“
You just contradicted yourself...
no the key word here is "usually". Not always.
“
Either you actually think people should behave according to their genitals (if so, there's really nothing I can do to change your mind on that, other than to tell you that I personally do not behave according to what society deems is right in relation to my genitals nor do my friends) or you're still not understanding that gender and biological sex are two entirely different things. People with a vagina can identify as part of the male gender. Can they identify as having a penis? No. Having a body part isn't part of your social identity. Can they identify as being masculine, which are attributes that people can have regardless of their genitalia? Yes. So they can identify as part of the male gender.
I didn't mean either of those things. I don't think they
should, I'm saying most do without any problems. Sure some men and women have problems with their psyche, or are have some genital anomalies, but they're exceptions and doesn't invalidate that sex has a very strong influence on gender to the point, for all practical purposes, for 99.99% of the time, it's simply not an issue.
“
All you're telling me is that these behavioral patterns are observable but you're insinuating that they are biological so do you have a source for that?
Most of the first links are things like assertiveness, cognitive skills, motor skills, aggression, etc. Those can't be learned.
“
I agree that they are observable. I just think social norms and what parents do is why they play with certain toys.
I doubt a 2 years old listens to "social norms" nor does his father plays truck often.
“
Like in the source that talks about imitating parents.
The source only
hypothesizes
about imitating parents, but then goes on to say that this theory has its limit.
“
They are being primed to do so. Even if what you're saying is true, it doesn't really have anything to do with gender since, again, using toys that are associated with both genders is encouraged more than using toys associated with the one gender.
How the hell do you prime a baby to play with a toy?? The first 12 months it's pretty much the same toys. Then you see that they have preferences for certain things (like toys that count stories versus the forms which must be placed at the right place) and then parents buy accordingly. Forcing the gender fluidity thing on all children is just wrong. Hell on a website about hermaphrodite children they recommend to stick to one gender. Confusion and ambiguity are bad for children development.
“
Well then the burden of proof is on you to show me that these observable behaviors that you are referencing are biological rather than as a result of social priming.
Like I said, motor skills, anger, cognitive skills and social skills are not things which can be imitated, especially at such a young age. Even the article you cited mentions it imitating and enforcing begins at 3 years old, not before.
“
I didn't specifically mention the Western world but what I am saying is that this isn't really a rule considering there are male children who play with dolls and female children who play and that this is, by the word of many doctors, of which i linked to some, completely normal.
Some, most don't. But for the most part the "traditional" genders model is spot on and works well. And no they are not "normal" (as in they are not like everyone else, with the same needs and particularities), but they are not incorrect either.
“
So... let's say this is a biological cause just for the sake of this argument... Well it's not even actually beneficial to children to do this so I feel like that should say something about the importance of certain evolutionary attributes. Men also generally grow more hair than women. Women generally detect colors better than men. Was this useful? Yes. Is it now? Nope.
Any people involved with children should have great interest in knowing their particularities. And unlike hairs and colors, behaviors are very important to take into account.
“
Almost every single one of my friends doesn't identify as cisgender.
You know what is the best way to know if someone is trans and disguised? He tells everyone about it. But more seriously, cisgenders simply don't "identify" themselves as cisgender, there is no need. Trans do, but please don't push the concept of gender fluidity as if it should be everyone's concern.
“
There is a large trans community in every major city, including mine.
Good for you guys, but your point is?
“
Btw trans does not only mean people who want to transition between biological sexes. It also includes gender nonconforming and non-binary people.
Yeah sure, whatever.