•
•

Requesting Documentaries and Resources About Sex (self.conspiracy)

CzzCCzzC が 投稿

Been on a binge of documentaries recently. However, I've noticed a lack of documentaries about the concept of sex, and how it's being used to control people by the NWO.

I've always thought there was something wrong and destructive about how 'casual sex' and internet porn has been so rampant in our society nowadays. I have that feeling that there's something greater to it, and that it has greater negative implications than I may even realize at first.

Any recommendations for documentaries about sex in general? Masturbation, pornography, casual sex, etc.

全 6 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]dukof 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not what you ask for, but yet a relevant little clip:

Babylon before Hitler

[–]robaloie 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

I think we are controlled by thinking we are a monogamous species even though clearly we are not.

We are taught to be jealous and we can only love one other person.

Unfortunately with money and society as it is we are forced to have relationships that confine us to not experiencing openness and sharing love.

[–]All_By_Me_Whatsy [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You're either a useful idiot or part of the problem. Divorce yourself of your insanity.

[–]jacks1000 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Of course, you want E. Michael Jones' Libido Dominandi.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQeRu7BUEr8

[–]All_By_Me_Whatsy -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

I don't know about documentaries, but I have these:

Leftists ruined sex. The study of sex! The profession of helping people grow closer together and have more satisfying lives by having sex!

Dwell on that for a bit. Leftists ruined sex. It’s pretty hard to ruin, but they did it. They injected politics into banging. Not only that, leftist politics and ideological favoritism has stonewalled most actual research into sex, instead favoring social bullshit and research into tiny, mentally defective minorities’ gender identity/politics bullshit. Apparently the lion’s share of good hard scientific research into sex and related topics comes out of Europe, but that’s also being slowly eroded. Most sex counselors now are psychologists with only relatively minor (fewer than 9 credits) education in sexuality and related topics and very little background in the hard sciences at all. So, yeah, it changed me pretty permanently. I avoided most of the SJWism by doing biochemistry, but that exposure made me hate leftists. I was interested in majoring in human sexuality, doing sex counseling or research for a living, and so I looked into the courses and talked to professors before registering for classes. It’s all about social sciences, feelings, and (at the time) proto-SJWism. There wasno biology, biochemistry, physiology, neuroscience, etc. I took a summer research job with a human sexuality institute and went out with some of the PhD candidates one night. They told me to avoid the field like the plague. There’s almost no grant money for neuropsychological, cognitive, biological, or biochemical research into sex and sexuality, much less hard scientific research on sex-related topics like infectious diseases, epigenetic responses, immunology, etc.

I had always been relatively conservative, but the experience was the final straw. I realized just how spineless mainstream conservatives have been and how they failed to stop the leftist tide in academia.

Think about the repercussions of this for a moment. Sex therapists have never been too plentiful, but at one point they were experts couples could hire to overcome any number of sexual problems. They’re supposed to be experts in terms of desire, physiology, and the mechanics of sex, as well as the social dynamics involved. You don’t go to a sex therapist if your relationship is bad; you go if the sex is bad or as part of a larger effort to improve all aspects of a relationship. Now people have little choice but to visit SJW PhDs who’ve opened a private practice or a psychologist with only minor training in the field. There are only a very few proper sex therapists these days. We’re left with amateurs like Lacy Greene for popular sex ed. Dan Savage varies from based to horrible, but he’s still an amateur. Only slightly related, but anyone heard of Wilhelm Reich? He was an early psychologist and contemporary of Freud’s. The Freud family hated him, and Jewish Freudian psychologists did everything in their power to discredit and ruin the guy. Excerpt from wikipedia on him:

His father was, by all accounts, a cold and jealous man. Both parents were Jewish but decided against raising the boys as Jews (HMM, I WONDER WHY THE JEWS MIGHT WANT TO SLANDER HIM). Reich and his brother, Robert, were brought up to speak only German, punished for using Yiddish expressions, and forbidden from playing with the local Yiddish-speaking children.

