全 6 件のコメント

[–]SolcaerevJOOOOOOHNNNY GUUUIIITAAAARRRR 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think it's time to stop.

Just....stop. We get it, Bethesda is Satan and obsidian is Bernie sanders Yada Yada Yada

[–]Murder-MountainNCR 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why wouldn't they? They are 90s developers.

Obsidian are made of 90s era game devs (and famous 90s era game devs) that have been in the business for over 30 years. They have made great fallout games with almost zero resources, mostly due to stingy publishing execs.

They are the developers who were given 1 year to make a whole new game with a budget of 0 dollars as the NORM back in the 90s.

Compared to 90s devs, modern devs are spoiled. Modern devs would never deal with the sort of shit a 90s dev had.

Modern devs would require millions upon millions of dollars, huge development houses, bloat their game size to insane levels with no concern for HD space, and be allowed to spend more than 1 year making a game.

In the 90s you have very little budget, exactly 365 days to make a game (This was the norm in the 90s), zero manpower, insane game size constraints, insane technical limits, and to top it all off you had zero support from other studios.

You can't call Nvidia and complain their ready made game works phsyics engine ain't working. Because you built that yourself, and you needed to fix it yourself.

You can't call Unity for tech support, nor purchase ready made assets on a website. This is the 90s.

So hell yeah Obsidian can. All developers that worked in the 90s are magic, and their level of skill, resourcefulness, and self reliance is something we will never see again. They can pull off great things with almost no resources.

Even the new blood Bethesda developers ain't got shit on the Bethesda greybeards that have been around since TES:Arena.

Its like asking of the greybeards of Bethesda can make a good TES game with no resources. Of course they can.

[–]Kloner22 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I disagree about Fallout 4's atmosphere. It's not bad at all. Really interesting in fact. Say what you want about questing and writing and all that, but exploring the commonwealth is really fun. There's so many buildings in downtown Boston that you can go in to and explore. The glowing sea is also a great place to go exploring. Bethesda is great at making worlds that are interesting and fun to explore, and they did just that with Fallout 4.

[–]cybersosa 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

i can literally remember every character from fallout 4 and a lot of the quests in this game are fun and interesting. i mean, did you even think, my dude? stuff like: silver shroud cabot house vault 81 quests far harbor quests children of atom quests uss constitution lost patrol emergent behavior jamaica plains lost treasure polymer labs

the list goes on. bethesda owns fallout. not obsidian. so its up to bethesda if they will let obsidian make another game. i think all of the fallout games are fantastic. i cant even choose one over the other. but NV certainly has flaws.

i can agree with you on the dialogue though. i think this is why everyone is so disappointed in the game. your choices have no outcome, honestly. you cant exactly be evil. theres no quests or decision making that are evil like there was in fo3 with the megaton bomb. i also hate how short the dialogue is, and I HATE that when you choose an option, you dont even know what he might say or he says misinterprets what you thought he'd say. they definitely need to fix the dialogue for the next game

[–]DGT-exeYAYUS 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Holy shit this is the 12,000th post about this.

We get it. You didn't like Fallout 4 and play the old "good game, bad Fallout" card (which is weird because you love Fallout 3 even though it committed more anti-Fallout crimes) yet again and want Obsidian to make a new one yada yada blah blah.

Seriously every time it's "hear me out, my opinion is totally different" when it's completely not and you continue to beat the horses rotting carcass further into the ground so much it's basically fucking buried at this point.

/rant

[–]Philip_Raven -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

its not like FO3 was worse thatn FO:NV...they took different approaches on it...while FO3 was more serious while still having some easy parts, FO:NV went full gas crazy...in FO3 you could role-play survival...like heavy survival of post apocalyptic wasteland...with a kind of a heavy main story. NV is just.. "that guy fcking shot the mailman!! In these parts, you never shot the mailman..never!!" and then from taking a revenge on that guy you make yourself king of a dessert with army of robots....you just cant roleplay survival in that game, but its more of a ride with guns and explosions...in FO4 story is fcking garbage IMO because if you want to roleplay...and go after your kid..you end up "no, I wont be your general..I have to find my kid" or "no, I wont go fetch you gren paint on the wall..I have a kid to safe"...but the improved mechanic are 10/10..gun crafting,power armor mechanics, settlements, bulding buldings....FO4 is improved in everyway against FO3 and NV..they added so many cool stuff that I love....just the story....my god the story..for me as a heavy RP person I finished my first playthrough in 8 hours... and I tried to not to rush...so if obsidian takes over Ihope they will come up with a story that lets you sidetrack.....as for memorable stuff in games...you remember NV things more because they are more egdy, lively and/or over the top..thile FO3 keeps more grounded, serious level, which isnt bad, its just different writing