for BuzzFeed News is a "Top Critic"? Also, is it normal to have a critic "consensus" when less than a third of total reviews are in?
Man, I told you guys people wouldn't be willing to be honest about this flick.
>>71842824Agreed. It had problems but overall was well made with some fantastic casting. Boyega is a great find. I just wish they hadn't reused another goddamn Death Star.
>>71842508Personally I will reserve judgement until I see the thing...which won't be until that shit pops up on netflix
>/tv/ was wrong>againlel
>>71842824VII is shit. theres a story about it but ill tell you later after another 14 bucks
>>71842270That's from fanboys bombing it with 10s beforehand. If Ghostbusters stays stable that'll confirm DCucks are worse than feminists.
>>71843164
>>71842114Devin "Pacific Rim is this generation's Star Wars" Faraci loves ithttps://archive.is/yxZAHApologize
>>71842615Apparently it's mediocre but funny. /tv/ would never admit to it being better than shitty, then declare victory for "guessing" that it would be shitty.
>>71843184I'm pretty sure SJW bloggers are trying to prop this thing up in the early stages too
I will never, ever see this movie, because it's a steaming pile of shit.I can't believe they are actually releasing it. Holy fuck this is going to be bad. Very, very bad.
only sexist foreign audiences can save /tv/ now kek
>>71842917Holy shit you total fucking simpleton. You complete goddamn idiot. Simply by virtue of posting an animal, he's a furry. he hasn't given you anything to work with. so what you're saying is, you fall to the other side of the spectrum but are so fucking prepubescent that you cannot see value in the other side. therefore he is "furshit" and thus everything wrong. Your emotion-driven blanket dismissal is everything wrong, shithead. You are unthinking dirt
>>71842855a female, not that the baby men on /tv/ knows what they look like
>>71842615I doubt it's going to bomb either.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOTHE SJWS ARE WINNING
>>71843144You male feminists sure seem really happy about a low 70% RT score, why is that? If you genuinely thought this movie was good, wouldn't a 70% score be kind of disappointing? Especially considering RT scores always trend downwards as time goes on.
>>71843233Apparently not as the ratings started out lower and have been climbing.
>>71843303
Reddit isn't too happy eitherhttps://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/4s6br7/ghostbusters_film_review/seems like they weren't expecting good reviews.
>>71843328>this autistic spergoutlel
>>71843294My wife and wife's son beg to differ
>>71843241>I hate this thing I haven't seen Literal reverse SJW
>>71843224We didn't guess, we saw the trailers...
>average rating>6.4/10>goodis this like how in bootcamp, the women recruits get feminism boxes to help them over all the obstacles?
>>71843363Remember how you hated your baby enough to kill it before you've even seen it?
>>71843349No shit Can't you see them all complaining in these threads they keep making
>>71842114>>71842132Usually I don't buy into the whole shill nonsense, but I believe it this time.>>71842114>>71842132The discrepancy is telling
>>71843349It's become a political statement to like or dislike the movie.
>>71843360sorry. I won't ever talk to you or your wife's son again
>>71842114Wait until the average movie goer is able to see it and judge it based on that. The movie was obviously going to strike a chord with a lot of critics too scared to give it a fair rating. Look at how many of the positive reviews also criticize it.
Alison WillmoreBuzzFeed NewsTop Critic>BuzzFeed>Top Critic
>>71843333Sweet quads, but you're wrong, we are still in the early stages. There are under 40 reviews counted. There will probably be over 150 when they are all in. This is still prime shill territory, once the movie is released, the score will be lower
>>71843349No shit, Reddit is just as full of woman-hating nerds as 4chan is, perhaps slightly less so
."The message of female empowerment is more important then the faulty third act/climax.">8/10
>reviews are mostly negative>weeks before a consensus>reviews are middling>positive consensus posted instantlywhat
>>71843391No? Even if I were a woman I'm not normalfag enough to get pregnant.
>>71843437I saw that too. Does journalism even exist anymore?
>>71843349It's the 'Gamers Are Dead' articles, but for film.Compare the score (so far) of top critics vs bloggers and internet """personalities""". It drops sharply from fresh to rotten at the push of a button.
>>71843204http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/star-wars-episode-i-the-phantom-menace-1999
>>71843489hasn't since fox launched it's 24 hour news channel.
The average will settle in the low 50s.Trust me, my dad works for Rotten Tomatoes
>>71843489Journalism has become something you do, not something you are. Since there is no license to practice it, anyone with an opinion, a keyboard and access to the internet can become a journalist.
>>71842615>weDon't ever fucking speak for me again, you worthless piece of shit.
So BvS gets 30% but this shit gets 70%?Where the fuck did objectivity go?
something seems off here...
>>71843402Gender Politics have been blown way out of proportion but the bigger problem is that nobody wants to actually challenge it.Despite the fact that one of the progenitors of this whole movement is a fucking whore that used the death of Robin Williams to her own end.
>It's currently at 75%
Why do these Sony movies all feel the same? Is it the cameras they use? I just can't shake how similar they look
>>71843583Calm yourself, legbeard. No one ever speaks for you.
>>71843631There's nothing to challenge. Identity politics in general are nothing but "my feelings."
