Ad hominem is attacking a person, and not their ideas (or arguments- policies, I'm not sure where you got that other than your ass, but it's not really the definition we're accepting at this time, sorry, you can always play again).
In formal logic, it is a fallacy. A false premise can ruin an entire argument and get you really bad grades so make sure not to do it on your mid term, even if you think you totes got the question right :(
Though it may have other premises that are true, an ad hominem attack is poisonous to a formal debate and a conversation stopper which proves the attacker has no more value to add to the discussion. This is because in informal verbal (or written) debates, an insult still just means you have nothing valuable to say, or desire to have any kind of productive discussion, or are too easily controlled by anger, or feel yourself superior to others to the point where you can easily dismiss them and their experiences.
But since you want to stay in the sandbox and call names, OK. You're right, you have every right to do that and by god it is your god-given right, god bless Feminism for giving you the courage to crassly diss, insult, and slander men on the internet. The world needs warriors like you. And to encourage your practice I'll lower my conversational values to yours since you can't rise to meet mine.
So all that said:
I'm not advocating rape, you alarmist, witch-hunting, slanderous, so-weak-the-baggage-is-on-your-sleeve, broken, abused excuse for a human being. It's your fault you couldn't say no. A strong person would have defended themself. You're a weeble who takes out their rage and self-loathing on men on the internet. And again, no matter what Jezebel tells you... it really
was
your fault. And you know it. That's all that really matters in the end.
That's my assessment.
:)