全 2 件のコメント

[–]ShockTrooper262Not even APCR can penetrate dreams :) [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Yeah, but goddamn just imagine if the Germans managed to field even 25% of the Maus's they had planned. 100 of those giant things with near impenetrable armor backed up with Infantry would have led to a longer war for sure.

Yes because moving tanks the sizes of houses would totally not invite every Allied bomber to bomb the hell out of it. Hell B-25's and even B-17's and B-24's couldn't miss something that large.

the K98 influnced both the springfield and the lee-enfield

K98: 1935

Springfield:1903 (gee I wonder why its called the M1903)

Lee-Enfield:1895 for the MLE and 1907 for the SMLE (I forgot how long the Lee-Enfield served, best rifle 10/10)

It makes sense why the Allies win, they have Time Machines.

[–]AdmiralScooter1 P40 = 5 Pershings [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Yes because moving tanks the sizes of houses would totally not invite every Allied bomber to bomb the hell out of it. Hell B-25's and even B-17's and B-24's couldn't miss something that large.

Implying that the allies would even need to bomb it. The very existence of Mausen in the field would cause the entire German supply chain to collapse on itself, resulting in critical mass of logistic failure. The entire German army would be stripped of all weapons and supplies instantly as the ensuing Rommelian Logistical Vortex Anomaly devours the supplies of the German army before finally destroying itself under it's own pressure. The war ends in 3 days and Germany ends up in massive debt from having to purchase clothes for all the naked soldiers coming home.

K98: 1935 Springfield:1903 (gee I wonder why its called the M1903) Lee-Enfield:1895 for the MLE and 1907 for the SMLE (I forgot how long the Lee-Enfield served, best rifle 10/10) It makes sense why the Allies win, they have Time Machines.

Perhaps he meant the Gewehr 98? Which is mildly plausible given that it comes before both the Springfield and the SMLE version of the Enfield, but still hilariously wrong especially in the case of the latter.