>>71843364Trailers undersell (and oversell) movies all the time.
>>71842232>RLM hated it so we must too
>>71843597its rotten tomatoes. the film itself has fuck all to do with the score when its trying to measure what a certain set of people thought.might aswell get 9 christians and 1 atheist and ask what they think of god
>>71843597>RT
>>71843651>Average Rating: 6.6/10
>>71843658>muh feelingsHow the fuck am I supposed to tell you why things "feel" certain ways to you?
>>71843597Delete this.
>>71843658It's the lack of vision and passion for the medium.
>>71843613Not really, Fred Topel said it's the movie of the summer.
>mfw this thing finishes with a 92% from critics
>>71843597>/tv/>objective
>>71843690Doesn't matter, if this thing gets a 70 or above sjws will celebrate it as a huge success.
>>71843349No shit Reddit is where gamer goobers were spawned from misogahell.
Ghostbusters is a legitimately fun movie. So a ghost gets shot in the dick, who cares? Fucks sake guys, just because a group of women are badass in a movie doesn't mean you have to hate it. Fuck, I'm literally in tears over all of the misogyny
>>71843597You're asking where objectivity went on subjective matters? Are you a child or just a moron?
>>71843756>people are gonna 4 bait this weak
>>71843671The point of trailers is literally to oversell the movie to create hype by putting together only the best, most interesting scenes. Trailers underselling a movie can happen once in a while when a studio puts out a really shitty trailer, but when they put out like 10 trailers and tv spots, it's fairly safe to assume if you think those looked like shit, you also won't like the movie much.
>>71843756>Fucks sake guys, just because a group of women are badass in a movie doesn't mean you have to hate it.I know that. I literally made a charlies angels thread hours ago.think youre being sexist here.
>>71843530That's one review by a retard who liked Home Alone 3.
>>71842331>spawncamping
>76%kino kino
>>71842114>HOW WILL /tv/ RECOVER?probably with box office mojo.
>>71842114It's still going up.Also:>Fanboy ire can’t stifle the defiant energy – and frequent hilarity – of this terrifically inventive comedy starring Melissa McCarthy and Kristen WiigI'm laughing so hard at the faggots who were saying the movie was going to be bad.
>>71843744Box office numbers will determine whether or not it's a success. No one gives a shit about RT scores unless it's in the high 90s or low 40s.
>>71843597You haven't even fucking watched ghostbusters for fucks sake
>>71843349Why would they? Where do you think gamergate came from? /v/, /pol/ and reddit teamed up to launch a fight against SJWs. The sad thing is no one won the fight
>suddenly /tv/ cares about average rating>implying anything above a 6 is bado i am laffin
Give it some time the score will flat line.
If Frozen can make $1.3bil, there is a sufficient market for this to easily make 2x-3x its budget and be considered a success.
>Step Brothers got a 55%>Anchorman got 66%Rotten Tomatoes never do comedy ratings correctly
>>71843744They'll celebrate it as a huge success no matter what. And with all the "reviewers", or as I've taken to calling them "nu-males and femenazis desperately trying to artificially inflate the movies score“, basically admiting it's bad in their reviews, but giving it a fresh score so as to not offend, it's clear that this movie will bomb, and not be well recived with actual critics, which is all that really matters.
>>71842114I don't get it, you fags do nothing but shitpost and defend RT when people who liked BvS say RT is a ton of shit and most likely paid off, yet when something like this happens you scream JEWSJEWS PAID REVIEWS.Make up your fuckin minds.
>>71843794literally THE review
>>71843773They actually make the movie look worse than it is all the goddamn time. Most recent example of this I can think of is Kingsmen. Often this is because they want to keep trailers E rated while most of the clever or entertaining stuff is in the PG13+ bits.
>Sites like who supported with with bias on the movie are on it(Buzzfeed, New York times, etc)>Most of them have it at a C or 3/5 range
>Rating just jumped up to 82%Jesus, this thing is going to get nominated for an oscar, isn't it?
>>71843770By definition it isn't weak. Bait need only be strong enough to catch.
>>71843847I care about RT scores, but the actual average score, not the Tomatometer.
>>71843938no. rotten tomatoes does not dictate quality. fucking hell, when will people understand this
>>71843842This is the best day, I'm so happy right now.I just need it to make half a billion or above. Please god.
Why does /tv/ hate fun?
>>71843858The SJWs won the fight, the fuck are you talking about. Zoe and Anita are literally speaking on world platforms now.
What did he mean by this?
>>71843921TPM is critically panned.
>>71842228>BvS didn't get a good rating so Rotten Tomatoes is Reddit.
>>71844030What has that actually accomplished? I haven't been keeping up.
>>71844066Big Fat Fucking WALLETS. Because of you shitlords.
>>71844056>Big brains>Jones is a stereotypical angry loud black woman
>>71843669but that's the problem. They don't think that, and if you try to say otherwise the entire faction tries their best to demonize you.
>>71843794Ebert just saw the cunny potential in ScarJo when he watched Home Alone 3. I saw that same potential and recognized the greatness of Home Alone 3.
WHITE MEN BTFO
>>71844056(((Rothkopf)))
>>71843798 Kek