3
4

Who else has been banned from TBP? (self.AgainstTheMRM)

wolololololo2 が 投稿

All the mods are still there but they just banned me randomly and muted me. Is anyone else getting this too? I made an alternative, /r/fucktheredpill which is only for approved submitters (who have been invited). In the light of AMR being hijacked I wonder if someone has done that to some moderators on TBP.

全 10 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]wolololololo2[S] 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

if anyone wants invites to the new sub hit me up here.

[–]IrbyTremor 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

do you know which moderator banned you from there?

[–]wolololololo2[S] 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

it didn't say and when i asked why i was banned the first time, i was ignored. when i asked again, i was muted.

[–]Aerik 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

i haven't

[–]hereandnotthere 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

Same here Didn't realise it was about TRP and not AMR. I contacted the admins and they don't seem to consider it a hack at the moment.

[–]IrbyTremor 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

He said to me it looked funny and they were definitely looking into it.

Odd. I love that they keep saying "we we we"

there's no one else there anymore.

[–]climbandmaintain 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

"The pool's closed" is a pretty racist 4chan meme derived from Habbo Hotel. Definitely an account steal.

[–]Quietuus 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

I checked your ban note on TBP, looks like you were banned for a comment three days ago in which you appear to encourage a redpiller to commit suicide. No mod accounts have been compromised. What I'd do is wait out the mute and then write something referencing that and explaining/apologising, rather than just asking why you were banned. The TBP modmail is a non-stop high pressure sewer line of man-rage, so it's likely you were just muted out of instinct.

[–]wolololololo2[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

my comment was just "the best way to protect yourself is not to exist", i didn't think that came off as telling someone to kill themselves.

[–]Quietuus 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well, that was how it appears to have been read by the moderator in question. I won't reveal their name but it's someone who's pretty trustworthy generally.