He was a pioneer in the power of sex to heal psychological wounds–the fundamental connection between sex and romantic love. Freud hated sex, stigmatized it, and turned it into a grand incestuous complex. Now look at the world. Sex is disconnected from the spiritual and even the psychological. It’s promoted as mechanical, as standard. There are asexual (something most sane people would consider a dysfunction) pride movements now. The problem is that sex is ultimately promoted as just “a thing people do” instead of the something special and unique it had always been. I can’t see a purer or more wholesome expression of love and companionship than two people teaming up together at a relatively young age, early 20s latest, to face the world together, to learn about sexuality and being an adult together. I just can’t imagine ever advocating that anyone aim for anything else in the ideal world that they would like to see. I think that if you take away sex in a caring relationship, most of it isn’t great for people in the long run or society as a whole. I just can’t see how a sexually egalitarian society can ever avoid the degeneracy and vice that we see around us now. So why not aim for the best option–the one we know works and has worked for millennia–which is marriage? There’s a reason many people have perfectly fun, healthy, loving sex and still manage to laugh, cry, and orgasm all in the same session–because it’s supposed to exorcise the body and mind of emotional and physical burden. We’ve ignored sex and its study as an essential part of human life for healing and bringing us closer together. Instead, we’ve perverted research into sex towards dividing us. We’ve distilled it down into an obscene product. I blame the Jews.

They want sex to be an identity, and nothing more. Not a bonding tool–we don’t want people bonding and getting in stable relationships–nor a function necessary for reproduction, we have donors now, people; stop thinking that 2 people are special for making a kid and being proud of your family! It’s being pulled away from its base uses and warped into a tool to push ideas with that are breaking down societies roles.

Another problem is that we’re simultaneously too timid about sex while being too public about it. Not public in a healthy sense–in the market commoditized sense. It’s not pornography per se; it’s more the view of sexual activity as a reward/goal rather than a shared experience. Sex is like a mouse after cheese. Look at pickup artists; sex is a transitory pleasure. It’s talked about in terms of market value, exchange of worth, etc. It’s a crazy, toxic brew of unhealthy attitudes. Look at how a lot of men and women talk about sex. It’s a means to get what they want–or more of it. Men seem to be solely interested in female pleasure for the sake of future sex. Women look at things as an exchange for favors. Granted, not everyone does this but it's a pretty dominant attitude.

We're riddled with Jewish influence in academia and the market telling us sex is a commodity to desperately seek and little else. It’s unhealthy, it’s wrong. Sex is fun. It’s an intensely personal thing two people can do to have fun, improve physical/mental health, and bring them closer together. It’s okay to laugh, it’s okay to cry, and it’s okay to be a bit overwhelmed. The idea of men as sexually potent robots is a media lie–a dysfunction pushed on us by an emotionally hollow people. The idea of women as either sluts or manipulative pussy monopolists is a lie–an unhealthy lie pushed on us by people incapable of viewing interpersonal relationships as anything more than market exchanges.

~:~

Why is that people who are either abstinent or in monogamous relationships are more stable and successful?

Pretty simple.

No STDs. Value of integrity, virtue, and human beings. Stronger families. Much more love, empathy, and companionship. More time for learning, thus success Such lifestyles enhance self-growth, gumption, and wisdom.

Historically speaking, civilizations lasted as long as they did because of virtue, piety, and purity, and civilizations fell because of moral degradation. The greatest sages–ones with the utmost wisdom and divine guidance–did not value promiscuity or gluttony by any means because it was a bottomless pit into unhappiness. One becomes unhappy with endless sex because it will never fulfill their propensity for companionship. And I’m well aware that companionship often doesn’t suffice many people’s sexual desires, but that is largely because they don’t see the bigger picture. We want more sex because we’re addicted to dopamine, vivification of monotony, and, most importantly, promiscuity serves as a transient bandage of comfort. Men and women often seek sex to compensate their loneliness and confusion about their lives. But chasing tail is akin to doing drugs, for it’s a temporary fixation for something much greater, that being your inability to absolve your woes or neurosis due to ignorance of one’s self.

When you overcome your mental ills and study life and nature, you will see that promiscuity and all other vices are pernicious and that the virtues of man are absolute and imperative for survival.

[–]All_By_Me_Whatsy 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Secularists, etc. have made everything that was once sacred ephemeral. Marriage is practically just a contract now. Roger Scruton said it best:

It is impossible for modern adolescents to regard erotic feelings as the preliminary to marriage, which they see as a condition of partial servitude, to be avoided as an unacceptable cost. Sexual release is readily available and courtship a time wasting impediment to pleasure. Far from being a commitment, in which the voice of future generations makes itself heard, sex is now an intrinsically adolescent experience. The transition from the virgin to the married state has disappeared, and with it the lyrical experience of sex, as a yearning for another, higher form of membership, to which the hard-won consent of the other is a necessary precondition. All other rites of passage have similarly withered away, since no social institution demands them–or if it does, it will be avoided as ‘judgmental’, ‘hierarchical’, or ‘oppressive.’

Deprive young people of a rite of passage into the social order and they will look for a rite of passage out of it. The effect of current policies has been to subsidize out of wedlock births, to remake marriage as a contract of cohabitation, and to drive religion, the true guardian of rites of passage, from the public sphere. Those policies have been embarked on with the best of intentions, but with a remarkable indifference to what we know of human nature.

~:~

Having a large number of partners indicates a person is a bad candidate for a long-term relationship. This is because that high partner count indicates one of the following:

  1. The person is bad at maintaining a relationship.
  2. The person enjoys short-term gain over long-term goal and is likely to be dishonest, intentionally or unintentionally, if they claim that they want a relationship to be long-term.
  3. The person enjoys casual sex, which they will not be able to get inside the relationship, and thus is more likely to want to leave it to engage in casual sex.
  4. The person enjoys casual sex, which they will not be able to get inside the relationship, and thus is more likely to have it secretly within the relationship.

If you went to a job interview for a position where they wanted someone who would really invest themselves in the company and be a team player in the long run and they see you’ve had 30 jobs before, each of which lasting less than a month, will that make them more or less likely to hire you?

~:~

The release of dopamine in the brain is tied to a reward system that gives incentive to instinctual elements of the body to chase something. I.E; orgasm makes you feel good, therefore you make the effort to seek it through reproduction. Otherwise we’d end up like pandas. Eating feels good, so you seek food for now and later. Happiness feels good (a regular aristotelean statement), so you seek things that generate it. In the environment where man was adapted to live, this meant that for that reward you had to apply the effort needed for it. For reaching orgasm, you would need to reproduce and secure offspring. For food, go hunting or create some system like agriculture. In essence, this reward system is just that–reward, or incentive, to accomplish that which would benefit you through other means.

Hedonism in itself is maximizing dopamine rush while minimizing effort or sacrifice. It’s no secret that one can grow tolerant to the dopamine rush after a while. However, with current technology and social structures that reduce effort to near nonexistent levels compared to prehistoric times, one will start chasing it harder and harder while the barrier of effort that would make you stop chasing it remains irrelevant. The closest thing, in concept, is be heroin addiction Hedonism in this current age is not natural. Hedonism at all is unnatural, as the reward system’s purpose is giving incentive to go through the efforts required, not skipping them altogether.

For porn, now the subconscious brain thinks you’re an absolute madman, skilled so much that you can get any woman seconds after getting the desire, even though the conscious knows that’s absolute bullshit.

A common effect of this hedonism is as follows:

One man starts looking at porn. At first it’s pretty tame stuff like softcore solo and so on. Eventually he masturbates so much to it that he finds it no longer appealing, but finds something else that catches his interest, something more extreme in comparison to what he looked at but still new stimuli. Repeat the vicious cycle. Soon you’ll see him looking up loli, incest, furry… worse, because he grew tolerant of the rest.

Sex work is basically another venue for this reward system to be skipped entirely. Just save up a few bucks and you already have the dopamine rush without effort whatsoever. You’ll find that most degenerate societies have a massive amount of sex-related work, most iconic being the Weimar Republic, though this is also affected by a desperate shortage of work that makes people sell their bodies.

Thus the issue is even worse, because you have people skipping the reward system and others reduced to prostitutes due to finding no work. Does this mean everyone is innocent? No, some people have no self-control and discipline whatsoever, even if they are aware of the situation. Hedonism is half-unawareness and half-lack of self-control and discipline, because at its core is the unwillingness to face the bad things life throws at you or trying to overcompensate with dopamine rushes. No matter the type of hedonism, you’ll find that a person has gained nothing since step 1, since all he seeks is that temporary rush of happiness. That is, unless the reward system kicks in full force and forces him to become successful to support his hedonism.

Bottom line. Hedonism has innumerable arguments against it and the only argument in favor is “people want to feel good.” You’ll notice how anyone in favor of hedonism will take any argument against him as a personal attack subconsciously. That’s because hedonism is an inherently individualistic idea. He doesn’t care about anything but his own happiness. and you have become an obstacle. By defending others, he is primarily defending himself. If he wasn’t a hedonist, he wouldn’t be defending the others.